From yahooist at anyisle.com Thu Oct 1 00:18:34 2009 From: yahooist at anyisle.com (Neil S.) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 00:18:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> All, I, as many here, hold my hand up to those mentioned plus many more technological advances for my home and person such as: Wireless networking Wireless print server Wireless Internet radio iTunes to HiFi wireless-ly iPhone Blah, Blah, Blah Those that don't have such because they have no need or interest, so be it. Those that don't have broadband, email, mobile phones and digital media and have a superiority complex because of it - sod 'um. Techno REFUSENIKS one and all. See what happened to King Cnut, I say. Don't get me started.... Regards... Neil On 29 Sep 2009, at 21:42, Simon Royal wrote: > Doesn't own an iPod? > Doesn't own a mobile phone? > Hasn't upgraded to OSX yet? > Is still using dial up? - aka Doesn't have Broadband > Doesn't have an email address? > Doesn't have digital tv? > Haven't used eBay? -- Neil Stevens Sent from my ? iMac G5 From allanmacam at me.com Thu Oct 1 00:29:59 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:29:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Parallels In-Reply-To: <8D5E4C61-9124-4CB7-8B06-1EC10734A23B@mac.com> References: <8D5E4C61-9124-4CB7-8B06-1EC10734A23B@mac.com> Message-ID: http://www.parallels.com/uk/products/desktop/?ClickID=asnszznwnrzntkr0n5v9loa9nktysovrarll AJ On 30 Sep 2009, at 14:41, Min Kennison wrote: > Since upgrading to Snow leopard I have not had cause to use Parallels > on my MBP. Today, having decided that a trip to the darker side was > necessary to complete some work, I opened the application and got a > notice saying > > > You can't use this version of the application Parallels Desktop.app > with this version of Mac OXX. > You have Parallels Desktop .app 3.0 > > > > > I have been unable to find any upgrade to this to make it compatible > with SL. Has anyone else found one or can they point me in the right > direction. > Thanks in advance > > Min > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Thu Oct 1 02:14:23 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:14:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New iMacs coming? Message-ID: http://macs.about.com/b/2009/09/24/new-imacs-may-be-closer-than-you-think.htm Mmm maybe. Kelvin From minkennison at mac.com Thu Oct 1 07:25:21 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:25:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Fwd: Parallels References: Message-ID: <4FC5C62D-E748-4697-AAD1-56A06D07D990@mac.com> Thanks Allan. I think I found every Parallels page except the one you have sent. Now for the download! Begin forwarded message: > From: Allan > Date: 1 October 2009 00:29:59 GMT+01:00 > To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Subject: Re: [NMUG] Parallels > Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list > > http://www.parallels.com/uk/products/desktop/?ClickID=asnszznwnrzntkr0n5v9loa9nktysovrarll > > > AJ > > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Thu Oct 1 07:26:04 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:26:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Parallels In-Reply-To: References: <8D5E4C61-9124-4CB7-8B06-1EC10734A23B@mac.com> Message-ID: <75287FEB-E9BF-4DA2-BFBF-6E0A53CC87A2@zen.co.uk> I believe Parallels 4 can be had in the Apple Store in Norwich and is compatible. On 1 Oct 2009, at 00:29, Allan wrote: > http://www.parallels.com/uk/products/desktop/?ClickID=asnszznwnrzntkr0n5v9loa9nktysovrarll > > > AJ > > > On 30 Sep 2009, at 14:41, Min Kennison wrote: > >> Since upgrading to Snow leopard I have not had cause to use Parallels >> on my MBP. Today, having decided that a trip to the darker side was >> necessary to complete some work, I opened the application and got a >> notice saying >> >> >> You can't use this version of the application Parallels Desktop.app >> with this version of Mac OXX. >> You have Parallels Desktop .app 3.0 >> >> >> >> >> I have been unable to find any upgrade to this to make it compatible >> with SL. Has anyone else found one or can they point me in the right >> direction. >> Thanks in advance >> >> Min >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk From jinshinjewels at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 07:42:17 2009 From: jinshinjewels at googlemail.com (Jules Slaughter) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:42:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> Message-ID: Guys, guys, guys, Remember how this started - just a banter, sense of humour, a little jesting, just putting over another point of view even - we can all get too absorbed in our pursuits. If we were in the pub, face to face with a broad smile, you would know this was humour, not arrogance, just pulling legs... BIG SMILE.... Jules On 10/1/09, Neil S. wrote: > All, > > I, as many here, hold my hand up to those mentioned plus many more > technological advances for my home and person such as: > > Wireless networking > Wireless print server > Wireless Internet radio > iTunes to HiFi wireless-ly > iPhone > Blah, Blah, Blah > > Those that don't have such because they have no need or interest, so > be it. > > Those that don't have broadband, email, mobile phones and digital > media and have a superiority complex because of it - sod 'um. Techno > REFUSENIKS one and all. See what happened to King Cnut, I say. > > Don't get me started.... > > Regards... > Neil > > > > On 29 Sep 2009, at 21:42, Simon Royal wrote: > > > Doesn't own an iPod? > > Doesn't own a mobile phone? > > Hasn't upgraded to OSX yet? > > > Is still using dial up? - aka Doesn't have Broadband > > > Doesn't have an email address? > > Doesn't have digital tv? > > Haven't used eBay? > > > -- > Neil Stevens > Sent from my ? iMac G5 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- Jules CalmClasses & Therapies to improve your health. My business works on referrals. If you like what I do, please tell others. If not, please tell me. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 08:09:01 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:09:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> Message-ID: Hi Jules, Thats the trouble with email/text, it's not always clear when someone is joking and things an be taken the wrong way. Ending the email with "Just a bit of fun" might not be enough to make your statements come across as funny. If you walked up to someone in a bar and made a rude comment about her hair but then ended with "no offence" would she still take offence? Anyways, sit on the naughty step for 5 minutes. By the way have you tried out Wii fit you can do a whole Yoga class standing on a electronic wireless balance board. haha. Steve. On 1 Oct 2009, at 07:42, Jules Slaughter wrote: > If we were in the pub, face to face > with a broad smile, you would know this was humour, not arrogance, > just pulling legs... > > BIG SMILE.... From allanmacam at me.com Thu Oct 1 08:21:50 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:21:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] UK broadband 'not fit' for future Message-ID: <78AE483F-524A-433C-843F-CCC3DCCBBDF7@me.com> As if we didn't know. http://thurly.net//5qk From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 08:24:10 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:24:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New iMacs coming? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yep, new iMacs just around the corner also I think we will see a new Mac mini soon too as stocks of the old mini have been depleted. The basic MacBook is getting updated too... Some say Blu-Ray drives will appear in this iMac refresh, I really don't know what to think about that. I would like to see the AppleTV get updated too, but have not heard anything about the ATV. Steve. On 1 Oct 2009, at 02:14, Kelvin Youngs wrote: > http://macs.about.com/b/2009/09/24/new-imacs-may-be-closer-than-you-think.htm > > Mmm maybe. > > Kelvin > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 1 09:11:37 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:11:37 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New iMacs coming? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2D70BD07-182D-4008-8262-B83A90B22048@simonroyal.co.uk> Kelvin Stocks have been running out of Macs all over the place and no word of whether they will be restocked. Looks like they are selling off their last ones before the new models come out. Simon On 1 Oct 2009, at 02:14, Kelvin Youngs wrote: > http://macs.about.com/b/2009/09/24/new-imacs-may-be-closer-than-you-think.htm > > Mmm maybe. > > Kelvin > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 1 09:13:41 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:13:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> Message-ID: <10FF7A95-9133-4A25-AD00-019D918E8F7B@simonroyal.co.uk> Jules It was just started as a bit of fun. Everyone has different tastes. Some prefer to sit in the sun on their garden furniture reading a novel and sipping a nice bottle of wine, others like to sit in the sun (of course making sure it doesn't glare on their screens) and surf away the glorious summer. Each to their own. Simon On 1 Oct 2009, at 07:42, Jules Slaughter wrote: > Guys, guys, guys, > > Remember how this started - just a banter, sense of humour, a little > jesting, just putting over another point of view even - we can all get > too absorbed in our pursuits. If we were in the pub, face to face > with a broad smile, you would know this was humour, not arrogance, > just pulling legs... > > BIG SMILE.... > > Jules > > > > > > On 10/1/09, Neil S. wrote: >> All, >> >> I, as many here, hold my hand up to those mentioned plus >> many more >> technological advances for my home and person such as: >> >> Wireless networking >> Wireless print server >> Wireless Internet radio >> iTunes to HiFi wireless-ly >> iPhone >> Blah, Blah, Blah >> >> Those that don't have such because they have no need or interest, so >> be it. >> >> Those that don't have broadband, email, mobile phones and digital >> media and have a superiority complex because of it - sod 'um. Techno >> REFUSENIKS one and all. See what happened to King Cnut, I say. >> >> Don't get me started.... >> >> Regards... >> Neil >> >> >> >> On 29 Sep 2009, at 21:42, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> Doesn't own an iPod? >>> Doesn't own a mobile phone? >>> Hasn't upgraded to OSX yet? >> >>> Is still using dial up? - aka Doesn't have Broadband >> >>> Doesn't have an email address? >>> Doesn't have digital tv? >>> Haven't used eBay? >> >> >> -- >> Neil Stevens >> Sent from my ? iMac G5 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > -- > Jules > > CalmClasses & Therapies > to improve your health. > > My business works on referrals. > If you like what I do, please tell others. > If not, please tell me. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 09:19:03 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:19:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <10FF7A95-9133-4A25-AD00-019D918E8F7B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> <10FF7A95-9133-4A25-AD00-019D918E8F7B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <4E10E1BB-72F7-4333-BDAD-DC715E0CFC14@gmail.com> Here in Norwich we're more refined, we sip glasses of wine while we figure out how to wind up our Mac buddies On 1 Oct 2009, at 09:13, Simon Royal wrote: sipping a nice bottle of wine, Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From karl.hortt at btinternet.com Thu Oct 1 09:31:38 2009 From: karl.hortt at btinternet.com (Karl hortt) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:31:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <4E10E1BB-72F7-4333-BDAD-DC715E0CFC14@gmail.com> References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> <10FF7A95-9133-4A25-AD00-019D918E8F7B@simonroyal.co.uk> <4E10E1BB-72F7-4333-BDAD-DC715E0CFC14@gmail.com> Message-ID: <72AA3038-53E0-4E9F-9048-64A7D375AC47@btinternet.com> > sipping a nice bottle of wine, This time of the morning !!!! Karl On 1 Oct 2009, at 09:19, Richard Stewart wrote: > Here in Norwich we're more refined, we sip glasses of wine while we > figure out how to wind up our Mac buddies > On 1 Oct 2009, at 09:13, Simon Royal wrote: > > > > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 09:36:48 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:36:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <72AA3038-53E0-4E9F-9048-64A7D375AC47@btinternet.com> References: <3E692516-DF40-4D52-8A5C-ECA0BD6BCADD@simonroyal.co.uk> <95A3342A-A4D3-4259-A438-9ED7FD3C4283@anyisle.com> <10FF7A95-9133-4A25-AD00-019D918E8F7B@simonroyal.co.uk> <4E10E1BB-72F7-4333-BDAD-DC715E0CFC14@gmail.com> <72AA3038-53E0-4E9F-9048-64A7D375AC47@btinternet.com> Message-ID: I did say I was trying figure out ways to wind you up!!!! And it's so uncouth to drink beer while emailing, don't you agree? On 1 Oct 2009, at 09:31, Karl hortt wrote: This time of the morning !!!! Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Thu Oct 1 12:11:10 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:11:10 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] UK broadband 'not fit' for future In-Reply-To: <78AE483F-524A-433C-843F-CCC3DCCBBDF7@me.com> References: <78AE483F-524A-433C-843F-CCC3DCCBBDF7@me.com> Message-ID: <4AC48E4E.6040800@stackyard.org> Don't get me started! Thank you very much to successive governments and successive BT management for woefully inadequate network investment! After all, who needs data communication anyway? That's the sort of thing FOREIGN people use. Allan wrote: > As if we didn't know. > > http://thurly.net//5qk > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 12:26:30 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:26:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 Message-ID: Hi, now that Snow Leopard is settled in is anyone planning to install windows 7 on Oct 22nd? Anyone having a Windows 7 launch party? I don't have a need for Windows 7, XP currently does what I need it to. Steve. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 1 12:30:03 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:30:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Steve I won't be installing it, as like you say XP does everything my wife needs. But I have tried it out and it is everything Vista should have been. Also on the same hardware Windows 7 runs so much better and smoother than Windows Vista. Simon On 1 Oct 2009, at 12:26, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > now that Snow Leopard is settled in is anyone planning to install > windows 7 on Oct 22nd? > > Anyone having a Windows 7 launch party? > > I don't have a need for Windows 7, XP currently does what I need it > to. > > > Steve. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 12:35:52 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:35:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhone v Googlemail Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910010435i16e20810s22e7906e0ce0b488@mail.gmail.com> Hello again Richard, Home now guest free. Returned to what passes for normal. Bingo! Picasa Web wotsit [sorry about the geek speak!] has neatly and comprehensibly solved the problem. Most grateful, John From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Thu Oct 1 12:45:59 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:45:59 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4AC49677.9070109@stackyard.org> Probably not exactly on October 22nd but as soon as I get the media and have the time. I've been running the release candidate on my Toshiba laptop and it has been fine. Very fast to boot and shut down. Sort of like Vista without the irritations and horrible performance (I would love to know what Vista does on boot-up to take as long as it does - agonizing). I think I might just pass on the party. This is a great example of really embarrassing marketing. Ken Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > now that Snow Leopard is settled in is anyone planning to install > windows 7 on Oct 22nd? > > Anyone having a Windows 7 launch party? > > I don't have a need for Windows 7, XP currently does what I need it to. > > > Steve. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 13:22:02 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:22:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Arranging bookmarks Message-ID: <85C880D1-B636-49C3-B01F-5CB7451B1A4B@gmail.com> Can anyone tell me how to arrange my Safari Bookmarks alphabetically? Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 13:26:38 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:26:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Arranging bookmarks In-Reply-To: <85C880D1-B636-49C3-B01F-5CB7451B1A4B@gmail.com> References: <85C880D1-B636-49C3-B01F-5CB7451B1A4B@gmail.com> Message-ID: <80809B81-EA65-46AA-A509-A669A4DF0B46@gmail.com> Hi, Ths thread may help: http://server.durrant.co.uk/pipermail/nmug/2009-September/021760.html Steve. On 1 Oct 2009, at 13:22, Richard Stewart wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to arrange my Safari Bookmarks alphabetically? From macman at f2s.com Thu Oct 1 13:34:35 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:34:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've been running the free Release Candidate for a couple of months under VirtualBox, and it's certainly seems the nicest and slickest Windows so far. My only difficulty has been getting it to see the printer, but to be fair, I haven't tried too hard, as I only want it to see how our website looks in IE. May come as a shock to some of you, but I've just bought a little Netbook running XP for my disabled wife - she is bedridden and I want her to have some simple means of communication and diversion. It's light & small, and just fits nicely on the bedside table so she can surf, watch video and use the webcam. It has, however, reinforced my loyalty to Apple, as setting it all up has taken me hours! Not at all intuitive: all seems very cack handed after the Mac........ Robbie On 1 Oct 2009, at 12:26, Steve Batch wrote: Hi, now that Snow Leopard is settled in is anyone planning to install windows 7 on Oct 22nd? Anyone having a Windows 7 launch party? I don't have a need for Windows 7, XP currently does what I need it to. Steve. _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 19:23:47 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:23:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple at PC World Message-ID: <88CCBCF1-521A-491E-9B9F-06977260EB04@gmail.com> In the euphoria of the new AppleStore it might be easy to forget the efforts made by fellow NMUG member and Apple employee Jon Fowler up there at PC World Sweetbriar Road Norwich. He's battling against the PC tide on a daily basis and seemingly has been doing a grand job converting a fair number each month to abandon the Dark Side. I heard from an Apple source that one of the reasons Norwich got its own Apple store is the success Jon has had to date in the Norwich area. So just a suggestion here: if you're in the market for another Mac or know someone who is, don't forget to give Jon a crack at the business. In the end, it's all Apple anyway, and I personally like to give anyone battling the PC tide all the help I can. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 20:08:06 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:08:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple at PC World In-Reply-To: <88CCBCF1-521A-491E-9B9F-06977260EB04@gmail.com> References: <88CCBCF1-521A-491E-9B9F-06977260EB04@gmail.com> Message-ID: <72809D01-428C-481D-92CA-E7E001451994@gmail.com> I remember going in to PCW before the Mac section was there and they had about 3 or 4 Macs on a shelf, I was drooling over a 12 inch powerbook G4, I'd never seen workmanship like this before in a computer every curve every detail was refined. A fat bloke in a purple shirt waddled over and said "Mac huh, we don't get much demand for them, if you are interested in laptops have you seen these ones over here they are 64bit ready" but I was already sold on the Mac. Steve. On 1 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > don't forget to give Jon a crack From rrandlesome at mac.com Thu Oct 1 20:21:28 2009 From: rrandlesome at mac.com (Richard Randlesome) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:21:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple at PC World In-Reply-To: <72809D01-428C-481D-92CA-E7E001451994@gmail.com> References: <88CCBCF1-521A-491E-9B9F-06977260EB04@gmail.com> <72809D01-428C-481D-92CA-E7E001451994@gmail.com> Message-ID: I bought my Bondi G3 iMac from PC World in 1998, later upgraded to a Blueberry one. That is the only time I have ever bought a computer from PC world, others since have been from the online Apple store. Don't know if I upgraded macs again I would use PCW. Richard On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:08, Steve Batch wrote: > I remember going in to PCW before the Mac section was there and they > had about 3 or 4 Macs on a shelf, I was drooling over a 12 inch > powerbook G4, I'd never seen workmanship like this before in a > computer every curve every detail was refined. A fat bloke in a > purple shirt waddled over and said "Mac huh, we don't get much demand > for them, if you are interested in laptops have you seen these ones > over here they are 64bit ready" but I was already sold on the Mac. > > Steve. > > > On 1 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > >> don't forget to give Jon a crack > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Thu Oct 1 20:33:23 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:33:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto Message-ID: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Does anyone know whether iPhoto can be 'pointed' to photos on an external drive in the same way as iTunes can be pointed to music held externally. I have just loaded Panther onto a Powerbook G4 and the iPhoto which comes with that is iPhoto 2.0! He only has a 20GB hard drive so I can't overload it. Any ideas folks? Ruth From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 1 20:36:25 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:36:25 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto In-Reply-To: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> References: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: Yesh, hold down 'alt' key when clicking on the iPhoto icon, keep holding the key down until you get a message saying "choose photo library" from here you can choose a different library or create a new library on an external drive. Steve. On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:33, Ruth Murray wrote: > Does anyone know whether iPhoto can be 'pointed' to photos on an > external drive in the same way as iTunes can be pointed to music held > externally. From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Thu Oct 1 20:41:10 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:41:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto In-Reply-To: References: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: <95F89B76-8603-4336-A31E-6762486AF0BD@zen.co.uk> My Dad had major issues with what seems a corrupt iPhoto Library after upgrading to 10.6. There is an app called iPhoto Library Manager which manages multiple libraries. Free until you want to use specific items. Can be used to rebuild the library if the built in Apple version doesn't Ace! Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:36, Steve Batch wrote: > > Yesh, hold down 'alt' key when clicking on the iPhoto icon, keep > holding the key down until you get a message saying "choose photo > library" from here you can choose a different library or create a new > library on an external drive. > > Steve. > > > On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:33, Ruth Murray wrote: > >> Does anyone know whether iPhoto can be 'pointed' to photos on an >> external drive in the same way as iTunes can be pointed to music held >> externally. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Thu Oct 1 20:45:11 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:45:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto In-Reply-To: References: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: <2381082D-3D37-436F-9E32-EDF67B8A290F@ruthmurray.f2s.com> HI guys Thanks but I'm not sure you quite get my question. Creating different libraries are no problem. But because iPhoto creates a folder (which looks like a file) with all your photo content inside it on your main hard drive I cannot store it there. (not enough room) Ruth On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:36, Steve Batch wrote: > > Yesh, hold down 'alt' key when clicking on the iPhoto icon, keep > holding the key down until you get a message saying "choose photo > library" from here you can choose a different library or create a new > library on an external drive. > > Steve. > > > On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:33, Ruth Murray wrote: > >> Does anyone know whether iPhoto can be 'pointed' to photos on an >> external drive in the same way as iTunes can be pointed to music held >> externally. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > Ruth Murray ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com Ruth Murray Graphic Design and Illustration 01603 632334 Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net From allanmacam at me.com Thu Oct 1 20:49:36 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:49:36 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto In-Reply-To: <2381082D-3D37-436F-9E32-EDF67B8A290F@ruthmurray.f2s.com> References: <857E58C2-8938-47B7-A2E6-EE86E0363B50@ruthmurray.f2s.com> <2381082D-3D37-436F-9E32-EDF67B8A290F@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: <9595A82D-E97A-4A5D-94B9-8A0DC824D552@me.com> It's no problem. I do it all the time with iPhoto and Aperture libraries. Saves having them backed up again and again. Just move/make a copy of the library to were you want it to live and use the technique mentioned below to point to the library you have moved. if all works well, you can delete the library in the oroginal location. AJ On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:45, Ruth Murray wrote: > HI guys > > Thanks but I'm not sure you quite get my question. Creating different > libraries are no problem. But because iPhoto creates a folder (which > looks like a file) with all your photo content inside it on your main > hard drive I cannot store it there. (not enough room) > > Ruth > > > On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:36, Steve Batch wrote: > >> >> Yesh, hold down 'alt' key when clicking on the iPhoto icon, keep >> holding the key down until you get a message saying "choose photo >> library" from here you can choose a different library or create a new >> library on an external drive. >> >> Steve. >> >> >> On 1 Oct 2009, at 20:33, Ruth Murray wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know whether iPhoto can be 'pointed' to photos on an >>> external drive in the same way as iTunes can be pointed to music >>> held >>> externally. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug >> > > Ruth Murray > ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com > > Ruth Murray > Graphic Design and Illustration > 01603 632334 > > Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From therealcazorla at yahoo.co.uk Fri Oct 2 09:49:50 2009 From: therealcazorla at yahoo.co.uk (julia cazorla) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [NMUG] re G4 start up disc: Help! Message-ID: <881709.34936.qm@web24301.mail.ird.yahoo.com> I have a G4 laptop, bought in 2004:?we've moved twice in the year, had stuff in storage and found that when we try to start it up, the spinning wheel begins to turn and then the screen goes to black with a prompt for the password (which I can't remember). ?Apple have said that inserting the start up disc and pressing 'c' should give an option to create a new password, but I can't find where I've put the?discs during the moves,though I've been searching for weeks. Is it possible to use any start up disc and does the start up disc have to be for the same version of Os X ? Could someone lend me a compatible start up disc so I can get the mac up and running again until I find my own disc? I found a thread on a forum about this, where someone gave some commands to enter into the mac, to get round the problem without start up discs, but the user got to a point where?she was stuck and uncertain how to continue: Link follows: ??http://www.notebookforums.com/thread190423.html Best Julia Cazorla Once you have pure and sincere motivation, all the rest follows.? You can develop this right attitude toward others on the basis of kindness, love and respect, and on the clear realisation of the oneness of all human beings.? This is important because others benefit by this motivation as much as by anything we do. Then, with a pure heart, you can carry on any work....and your profession becomes a real instrument to help the community. Dalai Lama - Insights on Daily Living, Compassion and Justice. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 2 10:25:03 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:25:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5BB9FC68-E636-4EFF-B7A3-9251375AA392@gmail.com> You say it like its a bad thing, I will be the first in line to get an iRetina installed Steve. On 30 Sep 2009, at 14:34, Brian Steere wrote: > I refer to the increasing capacity to obtain contextual information on > iPhone etc when out in the world. Leading to something like the > 'Terminator' > screen on our retina? From macman at f2s.com Fri Oct 2 11:08:52 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:08:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Who Doesn't Own In-Reply-To: <5BB9FC68-E636-4EFF-B7A3-9251375AA392@gmail.com> References: <5BB9FC68-E636-4EFF-B7A3-9251375AA392@gmail.com> Message-ID: ... or an iiRis? Robbie On 2 Oct 2009, at 10:25, Steve Batch wrote: You say it like its a bad thing, I will be the first in line to get an iRetina installed Steve. On 30 Sep 2009, at 14:34, Brian Steere wrote: > I refer to the increasing capacity to obtain contextual information on > iPhone etc when out in the world. Leading to something like the > 'Terminator' > screen on our retina? _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Fri Oct 2 11:29:17 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:29:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] re G4 start up disc: Help! In-Reply-To: <881709.34936.qm@web24301.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <881709.34936.qm@web24301.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <99084675-0D0D-485B-A157-C73B3215910F@durrant.co.uk> I'd try giving the suggestion in that article a go. It should work. Or you could try giving the new Norwich Apple Store a ring - perhaps book a time at the "genius" bar. 01603 21 66 00 http://www.apple.com/uk/retail/chapelfield/ regards, Paul On 2 Oct 2009, at 09:49, julia cazorla wrote: > I have a G4 laptop, bought in 2004: we've moved twice in the year, > had stuff in storage and found that when we try to start it up, the > spinning wheel begins to turn and then the screen goes to black with > a prompt for the password (which I can't remember). > > Apple have said that inserting the start up disc and pressing 'c' > should give an option to create a new password, but I can't find > where I've put the discs during the moves,though I've been searching > for weeks. > > Is it possible to use any start up disc and does the start up disc > have to be for the same version of Os X ? > > Could someone lend me a compatible start up disc so I can get the > mac up and running again until I find my own disc? > > I found a thread on a forum about this, where someone gave some > commands to enter into the mac, to get round the problem without > start up discs, but the user got to a point where she was stuck and > uncertain how to continue: Link follows: http://www.notebookforums.com/thread190423.html > > Best > > Julia Cazorla From p.hunter at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 2 13:13:04 2009 From: p.hunter at ntlworld.com (Peter Hunter) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:13:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) Message-ID: Hi all you 'experts'. Can anyone help me resolve a problem please. Some time ago I purchased a DVD set of 'Standard & Advanced' Dictionaries for BSL. I have been using these with no problems on a Windows PC for some time. However, as I have now been able to move back permanently to Mac, and as the DVDs say 'suitable for use on Windows, Mac & Linux' I assumed they would work ok. My Mac is an eMac with a 1.42 GHz G4 processor, 1 GB RAM. Running OS X 10.4.11 (Tiger). The DVDs installed and run ok, giving the list of words and ability to type in the word I am looking for, no problem there. What is meant to happen next, after I click on the word, is that a video screen opens up and displays a clip of a person signing that word. What actually happens is that the video window opens, but instead of the video clip playing I get a greyed out 'Q' with a question mark in the middle. It's as if Quicktime can't find the video clips (which are on the DVD). The DVD has to be in the drive all the time, and the Mac version of the program is designed to use Quicktime. My version of QT Player is 7.2.? I have searched the makers website for a solution, with no joy. I have also sent them an email, but had no reply so far. Any help or assistance with this would be most appreciated. Best regards. Peter From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 2 14:45:01 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:45:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed as the BSL software requires it. Steve. On 2 Oct 2009, at 13:13, Peter Hunter wrote: > the video window opens, but instead of > the video clip playing I get a greyed out 'Q' with a question mark in > the middle From p.hunter at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 2 17:18:31 2009 From: p.hunter at ntlworld.com (Peter Hunter) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:18:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> References: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Steve, thanks for that. I installed the Shockwave plug-in, but still the same. I don't know if this helps, but when I click on the word and the window opens with the Q and ? in it, the address line points to this location for the clip (which is on the DVD). I don't quite understand all of this, but someone might. file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% 20Version).app/Contents/Resources/app/text/frame.html Regards, Peter On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. > > Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed get.adobe.com/shockwave/ >> From anthonybrahams at themagic.me.uk Fri Oct 2 18:15:55 2009 From: anthonybrahams at themagic.me.uk (Anthony Brahams) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:15:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Bookmarks gone_Help! Message-ID: <2CA29509-3A99-42F6-96D3-AB0342B4FDDA@themagic.me.uk> I was editing Safari Bookmarks Bar when, from the bottom of the list they scrolled upwards, disappearing as they went, leaving only one which had been the bottom one. I hope and assume TimeMachine has them from earlier today but where, please! Anthony From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 2 18:30:06 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:30:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Bookmarks gone_Help! In-Reply-To: <2CA29509-3A99-42F6-96D3-AB0342B4FDDA@themagic.me.uk> References: <2CA29509-3A99-42F6-96D3-AB0342B4FDDA@themagic.me.uk> Message-ID: Hi, the Safari bookmarks are held in: /users/user/Library/Safari/ Bookmarks.plist You should be able to copy the backed up .plist file over the current one (close Safari first) Steve. On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:15, Anthony Brahams wrote: > I hope and assume TimeMachine has them > from earlier today but where, please! From munkt0n at gmail.com Fri Oct 2 19:23:39 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:23:39 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: References: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> Message-ID: that's an html file contained within "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD Version)" which should be in your Applications folder. If it's not in your Applications folder you may need to run an installer or copy something from the DVD to your Applications folder. what happens if you paste this into the address bar in safari? file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD%20Version).app/Content/Resources/app/text/frame.html On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Peter Hunter wrote: > Hi Steve, thanks for that. I installed the Shockwave plug-in, but > still the same. > > I don't know if this helps, but when I click on the word and the > window opens with the Q and ? in it, the address line points to this > location for the clip (which is on the DVD). I don't quite understand > all of this, but someone might. > > file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% > 20Version).app/Contents/Resources/app/text/frame.html > > Regards, ?Peter > > > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Steve Batch wrote: > >> Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. >> >> Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed > get.adobe.com/shockwave/ >>> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Fri Oct 2 19:29:00 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:29:00 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights Message-ID: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on computers. Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a light for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to see those anymore. I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport card) of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no other lights. Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of not. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 2 19:58:17 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 19:58:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <48E1A576-A133-4C83-893E-BD32414F03E3@gmail.com> Strangely I was thinking about this too.. I was thinking that I don't really mind not having blinking lights as most of the time they are an annoyance BUT I do find the subtle grinding noise of the hard drive useful to know when there is disk activity going on and when I upgrade to an SSD which will be silent I will actually miss the hard drive noise... I used to have a little app on windows that sat in the system tray and indicated hdd activity with pretend blinking lights, I don't know if something similar is available for OS X but I might need it with SSD. Steve. On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:29, Simon Royal wrote: > Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of > not. From p.hunter at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 2 20:07:04 2009 From: p.hunter at ntlworld.com (Peter Hunter) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:07:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: References: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8634EFB8-6B4F-4E7F-9DCA-9A83662E2415@ntlworld.com> Hi Scot, It just says safari can't find the file. On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Scott Matthews wrote: > that's an html file contained within > > "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD Version)" which should be in your > Applications folder. > > If it's not in your Applications folder you may need to run an > installer or copy something from the DVD to your Applications folder. > > what happens if you paste this into the address bar in safari? > > file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% > 20Version).app/Content/Resources/app/text/frame.html > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Peter Hunter > wrote: >> Hi Steve, thanks for that. I installed the Shockwave plug-in, but >> still the same. >> >> I don't know if this helps, but when I click on the word and the >> window opens with the Q and ? in it, the address line points to this >> location for the clip (which is on the DVD). I don't quite understand >> all of this, but someone might. >> >> file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% >> 20Version).app/Contents/Resources/app/text/frame.html >> >> Regards, Peter >> >> >> >> On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Steve Batch wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. >>> >>> Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed >> get.adobe.com/shockwave/ >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Fri Oct 2 21:48:11 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:48:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <48E1A576-A133-4C83-893E-BD32414F03E3@gmail.com> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <48E1A576-A133-4C83-893E-BD32414F03E3@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi. I have searched Google and cannot find a program that does this. A simple thing in the menu bar would be excellent and it seems a lot of other people would like one too. Simon On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:58, Steve Batch wrote: > > Strangely I was thinking about this too.. I was thinking that I don't > really mind not having blinking lights as most of the time they are an > annoyance BUT I do find the subtle grinding noise of the hard drive > useful to know when there is disk activity going on and when I upgrade > to an SSD which will be silent I will actually miss the hard drive > noise... > > I used to have a little app on windows that sat in the system tray and > indicated hdd activity with pretend blinking lights, I don't know if > something similar is available for OS X but I might need it with SSD. > > Steve. > > > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:29, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >> not. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From munkt0n at gmail.com Fri Oct 2 21:52:56 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:52:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <48E1A576-A133-4C83-893E-BD32414F03E3@gmail.com> Message-ID: try iStat Menus http://www.islayer.com/apps/istatmenus/ On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > I have searched Google and cannot find a program that does this. A > simple thing in the menu bar would be excellent and it seems a lot of > other people would like one too. > > Simon > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:58, Steve Batch wrote: > >> >> Strangely I was thinking about this too.. ?I was thinking that I don't >> really mind not having blinking lights as most of the time they are an >> annoyance BUT I do find the subtle grinding noise of the hard drive >> useful to know when there is disk activity going on and when I upgrade >> to an SSD which will be silent I will actually miss the hard drive >> noise... >> >> I used to have a little app on windows that sat in the system tray and >> indicated hdd activity with pretend blinking lights, I don't know if >> something similar is available for OS X but I might need it with SSD. >> >> Steve. >> >> >> >> On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:29, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >>> not. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From munkt0n at gmail.com Fri Oct 2 21:54:07 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:54:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: <8634EFB8-6B4F-4E7F-9DCA-9A83662E2415@ntlworld.com> References: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> <8634EFB8-6B4F-4E7F-9DCA-9A83662E2415@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: do you have an application called "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD Version)" in your Applications folder? On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Peter Hunter wrote: > Hi Scot, > It just says safari can't find the file. > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Scott Matthews wrote: > >> that's an html file contained within >> >> "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD Version)" which should be in your >> Applications folder. >> >> If it's not in your Applications folder you may need to run an >> installer or copy something from the DVD to your Applications folder. >> >> what happens if you paste this into the address bar in safari? >> >> file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% >> 20Version).app/Content/Resources/app/text/frame.html >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Peter Hunter >> wrote: >>> Hi Steve, thanks for that. I installed the Shockwave plug-in, but >>> still the same. >>> >>> I don't know if this helps, but when I click on the word and the >>> window opens with the Q and ? in it, the address line points to this >>> location for the clip (which is on the DVD). I don't quite understand >>> all of this, but someone might. >>> >>> file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% >>> 20Version).app/Contents/Resources/app/text/frame.html >>> >>> Regards, ?Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Steve Batch wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. >>>> >>>> Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed >>> get.adobe.com/shockwave/ >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >>> listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> :wq >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Fri Oct 2 22:00:16 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:00:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <48E1A576-A133-4C83-893E-BD32414F03E3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <25D6BC7D-BF36-44B2-93FE-9EEAB4E8C002@simonroyal.co.uk> Scott Cheers. Will check it out. Simon On 2 Oct 2009, at 21:52, Scott Matthews wrote: > try iStat Menus > > http://www.islayer.com/apps/istatmenus/ > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Simon Royal > wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I have searched Google and cannot find a program that does this. A >> simple thing in the menu bar would be excellent and it seems a lot of >> other people would like one too. >> >> Simon >> >> On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:58, Steve Batch wrote: >> >>> >>> Strangely I was thinking about this too.. I was thinking that I >>> don't >>> really mind not having blinking lights as most of the time they >>> are an >>> annoyance BUT I do find the subtle grinding noise of the hard drive >>> useful to know when there is disk activity going on and when I >>> upgrade >>> to an SSD which will be silent I will actually miss the hard drive >>> noise... >>> >>> I used to have a little app on windows that sat in the system tray >>> and >>> indicated hdd activity with pretend blinking lights, I don't know if >>> something similar is available for OS X but I might need it with >>> SSD. >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:29, Simon Royal wrote: >>> >>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >>>> not. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Fri Oct 2 22:06:15 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:06:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS! Alles touristen und non-technischen looken peepers! Das computermachine ist nicht fur gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowenfusen mit loudische poppencorken und spitzensparken. Ist nicht fur gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren und stupidisch volk, das hans in das pockets muss keepen; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten. regards, Paul (ref: http://www.catb.org/esr/jargon/html/B/blinkenlights.html ) On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:29, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on > computers. > > Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a light > for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to see > those anymore. > > I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport card) > of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a > light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no other > lights. > > Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of > not. From anthonybrahams at themagic.me.uk Fri Oct 2 22:13:52 2009 From: anthonybrahams at themagic.me.uk (Anthony Brahams) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:13:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Bookmarks gone_Help! In-Reply-To: References: <2CA29509-3A99-42F6-96D3-AB0342B4FDDA@themagic.me.uk> Message-ID: <038D69B3-2EBF-4FF3-8D94-FE28BFFD4FE6@themagic.me.uk> Thank you very much, Steve. All restored and working. Anthony On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:30, Steve Batch wrote: > > Hi, the Safari bookmarks are held in: /users/user/Library/Safari/ > Bookmarks.plist > > You should be able to copy the backed up .plist file over the current > one (close Safari first) > > Steve. > > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 18:15, Anthony Brahams wrote: > >> I hope and assume TimeMachine has them >> from earlier today but where, please! > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From p.hunter at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 2 22:36:35 2009 From: p.hunter at ntlworld.com (Peter Hunter) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:36:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] QuickTime Problem (Maybe!) In-Reply-To: References: <65BE9804-D165-453E-8134-87667D6ADD56@gmail.com> <8634EFB8-6B4F-4E7F-9DCA-9A83662E2415@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Yes. On 2 Oct 2009, at 21:54, Scott Matthews wrote: > do you have an application called "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD > Version)" in your Applications folder? > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Peter Hunter > wrote: >> Hi Scot, >> It just says safari can't find the file. >> >> On 2 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Scott Matthews wrote: >> >>> that's an html file contained within >>> >>> "The Standard BSL Dictionary (DVD Version)" which should be in your >>> Applications folder. >>> >>> If it's not in your Applications folder you may need to run an >>> installer or copy something from the DVD to your Applications >>> folder. >>> >>> what happens if you paste this into the address bar in safari? >>> >>> file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% >>> 20Version).app/Content/Resources/app/text/frame.html >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Peter Hunter >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Steve, thanks for that. I installed the Shockwave plug-in, but >>>> still the same. >>>> >>>> I don't know if this helps, but when I click on the word and the >>>> window opens with the Q and ? in it, the address line points to >>>> this >>>> location for the clip (which is on the DVD). I don't quite >>>> understand >>>> all of this, but someone might. >>>> >>>> file:///Applications/The%20Standard%20BSL%20Dictionary%20(DVD% >>>> 20Version).app/Contents/Resources/app/text/frame.html >>>> >>>> Regards, Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Steve Batch wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Peter, I'm not an expert but I'll have a go. >>>>> >>>>> Make sure you have Adobe Shockwave plug-in installed >>>> get.adobe.com/shockwave/ >>>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >>>> listinfo/nmug >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> :wq >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >>> listinfo/nmug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From penguin.999 at virgin.net Fri Oct 2 22:52:23 2009 From: penguin.999 at virgin.net (Paul Chapman) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:52:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <77B5265E-14B5-4435-BB40-B391725080B0@virgin.net> On Oct 2, 2009, at 22:06, Paul Durrant wrote: > ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS! And the Germans have a mock English version of the same text! Paul C From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Fri Oct 2 22:53:42 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:53:42 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack of disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) but if the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, previous patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of standby - and no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm not expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often thought of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. Ken Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on > computers. > > Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a light > for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to see > those anymore. > > I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport card) > of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a > light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no other > lights. > > Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of not. > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Sat Oct 3 06:22:03 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 06:22:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> Why all the fuss? Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: > Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack of > disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't > remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) but > if > the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, previous > patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of standby - > and > no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful > diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm not > expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often > thought > of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. > > Ken > > Simon Royal wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on >> computers. >> >> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >> light >> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >> see >> those anymore. >> >> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >> card) >> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no other >> lights. >> >> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >> not. >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sat Oct 3 10:07:17 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:07:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <9206C52C-7365-4AD4-A72D-68BDA22403C8@gmail.com> ooh I divent knaa daat. fanks. On 3 Oct 2009, at 06:22, Steven Jefferson wrote: > Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 3 10:37:20 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:37:20 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights Message-ID: Ken I too had thought of doing a hardware hack too. Might get round to it at some point. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) From h.tamplin at btinternet.com Sat Oct 3 13:12:22 2009 From: h.tamplin at btinternet.com (Heather Tamplin) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 13:12:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Good Food, with few blinking lights Message-ID: Hello all, the preview for my show at The Swan House, in Beccles is this Wednesday, 7th October 7 - 11pm. I hear the food is amazing ! It would be lovely to see some of you there if only for the food ...... I will be putting latest 2 paintings up on my web site in the next week so have a look if you can't get to the show. Familiar Norfolk Scene II and Leaping Dog, both sold from the 18/21 Gallery show, they are on the web site, the sales were great but mean I have to paint another piece for the New English Open at the Mall Galleries. Heather www.heathertamplin.co.uk "Art is the only way to run away without leaving home." Twyla Tharp From minkennison at mac.com Sat Oct 3 16:08:34 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:08:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Good Food, with few blinking lights References: Message-ID: <70559FD0-E259-418C-8761-1B656DCC0771@mac.com> > > Sorry won't be able to be there but look forward to seeing the > paintings on the website. Good luck Min > > > I hear the food is amazing ! > > It would be lovely to see some of you there if only for the > food ...... > > I > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 3 17:34:21 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:34:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spare G3 iMac on offer Message-ID: <56FCA769-D836-41F9-B82A-6632522D41C1@durrant.co.uk> Hi All, A friend has finally upgraded to a new Mac, and there's now an old iMac G3 needing a new home. In working order, but no mouse/keyboard. It's a fairly early model - no firewire, but I think (from memory) that it's a model C rather than the A or B version. Only a CD-ROM drive, I'm sure. Currently running Mac OS 8.6! Would anyone be interested? If so, please contact me off-list. paul at durrant.co.uk regards, Paul From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sat Oct 3 19:12:03 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:12:03 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to work. Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling poorly. Steven Jefferson wrote: > Why all the fuss? > > Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... > > > On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack of >> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) but >> if >> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, previous >> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of standby - >> and >> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm not >> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >> thought >> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >> >> Ken >> >> Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on >>> computers. >>> >>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>> light >>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >>> see >>> those anymore. >>> >>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>> card) >>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no other >>> lights. >>> >>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >>> not. >>> >>> Simon Royal >>> --- >>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Sat Oct 3 19:40:29 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:40:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> In 10 years of having a Mac I have never ever needed to have flashing lights to tell me I have a problem. If a disk is working but the rest of the machine is dead regardless of response I would imagine most people have a diagnostics process independent of blinking lights. And I've had a monitor and a G5 die.... Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:12, Ken Hamer wrote: > Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to work. > Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling > poorly. > > Steven Jefferson wrote: >> Why all the fuss? >> >> Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... >> >> >> On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> >>> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack >>> of >>> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >>> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) but >>> if >>> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, >>> previous >>> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of standby - >>> and >>> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >>> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm not >>> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >>> thought >>> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> Simon Royal wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on >>>> computers. >>>> >>>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>>> light >>>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >>>> see >>>> those anymore. >>>> >>>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>>> card) >>>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no >>>> other >>>> lights. >>>> >>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >>>> not. >>>> >>>> Simon Royal >>>> --- >>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 3 20:18:15 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:18:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: Steven It is not necessarily a need for them, I just like them, a hang up from the old days. Simon On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:40, Steven Jefferson wrote: > In 10 years of having a Mac I have never ever needed to have flashing > lights to tell me I have a problem. If a disk is working but the rest > of the machine is dead regardless of response I would imagine most > people have a diagnostics process independent of blinking lights. And > I've had a monitor and a G5 die.... > > Steven Jefferson > steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk > > > > On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:12, Ken Hamer wrote: > >> Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to work. >> Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling >> poorly. >> >> Steven Jefferson wrote: >>> Why all the fuss? >>> >>> Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... >>> >>> >>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack >>>> of >>>> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >>>> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) >>>> but >>>> if >>>> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, >>>> previous >>>> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of >>>> standby - >>>> and >>>> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >>>> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm >>>> not >>>> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >>>> thought >>>> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> Simon Royal wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi. >>>>> >>>>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights >>>>> on >>>>> computers. >>>>> >>>>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>>>> light >>>>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >>>>> see >>>>> those anymore. >>>>> >>>>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>>>> card) >>>>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>>>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no >>>>> other >>>>> lights. >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working >>>>> of >>>>> not. >>>>> >>>>> Simon Royal >>>>> --- >>>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From tom at tomkershaw.com Sat Oct 3 21:28:34 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:28:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AC7B3F2.6000209@tomkershaw.com> Somewhat related to flashing lights, NMUG members might well be interested in the current 'Archive on 4' programme, first broadcast at 20:00 this evening. See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00mz53r/Archive_on_4_In_the_Beginning_Was_the_Nerd/ Tom Simon Royal wrote: > Steven > > It is not necessarily a need for them, I just like them, a hang up > from the old days. > > Simon > > On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:40, Steven Jefferson wrote: > > >> In 10 years of having a Mac I have never ever needed to have flashing >> lights to tell me I have a problem. If a disk is working but the rest >> of the machine is dead regardless of response I would imagine most >> people have a diagnostics process independent of blinking lights. And >> I've had a monitor and a G5 die.... >> >> Steven Jefferson >> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >> >> >> >> On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:12, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to work. >>> Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling >>> poorly. >>> >>> Steven Jefferson wrote: >>> >>>> Why all the fuss? >>>> >>>> Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack >>>>> of >>>>> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >>>>> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) >>>>> but >>>>> if >>>>> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, >>>>> previous >>>>> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of >>>>> standby - >>>>> and >>>>> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >>>>> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm >>>>> not >>>>> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >>>>> thought >>>>> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >>>>> >>>>> Ken >>>>> >>>>> Simon Royal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights >>>>>> on >>>>>> computers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>>>>> light >>>>>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >>>>>> see >>>>>> those anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>>>>> card) >>>>>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>>>>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no >>>>>> other >>>>>> lights. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working >>>>>> of >>>>>> not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Simon Royal >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 3 22:33:03 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:33:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Video In? Message-ID: <2E5797A5-FEB8-432C-9ABA-9672DEA6D060@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. This might sound an odd question, but the S-Video and DVI ports are they just video out. I know it is a long shot, but can the screen be used as a video in? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 3 22:42:13 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:42:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Video In? In-Reply-To: <2E5797A5-FEB8-432C-9ABA-9672DEA6D060@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2E5797A5-FEB8-432C-9ABA-9672DEA6D060@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Mac video ports are video out only. For input you'd need some USB or Firewire peripheral. Paul On 3 Oct 2009, at 22:33, Simon Royal wrote: > This might sound an odd question, but the S-Video and DVI ports are > they just video out. > > I know it is a long shot, but can the screen be used as a video in? From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sun Oct 4 02:44:13 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:44:13 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AC7FDED.6010302@stackyard.org> It's not a big deal but I've had quite a few situations where a disk light would have been really useful. The disk in my Mini is really quiet and there is no audible access chatter but when the machine has hung, I've just had to switch off and restart. Like I say, not a big deal. There would probably have been the same outcome with or without a disk light, but I just really like having the light. But I'm ecstatically happy for all those who hate disk lights. I think you're safe. Steve is on your side. Ken Steven Jefferson wrote: > In 10 years of having a Mac I have never ever needed to have flashing > lights to tell me I have a problem. If a disk is working but the rest > of the machine is dead regardless of response I would imagine most > people have a diagnostics process independent of blinking lights. And > I've had a monitor and a G5 die.... > > Steven Jefferson > steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk > > > > On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:12, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to work. >> Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling >> poorly. >> >> Steven Jefferson wrote: >> >>> Why all the fuss? >>> >>> Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... >>> >>> >>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack >>>> of >>>> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >>>> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) but >>>> if >>>> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, >>>> previous >>>> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of standby - >>>> and >>>> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >>>> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm not >>>> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >>>> thought >>>> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> Simon Royal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi. >>>>> >>>>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity lights on >>>>> computers. >>>>> >>>>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>>>> light >>>>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem to >>>>> see >>>>> those anymore. >>>>> >>>>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>>>> card) >>>>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>>>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no >>>>> other >>>>> lights. >>>>> >>>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was working of >>>>> not. >>>>> >>>>> Simon Royal >>>>> --- >>>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Sun Oct 4 06:58:38 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 06:58:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Blinking Lights In-Reply-To: <4AC7FDED.6010302@stackyard.org> References: <2181C88B-B958-4825-B1BF-B57FFF8B6FB9@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AC67666.6060403@stackyard.org> <8CF1E707-9F8F-40BB-9C25-42807D25B743@zen.co.uk> <4AC793F3.6020109@stackyard.org> <79ABAF9A-17F6-46CE-BDC2-8A9A607A1690@zen.co.uk> <4AC7FDED.6010302@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <17D5E04F-D46F-4D04-AD32-F743AF6C56B4@zen.co.uk> Activity monitor shows hung processes. They can be force quit. Also both SL & L will show a non responsive tag in the dock icon IIRC. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 4 Oct 2009, at 02:44, Ken Hamer wrote: > It's not a big deal but I've had quite a few situations where a disk > light would have been really useful. The disk in my Mini is really > quiet and there is no audible access chatter but when the machine has > hung, I've just had to switch off and restart. Like I say, not a big > deal. There would probably have been the same outcome with or > without a > disk light, but I just really like having the light. > > But I'm ecstatically happy for all those who hate disk lights. I > think > you're safe. Steve is on your side. > > Ken > > > Steven Jefferson wrote: >> In 10 years of having a Mac I have never ever needed to have flashing >> lights to tell me I have a problem. If a disk is working but the rest >> of the machine is dead regardless of response I would imagine most >> people have a diagnostics process independent of blinking lights. And >> I've had a monitor and a G5 die.... >> >> Steven Jefferson >> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >> >> >> >> On 3 Oct 2009, at 19:12, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> >>> Yes, but the system has to be up, running and happy for this to >>> work. >>> Disk lights are at their most useful when the machine is feeling >>> poorly. >>> >>> Steven Jefferson wrote: >>> >>>> Why all the fuss? >>>> >>>> Activity monitor can show Disk Activity in the Dock...... >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Ken Hamer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Absolutely! One feature I really dislike about Macs is their lack >>>>> of >>>>> disk activity light. I have a software one on the desktop (can't >>>>> remember which one - only have my W7 Toshiba with me at present) >>>>> but >>>>> if >>>>> the graphics were to hang, it wouldn't be much use. In fact, >>>>> previous >>>>> patch levels of Leopard DID hang when the Mini came out of >>>>> standby - >>>>> and >>>>> no disk light - grrrrrr. A disk light is one of the most useful >>>>> diagnostic devices there is but it's not very "Steve-ish" so I'm >>>>> not >>>>> expecting them to make a reappearance any time soon. I've often >>>>> thought >>>>> of doing a hardware hack but I haven't got to that state yet. >>>>> >>>>> Ken >>>>> >>>>> Simon Royal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am I the only one who missing blinking lights or activity >>>>>> lights on >>>>>> computers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once upon a time there was a light for hard drive activity and a >>>>>> light >>>>>> for optical drive (or floppy drive) activity. But we don't seem >>>>>> to >>>>>> see >>>>>> those anymore. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a PCMCIA card in the slot (instead of an internal Airport >>>>>> card) >>>>>> of my PowerBook for wireless and it has a solid power light and a >>>>>> light that flashes whenever I transfer data, other than that no >>>>>> other >>>>>> lights. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sometimes these were handy to tell whether something was >>>>>> working of >>>>>> not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Simon Royal >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From phil.charnley at ntlworld.com Sun Oct 4 09:09:58 2009 From: phil.charnley at ntlworld.com (Phil Charnley) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:09:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help: MacBook won't start Message-ID: Hello everybody, I have a 1.83GHz Intel Core Duo (13-inch White) MacBook with 512MB RAM, running Leopard. I ordered some more RAM from Crucial and relied on their scanner to pick the correct modules. It arrived yesterday and I had a go at fitting it. I'm not 100% confident its fitted correctly as I couldn't get it to click as I pushed it in. I've tried it over a dozen times with the same result. I also think I may have made a faux pas as I didn't shut the MacBook down before taking the battery out. The lid was closed so I took it that it was "off". On pressing the power button now I get a black screen, the whirring noise as the Mac Book checks the optical drive and a flashing instead of a pulsing light at the front. Nothing else, even when connected via the power cable. I have a SL disk waiting in the wings. There is no desperately important information on the MacBook as all that is kept on the G5 and backed up with Time Machine. I wondered about trying a fresh install with SL. Any thoughts on this please? Or am I doing something wrong with the memory? I have tried putting the old modules back (2 x 256mb) with the same results ie no clicks and black screens. Any advice would be gratefully received Phil From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 4 10:33:35 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:33:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help: MacBook won't start In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Taking out the battery before shutting down will not cause any problems. This sounds very much like incorrectly installed RAM, when inserting the chips make sure you fill both RAM slots not just one slot, make sure the ram is the right way around some will only go in one way round and it must click in to place, if it does not click it's not inserted correctly. Steve. On 4 Oct 2009, at 09:09, Phil Charnley wrote: > On pressing the power button now I get a black screen, the whirring > noise as the Mac Book checks the optical drive and a flashing instead > of a pulsing light at the fron From paul at durrant.co.uk Sun Oct 4 10:44:47 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:44:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help: MacBook won't start In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <79AB0376-4641-4A5F-833B-E2509603EFF9@durrant.co.uk> Phil's MacBook is now booting happily again. In the MacBooks there's no 'click' as the RAM goes in - it's not that kind of receptacle. You just have to be sure of how you're inserting the RAM, and be prepared to push rather hard to seat it properly. It's quite worrying the first time you do it - it doesn't feel right to have to apply that much force. Paul On 4 Oct 2009, at 10:33, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > Taking out the battery before shutting down will not cause any > problems. > > This sounds very much like incorrectly installed RAM, when inserting > the chips make sure you fill both RAM slots not just one slot, make > sure the ram is the right way around some will only go in one way > round and it must click in to place, if it does not click it's not > inserted correctly. > > Steve. > > > On 4 Oct 2009, at 09:09, Phil Charnley wrote: > >> On pressing the power button now I get a black screen, the whirring >> noise as the Mac Book checks the optical drive and a flashing instead >> of a pulsing light at the fron > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From phil.charnley at ntlworld.com Sun Oct 4 10:45:31 2009 From: phil.charnley at ntlworld.com (Phil Charnley) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 10:45:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help: MacBook won't start In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Paul has very kindly just popped round and pushed the new RAM home properly. What a gent! Phil On 4 Oct 2009, at 10:33:35, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > Taking out the battery before shutting down will not cause any > problems. > > This sounds very much like incorrectly installed RAM, when inserting > the chips make sure you fill both RAM slots not just one slot, make > sure the ram is the right way around some will only go in one way > round and it must click in to place, if it does not click it's not > inserted correctly. > > Steve. > > > On 4 Oct 2009, at 09:09, Phil Charnley wrote: > >> On pressing the power button now I get a black screen, the whirring >> noise as the Mac Book checks the optical drive and a flashing instead >> of a pulsing light at the fron > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From june.perrett at mac.com Sun Oct 4 10:50:52 2009 From: june.perrett at mac.com (June Perrett) Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:50:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Heather's website Message-ID: <27F5AE16-1D46-43AB-AA70-7AD0D4756FE1@mac.com> Enjoyed looking at your website, Heather. Some wonderful and very interesting pictures! From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 4 12:56:07 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:56:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow MP3 Message-ID: <62AAEF15-B467-46E2-9004-5453C886BCBE@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I do a lot of MP3 editing, usually for ringtones. A combination of QuickTime, Audacity and iTunes to make them. I normally import the MP3 straight into Audacity and it always works. I cut it up how I want it, export it to WAV (as I cannot get the MP3 exporter to work), then bring it into iTunes, edit the ID3 tags and convert to MP3. However, this morning I imported one MP3 into Audacity and when I played it, it had slowed it right down. I tried it again and the same results. Never had it before. I converted it to an AIFF with another program and then reimported that AIFF into Audacity and it worked fine. Any ideas why. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 4 15:13:33 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:13:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl Message-ID: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. Does anyone else use Growl? It is probably the best little app I have come across for the Mac. It is just such an awesome app that interacts with lots of other apps to tell you what is going on. Brilliant. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Sun Oct 4 15:23:35 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:23:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow MP3 In-Reply-To: <62AAEF15-B467-46E2-9004-5453C886BCBE@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <62AAEF15-B467-46E2-9004-5453C886BCBE@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <163B67A6-10F2-45DF-9BDA-B6962968D8D2@durrant.co.uk> I would guess that there's some tag in the MP3 identifying the bit rate of the data, and that Audacity doesn't handle this correctly for certain strange mp3 files. But that is just a guess. regards, Paul On 4 Oct 2009, at 12:56, Simon Royal wrote: > However, this morning I imported one MP3 into Audacity and when I > played it, it had slowed it right down. I tried it again and the same > results. Never had it before. > > I converted it to an AIFF with another program and then reimported > that AIFF into Audacity and it worked fine. > > Any ideas why. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 4 18:05:27 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:05:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl In-Reply-To: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <46C74DFF-58A9-451B-A6A7-8C9FC552B1C4@gmail.com> I was patiently waiting for the software to be updated to support Snow Leopard and it looks like the 28th September update v1.2 now supports SL (mostly). Downloading now... Thanks for the heads up. On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Simon Royal wrote: > Does anyone else use Growl? From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 4 18:45:46 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 18:45:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl In-Reply-To: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Simon, I'm looking at Growl now but It doesn't seem to be that great, perhaps I'm missing something, what apps have you found growl to work best with? Steve. On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Simon Royal wrote: > It is probably the best little app I have come across for the Mac. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 4 20:18:54 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:18:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl In-Reply-To: References: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <30F85B6C-A5E7-4A75-BFF4-69AA1C72B40B@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve Skype, CyberDuck, Firefox, FaceBook Notifications, Yahoo Messenger, Adium, iStumbler to name a few. Simon On 4 Oct 2009, at 18:45, Steve Batch wrote: > Simon, > I'm looking at Growl now but It doesn't seem to be that great, perhaps > I'm missing something, what apps have you found growl to work best > with? > > Steve. > > > On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Simon Royal wrote: > >> It is probably the best little app I have come across for the Mac. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Sun Oct 4 20:49:53 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:49:53 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl In-Reply-To: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <19CEB51D-6D8C-42C1-9CCE-4934BF04C55D@ntlworld.com> Sorry maybe I'm a little thick, I've read the web site but I still don't really know what it does? Kerin On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > Does anyone else use Growl? > > It is probably the best little app I have come across for the Mac. It > is just such an awesome app that interacts with lots of other apps to > tell you what is going on. > > Brilliant. > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From penguin.999 at virgin.net Sun Oct 4 22:56:48 2009 From: penguin.999 at virgin.net (Paul Chapman) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 22:56:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple ads hint at thinner iMacs, lighter MacBooks, cheaper Mac minis Message-ID: Just in case anyone was thinking about a new Mac. Might be a hoax but then again... Paul C From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Mon Oct 5 07:43:58 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:43:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple ads hint at thinner iMacs, lighter MacBooks, cheaper Mac minis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <68725A0F-33E9-4FC2-9CAF-1DCE213D7614@virgin.net> Hmm.. I have been thinking it's time I had a new iMac. However I don't see the point of a thinner iMac. I'd rather have a fatter machine if it meant increased performance. Nathan On 4 Oct 2009, at 22:56, Paul Chapman wrote: > Just in case anyone was thinking about a new Mac. > > Might be a hoax but then again... > > > > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan.barber3 at ntlworld.com Mon Oct 5 08:24:48 2009 From: alan.barber3 at ntlworld.com (Alan Barber) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:24:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse Message-ID: The scroll wheel on my corded mighty mouse has stopped working. Any ideas on how to get it going again? I believe it may need cleaning. Easiest way? Regards Alan From alanbarber at mac.com Mon Oct 5 08:26:49 2009 From: alanbarber at mac.com (Alan Barber) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:26:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse Message-ID: <41187A4B-43A6-4B3E-B1EC-08418F19E274@mac.com> Panic over it started working again Perhaps it was just asleep. Regards Alan From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 5 08:32:13 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:32:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: <41187A4B-43A6-4B3E-B1EC-08418F19E274@mac.com> References: <41187A4B-43A6-4B3E-B1EC-08418F19E274@mac.com> Message-ID: Now would be a good time to clean it. Get a sheet of plain paper on a hard surface. turn mouse upside down, and roll the scroll ball across the paper in lots of different directions. The scroll ball seems to be prone to getting clogged with dirt. A design flaw, IMO. I have heard rumours that the next mouse will have a sensor area rather than a physical scroll. But that's just rumour. Paul On 5 Oct 2009, at 08:26, Alan Barber wrote: > Panic over it started working again > Perhaps it was just asleep. > From brian at clearlight.uk.net Mon Oct 5 08:54:15 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:54:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I do this periodically and press fairly hard while doodling it about in lines and squiggles. One can see the muck come out. And it then works perfectly. regards Brian Paul Durrant said recently: > Now would be a good time to clean it. Get a sheet of plain paper on a > hard surface. turn mouse upside down, and roll the scroll ball across > the paper in lots of different directions. > > The scroll ball seems to be prone to getting clogged with dirt. A > design flaw, IMO. I have heard rumours that the next mouse will have a > sensor area rather than a physical scroll. But that's just rumour. > > Paul > > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 08:26, Alan Barber wrote: > >> Panic over it started working again >> Perhaps it was just asleep. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From munkt0n at gmail.com Mon Oct 5 09:00:07 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:00:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've heard that turning the mouse upside down and rubbing the scroll 'ball' against a piece of paper works. I got fed up with mine clogging up, it seemed to need cleaning every two weeks, got fed up with it and replaced it with *gasp* a spare Microsoft mouse I had On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Barber wrote: > The scroll wheel on my corded mighty mouse has stopped working. > Any ideas on how to get it going again? > > I believe it may need cleaning. > Easiest way? > > Regards > > Alan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From macman at f2s.com Mon Oct 5 09:25:25 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 09:25:25 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9E91BE52-D3F4-46C0-80CA-A56DC1936981@f2s.com> I've had mine to pieces and completely cleaned it, but it's not for the faint hearted, as the ball sits in a tiny little cup held in place by 4 miniscule bearings and magnets which are very tricky for fat fingers to replace. I was beginning to regret it, but eventually got there. I would, however, be loath to do it again! Robbie On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:00, Scott Matthews wrote: I've heard that turning the mouse upside down and rubbing the scroll 'ball' against a piece of paper works. I got fed up with mine clogging up, it seemed to need cleaning every two weeks, got fed up with it and replaced it with *gasp* a spare Microsoft mouse I had On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Barber wrote: > The scroll wheel on my corded mighty mouse has stopped working. > Any ideas on how to get it going again? > > I believe it may need cleaning. > Easiest way? > > Regards > > Alan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alanbarber at mac.com Mon Oct 5 09:31:56 2009 From: alanbarber at mac.com (Alan Barber) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:31:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: <9E91BE52-D3F4-46C0-80CA-A56DC1936981@f2s.com> References: <9E91BE52-D3F4-46C0-80CA-A56DC1936981@f2s.com> Message-ID: <212BE89F-C599-4435-9EA2-EE3AF3FD52D3@mac.com> So you dont want me to bring it round? Regards Alan On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:25, Robbie Murray wrote: > I've had mine to pieces and completely cleaned it, but it's not for > the faint hearted, as the ball sits in a tiny little cup held in place > by 4 miniscule bearings and magnets which are very tricky for fat > fingers to replace. > > I was beginning to regret it, but eventually got there. I would, > however, be loath to do it again! > > > Robbie > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:00, Scott Matthews wrote: > > I've heard that turning the mouse upside down and rubbing the scroll > 'ball' against a piece of paper works. > I got fed up with mine clogging up, it seemed to need cleaning every > two weeks, got fed up with it and replaced it with *gasp* a spare > Microsoft mouse I had > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Barber > wrote: > >> The scroll wheel on my corded mighty mouse has stopped working. >> Any ideas on how to get it going again? >> >> I believe it may need cleaning. >> Easiest way? >> >> Regards >> >> Alan >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alanbarber at mac.com Mon Oct 5 09:35:16 2009 From: alanbarber at mac.com (Alan Barber) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:35:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: References: <41187A4B-43A6-4B3E-B1EC-08418F19E274@mac.com> Message-ID: <9FB581EA-15CE-4100-87D2-FE1E6ED3AF7E@mac.com> Thanks for all the tips cleaned and working fine Regards Alan On 5 Oct 2009, at 08:32, Paul Durrant wrote: > Now would be a good time to clean it. Get a sheet of plain paper on a > hard surface. turn mouse upside down, and roll the scroll ball across > the paper in lots of different directions. > > The scroll ball seems to be prone to getting clogged with dirt. A > design flaw, IMO. I have heard rumours that the next mouse will have a > sensor area rather than a physical scroll. But that's just rumour. > > Paul > > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 08:26, Alan Barber wrote: > >> Panic over it started working again >> Perhaps it was just asleep. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 10:17:59 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:17:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple ads hint at thinner iMacs, lighter MacBooks, cheaper Mac minis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1DD053F5-F013-4616-9FA4-5CC61ED44213@simonroyal.co.uk> Paul Stocks of Macs have been running low, some places like Amazon have sold out. Simon On 4 Oct 2009, at 22:56, Paul Chapman wrote: > Just in case anyone was thinking about a new Mac. > > Might be a hoax but then again... > > > > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From macman at f2s.com Mon Oct 5 11:30:58 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:30:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] mighty mouse In-Reply-To: <212BE89F-C599-4435-9EA2-EE3AF3FD52D3@mac.com> References: <9E91BE52-D3F4-46C0-80CA-A56DC1936981@f2s.com> <212BE89F-C599-4435-9EA2-EE3AF3FD52D3@mac.com> Message-ID: Not just at the moment thank you Alan .. Robbie Murray 01603 620749 01603 516175 07882 007667 macman at f2s.com On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:31, Alan Barber wrote: So you dont want me to bring it round? Regards Alan On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:25, Robbie Murray wrote: > I've had mine to pieces and completely cleaned it, but it's not for > the faint hearted, as the ball sits in a tiny little cup held in place > by 4 miniscule bearings and magnets which are very tricky for fat > fingers to replace. > > I was beginning to regret it, but eventually got there. I would, > however, be loath to do it again! > > > Robbie > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 09:00, Scott Matthews wrote: > > I've heard that turning the mouse upside down and rubbing the scroll > 'ball' against a piece of paper works. > I got fed up with mine clogging up, it seemed to need cleaning every > two weeks, got fed up with it and replaced it with *gasp* a spare > Microsoft mouse I had > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Barber > wrote: > >> The scroll wheel on my corded mighty mouse has stopped working. >> Any ideas on how to get it going again? >> >> I believe it may need cleaning. >> Easiest way? >> >> Regards >> >> Alan >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stuartfidler_uk at yahoo.co.uk Mon Oct 5 13:20:24 2009 From: stuartfidler_uk at yahoo.co.uk (Stuart Fidler) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 05:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <414782.86910.qm@web24105.mail.ird.yahoo.com> I have been running Windows 7 RC on a Mac Leopard laptop using Parallels and everything seems fine except, like all new operating systems, it takes a bit of getting used to. The real test is going to see which programs will fully migrate across ? at the moment I am only using Office 2003 and that seems fine. I have used Vista but have avoided installing as I did not like it. My desktop operating system is XP3 which seems fairly stable so I may be tempted to try XP with Parallels on the laptop. ? I am holding out on Snow Leopard until I hear some more positive reports. ? Bring back DOS, I say. ? Stuart ? --- On Thu, 1/10/09, Steve Batch wrote: From: Steve Batch Subject: [NMUG] Windows 7 To: "Norwich Mac User Group list" Date: Thursday, 1 October, 2009, 12:26 PM Hi, now that Snow Leopard is settled in is anyone planning to install? windows 7 on Oct 22nd? Anyone having a Windows 7 launch party? I don't have a need for Windows 7, XP currently does what I need it to. Steve. _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 14:49:10 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:49:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Videos For DVD Message-ID: <6A7D309E-7B5A-4103-9CAB-A9753E26514B@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I have a bunch of clips I want to burn to DVD. They are currently in FLV format. I can burn them directly with Toast, but it takes ages due to it having to re-encode (and having a relatively slow machine). Is it worth re-encoding them with something else or converting with another program? Really what I am asking is, would another program encode them to DVD format faster or does Toast just pull in from the same source? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 14:55:11 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:55:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Growl In-Reply-To: <19CEB51D-6D8C-42C1-9CCE-4934BF04C55D@ntlworld.com> References: <2C3FC02A-0B51-4FB8-8630-008F1295E15E@simonroyal.co.uk> <19CEB51D-6D8C-42C1-9CCE-4934BF04C55D@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <25F4FAF2-140A-4896-A73C-E5FCB5266196@simonroyal.co.uk> Kerin It's a notification tool. Firefox: it will notify you when downloads are finished or when a new update. Yahoo Messenger: it will tell you when new emails and messages come in. Skype: it tells you when contacts come online and will even show you when a chat message comes in. CyberDuck: it tells you when connections are open and when transfers are complete. To name but a few uses. It just displays a small pop up that fades after a few seconds. It is handy so you dont have to keep switching apps to see what is going on. Simon On 4 Oct 2009, at 20:49, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Sorry maybe I'm a little thick, I've read the web site but I still > don't really know what it does? > > Kerin > > On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Does anyone else use Growl? >> >> It is probably the best little app I have come across for the Mac. It >> is just such an awesome app that interacts with lots of other apps to >> tell you what is going on. >> >> Brilliant. >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From penguin.999 at virgin.net Mon Oct 5 15:14:05 2009 From: penguin.999 at virgin.net (Paul Chapman) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:14:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Videos For DVD In-Reply-To: <6A7D309E-7B5A-4103-9CAB-A9753E26514B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <6A7D309E-7B5A-4103-9CAB-A9753E26514B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <9E5BA373-54A4-4666-8111-DC9D908FCB32@virgin.net> On Oct 5, 2009, at 14:49, Simon Royal wrote: > Really what I am asking is, would another program encode them to DVD > format faster or does Toast just pull in from the same source? I've been creating DVDs since my G3 iMac days and found that Toast is as fast as most other programs. These days on my latest machine the encoding is quick but back then I would get it all set up ready then tell it to start before I went to bed. Usually it was done by the morning so didn't get in the way of doing anything else. Paul C From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 15:26:55 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:26:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Videos For DVD In-Reply-To: <9E5BA373-54A4-4666-8111-DC9D908FCB32@virgin.net> References: <6A7D309E-7B5A-4103-9CAB-A9753E26514B@simonroyal.co.uk> <9E5BA373-54A4-4666-8111-DC9D908FCB32@virgin.net> Message-ID: <2960BF04-F64D-41CE-BACB-3072D4B91A9D@simonroyal.co.uk> Paul Thanks. I thought Toast was pretty good but I just wanted to make sure. Looks like my PowerBook will be up all night. Simon On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:14, Paul Chapman wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2009, at 14:49, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Really what I am asking is, would another program encode them to DVD >> format faster or does Toast just pull in from the same source? > > I've been creating DVDs since my G3 iMac days and found that Toast is > as fast as most other programs. These days on my latest machine the > encoding is quick but back then I would get it all set up ready then > tell it to start before I went to bed. Usually it was done by the > morning so didn't get in the way of doing anything else. > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From penguin.999 at virgin.net Mon Oct 5 15:28:56 2009 From: penguin.999 at virgin.net (Paul Chapman) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:28:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber Message-ID: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? Paul C From band1 at mac.com Mon Oct 5 15:35:26 2009 From: band1 at mac.com (David King) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:35:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> Message-ID: <90BBE08A-A545-432B-B633-0857444B0079@mac.com> Yes exactly the same but you can now use the BBC downloader. If you go to the BBC iPlayer site you need to install BBC iPlayer desktop - it does it all for you - and then the programme will download. Not sure when all this changed but presumably means the other programmes are now defunct. This may be intel only of course. David On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Paul Chapman wrote: > I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last > few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there > appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be > downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means > that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer > Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I > have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else > having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? > > Paul C > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From munkt0n at gmail.com Mon Oct 5 15:36:45 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:36:45 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> Message-ID: yep, BBC have changed things again. from the iPlayer Grabber site "iPlayer Grabber is currently broken. The maintainer of the script that powers iPlayer Grabber is away until October 10th so there will be no fix for a while yet. Sorry for the inconvenience!" On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Paul Chapman wrote: > I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last > few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there > appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be > downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means > that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer > Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I > have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else > having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? > > Paul C > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From macman at f2s.com Mon Oct 5 15:50:30 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:50:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> Message-ID: Yes, same here Paul ... Robbie On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Paul Chapman wrote: I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? Paul C _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From macman at f2s.com Mon Oct 5 15:55:00 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:55:00 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <90BBE08A-A545-432B-B633-0857444B0079@mac.com> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> <90BBE08A-A545-432B-B633-0857444B0079@mac.com> Message-ID: <4DC8EE23-B5AC-44FA-BCE2-2E1CA58F0457@f2s.com> Problem with that are that It's a much bigger file, and time limited, whereas you can keep the Grabber & Downloader files for ever ... (I don't want to get into a discussion about the legality though - I understand it's very grey ....) They've also done away with the option to listen to Radio on a standalone Real Player, which I found very convenient. Robbie On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:35, David King wrote: Yes exactly the same but you can now use the BBC downloader. If you go to the BBC iPlayer site you need to install BBC iPlayer desktop - it does it all for you - and then the programme will download. Not sure when all this changed but presumably means the other programmes are now defunct. This may be intel only of course. David On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Paul Chapman wrote: > I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last > few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there > appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be > downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means > that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer > Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I > have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else > having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? > > Paul C > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From band1 at mac.com Mon Oct 5 15:57:29 2009 From: band1 at mac.com (David King) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:57:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <4DC8EE23-B5AC-44FA-BCE2-2E1CA58F0457@f2s.com> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> <90BBE08A-A545-432B-B633-0857444B0079@mac.com> <4DC8EE23-B5AC-44FA-BCE2-2E1CA58F0457@f2s.com> Message-ID: But if you want a programme yesterday or today or tomorrow it appears to be the only answer until the others are upgraded. David On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:55, Robbie Murray wrote: > Problem with that are that It's a much bigger file, and time limited, > whereas you can keep the Grabber & Downloader files for ever ... > > (I don't want to get into a discussion about the legality though - I > understand it's very grey ....) > > They've also done away with the option to listen to Radio on a > standalone Real Player, which I found very convenient. > > Robbie > > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:35, David King wrote: > > Yes exactly the same but you can now use the BBC downloader. If you > go to the BBC iPlayer site you need to install BBC iPlayer desktop - > it does it all for you - and then the programme will download. Not > sure when all this changed but presumably means the other programmes > are now defunct. This may be intel only of course. > > David > > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Paul Chapman wrote: > >> I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the >> last >> few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get >> there >> appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be >> downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means >> that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer >> Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac >> and I >> have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else >> having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? >> >> Paul C >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 5 17:37:08 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:37:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard vs Windows 7 References: Message-ID: <784746D0-A87A-41F8-B239-48CBE74756EA@durrant.co.uk> The Joy of Tech amused me with this cartoon: http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1286.html Paul From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 17:43:56 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:43:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard vs Windows 7 In-Reply-To: <784746D0-A87A-41F8-B239-48CBE74756EA@durrant.co.uk> References: <784746D0-A87A-41F8-B239-48CBE74756EA@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Paul Hilarious. Simon On 5 Oct 2009, at 17:37, Paul Durrant wrote: > The Joy of Tech amused me with this cartoon: > > http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1286.html > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Mon Oct 5 18:14:59 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 18:14:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard vs Windows Message-ID: It's very cruel to laugh at Windows shortcomings, but oh! so funny. Thanks Paul Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From minkennison at mac.com Mon Oct 5 18:24:11 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:24:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard vs Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: EXCELLENT Paul. Thank you Min On 5 Oct 2009, at 18:145 Oct 2009, Richard Stewart wrote: > It's very cruel to laugh at Windows shortcomings, but oh! so funny. > Thanks Paul > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 20:21:22 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:21:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free iPod Ripper Message-ID: <8B9D0715-FAEE-479E-93FB-1F96A2C12492@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I need a tool to take music off of my iPod. It has to be free of course. I used to use Senuti, but it has expired. YamiPod doesn't seem to work with iTunes 9. iPodRip is free but it requires auto-sync with iTunes on your iPod and mine is manual. Can anyone help. I only want to pull one song from my iPod. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 21:19:17 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:19:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Vocal Removal / Instrumentals Message-ID: <6DE47532-F7BE-41C8-8551-CB8FB45EDED4@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. A while ago I removed the vocals from a song and it worked amazingly well. I am sure I used Audacity to do it. However, I just tried again with a different track and I don't remember the process being like that and the end results were not very good at all. So. 1. Does anyone know of a piece of software that does this? 2. Does anyone know where I can get instrumental versions of songs... instrumentals and not horrible karaoke versions? 3. Or perhaps by some long shot, does somebody has an instrumental version of Paul Young - Wherever I Lay My Hat? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From Tgoldensection at aol.com Mon Oct 5 22:28:40 2009 From: Tgoldensection at aol.com (Tgoldensection at aol.com) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:28:40 EDT Subject: [NMUG] Updating Tiger Message-ID: I downloaded the 10.4.11 update for my version 10.4.3 Tiger that was already installed on a secondhand eMac. I copied it to a reader then to the HD on the Mac in question, doubled clicked it, it opened, I then double clicked and the installation procedure started. It got as far as asking where to install it and I highlighted the HD. I then got the message words to the effect 'you can't install this volume as it doesn't meet the installation requirements.' I thought that maybe the leap to 10.4.11 was too much, so I tried again with 10.4.6 but with the same result. The machine is a 1.25Ghz G4 with 1 gig ram and 40 gig hard drive. Am I doing something wrong? I'm not used to OS X. Any thoughts gratefully received. From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 5 22:45:32 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:45:32 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Updating Tiger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C1F26AF-BE02-4F3F-8025-0C1146CD45A9@durrant.co.uk> Make sure you download the 'combo' updater, then you should be able to go from 10.4.3 to 10.4.11 in one step. The combo updater you want is here: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL170 180MB of download! And then you'll need all the security updates... It's a lot easier just to use the built-in Software Update if you can hook the machine up to the internet. regards, Paul On 5 Oct 2009, at 22:28, Tgoldensection at aol.com wrote: > I downloaded the 10.4.11 update for my version 10.4.3 Tiger that was > already installed on a secondhand eMac. > > I copied it to a reader then to the HD on the Mac in question, doubled > clicked it, it opened, I then double clicked and the installation > procedure > started. It got as far as asking where to install it and I > highlighted the HD. > > I then got the message words to the effect 'you can't install this > volume > as it doesn't meet the installation requirements.' > > I thought that maybe the leap to 10.4.11 was too much, so I tried > again > with 10.4.6 but with the same result. > > The machine is a 1.25Ghz G4 with 1 gig ram and 40 gig hard drive. > > Am I doing something wrong? I'm not used to OS X. > > Any thoughts gratefully received. From penguin.999 at virgin.net Mon Oct 5 22:52:55 2009 From: penguin.999 at virgin.net (Paul Chapman) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:52:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> Message-ID: <06579EB8-4635-4FEA-B667-327C2EB4903E@virgin.net> Now trying to go the 'official' route for downloading programmes with BBC iPlayer and I cannot find any that have the download button available. I can listen again but I don't know where the option is to download for listening later. Any thoughts where I'm going wrong? I used to be able to do this but either I have forgotten or they have changed something. Paul C From allanmacam at me.com Mon Oct 5 23:08:24 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:08:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] This should put the cat amongst the pidgeons Message-ID: <2ABDCADD-9A4D-494C-A386-0D921FF5950E@me.com> If this is trues, that is.. http://thurly.net//5yv AJ From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 23:12:37 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:12:37 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] This should put the cat amongst the pidgeons In-Reply-To: <2ABDCADD-9A4D-494C-A386-0D921FF5950E@me.com> References: <2ABDCADD-9A4D-494C-A386-0D921FF5950E@me.com> Message-ID: <87F6F4E9-643D-4953-8402-29E336E73C0F@simonroyal.co.uk> Alan Yes, another company offered a USB dongle that enabled this. Simon On 5 Oct 2009, at 23:08, Allan wrote: > If this is trues, that is.. > > http://thurly.net//5yv > > AJ > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 5 23:17:27 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:17:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Interesting Message-ID: <0E120A7D-3091-4640-8998-91EEEEE7D2B6@simonroyal.co.uk> Interesting stat: 85% of Mac owners also own a Windows machine. http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-348905.html Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Mon Oct 5 23:21:34 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:21:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems Message-ID: Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. They used to be duplicated but not anymore. I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. Nathan From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Mon Oct 5 23:31:13 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:31:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I use to (virgin media now), but my daughter still use virgin.net on pc it's running smooth on her's either. Sorry cant help more than that. Kerin On 5 Oct 2009, at 23:21, Nathan Crosby wrote: > Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? > I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. > They used to be duplicated but not anymore. > I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. > If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. > > Nathan > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 6 02:47:44 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:47:44 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> Nathan, I'd love to say that it's Virgin (many people write in with Virgin mail problems) but I suspect that what's happening is that the email client on one or both of your machines has had its config changed by someone and has started to delete email from the server immediately after downloading instead of leaving it on the server long enough for the other machine to download the same emails. In Apple Mail, the setting is under Preferences -> Accounts -> Advanced -> "Remove copy from server after retrieving a message:". The trick is to choose a useful option such as "After one week" or "After one month", in other words, long enough to give the other machine time to download the emails but not so long that the email is there forever and crashes your quota. This may not be the problem but it would explain the symptoms. Ken Nathan Crosby wrote: > Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? > I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. > They used to be duplicated but not anymore. > I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. > If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. > > Nathan > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Tue Oct 6 08:16:10 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:16:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> Thanks Ken this sounded logical but when I checked, both machine settings were 'After one week" Any more ideas? Nathan On 6 Oct 2009, at 02:47, Ken Hamer wrote: > > I suspect that what's happening is that the email client > on one or both of your machines has had its config changed by someone > and has started to delete email from the server immediately after > downloading instead of leaving it on the server long enough for the > other machine to download the same emails. > > Nathan Crosby wrote: >> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? >> I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. >> They used to be duplicated but not anymore. >> I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. >> If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. >> From Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net Tue Oct 6 08:30:14 2009 From: Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net (Jeremy Webb) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:30:14 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> Message-ID: <47F12524-4953-46CD-BD67-416EF879132C@virgin.net> You're not alone Nathan. I had 3 or 4 days worth of problems going on - emails stuck on the server, or being held in spam folders etc on a machine only I use. I never touched the settings (honest guv) but after a quick sort out in webmail, things are back to normal now. I was notified by email from Virgin that "improvements" were being made. ho hum. Jeremy Webb Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net On 6 Oct 2009, at 08:16, Nathan Crosby wrote: > Thanks Ken this sounded logical but when I checked, both machine > settings were 'After one week" > Any more ideas? > > Nathan > > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 02:47, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> I suspect that what's happening is that the email client >> on one or both of your machines has had its config changed by someone >> and has started to delete email from the server immediately after >> downloading instead of leaving it on the server long enough for the >> other machine to download the same emails. >> >> Nathan Crosby wrote: >>> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? >>> I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. >>> They used to be duplicated but not anymore. >>> I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. >>> If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Tue Oct 6 08:37:08 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:37:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <47F12524-4953-46CD-BD67-416EF879132C@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <47F12524-4953-46CD-BD67-416EF879132C@virgin.net> Message-ID: <5CBD9696-A564-4A96-A22A-A5EC9CDF2181@virgin.net> Right. Why is it that 'improvements' inevitably make things worse! Nathan On 6 Oct 2009, at 08:30, Jeremy Webb wrote: > You're not alone Nathan. I had 3 or 4 days worth of problems going on > - emails stuck on the server, or being held in spam folders etc on a > machine only I use. I never touched the settings (honest guv) but > after a quick sort out in webmail, things are back to normal now. I > was notified by email from Virgin that "improvements" were being > made. ho hum. > > Jeremy Webb > Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net > > > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 08:16, Nathan Crosby wrote: > >> Thanks Ken this sounded logical but when I checked, both machine >> settings were 'After one week" >> Any more ideas? >> >> Nathan >> >> >> On 6 Oct 2009, at 02:47, Ken Hamer wrote: >>> >>> I suspect that what's happening is that the email client >>> on one or both of your machines has had its config changed by >>> someone >>> and has started to delete email from the server immediately after >>> downloading instead of leaving it on the server long enough for the >>> other machine to download the same emails. >>> >>> Nathan Crosby wrote: >>>> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? >>>> I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. >>>> They used to be duplicated but not anymore. >>>> I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. >>>> If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. >>>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Tue Oct 6 08:50:16 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:50:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <47F12524-4953-46CD-BD67-416EF879132C@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <47F12524-4953-46CD-BD67-416EF879132C@virgin.net> Message-ID: Hello, I too have problems (Virgin). I receive mail on 3 computers (1 PC running Windows XP) + iPod Touch. However, reception is irregular i.e sometimes I receive a message on all 4, sometimes on 1 or 2, sometimes none. I have altered my settings in 'Advanced', as suggest by Ken Hamer, and will see what happens, however if that is was the reason, I would expect those using other ISPs to have the same problem. Virgin say that they are making changes and improvements to mail, so I await the result. Ken Arnoldi On 6 Oct 2009, at 08:30, Jeremy Webb wrote: >>>> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 6 09:00:20 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:00:20 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop Message-ID: After the first few 'beginners' courses, we had a number of requests to have a session on iPhoto, so the course next Saturday (10/10/09) will be an iPhoto workshop. As usual it will be held in the back meeting room at St. Matthews Church Telegraph Lane West Thorpe Hamlet. For directions see http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl The 2 hour session (10-12 noon) will give people the opportunity to explore the program and to help each other with tips. tricks and hidden features. If there is a member out there who is comfortably familiar with iPhoto who could spare the time to help lead the session, please let me know. We don't need a full blown expert (although that would be great), just somebody who knows how to drive it. Could those people who are intending to come to the workshop please let me know either on or off list, so that catering arrangements can be made. A sprinkling of MacBooks/MacBookPros with iPhoto and some problematic pics on them might be useful, as well. See you Saturday, Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From richardivers at mac.com Tue Oct 6 09:14:07 2009 From: richardivers at mac.com (Richard Ivers) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:14:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <06579EB8-4635-4FEA-B667-327C2EB4903E@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> <06579EB8-4635-4FEA-B667-327C2EB4903E@virgin.net> Message-ID: <5F62BB0C-43A5-4C1F-8C6F-9B360F448920@mac.com> Paul, the BBC iPlayer site states that there are very few radio programs available to download and the reason they give for that is Digital Rights Management. I can see that there might be a problem with music. Programs are available to stream for up to seven days after original broadcast. You could see if the program you are interested in is available as a podcast which you can download and tailor for the device you intend to play it on. By the way I couldn't find ANY radio programs to download. Regards Richard On 5 Oct 2009, at 22:52, Paul Chapman wrote: > Now trying to go the 'official' route for downloading programmes with > BBC iPlayer and I cannot find any that have the download button > available. I can listen again but I don't know where the option is to > download for listening later. > > Any thoughts where I'm going wrong? I used to be able to do this but > either I have forgotten or they have changed something. > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From Tgoldensection at aol.com Tue Oct 6 09:23:09 2009 From: Tgoldensection at aol.com (Tgoldensection at aol.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:23:09 EDT Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop Message-ID: I'm new to this site and would like to learn a website programme, have you had any intros on this subject? Terry From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 6 09:46:32 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:46:32 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Website design programs intro Course: Was: Re: NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F7EFBD4-858A-4611-9385-FDD2D08C79B5@mac.com> Hello Terry, Welcome to NMUG. How did you find out about us? We've not yet done website programs. We ran a survey of attendees at the first couple of beginners courses and website construction/design one of the things which people expressed some interest in. We may run an introductory session at some stage, depending on demand. Your interest is noted and helps to measure demand. On 6 Oct 2009, at 09:23, Tgoldensection at aol.com wrote: > I'm new to this site and would like to learn a website programme, > have you > had any intros on this subject? > > Terry Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Tue Oct 6 09:58:42 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Youngs) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:58:42 +0200 Subject: [NMUG] Virgin mail problems Message-ID: In respect of mail problems possibly originating elsewhere, please bear in mind an axiom of computing stipulating use of Virgin Media in any way shape or form involves problems. This is an immutable law of the Universe determined by the use of 'Virgin Media' and 'service' in close proximity. Sent from Mallorca Spain where I am involved in proving the square on the playa is equal to the other two squares in the bar. -- Stefan Youngs Tel: +44 (01603) 702714 UK Landline Tel: +1 (415) 449 1771 US Landline FAX: +1 (206) 237 4155 skype me at stefanyoungs From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 6 10:06:45 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:06:45 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti Message-ID: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it needs a little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in with a chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared to the Titanium. The AlBook is either an 867Mhz or a 1Ghz - so farely comparable to my current TiBook. The TiBook has L3 cache. The AlBook doesn't. Both are 133Mhz system bus. The TiBook uses PC133 RAM and tops at 1GB. The AlBook uses DDR RAM and tops at 1.1GB. The TiBook has a 15.2" screen 1280x768 native. The AlBook has a 12" screen 1024x768 native. The TiBook has 10/100/1000 ethernet. The ABook has 10/100 ethernet. I love my TiBook, but if I can get a little extra ooomph for little pennies then I'm up for it. There isn't much difference in spec, but would the fact it the AlBook has DDR RAM and a slightly higher limit make a big difference. Also they both have 32MB AGP 4x graphics cards, but the AlBook has a smaller, lower resolution screen to power. The 1Ghz TiBook ups its video RAM to 64MB whereas the 1Ghz 12" AlBook only has 32MB of RAM, but has a RAM limit of 1.25Ghz vs the 1GB of all the TiBooks. Out of the 4 which one is better. I know a MacBook is my best option, but it is out of reach at the moment. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 6 10:27:11 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:27:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti In-Reply-To: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: The 1GHz Titanium Powerbook is clearly the better machine unless you need extreme portability. Having the Mobility Radeon 9000 video chip will make the display faster. Having Gigabit ethernet is a big plus for home networking. And the bigger screen! And the DVI out instead of VGA. regards, Paul On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:06, Simon Royal wrote: > It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it needs a > little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in with a > chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared to > the Titanium. From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 6 10:29:19 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:29:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti In-Reply-To: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <2FA09ADD-9FBC-4800-B8C7-1B44454DF2CF@durrant.co.uk> The 1GHz Titanium Powerbook is clearly the better machine unless you need extreme portability. Having the Mobility Radeon 9000 video chip will make the screen better. Having Gigabit ethernet is a big plus for home networking. And the bigger screen! And the DVI out instead of VGA. regards, Paul On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:06, Simon Royal wrote: > It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it needs a > little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in with a > chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared to > the Titanium. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 6 10:48:50 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:48:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti In-Reply-To: References: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Paul Would the extra video RAM and better video card out way the higher RAM limit and faster system bus? Bear in mind my TiBook is my main Mac so it gets everything from Photoshop and Illustrator work to audio and video processing. Simon On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:27, Paul Durrant wrote: > The 1GHz Titanium Powerbook is clearly the better machine unless you > need extreme portability. > > Having the Mobility Radeon 9000 video chip will make the display > faster. Having Gigabit ethernet is a big plus for home networking. And > the bigger screen! And the DVI out instead of VGA. > > regards, > > Paul > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:06, Simon Royal wrote: > >> It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it needs a >> little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in >> with a >> chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared to >> the Titanium. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 6 11:20:55 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:20:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" PowerBook Message-ID: <46AAFE78-2097-4312-94A9-3F8928E1868E@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I know a couple of you are using a 12" PowerBook. Can you let me know what you think of them and whether you have had any problems with it. I've been reading about the whole AlBook range and seemed to be plagued with major problems like faulty logic boards, over heating, dodgy screen connections, but I don't know whether this is just web- slander. Also people only write they have problems. I'd like to know how it handles Leopard. My 867Mhz TiBook runs it lovely, the latest update has caused a few SPODs more than usual. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Tue Oct 6 11:33:17 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:33:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] RAM Message-ID: <6189C761-FD88-4C1D-828E-4D532A82E810@ruthmurray.f2s.com> HI folks Does anyone have a 512MB SD RAM PC133MHZ chip for sale? To go in a Powerbook G4? I need this upgrade a friends machine in order to load Tiger. Many thanks Ruth Murray ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com Ruth Murray Graphic Design and Illustration 01603 632334 Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 6 11:36:26 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:36:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Problems with iPlayer Grabber In-Reply-To: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> References: <8E940D62-7D7C-4DB0-9C6F-98563913C9F8@virgin.net> Message-ID: <5DC02905-C0D0-4508-ADDD-EDB9DE20E371@mac.com> The Beeb iPlayer seems to be in a state of flux at present, particularly with radio streams. This hiatus is affecting most grabbers. For sound, you could try : http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijackpro/ or, more expensive : http://www.ambrosiasw.com/utilities/wiretap/ On 5 Oct 2009, at 15:28, Paul Chapman wrote: > I haven't been able to download any Radio or TV programmes in the last > few days via iPlayer Grabber. After selecting a programme to get there > appears a box telling me that "The program you selected could not be > downloaded! There is no page for this programme. This probably means > that the programme does not exist." I have tried with iPlayer > Downloader and that also has problems. This was on my Intel iMac and I > have tried with my MacBook Pro with the same results. Anyone else > having problems? Has the BBC changed things again? Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 6 11:39:22 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:39:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] RAM In-Reply-To: <6189C761-FD88-4C1D-828E-4D532A82E810@ruthmurray.f2s.com> References: <6189C761-FD88-4C1D-828E-4D532A82E810@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: Ruth What model PowerBook G4 and how much RAM is in there at present? Simon On 6 Oct 2009, at 11:33, Ruth Murray wrote: > HI folks > > Does anyone have a 512MB SD RAM PC133MHZ chip for sale? > > To go in a Powerbook G4? > > I need this upgrade a friends machine in order to load Tiger. > > Many thanks > > Ruth Murray > ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com > > Ruth Murray > Graphic Design and Illustration > 01603 632334 > > Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From robharrington at mac.com Tue Oct 6 11:39:57 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:39:57 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems Message-ID: <424B79BA-1E14-4557-8A96-FB840CE56A51@mac.com> I feel very hesitant in raising this particular problem again but here I go. On 25th Sept I asked if anyone could shed light on a friend's - who lives abroad- QuickMail Pro problem: not always successfully sending or receiving e-mails. I sent my enquiry from Annercy in France, using Mobileme through Safari. Paul Durrant kindly sent a reply very quickly but I did not receive it. I have never had any problems before using this set-up in other places. I used, in my friend's house, a laptop which was basically a clone of her iMac in her office. Now that I have returned to my own iMac back home (where all my correspondence was waiting for me) Ken Hamer's suggestion of checking Mail prefs>Accounts>Advanced>'Remove copy from server after retrieving message' seems like a good idea. In my 2.1.3 version I cannot find that precise line. I would like to know what checks I should make, either in Safari, Firefox, Mobilme or Mail, before I send further e-mails away from home. I do not think I can help solve my friend's problem, one reason being is that she is hoping it will go away or is waiting until it gets dangerous and then call someone to sort it out..... (It was interesting how quickly failed communication can become an irritation - I hesitated in raising this problem again as I had that response in both directions; must be a bit like making the effort to repeat conversation to a deaf person.) Rob Harrington From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 6 11:51:10 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:51:10 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Virgin mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ACB211E.1010904@stackyard.org> Yes, couldn't agree more, Stefan. When you consider that Virgin Media is just NTL in disguise, it's not surprising. Actually, I believe they are in the process of cutting their email service over to Google but I can't confirm. Almost every post to this list regarding email problems involves Virgin. Salud! Stefan Youngs wrote: > In respect of mail problems possibly originating elsewhere, please bear in > mind an axiom of computing stipulating use of Virgin Media in any way shape > or form involves problems. > This is an immutable law of the Universe determined by the use of 'Virgin > Media' and 'service' in close proximity. > > Sent from Mallorca Spain where I am involved in proving the square on the > playa is equal to the other two squares in the bar. > > From Tgoldensection at aol.com Tue Oct 6 11:57:46 2009 From: Tgoldensection at aol.com (Tgoldensection at aol.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:57:46 EDT Subject: [NMUG] Upgrade Tiger Message-ID: Thanks for the advice Tiger now upgraded and quark 8 working. From skipmeg at skipmeg.plus.com Tue Oct 6 12:17:31 2009 From: skipmeg at skipmeg.plus.com (skipmeg at skipmeg.plus.com) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:17:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <699c6922917a7db1b6e1c27562ba2c6b.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> Looking forward to meeting all and the workshop. Brian Coman After the first few 'beginners' courses, we had a number of requests > to have a session on iPhoto, so the course next Saturday (10/10/09) > will be an iPhoto workshop. > > From david at vanedwards.co.uk Tue Oct 6 12:39:11 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:39:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We'd very much like to be there if there's space. Best wishes, David and Thea >After the first few 'beginners' courses, we had a number of requests >to have a session on iPhoto, so the course next Saturday (10/10/09) >will be an iPhoto workshop. > >As usual it will be held in the back meeting room at St. Matthews >Church Telegraph Lane West Thorpe Hamlet. >For directions see http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl > >The 2 hour session (10-12 noon) will give people the opportunity to >explore the program and to help each other with tips. tricks and >hidden features. > >If there is a member out there who is comfortably familiar with iPhoto >who could spare the time to help lead the session, please let me know. >We don't need a full blown expert (although that would be great), just >somebody who knows how to drive it. > >Could those people who are intending to come to the workshop please >let me know either on or off list, so that catering arrangements can >be made. > >A sprinkling of MacBooks/MacBookPros with iPhoto and some problematic >pics on them might be useful, as well. > >See you Saturday, > >Richard Nevill >ricnev at mac.com > > > >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From richardivers at mac.com Tue Oct 6 13:04:45 2009 From: richardivers at mac.com (Richard Ivers) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:04:45 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto workshop Message-ID: Richard, count me in please Regards Richard From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 6 13:13:00 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:13:00 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <424B79BA-1E14-4557-8A96-FB840CE56A51@mac.com> References: <424B79BA-1E14-4557-8A96-FB840CE56A51@mac.com> Message-ID: <4ACB344C.4040208@stackyard.org> Rob, When you use MobileMe through Safari, you are getting a remote view of your email which is sitting on a server somewhere on Apple's network. The network or machine you are viewing it on are not involved in an email sense, they are merely displaying a web page for you. If Paul's response to you did not appear on the MobileMe page, it was because, for whatever reason, the email wasn't on the MobileMe server at the point at which you looked and it had nothing to do with the network you were on, the location or the machine you were using at the time. The reasons for an email not to show on any webmail service such as MobileMe are legion. One possible reason is that the email had already been downloaded by the email client on a computer somewhere else which was set to delete the email from the server immediately after download. When you were in France, were any family members using your computer at home? Could they have checked your email, thus deleting it from the server, making it disappear from the MobileMe page? I'm not familiar with QuickMail Pro but when there are OCCASIONAL send/receive failures with any email client, it usually means that there are network or infrastructure problems, i.e. somewhere between the Ethernet port on the back of your machine and the hard disk of the email server so probably outside of your control. It's difficult to know where to look without seeing an error message. Your friend probably fits into this category and she might want to look for another ISP or some sort of improvement to her connection. Virgin users are also in this category. Regarding the wording of the advanced email settings, yes, there could well be differences between different versions of Apple Mail. I only have 10.4 in front of me at this particular moment. Most email clients have similar settings. If you are using two or more machines to view the same email account, you must make sure that any email clients involved do not immediately delete email after downloading. The default setting on Microsoft email clients is always to delete immediately. I can't now remember what the default Apple Mail setting is. Perhaps someone will remind us. Ken ROB HARRINGTON wrote: > I feel very hesitant in raising this particular problem again but > here I go. > > On 25th Sept I asked if anyone could shed light on a friend's - who > lives abroad- QuickMail Pro problem: not always successfully sending > or receiving e-mails. > I sent my enquiry from Annercy in France, using Mobileme through > Safari. Paul Durrant kindly sent a reply very quickly but I did not > receive it. I have never had any problems before using this set-up in > other places. > I used, in my friend's house, a laptop which was basically a clone of > her iMac in her office. > Now that I have returned to my own iMac back home (where all my > correspondence was waiting for me) Ken Hamer's suggestion of checking > Mail prefs>Accounts>Advanced>'Remove copy from server after > retrieving message' seems like a good idea. > In my 2.1.3 version I cannot find that precise line. > I would like to know what checks I should make, either in Safari, > Firefox, Mobilme or Mail, before I send further e-mails away from home. > > I do not think I can help solve my friend's problem, one reason being > is that she is hoping it will go away or is waiting until it gets > dangerous and then call someone to sort it out..... > (It was interesting how quickly failed communication can become an > irritation - I hesitated in raising this problem again as I had that > response in both directions; must be a bit like making the effort to > repeat conversation to a deaf person.) > > Rob Harrington > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From jinshinjewels at googlemail.com Tue Oct 6 13:41:23 2009 From: jinshinjewels at googlemail.com (Jules Slaughter) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:41:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Website design programs intro Course: Was: Re: NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: <4F7EFBD4-858A-4611-9385-FDD2D08C79B5@mac.com> References: <4F7EFBD4-858A-4611-9385-FDD2D08C79B5@mac.com> Message-ID: Dear Richard I would like a space if there is still room and probably Helen as well. I have emailed her to remind. Regards Jules On 10/6/09, Richard Nevill wrote: > Hello Terry, Welcome to NMUG. How did you find out about us? > > We've not yet done website programs. We ran a survey of attendees at > the first couple of beginners courses and website construction/design > one of the things which people expressed some interest in. > > We may run an introductory session at some stage, depending on demand. > > Your interest is noted and helps to measure demand. > > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 09:23, Tgoldensection at aol.com wrote: > > > I'm new to this site and would like to learn a website programme, > > have you > > had any intros on this subject? > > > > Terry > > Richard Nevill > ricnev at mac.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- Jules CalmClasses & Therapies to improve your health. My business works on referrals. If you like what I do, please tell others. If not, please tell me. From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 6 14:00:21 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:00:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti In-Reply-To: References: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: The extra 128MB of Ram possible on the 12" PBG4 is insignificant, IMO. The faster memory bus might make a difference, but I think that the extra processor speed will more than make up for that, especially since the Ti has the 1MB level 3 DDR memory. Whatever difference there is in performance is going to be very small. Even if the 12" was marginally faster for your uses, I think the bigger screen would more than make up for it. Paul On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:48, Simon Royal wrote: > Paul > > Would the extra video RAM and better video card out way the higher RAM > limit and faster system bus? > > Bear in mind my TiBook is my main Mac so it gets everything from > Photoshop and Illustrator work to audio and video processing. > > Simon > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:27, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> The 1GHz Titanium Powerbook is clearly the better machine unless you >> need extreme portability. >> >> Having the Mobility Radeon 9000 video chip will make the display >> faster. Having Gigabit ethernet is a big plus for home networking. >> And >> the bigger screen! And the DVI out instead of VGA. >> >> regards, >> >> Paul >> >> On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:06, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it >>> needs a >>> little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in >>> with a >>> chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared >>> to >>> the Titanium. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From minkennison at mac.com Tue Oct 6 15:31:23 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:31:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: <699c6922917a7db1b6e1c27562ba2c6b.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> References: <699c6922917a7db1b6e1c27562ba2c6b.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> Message-ID: <1C2C45AD-70C7-4A13-A179-D65E85A29D12@mac.com> We look forward to meting you too Brian Richard - I will be there this time Min On 6 Oct 2009, at 12:176 Oct 2009, skipmeg at skipmeg.plus.com wrote: > Looking forward to meeting all and the workshop. Brian Coman > > > > > After the first few 'beginners' courses, we had a number of requests >> to have a session on iPhoto, so the course next Saturday (10/10/09) >> will be an iPhoto workshop. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Tue Oct 6 16:34:44 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:34:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Saturday class Message-ID: <40B43D57-D4E3-4D62-8104-8F012D19486B@virgin.net> Hello, I expect to attend the iPhoto class next Saturday. Celia Arnoldi From djr.massy at ntlworld.com Tue Oct 6 17:36:27 2009 From: djr.massy at ntlworld.com (DJR Massy) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:36:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 256MB RAM going for S.A.E. Message-ID: <770F914A-B9F7-4072-BCD4-179C084B999B@ntlworld.com> Having just upgraded an iBook, there is a spare 256MB RAM piece going free. I doubt if anyone wants it, but if so, please contact me offline. Jim. From june.perrett at mac.com Tue Oct 6 17:37:40 2009 From: june.perrett at mac.com (June Perrett) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:37:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop Message-ID: <63932C1B-B53D-4EBD-AA2E-4EC9138174EC@mac.com> Richard I'm sorry I cannot attend the Beginners' courses for quite a while. I am studying for another Keep Fit qualification and the training takes place on Saturdays. I hope all goes well on Saturday. Sorry to miss it. Regards June From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Tue Oct 6 17:43:16 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:43:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: <63932C1B-B53D-4EBD-AA2E-4EC9138174EC@mac.com> References: <63932C1B-B53D-4EBD-AA2E-4EC9138174EC@mac.com> Message-ID: <94F49B6C-3E96-4629-A532-EB862A451638@ruthmurray.f2s.com> HI June You can always book yourself on one of the free workshops on iPhoto held at the new Apple Store. There is one on Sunday 11th Oct and the 18th Oct. 12-1pm http://concierge.apple.com/WebObjects/Concierge.woa/12/wo/ AA1u9rSOTt5dRkpLcX1ij0/0.0.25.1# Ruth On 6 Oct 2009, at 17:37, June Perrett wrote: > Richard > I'm sorry I cannot attend the Beginners' courses for quite a while. > I am studying for another Keep Fit qualification and the training > takes place on Saturdays. I hope all goes well on Saturday. Sorry to > miss it. > Regards > June > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > Ruth Murray ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com Ruth Murray Graphic Design and Illustration 01603 632334 Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Tue Oct 6 20:10:56 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:10:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <830FD821-C3C5-4D29-802E-60D8CD8F67DF@mac.com> Terry I have never done web work before and taught myself using a mac based programme Rapid Weaver. It really is a great programme and very easy to learn ? it must be for me to use it! Not expensive either (Free I think for up to 5 pages.) Then around ?50 for the programme. They also have a superb forum where you can get answers to problems very quickly. http://www.realmacsoftware.com/rapidweaver/ Kelvin http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com On 6 Oct 2009, at 09:23, Tgoldensection at aol.com wrote: > I'm new to this site and would like to learn a website programme, > have you > had any intros on this subject? > > Terry > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com From ehitchins at aol.com Tue Oct 6 20:59:13 2009 From: ehitchins at aol.com (ehitchins at aol.com) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:59:13 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] ReSaturday IPhoto Session Message-ID: <8CC14D69C8FBACB-311C-13D1D@webmail-d008.sysops.aol.com> Hope to be there Eric Hitchins From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 7 03:09:03 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:09:03 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> Sorry this is such a late reply to this thread - long story. If both of your machines are set to leave the email on the server for long enough for the other one to download a copy, then it might just be a Virgin problem. I assume you ticked the tick box next to "Remove copy from server after retrieving a message:". I presume also that you have only one account and that there aren't actually two email addresses here. See what happens if you use the Virgin webmail page to read your email. Ken Nathan Crosby wrote: > Thanks Ken this sounded logical but when I checked, both machine > settings were 'After one week" > Any more ideas? > > Nathan > > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 02:47, Ken Hamer wrote: > >> I suspect that what's happening is that the email client >> on one or both of your machines has had its config changed by someone >> and has started to delete email from the server immediately after >> downloading instead of leaving it on the server long enough for the >> other machine to download the same emails. >> >> Nathan Crosby wrote: >> >>> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? >>> I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. >>> They used to be duplicated but not anymore. >>> I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. >>> If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. >>> >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 07:59:38 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:59:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC Message-ID: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> Good though my ibook is I am being seriously tempted by a new Macbook Pro . What is the best way of transferring my info across as I would like to keep the system as " clean " as possible. Also I remember the debate on Applecare warranties from Ebay but how did it conclude ? Are they legal & proper. Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Wed Oct 7 07:59:43 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:59:43 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <87372142-8EF6-47EB-88A4-01C1C3AF5C4F@virgin.net> Yes Ken, box ticked. I have one account and one email address. I checked the Virgin Webmail page and as far as I could see, all the mail was there. But, for instance, your email appeared on my iMac but has not appeared on my Macbook. I'll check with the Virgin help line. Thanks for your input. Nathan On 7 Oct 2009, at 03:09, Ken Hamer wrote: > Sorry this is such a late reply to this thread - long story. If > both of > your machines are set to leave the email on the server for long enough > for the other one to download a copy, then it might just be a Virgin > problem. I assume you ticked the tick box next to "Remove copy from > server after retrieving a message:". I presume also that you have > only > one account and that there aren't actually two email addresses here. > See what happens if you use the Virgin webmail page to read your > email. > From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Wed Oct 7 08:20:55 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:20:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <22F913BB-045B-4F5D-A33E-7299F051F31C@virgin.net> Hope you don't mind me joining in - I have a similar problem! But doesn't ticking the box "remove copy from server after retrieving message" mean that the next machine is unable to get a message already read by the previous machine? However my receiving or not receiving message results seen inconsistent eg I got your message this morning on all machines. Ken Arnoldi > ticked the tick box next to "Remove copy from > server after retrieving a message:" From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 7 08:35:55 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:35:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> References: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <188B2E74-A6D7-4E2E-A037-B5E0761D9509@f2s.com> For me, Migration Assistant every time - brings in Programmes, Accounts, Settings, Preferences and Passwords seamlessly. Robbie On 7 Oct 2009, at 07:59, Alan Williams wrote: Good though my ibook is I am being seriously tempted by a new Macbook Pro . What is the best way of transferring my info across as I would like to keep the system as " clean " as possible. Also I remember the debate on Applecare warranties from Ebay but how did it conclude ? Are they legal & proper. Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 08:51:25 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:51:25 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <188B2E74-A6D7-4E2E-A037-B5E0761D9509@f2s.com> References: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> <188B2E74-A6D7-4E2E-A037-B5E0761D9509@f2s.com> Message-ID: <23DFCBE1-6BB3-4861-873F-7F3A73ED6BD7@asw6000.plus.com> Yes but wont this also bring any accumulated bugs problems etc with the ex system ? On 7 Oct 2009, at 08:35, Robbie Murray wrote: > For me, Migration Assistant every time - brings in Programmes, > Accounts, Settings, Preferences and Passwords seamlessly. > > > Robbie > > > > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 7 09:04:35 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:04:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <23DFCBE1-6BB3-4861-873F-7F3A73ED6BD7@asw6000.plus.com> References: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> <188B2E74-A6D7-4E2E-A037-B5E0761D9509@f2s.com> <23DFCBE1-6BB3-4861-873F-7F3A73ED6BD7@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <3DA0740E-07CF-448B-82A7-A185DFA481DF@f2s.com> It doesn't pull across any part of the actual system - just the personalisation and programmes and personal data, and applies them to the system in the new machine. http://www.apple.com/pro/tips/migration.html Robbie On 7 Oct 2009, at 08:51, Alan Williams wrote: Yes but wont this also bring any accumulated bugs problems etc with the ex system ? On 7 Oct 2009, at 08:35, Robbie Murray wrote: > For me, Migration Assistant every time - brings in Programmes, > Accounts, Settings, Preferences and Passwords seamlessly. > > > Robbie > > > > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 7 09:13:01 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:13:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> References: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <55EBAFF9-1F83-4068-89F4-4A9C4871A769@durrant.co.uk> I have bought Applecare on eBay for four systems now - two iMacs, a MacBook and a MacBook Pro. In all cases, I chose sellers with good feedback for previous Applecare sales. The one problem I had was with someone selling a boxed Applecare package, where they'd made a mistake and it didn't include the code - and I got a swift refund. For the sellers where I just got emailed the code, it has all worked fine. And at Also I remember the > debate on Applecare warranties from Ebay but how did it conclude ? > Are they legal & proper. From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Wed Oct 7 09:17:02 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:17:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 5 Oct 2009, at 23:21, Nathan Crosby wrote: > Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? > I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. > They used to be duplicated but not anymore. > I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. > If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. Nathan (and other people with a similar setup), The best thing to do if you check your email on multiple computers is to use IMAP instead of POP - that is what IMAP is for. With IMAP you basically see the same email setup on whichever computer you look at, because all of your email is stored on the server. I'm not sure if Virgin offer IMAP, I know NTL used to - worth asking them though. -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 7 09:25:06 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:25:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 12" Alu vs 15" Ti In-Reply-To: References: <5A31B8FE-AE76-4F42-8A22-34133470493D@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Paul I think I would miss the large wide screen of the Ti. I'm still awaiting the arrival of the 1Ghz Ti - so I will cobble a top notch Ti out of the two and keep the higher spec one. I do like the Ti's. Simon On 6 Oct 2009, at 14:00, Paul Durrant wrote: > The extra 128MB of Ram possible on the 12" PBG4 is insignificant, IMO. > > The faster memory bus might make a difference, but I think that the > extra processor speed will more than make up for that, especially > since the Ti has the 1MB level 3 DDR memory. > > Whatever difference there is in performance is going to be very small. > Even if the 12" was marginally faster for your uses, I think the > bigger screen would more than make up for it. > > > Paul > > On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:48, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Paul >> >> Would the extra video RAM and better video card out way the higher >> RAM >> limit and faster system bus? >> >> Bear in mind my TiBook is my main Mac so it gets everything from >> Photoshop and Illustrator work to audio and video processing. >> >> Simon >> >> On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:27, Paul Durrant wrote: >> >>> The 1GHz Titanium Powerbook is clearly the better machine unless you >>> need extreme portability. >>> >>> Having the Mobility Radeon 9000 video chip will make the display >>> faster. Having Gigabit ethernet is a big plus for home networking. >>> And >>> the bigger screen! And the DVI out instead of VGA. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> On 6 Oct 2009, at 10:06, Simon Royal wrote: >>> >>>> It's comparison time again. I've got a 1Ghz TiBook coming (it >>>> needs a >>>> little work and a few donor parts from my Ti) and I might be in >>>> with a >>>> chance of a 12" Aluminium PowerBook and wondered how they compared >>>> to >>>> the Titanium. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 10:35:42 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:35:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac Message-ID: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> Thanks for that Robbie -I will try it. Going to Norwich tomorrow & will probably buy in John Lewis.Wish I got one in Boston recently they were ?800 for the Macbook Pro, about ?100 cheaper but I was worried about customs . regards Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 10:38:01 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:38:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <55EBAFF9-1F83-4068-89F4-4A9C4871A769@durrant.co.uk> References: <29C2D779-FA3A-43CD-8864-43495A5843EB@asw6000.plus.com> <55EBAFF9-1F83-4068-89F4-4A9C4871A769@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Thanks Paul @ that price its worth it . regards On 7 Oct 2009, at 09:13, Paul Durrant wrote: > > For the sellers where I just got emailed the code, it has all worked > fine. And at doing! > > > > regards, > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 7 11:08:17 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:08:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac In-Reply-To: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> References: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: Well, you will get a 2 year warranty! Or there's that little place in Chapelfield .....? Or PC World .... Personally, I always buy refurb from Apple - worthwhile savings and have never had a problem..... Robbie On 7 Oct 2009, at 10:35, Alan Williams wrote: Thanks for that Robbie -I will try it. Going to Norwich tomorrow & will probably buy in John Lewis.Wish I got one in Boston recently they were ?800 for the Macbook Pro, about ?100 cheaper but I was worried about customs . regards Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 12:43:24 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:43:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac In-Reply-To: References: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: Yes I've been checking the refurbs but they dont seem to have the lower end Macbooks. On 7 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Robbie Murray wrote: > Well, you will get a 2 year warranty! > > Or there's that little place in Chapelfield .....? > > Or PC World .... > > Personally, I always buy refurb from Apple - worthwhile savings and > have never had a problem..... > > > Robbie > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Wed Oct 7 12:43:30 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (nathan crosby) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:43:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks David but this has only been happening since Virgin changed their system. Nathan On 7 Oct 2009, at 09:17, David Reynolds wrote: > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 23:21, Nathan Crosby wrote: > >> Does anyone else using virgin.net have a mail problem? >> I receive different emails on my macbook than I do on my iMac. >> They used to be duplicated but not anymore. >> I know Virgin have been changing their mail systems. >> If I only check one computer I am missing some emails. > > Nathan (and other people with a similar setup), > > The best thing to do if you check your email on multiple computers is > to use IMAP instead of POP - that is what IMAP is for. > > With IMAP you basically see the same email setup on whichever computer > you look at, because all of your email is stored on the server. > > I'm not sure if Virgin offer IMAP, I know NTL used to - worth asking > them though. > > -- > David Reynolds > david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 7 12:46:13 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:46:13 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <22F913BB-045B-4F5D-A33E-7299F051F31C@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> <22F913BB-045B-4F5D-A33E-7299F051F31C@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4ACC7F85.5090908@stackyard.org> Yes, ticking the box allows you to select a delay time from the drop-down menu. If you don't tick the box, your email will never be deleted from the server and eventually, you will overflow your quota. Ken Arnoldi wrote: > Hope you don't mind me joining in - I have a similar problem! > > But doesn't ticking the box "remove copy from server after retrieving > message" > mean that the next machine is unable to get a message already read by > the previous machine? > > However my receiving or not receiving message results seen > inconsistent eg > I got your message this morning on all machines. > > Ken Arnoldi > > >> ticked the tick box next to "Remove copy from >> server after retrieving a message:" >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Wed Oct 7 12:49:33 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:49:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <11722514-132A-4FCB-AD0D-05AD41BF8405@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> On 7 Oct 2009, at 12:43, nathan crosby wrote: > Thanks David but this has only been happening since Virgin changed > their system. It's still worth considering - POP isn't really designed for what you are trying to do with it. -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 7 12:52:54 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:52:54 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <87372142-8EF6-47EB-88A4-01C1C3AF5C4F@virgin.net> References: <4ACAA1C0.2040504@stackyard.org> <8BEB11CB-0F69-45E2-A5A7-B52128EB157A@virgin.net> <4ACBF83F.4060605@stackyard.org> <87372142-8EF6-47EB-88A4-01C1C3AF5C4F@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4ACC8116.5030402@stackyard.org> If an email message appears on one machine and not the other, log into the Virgin webmail page and see if the message is there. If it is, it sounds like some sort of communication problem between your machine and Virgin. If it isn't, it really sounds like the first machine is telling the server to delete immediately. Nathan Crosby wrote: > Yes Ken, box ticked. I have one account and one email address. > I checked the Virgin Webmail page and as far as I could see, all the > mail was there. > But, for instance, your email appeared on my iMac but has not appeared > on my Macbook. I'll check with the Virgin help line. > Thanks for your input. > > Nathan > > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 03:09, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Sorry this is such a late reply to this thread - long story. If >> both of >> your machines are set to leave the email on the server for long enough >> for the other one to download a copy, then it might just be a Virgin >> problem. I assume you ticked the tick box next to "Remove copy from >> server after retrieving a message:". I presume also that you have >> only >> one account and that there aren't actually two email addresses here. >> See what happens if you use the Virgin webmail page to read your >> email. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 7 12:56:29 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:56:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac In-Reply-To: References: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <6FF5DF7E-1686-4585-B791-634E812AD659@durrant.co.uk> Bear in mind that there have been several recent rumours to the effect that the low end MacBook is going to be updated with a new model within the next month. It is only rumour, so might not happen. But the low end MacBook has been revised in October or early November in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2008. (not 2005). Mostly in second half of October, once as late as 8th November. Given the way the weeks fall this year, I'd be surprised if we don't see an update on or before 3rd November. See http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#MacBook for details. regards, Paul On 7 Oct 2009, at 12:43, Alan Williams wrote: > Yes I've been checking the refurbs but they dont seem to have the > lower end Macbooks. > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Robbie Murray wrote: > >> Well, you will get a 2 year warranty! >> >> Or there's that little place in Chapelfield .....? >> >> Or PC World .... >> >> Personally, I always buy refurb from Apple - worthwhile savings and >> have never had a problem..... >> >> >> Robbie >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > Alan Williams > alan at asw6000.plus.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 7 13:09:14 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:09:14 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Mail problems In-Reply-To: <11722514-132A-4FCB-AD0D-05AD41BF8405@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> References: <11722514-132A-4FCB-AD0D-05AD41BF8405@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> Message-ID: <4ACC84EA.1080600@stackyard.org> I've not really had an issue with POP3 when using multiple machines. The ability to delete messages later SHOULD work fine if your email provider isn't playing silly wotsits. I've got 6 accounts with 2 services and they all work fine on multiple machines with delayed message delete. The other thing people who have ISPs with unreliable email can do is to open an email account with someone like MobileMe (yes, ok there's a charge), GoogleMail or Yahoo (both free). The last two, despite being free, allow the setup of POP download and I believe Google allows IMAP as well. The other advantage is that you can change your ISP when you get fed up with it and don't have to change your email address. Ken David Reynolds wrote: > On 7 Oct 2009, at 12:43, nathan crosby wrote: > > >> Thanks David but this has only been happening since Virgin changed >> their system. >> > > It's still worth considering - POP isn't really designed for what you > are trying to do with it. > > From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 7 13:31:33 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:31:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac In-Reply-To: References: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <9D4D1331-B44B-448A-B754-8EA7FDC7CB0E@f2s.com> It's a waiting game, as the stock can change daily, but worth it if you're not desperate. Robbie On 7 Oct 2009, at 12:43, Alan Williams wrote: Yes I've been checking the refurbs but they dont seem to have the lower end Macbooks. On 7 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Robbie Murray wrote: > Well, you will get a 2 year warranty! > > Or there's that little place in Chapelfield .....? > > Or PC World .... > > Personally, I always buy refurb from Apple - worthwhile savings and > have never had a problem..... > > > Robbie > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 7 13:38:13 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:38:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac In-Reply-To: <9D4D1331-B44B-448A-B754-8EA7FDC7CB0E@f2s.com> References: <7184295F-2635-4EB5-9B9A-AA83905152F0@asw6000.plus.com> <9D4D1331-B44B-448A-B754-8EA7FDC7CB0E@f2s.com> Message-ID: I am desperate , I also hear what Paul says about revised models & I dont care . regards On 7 Oct 2009, at 13:31, Robbie Murray wrote: > It's a waiting game, as the stock can change daily, but worth it if > you're not desperate. > > > Robbie > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > Alan Williams > alan at asw6000.plus.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From brian at clearlight.uk.net Wed Oct 7 14:38:13 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:38:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new MAC In-Reply-To: <55EBAFF9-1F83-4068-89F4-4A9C4871A769@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: I bought iMac applecare from an eBay seller with a 99% record and 5 figure sales record. The number I applied worked - but then (curiously after posting here) was queried by Apple who wanted proof of purchase. (Not an ebay receipt but the original applecare receipt. Alternatively the serial number from the box). I emailed the seller through eBay messaging and was told that yes they had had problems and this meant a new number was being allocated - which I then received. The online registration cannot be re enetered though and Apple will not reset the applecare status. I waited a month or more as the Apple email originally said it would be rendered void if not supported by meeting demands - and I thought this would 'reset the system' and allow me to enter the new number. But what actually occurred is that the status remains 'pending verification' and the eBay seller has been deleted from eBay records entirely. EBay themselves will have nothing to do with it and will not even comment - as it is beyond the period within which they set in their terms. Now it just maybe that I bought from a hacked eBay account. But I have no way of proceeding that I can justify in terms of time and money - so it is money lost. (Though the second number I was sent may well be completely kosher) I feel that the same seller is simply operating under a new name - as the items are described and sold in the same way. So I would add from my experience that you either want the boxed product or the serial as well as the reg no. If anyone with a new iMac wants to try the newer number I was given - I cant use it. I haven't any way of communicating with the seller as all communication was via the eBay messaging. The numbers clearly show that many many thousands of applecares are successfully bought and used via these sellers. And I have had four previous instances identical but which did not lead to any issue at all. I'll probably end up buying one somewhere - but I got a bit fed up with the whole thing and put it to one side for a while. Legally Apple could at any time ask for the supporting evidence for an applecare reg but they generally dont. Jon of PC World-Apple warned me off of buying applecare from eBay as they might be stolen. I suspect that was the case or else why would Apple have queried it. Jon also warned me off of buying from John Lewis as their warranty system was entirely separate from Apple's and couldn't be extended with Applecare. The latter is simply not true and he must have been misinformed. In future I will need confirmation that an applecare purchase will provide more than just the reg no. all the best Brian Paul Durrant said recently: > I have bought Applecare on eBay for four systems now - two iMacs, a > MacBook and a MacBook Pro. > > In all cases, I chose sellers with good feedback for previous > Applecare sales. The one problem I had was with someone selling a > boxed Applecare package, where they'd made a mistake and it didn't > include the code - and I got a swift refund. > > For the sellers where I just got emailed the code, it has all worked > fine. And at doing! > > The only exception is if you're eligible for education discount. The > education discount on Applecare is even better than your can get on > eBay. > > regards, > > Paul > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 07:59, Alan Williams wrote: >> Also I remember the >> debate on Applecare warranties from Ebay but how did it conclude ? >> Are they legal & proper. > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From richardivers at mac.com Wed Oct 7 15:11:21 2009 From: richardivers at mac.com (Richard Ivers) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:11:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto Workshop Message-ID: Richard, unfortunately I am now unable to attend the iPhoto workshop on Sat, I have been asked to look after my twin granddaughters who are nearly 12 yrs. Would it be possible to take them along, I know space might be a problem. They are Mac users Regards Richard From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 7 15:17:04 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:17:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] Google and Barcodes Message-ID: <32521837-62FB-4CB5-8C06-E0A4B54FE71B@durrant.co.uk> Today is the 57th anniversary of the issuing of the first patent for barcodes. Google's icon has changed to a bar code. I happen to have a USB barcode scanner. Printing out the Google home page and scanning it with the scanner does indeed produce "Google". Nice to see that Google pays attention to the technical details. Paul (Yes, completely off-topic. Well, except that my barcode scanner works very nicely with my Mac!) From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 7 18:01:49 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:01:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm pretty certain we'd all want the club to be open to every Mac user - no age or other discrimination here! Space shouldn't be a problem on Saturday - I expect comfortable numbers unless we get a late rush. On 7 Oct 2009, at 15:11, Richard Ivers wrote: > Richard, unfortunately I am now unable to attend the iPhoto workshop > on Sat, I have been asked to look after my twin granddaughters who are > nearly 12 yrs. Would it be possible to take them along, I know space > might be a problem. They are Mac users > Regards > Richard Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Wed Oct 7 20:07:46 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:07:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] FileFault Message-ID: <91737488-6004-4800-8DE9-A80EF525370E@ntlworld.com> Hi, just wondered if anyone is using FileFault on their Mac, and if you switch it on can you switch it off if you change your mind. Kerin From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 7 20:11:44 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:11:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] FileFault In-Reply-To: <91737488-6004-4800-8DE9-A80EF525370E@ntlworld.com> References: <91737488-6004-4800-8DE9-A80EF525370E@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Did you mean: FileVault On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:07, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Hi, > just wondered if anyone is using FileFault on their Mac, and if you > switch it on can you switch it off if you change your mind. > > Kerin > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 7 20:14:23 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:14:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] Google and Barcodes In-Reply-To: <32521837-62FB-4CB5-8C06-E0A4B54FE71B@durrant.co.uk> References: <32521837-62FB-4CB5-8C06-E0A4B54FE71B@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <8C344B8A-8475-4CC8-861D-F4141BDABC6C@mac.com> On 7 Oct 2009, at 15:17, Paul Durrant wrote: > Today is the 57th anniversary of the issuing of the first patent for > barcodes. For Baked Beans cans? > > Google's icon has changed to a bar code. > > I happen to have a USB barcode scanner. Printing out the Google home > page and scanning it with the scanner does indeed produce "Google". > > Nice to see that Google pays attention to the technical details. > > Paul > > (Yes, completely off-topic. Well, except that my barcode scanner works > very nicely with my Mac!) As does Google! Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Wed Oct 7 20:14:04 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:14:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] FileFault In-Reply-To: References: <91737488-6004-4800-8DE9-A80EF525370E@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Prat yes I did 'FileVault' On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:11, Steve Batch wrote: > > Did you mean: FileVault > > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:07, Kerin Westgate wrote: > >> Hi, >> just wondered if anyone is using FileFault on their Mac, and if you >> switch it on can you switch it off if you change your mind. >> >> Kerin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 7 22:55:07 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:55:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination Message-ID: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I am on a mission to have a greater web presence, by having a page on all the latest and greatest social sites (FaceBook, Twitter, MySpace, Bebo) all pointing back to my website. I just Googled my own name - yes I know how sad and self obsessed that sounds - but I was pleasantly surprised and the results were better than they were six months ago. 1. My website. 2. My blog. 3. My LowEndMac column. 4. Not me. 5. Not me. 6. My Twitter page. 7. Not me. 8. A mention to my site from a fellow computer enthusiast. I thought that was pretty good going, but it is not enough. What else can I do to achieve web domination, without having to pay for it obviously? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 7 23:07:40 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:07:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> You have got to be joking, I've been on a mission to remove my web presence, I don't wan't people collecting my personal details from the web, you might think I am being paranoid but I ran an example for someone a few weeks back, all I knew about her to begin with was her online nickname/handle and what country she was from using this I was able to run various searches and eventually had her name, photos of her, age, current email, where she worked, working hours, mobile phone number, names of her friends/co workers, where she went to school, map/ satellite image of her home. Steve. On 7 Oct 2009, at 22:55, Simon Royal wrote: > I am on a mission to have a greater web presence From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 7 23:17:13 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:17:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> Message-ID: <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve I am trying every avenue to get further up the online ladder. I am doing pretty well so far. I take the attitude, it is going to be pretty hard to fight having your details online so why do it. Grab it with both hands, embrace it, run with it, use it your advantage. I even tried to write my own Wikipedia page, but you are not allowed auto-biographical pages. It got pulled off within minutes. As you can tell I am a little self obsessed. Simon On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:07, Steve Batch wrote: > > You have got to be joking, I've been on a mission to remove my web > presence, I don't wan't people collecting my personal details from the > web, you might think I am being paranoid but I ran an example for > someone a few weeks back, all I knew about her to begin with was her > online nickname/handle and what country she was from using this I was > able to run various searches and eventually had her name, photos of > her, age, current email, where she worked, working hours, mobile phone > number, names of her friends/co workers, where she went to school, > map/ > satellite image of her home. > > Steve. > > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 22:55, Simon Royal wrote: > >> I am on a mission to have a greater web presence > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 7 23:25:11 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:25:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> The way I understand it is that the more sites that link back to your sites the higher google will rate your site in it's searches, so having good content that people will want to link to is the key. Steve. On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:17, Simon Royal wrote: > I am trying every avenue to get further up the online ladder. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 7 23:33:41 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:33:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6A981795-766F-48D9-85C3-E8758EABC914@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve The content is there and ever growing. Simon On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:25, Steve Batch wrote: > > The way I understand it is that the more sites that link back to your > sites the higher google will rate your site in it's searches, so > having good content that people will want to link to is the key. > > Steve. > > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:17, Simon Royal wrote: > >> I am trying every avenue to get further up the online ladder. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 7 23:43:26 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:43:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <6A981795-766F-48D9-85C3-E8758EABC914@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> <6A981795-766F-48D9-85C3-E8758EABC914@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Have you tried vlogging on youtube? On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:33, Simon Royal wrote: > The content is there and ever growing. From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Wed Oct 7 23:52:42 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:52:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8DD08ADF-937F-4377-A127-7337C04A053D@mac.com> I think that you are absolutely spot on Steve. These links from other websites are the key and that you should contact others ? if you have a good website others will want to link to you ? and you them. Use google analytics or another site stat counter and that will prove the point. Kelvin On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:25, Steve Batch wrote: > > The way I understand it is that the more sites that link back to your > sites the higher google will rate your site in it's searches, so > having good content that people will want to link to is the key. > > Steve. From macman at f2s.com Thu Oct 8 00:20:01 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:20:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> Message-ID: I'd like to know how 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' and other similar would-be contacts all got a hold of my Skype name at the same time and wanted to be my friend! Robbie On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:07, Steve Batch wrote: You have got to be joking, I've been on a mission to remove my web presence, I don't wan't people collecting my personal details from the web, you might think I am being paranoid but I ran an example for someone a few weeks back, all I knew about her to begin with was her online nickname/handle and what country she was from using this I was able to run various searches and eventually had her name, photos of her, age, current email, where she worked, working hours, mobile phone number, names of her friends/co workers, where she went to school, map/ satellite image of her home. Steve. On 7 Oct 2009, at 22:55, Simon Royal wrote: > I am on a mission to have a greater web presence From richardivers at mac.com Thu Oct 8 08:23:06 2009 From: richardivers at mac.com (Richard Ivers) Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:23:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] FileFault In-Reply-To: References: <91737488-6004-4800-8DE9-A80EF525370E@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <84C77AF2-5920-4B4F-835F-AE7737188899@mac.com> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.4/en/mh1908.html Go to the above address Regards Richard On 7 Oct 2009, at 20:14, Kerin Westgate wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> just wondered if anyone is using FileFault on their Mac, and if you >>> switch it on can you switch it off if you change your mind. >>> >>> Kerin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 8 09:06:55 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:06:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <8DD08ADF-937F-4377-A127-7337C04A053D@mac.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <36FE6DB0-36B2-4B58-BBF1-1D040267E474@simonroyal.co.uk> <83D3C279-4297-4825-BE43-ADD68668C7C8@gmail.com> <8DD08ADF-937F-4377-A127-7337C04A053D@mac.com> Message-ID: Kelvin I am gaining links from other sites. I've been around all the Mac sites and offered link swapping and it seems to be working. I have used Google Analytics for about two years and I had a drop in traffic about a year ago, but it has steadily inclined over the last few months to an all time high. I am sure this is due to my LowEndMac column and new content on my site, plus the redesign and links from other sites. Maybe I am just being greedy, but I want better and more traffic, better and more web presence. I am going to see if I can write for other websites and not just Mac related ones, as my LEM column has done me wonders, as it always offers a link back to my site. Simon On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:52, Kelvin Youngs wrote: > I think that you are absolutely spot on Steve. > > These links from other websites are the key and that you should > contact others ? if you have a good website others will want to link > to you ? and you them. > Use google analytics or another site stat counter and that will prove > the point. > > Kelvin > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 23:25, Steve Batch wrote: > >> >> The way I understand it is that the more sites that link back to your >> sites the higher google will rate your site in it's searches, so >> having good content that people will want to link to is the key. >> >> Steve. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From brian at clearlight.uk.net Thu Oct 8 09:16:49 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:16:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] FileFault In-Reply-To: <84C77AF2-5920-4B4F-835F-AE7737188899@mac.com> Message-ID: It converts your whole user folder into and encrypted disk image. This is to put all your eggs into one basket. I would reckon generally that it would be better to use custom encrypted sparse disk image or images only for the data that you feel is sensitive. Unless almost all the data is confidential at a level that demands higher protection. But then you really need a considered rotating back up also. Disk image files can become corrupted. hope this helps regards Brian Richard Ivers said recently: >>>> just wondered if anyone is using FileFault on their Mac, and if you >>>> switch it on can you switch it off if you change your mind. From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Thu Oct 8 11:39:45 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:39:45 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> Message-ID: > > HEY ! You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this conversation! martin From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Thu Oct 8 12:57:11 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (nathan crosby) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:57:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> She told me I was the only one! Nathan On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Martin Fry wrote: > >> >> HEY ! > > You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this > conversation! > > martin > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From macman at f2s.com Thu Oct 8 13:05:44 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:05:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> Message-ID: Well if you're both looking after her, I'll withdraw .... .... or would "end the relationship" be more appropriate? :-) Robbie On 8 Oct 2009, at 12:57, nathan crosby wrote: She told me I was the only one! Nathan On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Martin Fry wrote: > >> >> HEY ! > > You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this > conversation! > > martin > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From h.tamplin at btinternet.com Thu Oct 8 14:01:13 2009 From: h.tamplin at btinternet.com (Heather Tamplin) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:01:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> Message-ID: <336B74FE-EA4B-4E13-A9DE-2BED024F9D91@btinternet.com> I have something you boys need to know - she also writes to me ....... Heather On 8 Oct 2009, at 13:05, Robbie Murray wrote: > Well if you're both looking after her, I'll withdraw .... > > .... or would "end the relationship" be more appropriate? > > :-) > > > Robbie > > > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 12:57, nathan crosby wrote: > > She told me I was the only one! > > Nathan > > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Martin Fry wrote: > >> >>> >>> HEY ! >> >> You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this >> conversation! >> >> martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug Heather Tamplin www.heathertamplin.co.uk "Art is the only way to run away without leaving home." Twyla Tharp From alan at asw6000.plus.com Thu Oct 8 14:39:02 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:39:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac Message-ID: Just got back from Norwich with my gleaming new Macbook Pro , well I think its gleaming its still in the box. I bought in John Lewis but was surprised that ALL their Macs come with Leopard & that they wanted ?25 for the Snow Leopard disc. A gentle push & mention of Chapelfield & they caved in & gave me the disc for free however. Now wheres the scissors & what did Robbie say about migration assistant ..... Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Thu Oct 8 15:01:28 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 15:01:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <336B74FE-EA4B-4E13-A9DE-2BED024F9D91@btinternet.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> <336B74FE-EA4B-4E13-A9DE-2BED024F9D91@btinternet.com> Message-ID: <95428317-9E75-46F3-BEEF-48A5753591CF@virgin.net> Oh no. Not a PC user! Nathan On 8 Oct 2009, at 14:01, Heather Tamplin wrote: > I have something you boys need to know - she also writes to me ....... > > > > Heather > > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 13:05, Robbie Murray wrote: > >> Well if you're both looking after her, I'll withdraw .... >> >> .... or would "end the relationship" be more appropriate? >> >> :-) >> >> >> Robbie >> >> >> >> On 8 Oct 2009, at 12:57, nathan crosby wrote: >> >> She told me I was the only one! >> >> Nathan >> >> >> On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Martin Fry wrote: >> >>> >>>> >>>> HEY ! >>> >>> You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this >>> conversation! >>> >>> martin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >>> listinfo/nmug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug > > Heather Tamplin > > www.heathertamplin.co.uk > > "Art is the only way to run away without leaving home." > Twyla Tharp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From macman at f2s.com Thu Oct 8 16:57:35 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 16:57:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Web Domination In-Reply-To: <336B74FE-EA4B-4E13-A9DE-2BED024F9D91@btinternet.com> References: <37386A9B-3912-4F54-89C1-59D954A4E911@simonroyal.co.uk> <1EEF4F42-C55C-4203-B0C9-4B54BCDC5F85@gmail.com> <7BE3E5CF-F72B-46B6-ACFF-484E5536441D@virgin.net> <336B74FE-EA4B-4E13-A9DE-2BED024F9D91@btinternet.com> Message-ID: <9A9DCF87-7AA8-4133-B490-A4D0F1EBBE19@f2s.com> Obviously enjoys a bit of variety! Robbie On 8 Oct 2009, at 14:01, Heather Tamplin wrote: I have something you boys need to know - she also writes to me ....... Heather On 8 Oct 2009, at 13:05, Robbie Murray wrote: > Well if you're both looking after her, I'll withdraw .... > > .... or would "end the relationship" be more appropriate? > > :-) > > > Robbie > > > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 12:57, nathan crosby wrote: > > She told me I was the only one! > > Nathan > > > On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Martin Fry wrote: > >> >>> >>> HEY ! >> >> You leave my friend 'lovelyjuicyladyseekingfun' out of this >> conversation! >> >> martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug Heather Tamplin www.heathertamplin.co.uk "Art is the only way to run away without leaving home." Twyla Tharp _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Thu Oct 8 18:55:42 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 18:55:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new Mac Message-ID: <36DD0331-1B2D-4BCD-BBD7-A6C523E73494@asw6000.plus.com> Further to my prev email it would appear that John Lewis were talking rubbish - my MBP is already running 10.6 which I am sure is Snow Leopard so the extra boxed disc they have given me is superfluous . Glad I never paid the ?25 they wanted. Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From jinshinjewels at googlemail.com Fri Oct 9 08:32:34 2009 From: jinshinjewels at googlemail.com (Jules Slaughter) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:32:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Saturday Message-ID: Dear Richard I'm going to have to miss tomorrow's session much to my regret. I'm going on hols on Monday and am beginning to lag behind with all I need to do before hand. Sorry but hope to see you at the next one. Kind regards -- Jules From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Fri Oct 9 10:29:37 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:29:37 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Google Car Spotted Message-ID: Hi. Just travelling along the Watton Road (B1108) towards Watton and the Google camera car drove past the other way. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) From sc at davidviner.com Fri Oct 9 10:32:52 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:32:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Google Car Spotted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ACF0344.8080205@davidviner.com> Well, you wanted a higher web profile - what better than appearing on Google Street View ;-) Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. Just travelling along the Watton Road (B1108) towards Watton and the Google camera car drove past the other way. > > Simon > > --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Fri Oct 9 11:12:52 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:12:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Google Car Spotted In-Reply-To: <4ACF0344.8080205@davidviner.com> References: <4ACF0344.8080205@davidviner.com> Message-ID: David Just wish I was at my house when it snapped a pic and I would have stood outside with a massive banner with my web address on it. :) Simon On 9 Oct 2009, at 10:32, David Viner wrote: > Well, you wanted a higher web profile - what better than appearing on > Google Street View ;-) > > Simon Royal wrote: >> Hi. Just travelling along the Watton Road (B1108) towards Watton >> and the Google camera car drove past the other way. >> >> Simon >> >> --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 9 18:37:12 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:37:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word Message-ID: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? Kerin From mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk Fri Oct 9 18:45:48 2009 From: mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk (Michael Woodhouse) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:45:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <486BFB1C-E875-472A-8EC5-1A63E36421FE@freeflightsupplies.co.uk> I have all three and use MS Office in preference to IWorks, practice is probably the reason. I have Open Office but I have not really explored it fully, but it looks good. Michael Woodhouse mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ On 9 Oct 2009, at 18:37, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S > Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > > Kerin > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From rrandlesome at mac.com Fri Oct 9 18:59:54 2009 From: rrandlesome at mac.com (Richard Randlesome) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:59:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <432F1C39-034A-4AE5-B403-31B4F14D49E6@mac.com> Kerin I use Word, iWork, Appleworks and Nisus Writer and have done for many years. Richard On 9 Oct 2009, at 18:37, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S > Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > > Kerin > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 9 19:25:56 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:25:56 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Conection Message-ID: <942E2C76-6A43-41AB-BD56-3A3035927954@ntlworld.com> Hi, does anyone else have this problem, Within the family we have several PC's plus my Macbook, I use a Time Capsule for the net and storage, Now I can connect and view,copy photo's from the Time Capsule (T/C) with no slowing of speed but my wife's laptop (Vista Ultimate) with enough memory and processor speed is really slow to view and copy photo's from the T/C. Have I missed a setting somewhere on her laptop. or is it the Apple to Apple is better than Windows to Apple :) Kerin From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 9 19:26:02 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:26:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: I like iWork and have made the leap of faith from excel to numbers but I keep an old copy of MS Office around incase iWork fails me. for example, a company asked that I sent my C.V. in MS Word format, no problem I thought I'll just export the file as MS Word format... but unfortunately this just made a mess of the document and I ended up having to recreate the C.V. using MS Word. I did trial OpenOffice but really didn't get on with it. Steve. On 9 Oct 2009, at 18:37, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S > Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Fri Oct 9 19:34:42 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:34:42 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> In this order: 1. iWork - normal docs, invoices, etc. - mostly exported to PDF for later reference/printing on multiple OS machines. 2. OpenOffice - for most other stuff - such as spreadsheets - need to use on multiple OSes 3. MS Office - for when people send me weird stuff to figure out which was created in Word, e.g. doctoral theses where page format is critical 4. vi - preferred editor for creating ordinary text. I love vi. Have forgotten a lot of it but still love it. Ken Kerin Westgate wrote: > Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S > Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > > Kerin > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 9 19:37:53 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:37:53 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Conection In-Reply-To: <942E2C76-6A43-41AB-BD56-3A3035927954@ntlworld.com> References: <942E2C76-6A43-41AB-BD56-3A3035927954@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <13D56DA1-A888-4BFB-B168-7F090A4BCFB9@gmail.com> There are several possibilities for why there might be speed differences, are you connecting to the time capsule wirelessly or over a cable? If using WIFI you may be connected using the Airport's 802.11n while your wife's laptop may only be capable of connecting at 802.11g??? Steve. On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:25, Kerin Westgate wrote: > my wife's laptop (Vista Ultimate) > with enough memory and processor speed is really slow to view and copy > photo's from the T/C. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 9 19:39:30 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:39:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> oh dear... On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:34, Ken Hamer wrote: > I love vi From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 9 19:50:02 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:50:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Conection In-Reply-To: <13D56DA1-A888-4BFB-B168-7F090A4BCFB9@gmail.com> References: <942E2C76-6A43-41AB-BD56-3A3035927954@ntlworld.com> <13D56DA1-A888-4BFB-B168-7F090A4BCFB9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <17286E3B-3059-490B-93B5-4253C0EE06E2@ntlworld.com> Thanx looks like that could be it, her laptop connects 802.11g <-- Oh well have wait until I can afford her MacBook Pro :) Many thanx On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:37, Steve Batch wrote: > > There are several possibilities for why there might be speed > differences, are you connecting to the time capsule wirelessly or over > a cable? If using WIFI you may be connected using the Airport's > 802.11n while your wife's laptop may only be capable of connecting at > 802.11g??? > > Steve. > > > On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:25, Kerin Westgate wrote: > >> my wife's laptop (Vista Ultimate) >> with enough memory and processor speed is really slow to view and >> copy >> photo's from the T/C. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Fri Oct 9 20:04:13 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4ACF892D.4000809@stackyard.org> Yes, I know - sad and proud of it. ZZ Steve Batch wrote: > oh dear... > > > On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:34, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> I love vi >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From munkt0n at gmail.com Fri Oct 9 20:04:50 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 20:04:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Steve Batch wrote: > oh dear... > > > On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:34, Ken Hamer wrote: > >> I love vi > ha! the best thing about vi is it's almost 100% guaranteed to be installed on any linux/unix machine, the worst bit is the RSI and the urge to keep hitting esc then w every few seconds when editing with anything else (hence the signature) -- :wq From david at vanedwards.co.uk Fri Oct 9 19:15:47 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:15:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: I have all three too, I prefer Apple works for wordprocessing I have to use Excel for spreadsheet because it allows more cells. PowerPoint because I'm used to it. OpenOffice irritates me because it takes so long to open via Xterm and ends up looking like Word. Word irritates because of its illiterate drop down menus with meaningless terms and rows of unreadable icons instead of keystrokes. Best wishes, David >Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S >Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > >Kerin >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sat Oct 10 00:27:18 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:27:18 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> <4ACF8242.6040102@stackyard.org> <2C6CAFA7-2970-4022-B1BC-9787EFFD966B@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4ACFC6D6.8040309@stackyard.org> Yes, fantastic, isn't it! ZZ (easier than typing :wq) Ken Scott Matthews wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Steve Batch wrote: > >> oh dear... >> >> >> On 9 Oct 2009, at 19:34, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> >>> I love vi >>> > > ha! the best thing about vi is it's almost 100% guaranteed to be > installed on any linux/unix machine, the worst bit is the RSI and the > urge to keep hitting esc then w every few seconds when editing with > anything else (hence the signature) > > From tobiasarnup at onetel.com Sat Oct 10 08:14:17 2009 From: tobiasarnup at onetel.com (Tobias Arnup) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:14:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Richard, Can I be part of a late rush please.... Tobias On 7 Oct 2009, at 18:01, Richard Nevill wrote: Space shouldn't be a problem on Saturday - I expect comfortable numbers unless we get a late rush. From ricnev at mac.com Sat Oct 10 08:18:18 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:18:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhoto Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Of course - see you later. On 10 Oct 2009, at 08:14, Tobias Arnup wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Can I be part of a late rush please.... > Tobias > > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 18:01, Richard Nevill wrote: > > Space shouldn't be a problem on Saturday - I expect comfortable > numbers unless we get a late rush. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 10 09:33:02 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:33:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word Message-ID: Hi. A bit late, but I havent used MS Office for years. For quick word processing I use Bean or Abiword. For heavy word processing or spreadsheeting I use OpenOffice. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) - original message - Subject: Re: [NMUG] Word From: David Van Edwards Date: 09/10/2009 19:05 I have all three too, I prefer Apple works for wordprocessing I have to use Excel for spreadsheet because it allows more cells. PowerPoint because I'm used to it. OpenOffice irritates me because it takes so long to open via Xterm and ends up looking like Word. Word irritates because of its illiterate drop down menus with meaningless terms and rows of unreadable icons instead of keystrokes. Best wishes, David >Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S >Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > >Kerin >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ghowells at f2s.com Sat Oct 10 10:32:25 2009 From: ghowells at f2s.com (G.Howells) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:32:25 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> References: <55D73F66-4C3E-4D69-908E-41536554D4C7@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Hi. I did try Open Office when using Leopard and found it useful for opening a .docx attachment that someone sent me that even my older Microsoft Word wouldn't open! BUT while Open Office was open it resulted it the computer freezing on a number of occasions and made me wonder whether there were conflicts with one or more other programs. I eventually removed it from my HD because it seemed to open up in preference to Word when a .doc arrived! For me open Office wasn't worth the hassle. I have used AppleWorks for many years since having my first Apple computer. It's now upgraded to the final version (a few years ago) and still works well with Snow Leopard. Word (from M/s Office) comes in handy very occasionally for sending things to organisations that are more likely to use it! But Word always seems more of a bother to use - doesn't seem as simple for the user as AppleWorks. I think my trial copy of Apple iWorks did open .docx documents, but it hasn't seemed worth the expense yet of buying the complete version, especially as I already had Keynote (and there was always a very simple presentation prog as part of AppleWorks!!!) >Hi, just wondered who use which Office set ie Apple's iWork, M/S >Office or Open Office etc on there Mac and why? > >Kerin >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From davidenglish at mac.com Sat Oct 10 12:11:09 2009 From: davidenglish at mac.com (David English) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:11:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Word In-Reply-To: <9445465951037235517434088000672975549-Webmail@me.com> References: <9445465951037235517434088000672975549-Webmail@me.com> Message-ID: <612380066255835139942574505697252332-Webmail@me.com> Thanks Simon Bean is just what I have been looking for in a word processor for a long time. Straight forward clear easy to use without all the clutter and stupid cleaver stuff that 'word' especially imposes. Time to write the book...no excuse left! David From ehitchins at aol.com Sat Oct 10 14:25:55 2009 From: ehitchins at aol.com (ehitchins at aol.com) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:25:55 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Worshop Message-ID: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> Ricahard Thank you for this mornings iPhoto session, I, as I am sure others there, found it useful It seems a shame that more don't support these events, if others feel that they already know more these sessions offer then perhaps by attending they could provide useful input for those that do attend Eric Hitchins From ricnev at mac.com Sat Oct 10 14:55:49 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:55:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> Message-ID: <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> On 10 Oct 2009, at 14:25, ehitchins at aol.com wrote: > Richard > > Thank you for this mornings iPhoto session, I, as I am sure others > there, found it useful > > It seems a shame that more don't support these events, if others feel > that they already know more these sessions offer then perhaps by > attending they could provide useful input for those that do attend > > Eric Hitchins > > Thanks for your comments. I thought it was a lively, probing, illuminating session this morning and I'm glad it was found to be useful. With regard to the numbers, I think it is not necessarily how many attend which makes the session work, its more about the willingness of the attendees to participate. Those there today were good at participating - the fact that the end of the session came round so quickly was a measure of this. I've always found than between 7 and around 14 is a good size to generate participation but still have some degree of structure to a course. 7 or so also provides enough income to cover the room hire and refreshments etc. There were a fair few who wanted to come today but for a variety of reasons just could not make it. If they had been there, we would have been around 15 strong, which I think would have demonstrated a very healthy level of support. Regards, Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From ricnev at mac.com Sat Oct 10 15:10:27 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:10:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple iPhoto on-line Tutorials Message-ID: As a follow-up to this morning's iPhoto Workshop, here is a link to the on-line Apple tutorials we discussed: http://www.apple.com/ilife/tutorials/#iphoto If any participants have any more questions about iPhoto, please ask away here on our forum - we'll all learn from your explorations. Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From penguinsplj at me.com Sat Oct 10 15:10:18 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:10:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> Message-ID: A question arose at the workshop today about date changing of files. This would be useful if say the date on your digital camera was wrong and after importing into programs like iPhoto the photo appeared in the wrong area. Within iPhoto it is possible to change the date but this only worked within iPhoto but I was sure that I had seen a similar question before on another forum. I have since investigated and found that there is a program called Reveal that will allow you to change the "EXIF info". It is free so I downloaded and experimented with it. I had a picture that in "Get Info" said it was created October 5th 2009 18.46 so opened it in Reveal. I edited the date and time but going back to "Get Info" didn't show any changes. I imported the file into iPhoto and it showed the changed date and this new date also showed up in the "Info" when opened in PhotoShop. Maybe someone who knows about these things can explain why I appeared to have changed the date and time on a file such that various programs recognise this new date rather than the original date but doing "Get Info" on the file itself still shows the original date. Does "Get Info" access other details? This program Reveal does seem to be a useful program as it can help you edit not just the date but also information like all the exposure details. Download it from here: Paul C From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Sat Oct 10 15:31:45 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (nathan crosby) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:31:45 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> Message-ID: <77801BA0-B9BE-41FA-8D6A-625D9845585D@virgin.net> There are various reasons why the Exif date on a photograph shouldn't be altered. Entering a competition that stipulated only recent pictures, for instance, or in a court of law where the date was important. I suppose it would be a bit like altering the milage on a second hand car before selling it. Nathan On 10 Oct 2009, at 15:10, Paul Chapman wrote: > A question arose at the workshop today about date changing of files. > This would be useful if say the date on your digital camera was wrong > and after importing into programs like iPhoto the photo appeared in > the wrong area. Within iPhoto it is possible to change the date but > this only worked within iPhoto but I was sure that I had seen a > similar question before on another forum. I have since investigated > and found that there is a program called Reveal that will allow you to > change the "EXIF info". It is free so I downloaded and experimented > with it. > > I had a picture that in "Get Info" said it was created October 5th > 2009 18.46 so opened it in Reveal. I edited the date and time but > going back to "Get Info" didn't show any changes. I imported the file > into iPhoto and it showed the changed date and this new date also > showed up in the "Info" when opened in PhotoShop. Maybe someone who > knows about these things can explain why I appeared to have changed > the date and time on a file such that various programs recognise this > new date rather than the original date but doing "Get Info" on the > file itself still shows the original date. Does "Get Info" access > other details? > > This program Reveal does seem to be a useful program as it can help > you edit not just the date but also information like all the exposure > details. Download it from here: > > > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From penguinsplj at me.com Sat Oct 10 16:04:40 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:04:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: <77801BA0-B9BE-41FA-8D6A-625D9845585D@virgin.net> References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> <77801BA0-B9BE-41FA-8D6A-625D9845585D@virgin.net> Message-ID: On Oct 10, 2009, at 15:31, nathan crosby wrote: > There are various reasons why the Exif date on a photograph > shouldn't be altered. Entering a competition that stipulated only > recent pictures, for instance, > or in a court of law where the date was important. I understand that but as in the circumstances to the question posed this morning, if the camera's own dating is wrong then the information attached to the file is meaningless. My personal experience has been that a good percentage of digital cameras do not have the date and/or time set correctly and for many this does not matter. It's only when they are imported into programs that sort by date that the problems occur. I cannot believe that a court of law could reliably use the dating on digital photos whether they could be altered after the picture has been taken or not. Paul C From minkennison at mac.com Sat Oct 10 17:58:12 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:58:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple iPhoto on-line Tutorials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <90755195-7913-463A-B387-0DA674A76B3F@mac.com> Hi Richard Let me add my thanks to you for leading the workshop this morning: It was informative and useful: Thanks also for the tutorial link: It will be very useful to us to recap and hone our knowledge. See you next month Min On 10 Oct 2009, at 15:1010 Oct 2009, Richard Nevill wrote: > As a follow-up to this morning's iPhoto Workshop, here is a link to > the on-line Apple tutorials we discussed: > > http://www.apple.com/ilife/tutorials/#iphoto > > If any participants have any more questions about iPhoto, please ask > away here on our forum - we'll all learn from your explorations. > > > Richard Nevill > ricnev at mac.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From david at vanedwards.co.uk Sat Oct 10 23:02:12 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:02:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG iPhoto learners Workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Richard, Thank you for organising the iPhoto workshop today, we found it very useful to talk through some of the issues that had been troubling us. Best wishes, David and Thea -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Sun Oct 11 10:34:44 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:34:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> Message-ID: <40BF6818-A650-4055-B453-F6D30EAEB498@virgin.net> Hello All, Thanks Paul, and others for info on 'Reveal' It works, and is simple. Moreover if one is sure of the date and time a photo was taken (despite what date the camera records) it can save later family arguments! Ken Arnoldi On 10 Oct 2009, at 15:10, Paul Chapman wrote: > This program Reveal does seem to be a useful program as it can help > you edit not just the date but also information like all the exposure > details. Download it from here: From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Sun Oct 11 10:38:12 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:38:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Re Saturday Workshop In-Reply-To: References: <8CC17C454E3DFA2-2970-1AE5D@webmail-m100.sysops.aol.com> <512D82F4-36E5-47D9-AC6B-3A902B81147F@mac.com> <77801BA0-B9BE-41FA-8D6A-625D9845585D@virgin.net> Message-ID: IIRC there is software on the market that can either "seal" or verify that the data in an image hasn't been tampered with. Obviously if you are using RAW.... On 10 Oct 2009, at 16:04, Paul Chapman wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2009, at 15:31, nathan crosby wrote: > >> There are various reasons why the Exif date on a photograph >> shouldn't be altered. Entering a competition that stipulated only >> recent pictures, for instance, >> or in a court of law where the date was important. > > I understand that but as in the circumstances to the question posed > this morning, if the camera's own dating is wrong then the information > attached to the file is meaningless. My personal experience has been > that a good percentage of digital cameras do not have the date and/or > time set correctly and for many this does not matter. It's only when > they are imported into programs that sort by date that the problems > occur. > > I cannot believe that a court of law could reliably use the dating on > digital photos whether they could be altered after the picture has > been taken or not. > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From lizbarnard at btinternet.com Sun Oct 11 10:59:50 2009 From: lizbarnard at btinternet.com (Liz) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:59:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Iphoto workshop Message-ID: I missed the Saturday workshop as I am flat on my back with a slipped disc. Could I ?phone one of you for a debrief? Liz From tobiasarnup at onetel.com Sun Oct 11 15:49:10 2009 From: tobiasarnup at onetel.com (Tobias Arnup) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:49:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] a quick look Message-ID: I read somewhere recently (perhaps on the list) , that there was a quick way to have a look at what was in a file without having to fully open an application to do so. Does anyone know what I mean? Tobias From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 11 15:52:07 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:52:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] a quick look In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0BD5CA2E-76E8-470C-A5FC-470610393AA6@simonroyal.co.uk> Tobias If you are using Leopard or Snow Leopard you can press the space bar and it will preview the item. Simon On 11 Oct 2009, at 15:49, Tobias Arnup wrote: > I read somewhere recently (perhaps on the list) , that there was a > quick way to have a look at what was in a file without having to fully > open an application to do so. > Does anyone know what I mean? > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From tobiasarnup at onetel.com Sun Oct 11 16:05:21 2009 From: tobiasarnup at onetel.com (Tobias Arnup) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:05:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] a quick look In-Reply-To: <0BD5CA2E-76E8-470C-A5FC-470610393AA6@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <0BD5CA2E-76E8-470C-A5FC-470610393AA6@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: thanks, that was it - so simple Tobias On 11 Oct 2009, at 15:52, Simon Royal wrote: Tobias If you are using Leopard or Snow Leopard you can press the space bar and it will preview the item. Simon On 11 Oct 2009, at 15:49, Tobias Arnup wrote: > I read somewhere recently (perhaps on the list) , that there was a > quick way to have a look at what was in a file without having to fully > open an application to do so. > Does anyone know what I mean? > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From richardivers at mac.com Sun Oct 11 16:33:18 2009 From: richardivers at mac.com (Richard Ivers) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:33:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] a quick look In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3719F595-F5AB-4A8B-ABEC-CFB19AB7B1FD@mac.com> Tobias, if u are using Finder u can also use the icon which looks like an eye to the right of the views icons in the toolbar. Regards Richard On 11 Oct 2009, at 15:49, Tobias Arnup wrote: > I read somewhere recently (perhaps on the list) , that there was a > quick way to have a look at what was in a file without having to fully > open an application to do so. > Does anyone know what I mean? > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From michelehurst at mac.com Sun Oct 11 16:42:04 2009 From: michelehurst at mac.com (Michele Hurst) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:42:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Happy mac week!! Message-ID: Well gone a bit mad this week. New 32G iphone comes tomorrow and snow leopard plus ilife & iwork 09 due any day. Guess I'll be having a very busy happy mac week!!!!! michele Michele Hurst michelehurst at mac.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 11 18:01:01 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:01:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Happy mac week!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7D934135-A81E-4D97-AA2B-8EBD63230B9F@gmail.com> Show off! :D Are you upgrading your phone or are you new to the iPhone? Steve. On 11 Oct 2009, at 16:42, Michele Hurst wrote: > New 32G iphone comes tomorrow and snow leopard plus ilife & iwork 09 > due any day. From minkennison at mac.com Sun Oct 11 18:24:46 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:24:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Iphoto workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8CBC27B4-A91C-4B5D-93A7-DA9EA6AADC4D@mac.com> Hi Liz Sorry to hear you are not well. By all means phone . I shall be around alll day tomorrow if that is any help Min (01953 607471 or Mob 07770 611841) On 11 Oct 2009, at 10:5911 Oct 2009, Liz wrote: > I missed the Saturday workshop as I am flat on my back with a > slipped disc. > Could I ?phone one of you for a debrief? > > Liz > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 12 11:22:26 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:22:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Internet On PowerBook Message-ID: <9003E04A-A2E0-4238-A6E6-E4BB77A93D0B@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. Over the past week my internet has been painfully slow on my PowerBook. At first I thought it was our broadband, but everyone else seems to be running at normal speed. It takes ages for Safari to load any pages and emails are slow to come in to using Mail. I haven't changed anything on my PowerBook nor my HomeHub. Any ideas? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From michelehurst at mac.com Mon Oct 12 12:04:03 2009 From: michelehurst at mac.com (Michele Hurst) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:04:03 -0700 Subject: [NMUG] re happy mac week Message-ID: <44090722809867714526005802875061998424-Webmail@me.com> Hi Steve Am new to iphone and still trying to work out where the sim goes!!!!! MIchele From ricnev at mac.com Mon Oct 12 13:04:40 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:04:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Internet On PowerBook In-Reply-To: <9003E04A-A2E0-4238-A6E6-E4BB77A93D0B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <9003E04A-A2E0-4238-A6E6-E4BB77A93D0B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <1975F0E7-42B5-41EC-9502-56DCBC86250B@mac.com> On 12 Oct 2009, at 11:22, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > Over the past week my internet has been painfully slow on my > PowerBook. At first I thought it was our broadband, but everyone else > seems to be running at normal speed. > > It takes ages for Safari to load any pages and emails are slow to come > in to using Mail. I haven't changed anything on my PowerBook nor my > HomeHub. > > Any ideas? > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > No ideas, but I have been experiencing a large attack of 'slowness' on my MacBook Pro using WiFi over recent days. I have a BT HomeHub 2, and, like you, other machines (1 Wintel laptop, 1 Mac Mini) seem to be unaffected. I'm off to Chapelfields tomorrow to see a Genius about other matters. I'll see if he has any suggestions, but WiFi is such a black art, I don't expect any easy answers. If he has any clues to offer, I'll let you know. Richard. From dvg at f2s.com Mon Oct 12 13:23:05 2009 From: dvg at f2s.com (David Gregory) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:23:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow internet on PowerBook Message-ID: <31414BDD-0E3A-4A88-A5A3-5D7B588DE8D4@f2s.com> Hi My broadband went haywire on Sunday, 4th October and has been amiss the last week. Sometimes, briefly, okay but usually in the range 1<4 of a possible 15 on the Open Internet Display when it was previously around 10 out of 15. I'm with f2s and running an iMac David Gregory dvg at f2s.com From band1 at mac.com Mon Oct 12 15:04:23 2009 From: band1 at mac.com (David King) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:04:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iplayer downloader Message-ID: <52E6EEB6-4C27-4BD0-A9F7-E816F51489D5@mac.com> I see that new updates are available for both iPlayer Downloader and iPlayer grabber. Both seem to work ok now. David From penguinsplj at me.com Mon Oct 12 18:04:31 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:04:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iplayer downloader In-Reply-To: <52E6EEB6-4C27-4BD0-A9F7-E816F51489D5@mac.com> References: <52E6EEB6-4C27-4BD0-A9F7-E816F51489D5@mac.com> Message-ID: <6A7B4B9C-26F2-4F12-BD7B-DD21F5193431@me.com> On Oct 12, 2009, at 15:04, David King wrote: > I see that new updates are available for both iPlayer Downloader and > iPlayer grabber. Both seem to work ok now. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! Paul C From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 12 18:12:52 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:12:52 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard For Sale Message-ID: Hi. If anyone is interested in buying my Snow Leopard disc, I have just listed it on eBay. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170393751424 Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 12 20:15:22 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:15:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard and Guest Accounts Message-ID: There are reports circulating about a serious bug to do with guest accounts and Snow Leopard. If you have Snow Leopard, /do not/ log in with the guest account, and disable the guest account to make sure that no-one does log in with it. Under some circumstances, it seems that your entire user folder can get deleted when logging out of the guest account. http://www.macrumors.com/2009/10/12/snow-leopard-bug-responsible-for-loss-of-user-data-gaining-notice/ regards, Paul From peterforrester at waitrose.com Tue Oct 13 14:59:23 2009 From: peterforrester at waitrose.com (Peter Forrester) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:59:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Internet Message-ID: <007C9298-06DF-470E-88C9-E57266CB4DCA@waitrose.com> We've had some very erratic broadband speeds lately. We've been on BT option 1 for about a year but having only acquired an intel iMac and Leopard this summer I hadn't gained much from it. Have only used BBC IPlayer Desktop twice. On the first occasion a 1 hour programme downloaded in a little over an hour; on the second it took rather more than 10 hours. I've used Broadband Beginners Guide to check speeds fairly regularly since (and others occasionally). The best speeds we rarely achieve are 3.23 and 0.33Mb. The download speed is usually between 1.7 and 2.7Mb but on the 28th September it started at 392Kb (251Kb up) rose to 464 and 356Kb in the afternoon but dropped to 144 and 46Kb in the early evening. Later in the evening the speed check refused to download at all. We are very much out in the sticks near Roman Camp in North Norfolk. How do others in the wilds fare? Peter And belated thanks for last Saturdays iPhoto session! From h.tamplin at btinternet.com Tue Oct 13 15:21:19 2009 From: h.tamplin at btinternet.com (Heather Tamplin) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:21:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Internet In-Reply-To: <007C9298-06DF-470E-88C9-E57266CB4DCA@waitrose.com> References: <007C9298-06DF-470E-88C9-E57266CB4DCA@waitrose.com> Message-ID: <887ED2A5-119F-4964-A3ED-92F2F3FF0BC9@btinternet.com> I am in Aldborough -access for me is through the Hanworth exchange, always had reasonable speeds average 3 - 3.35mbs upload iplayer is used to list3en live to the radio I am on an older dual non intel imac and BT option 1 Broadband Heather On 13 Oct 2009, at 14:59, Peter Forrester wrote: > We've had some very erratic broadband speeds lately. We've been on BT > option 1 for about a year but having only acquired an intel iMac and > Leopard this summer I hadn't gained much from it. Have only used BBC > IPlayer Desktop twice. On the first occasion a 1 hour programme > downloaded in a little over an hour; on the second it took rather more > than 10 hours. > > I've used Broadband Beginners Guide to check speeds fairly regularly > since (and others occasionally). The best speeds we rarely achieve > are 3.23 and 0.33Mb. The download speed is usually between 1.7 and > 2.7Mb but on the 28th September it started at 392Kb (251Kb up) rose > to 464 and 356Kb in the afternoon but dropped to 144 and 46Kb in the > early evening. Later in the evening the speed check refused to > download at all. > > We are very much out in the sticks near Roman Camp in North Norfolk. > How do others in the wilds fare? > > Peter > > And belated thanks for last Saturdays iPhoto session! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug Heather Tamplin www.heathertamplin.co.uk "Art is the only way to run away without leaving home." Twyla Tharp From macman at f2s.com Tue Oct 13 17:22:35 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:22:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Slow Internet In-Reply-To: <887ED2A5-119F-4964-A3ED-92F2F3FF0BC9@btinternet.com> References: <007C9298-06DF-470E-88C9-E57266CB4DCA@waitrose.com> <887ED2A5-119F-4964-A3ED-92F2F3FF0BC9@btinternet.com> Message-ID: <85C79B38-4E8D-4BC1-ACAD-783EE2CBA727@f2s.com> Whatever your speed, iPlayer Grabber/iPlayer Downloader should be much faster than iPlayer, due, I am told to the files being lower resolution and suitable for iPod/iPhone etc. Whether or not this is the case, I find the quality perfectly acceptable on my 20" iMac, and unlike iPlayer, you can keep them forever..... Robbie On 13 Oct 2009, at 14:59, Peter Forrester wrote: > We've had some very erratic broadband speeds lately. We've been on BT > option 1 for about a year but having only acquired an intel iMac and > Leopard this summer I hadn't gained much from it. Have only used BBC > IPlayer Desktop twice. On the first occasion a 1 hour programme > downloaded in a little over an hour; on the second it took rather more > than 10 hours. From dvg at f2s.com Tue Oct 13 19:57:20 2009 From: dvg at f2s.com (dvg at f2s.com) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:57:20 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] colour coded cables Message-ID: <1255460240.4ad4cd906426c@webmail.freedom2surf.net> Hi I have started to install a Maplin ADSL/phone surface Box (A94CQ) but on opening the present box find the cables are coloured Black, White, Green and Orange - not the usual colour coding. Black and Green aren't used. Can anyone suggest how the colours should be connencted between points 2 through to 5 in the Maplin adaptor? David Gregory From mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk Tue Oct 13 21:46:39 2009 From: mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk (Michael Woodhouse) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:46:39 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spam Message-ID: Guys Am I alone? I get plenty of rubbish but a new kid on the block has appeared. From the Internal Revenue Service with the subject line underreported Income. This is starting to be a pain and I wondered if this was general or just for me! Michael Woodhouse mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Tue Oct 13 21:52:28 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:52:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5AD08596-7073-4C89-9292-A0600EED9E5C@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> Michael, On 13 Oct 2009, at 21:46, Michael Woodhouse wrote: > Am I alone? I get plenty of rubbish but a new kid on the block has > appeared. > > From the Internal Revenue Service with the subject line underreported > Income. > > This is starting to be a pain and I wondered if this was general or > just for me! Yep, I've had loads of these over the past couple of days too. Very annoying... -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From Stuartrichards at fastmail.fm Tue Oct 13 22:23:27 2009 From: Stuartrichards at fastmail.fm (Stuart Richards) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:23:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Michael I average about 15 a day ! which automatically get assigned to the trash. At the end of the day I check the trash just to ensure there have been no mistakes. I received an "Internal Revenue Service" spam some time ago which was a phishing e-Mail which was immediately deleted. Stuart Richards stuartrichards at fastmail.fm On 13 Oct 2009, at 21:46, Michael Woodhouse wrote: Guys Am I alone? I get plenty of rubbish but a new kid on the block has appeared. From the Internal Revenue Service with the subject line underreported Income. This is starting to be a pain and I wondered if this was general or just for me! Michael Woodhouse mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From steve.forst at virgin.net Tue Oct 13 22:48:08 2009 From: steve.forst at virgin.net (Steve Forster) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:48:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Yep me too, about 20 a day for the last 3 days. -- Steve Forster From: Stuart Richards Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:23:27 +0100 To: Norwich Mac User Group list Subject: Re: [NMUG] Spam Michael I average about 15 a day ! which automatically get assigned to the trash. At the end of the day I check the trash just to ensure there have been no mistakes. I received an "Internal Revenue Service" spam some time ago which was a phishing e-Mail which was immediately deleted. Stuart Richards stuartrichards at fastmail.fm On 13 Oct 2009, at 21:46, Michael Woodhouse wrote: Guys Am I alone? I get plenty of rubbish but a new kid on the block has appeared. From the Internal Revenue Service with the subject line underreported Income. This is starting to be a pain and I wondered if this was general or just for me! Michael Woodhouse mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 13 23:22:33 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:22:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? Message-ID: Hi. With the Apple world wrapped up in Snow Leopard and its updates, do we think Apple will release anymore updates for Leopard? I have searched and couldn't find any reference to 10.5.9 being released or being sent to developers. Previous versions of OSX have been updated while a new one is out to ensure compatibility. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 14 08:06:21 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:06:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would expect Apple to continue releasing security updates and bug fixes for Leopard until 10.7 is out. regards, Paul On 13 Oct 2009, at 23:22, Simon Royal wrote: > With the Apple world wrapped up in Snow Leopard and its updates, do we > think Apple will release anymore updates for Leopard? > > I have searched and couldn't find any reference to 10.5.9 being > released or being sent to developers. Previous versions of OSX have > been updated while a new one is out to ensure compatibility. > From kevin at sanderling.co.uk Wed Oct 14 08:08:10 2009 From: kevin at sanderling.co.uk (Kevin Allenby) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:08:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9c83344f0910140008q56059ecfkcd680ed916ffdcea@mail.gmail.com> I now put my email through googlemail which is very efficient at stopping most spam - I don't usually get more than a couple a day now (used to be over 100) and have not seen the Inland Revenue one at all. Kevin 2009/10/13 Steve Forster > Yep me too, about 20 a day for the last 3 days. > -- > Steve Forster > > > > > From: Stuart Richards > Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:23:27 +0100 > To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Subject: Re: [NMUG] Spam > > Michael > > I average about 15 a day ! which automatically get assigned to the > trash. At the end of the day I check the trash just to ensure there > have been no mistakes. > > I received an "Internal Revenue Service" spam some time ago which > was a phishing e-Mail which was immediately deleted. > > Stuart Richards > > stuartrichards at fastmail.fm > > On 13 Oct 2009, at 21:46, Michael Woodhouse wrote: > > Guys > > Am I alone? I get plenty of rubbish but a new kid on the block has > appeared. > > From the Internal Revenue Service with the subject line underreported > Income. > > This is starting to be a pain and I wondered if this was general or > just for me! > > Michael Woodhouse > mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk > http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 14 08:58:31 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:58:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> Paul So would I. When Leopard was released we still had point updates for Tiger. Some were to fix compatibility issues between the two. However since Snow Leopard, Apple seems to have spoke nothing of Leopard. Simon On 14 Oct 2009, at 08:06, Paul Durrant wrote: > I would expect Apple to continue releasing security updates and bug > fixes for Leopard until 10.7 is out. > > regards, > > Paul > > On 13 Oct 2009, at 23:22, Simon Royal wrote: >> With the Apple world wrapped up in Snow Leopard and its updates, do >> we >> think Apple will release anymore updates for Leopard? >> >> I have searched and couldn't find any reference to 10.5.9 being >> released or being sent to developers. Previous versions of OSX have >> been updated while a new one is out to ensure compatibility. >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 14 10:30:08 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:30:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> I wonder if Mac OS 11 will be a completely new operating system, perhaps with a 3D interface? Tom Simon Royal wrote: > Paul > > So would I. When Leopard was released we still had point updates for > Tiger. Some were to fix compatibility issues between the two. > > However since Snow Leopard, Apple seems to have spoke nothing of > Leopard. > > Simon > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 08:06, Paul Durrant wrote: > > >> I would expect Apple to continue releasing security updates and bug >> fixes for Leopard until 10.7 is out. >> >> regards, >> >> Paul >> >> On 13 Oct 2009, at 23:22, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> With the Apple world wrapped up in Snow Leopard and its updates, do >>> we >>> think Apple will release anymore updates for Leopard? >>> >>> I have searched and couldn't find any reference to 10.5.9 being >>> released or being sent to developers. Previous versions of OSX have >>> been updated while a new one is out to ensure compatibility. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From michelehurst at mac.com Wed Oct 14 12:11:04 2009 From: michelehurst at mac.com (Michele Hurst) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:11:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow leopard and g4 power book Message-ID: Oh dear Just bought. This before checking and think it may not be ok for my 17" g4 PowerBook. Have also bought iphoto and iLife 09. Anyone know before I do anything wrong? Thanks Michele Sent from Michele's iPhone From alan at asw6000.plus.com Wed Oct 14 12:18:58 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:18:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow leopard and g4 power book In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think it only works on an intel mac. regards Alan On 14 Oct 2009, at 12:11, Michele Hurst wrote: > Oh dear > Just bought. This before checking and think it may not be ok for my > 17" g4 PowerBook. Have also bought iphoto and iLife 09. Anyone know > before I do anything wrong? > Thanks > Michele > > Sent from Michele's iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 14 12:21:33 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:21:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow leopard and g4 power book In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <446CFC4C-12A0-4B75-9615-82D4E28E4EA0@simonroyal.co.uk> Michelle Snow Leopard requires an Intel Mac. It won't work on a PowerBook. Simon On 14 Oct 2009, at 12:11, Michele Hurst wrote: > Oh dear > Just bought. This before checking and think it may not be ok for my > 17" g4 PowerBook. Have also bought iphoto and iLife 09. Anyone know > before I do anything wrong? > Thanks > Michele > > Sent from Michele's iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From david at vanedwards.co.uk Wed Oct 14 13:41:30 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:41:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Repeat emails Message-ID: Ah, I've now found that I'm getting two copies of EVERY email so it's obviously not an NMUG setting but guess who! Virgin of course!! Best wishes, David -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 14 16:11:23 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:11:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: A lot of research has been done on interface design and while a 3D interface sounds good people who have done the research find that 3D is more of a gimmick than useful, instead developing better ways to interact with the interface is more useful, so perhaps OS11 will be completely controlled with hand gestures and voice commands... Steve. On 14 Oct 2009, at 10:30, Tom Kershaw wrote: > I wonder if Mac OS 11 will be a completely new operating system, > perhaps > with a 3D interface? From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 14 16:13:59 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:13:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve Call me old fashioned, but that would put me off. I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms around like a Nintendo Wii. Simon On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:11, Steve Batch wrote: > A lot of research has been done on interface design and while a 3D > interface sounds good people who have done the research find that 3D > is more of a gimmick than useful, instead developing better ways to > interact with the interface is more useful, so perhaps OS11 will be > completely controlled with hand gestures and voice commands... > > Steve. > > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 10:30, Tom Kershaw wrote: > >> I wonder if Mac OS 11 will be a completely new operating system, >> perhaps >> with a 3D interface? > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 14 16:32:58 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:32:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] colour coded cables In-Reply-To: <1255460240.4ad4cd906426c@webmail.freedom2surf.net> References: <1255460240.4ad4cd906426c@webmail.freedom2surf.net> Message-ID: <128428E8-ADA9-41F5-B262-778DB72650B6@mac.com> On 13 Oct 2009, at 19:57, dvg at f2s.com wrote: > > Hi > > I have started to install a Maplin ADSL/phone surface Box (A94CQ) > but on opening > the present box find the cables are coloured Black, White, Green and > Orange - > not the usual colour coding. Black and Green aren't used. > > Can anyone suggest how the colours should be connencted between > points 2 through > to 5 in the Maplin adaptor? > > David Gregory This site seems to tell all: http://www.telephonesuk.co.uk/wiring_info.htm Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net Wed Oct 14 16:39:29 2009 From: Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net (Jeremy Webb) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:39:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] 2 old G3 macs Message-ID: <2A91529D-617F-43D5-BEF6-22EDD01745EC@virgin.net> Hi all In doing some clearing out I came across 2 old G3 towers, both appear to be in good nick and I remember them both working although I don't have a spare monitor at the moment to test them with. One of them looks adapted with a different drive of some sort at the rear. They were passed on to me 3 years ago but barely used. If anyone with an interest in old macs would like these for spare parts, components etc I'd be happy to pass them on. I can email a jpeg if anyone wants to contact me off-list, and I'm in NR2 if anyone wants to pick up. I'll offer on Freecycle (oops, I mean Freegle) otherwise. Cheers everyone Jeremy Webb Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Wed Oct 14 17:50:24 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (KEN ARNOLDI) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:50:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Repeat emails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7c0f9d370910140950k3c7b57e0r7a90bd906441ac9@mail.gmail.com> How fortunate you are David!I have in the family, 2 Macs and an iPod Touch, and sometimes I receive from Virgin, an email on all 3 Macs, sometimes, on 2 and sometimes only 1 - or none. When are Virgin going to finish their 'improvements"? Ken Arnoldi 2009/10/14 David Van Edwards > Ah, I've now found that I'm getting two copies of EVERY email so it's > obviously not an NMUG setting but guess who! > > Virgin of course!! > > Best wishes, > > David > -- > The Smokehouse, > 6 Whitwell Road, > Norwich, NR1 4HB > England. > > Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 > Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 14 19:18:10 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:18:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> Yeah agreed, any repetitive task sucks with hand, voice or facial gestures so I guess before they can implement any of these technologies they will have to eliminate repetitive tasks first. Steve. On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:13, Simon Royal wrote: > I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms > around like a Nintendo Wii. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 14 19:20:50 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:20:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve Perhaps we could all have bluetooth or wifi implants and Mac OS11 will be thought controlled. Could be a bit embarrassing when you mind wanders on to naked women. Simon On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:18, Steve Batch wrote: > Yeah agreed, any repetitive task sucks with hand, voice or facial > gestures so I guess before they can implement any of these > technologies they will have to eliminate repetitive tasks first. > > Steve. > > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:13, Simon Royal wrote: > >> I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms >> around like a Nintendo Wii. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk Wed Oct 14 19:29:02 2009 From: mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk (Michael Woodhouse) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:29:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <5E2F1535-53FE-431A-9F1F-192A695C60F4@freeflightsupplies.co.uk> What do you mean, wanders? Michael Woodhouse mike at freeflightsupplies.co.uk http://www.freeflightsupplies.co.uk/ On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:20, Simon Royal wrote: > Steve > > Perhaps we could all have bluetooth or wifi implants and Mac OS11 will > be thought controlled. > > Could be a bit embarrassing when you mind wanders on to naked women. > > Simon > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:18, Steve Batch wrote: > >> Yeah agreed, any repetitive task sucks with hand, voice or facial >> gestures so I guess before they can implement any of these >> technologies they will have to eliminate repetitive tasks first. >> >> Steve. >> >> >> On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:13, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms >>> around like a Nintendo Wii. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Wed Oct 14 19:36:26 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:36:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: mmm naked women. An interesting article on 3DGUI I read a while ago: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/11/apple_working_on_3d_mac_os_x_user_interface_images.html Steve. On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:20, Simon Royal wrote: > Steve > > Perhaps we could all have bluetooth or wifi implants and Mac OS11 will > be thought controlled. > > Could be a bit embarrassing when you mind wanders on to naked women. > > Simon > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:18, Steve Batch wrote: > >> Yeah agreed, any repetitive task sucks with hand, voice or facial >> gestures so I guess before they can implement any of these >> technologies they will have to eliminate repetitive tasks first. >> >> Steve. >> >> >> On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:13, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms >>> around like a Nintendo Wii. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Wed Oct 14 20:15:02 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:15:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <04203757-5683-4F05-80BB-84360CB8B0DE@ntlworld.com> even my wife agrees mmmm naked women Kerin On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:36, Steve Batch wrote: > > mmm naked women. > > An interesting article on 3DGUI I read a while ago: > > http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/11/apple_working_on_3d_mac_os_x_user_interface_images.html > > Steve. > > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:20, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Steve >> >> Perhaps we could all have bluetooth or wifi implants and Mac OS11 >> will >> be thought controlled. >> >> Could be a bit embarrassing when you mind wanders on to naked women. >> >> Simon >> >> On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:18, Steve Batch wrote: >> >>> Yeah agreed, any repetitive task sucks with hand, voice or facial >>> gestures so I guess before they can implement any of these >>> technologies they will have to eliminate repetitive tasks first. >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> >>> On 14 Oct 2009, at 16:13, Simon Royal wrote: >>> >>>> I couldn't cope with browsing through my photos by waving my arms >>>> around like a Nintendo Wii. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 14 20:23:06 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:23:06 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Repeat emails In-Reply-To: <7c0f9d370910140950k3c7b57e0r7a90bd906441ac9@mail.gmail.com> References: <7c0f9d370910140950k3c7b57e0r7a90bd906441ac9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AD6251A.1070108@stackyard.org> A very nasty and sarcastic person might ask "When are Virgin users going to realize where the problem lies and switch to a proper ISP?". I would NEVER, ever say such a thing, of course. The other Ken KEN ARNOLDI wrote: > How fortunate you are David!I have in the family, 2 Macs and an iPod Touch, > and sometimes I receive from Virgin, > an email on all 3 Macs, sometimes, on 2 and sometimes only 1 - or none. > When are Virgin going to finish their 'improvements"? > > Ken Arnoldi > > From bazyoungs at mac.com Wed Oct 14 20:30:28 2009 From: bazyoungs at mac.com (Barry Youngs) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:30:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Repeat emails In-Reply-To: <4AD6251A.1070108@stackyard.org> References: <7c0f9d370910140950k3c7b57e0r7a90bd906441ac9@mail.gmail.com> <4AD6251A.1070108@stackyard.org> Message-ID: Sorry but my brother is in Majorca at the moment!!!!!!! Baz On 14 Oct 2009, at 20:23, Ken Hamer wrote: > A very nasty and sarcastic person might ask "When are Virgin users > going > to realize where the problem lies and switch to a proper ISP?". I > would > NEVER, ever say such a thing, of course. > > The other Ken > From michelehurst at mac.com Wed Oct 14 20:35:40 2009 From: michelehurst at mac.com (Michele Hurst) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:35:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] snow leopard and powerbook Message-ID: <02BD28C3-4540-4509-9D8C-CEC73B9972E4@mac.com> So actually when I thought of selling my powerbook and buying a macbook pro in the summer would have possibly been the right choice after all if Mac have abandoned me!! Michele Michele Hurst michelehurst at mac.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 14 20:43:34 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:43:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] snow leopard and powerbook In-Reply-To: <02BD28C3-4540-4509-9D8C-CEC73B9972E4@mac.com> References: <02BD28C3-4540-4509-9D8C-CEC73B9972E4@mac.com> Message-ID: <081E4107-070B-4EC4-9EEF-5A58660B3DA5@simonroyal.co.uk> Michele Mac have not abandoned you. Mac is a product. Apple has abandoned you and all it's faithful PowerPC users, myself included. At the risk of sparking another 'well they supported PowerPC for long enough' row, there are plenty of PowerPC users still around and those high end G5 owners are being penalised more than us G4 PowerBook users. But this is progress, all be it forced progress. If you want the latest OS, you need the latest hardware. Hey, if you were a follower of the dark side, you could have a six month old PC that still couldn't run Vista properly. Apple moved to Intel nearly 4 years ago and has supported both architectures through out Tiger and Leopard. It is now time to cut its losses, streamline Leopard and rebrand it Snow Leopard and push Intel as the way forward. PowerPC Macs can still run Leopard, a great OS. I know some Intel Mac users who still run Tiger, so not even those who can run it are running it and with the myriad of major problems with it so far it will put a lot of people off of upgrading just yet. Simon On 14 Oct 2009, at 20:35, Michele Hurst wrote: > So actually when I thought of selling my powerbook and buying a > macbook pro in the summer would have possibly been the right choice > after all if Mac have abandoned me!! > Michele > > Michele Hurst > michelehurst at mac.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 14 21:23:40 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:23:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Will There Be A 10.5.9? In-Reply-To: References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <1E02A02D-57B9-46A1-985A-B186F94922E5@simonroyal.co.uk> <11A946EC-963D-4657-9114-88F54714BAC9@gmail.com> <288D2C8A-D89A-46C4-8C1E-37F8389B5149@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: No mention of naked women there that I can see ... Robbie On 14 Oct 2009, at 19:36, Steve Batch wrote: mmm naked women. An interesting article on 3DGUI I read a while ago: http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/11/apple_working_on_3d_mac_os_x_user_interface_images.html Steve. From mghc.repps at virgin.net Wed Oct 14 22:22:23 2009 From: mghc.repps at virgin.net (Michael Crook) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:22:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Duplicate messages Message-ID: <18C06C08-FB62-4ACE-88AE-45877F094046@virgin.net> Over a three minute period today, from 11.43 am to 11.45 am I received 125 emails including 11 junk mails. They were all duplicates of emails I've received over the last fortnight. Yes, you've guessed it. My ISP is Virgin! - Michael. 14.10.09. From david at vanedwards.co.uk Wed Oct 14 22:48:18 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:48:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Repeat emails In-Reply-To: <4AD6251A.1070108@stackyard.org> References: <7c0f9d370910140950k3c7b57e0r7a90bd906441ac9@mail.gmail.com> <4AD6251A.1070108@stackyard.org> Message-ID: Dear Ken, Ah yes, true enough but for us in Norwich the cable option is so good in other respects that I at least have to put up with Virgin ex-NTL. I keep threatening them with leaving if they go ahead with signing up to Phorm and I've had two phonecalls on the subject from them, so they are clearly a little concerned about possible customer reaction. But seriously again the cable option is likely to keep me onboard. But if anyone else is concerned about Phorm I'd certainly encourage them to complain about it to Virgin, who have "only" signed a provisional aggreement with Phorm! http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_roundup/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jul/06/btgroup-privacy-and-the-net Best wishes, David >A very nasty and sarcastic person might ask "When are Virgin users going >to realize where the problem lies and switch to a proper ISP?". I would >NEVER, ever say such a thing, of course. > >The other Ken > >KEN ARNOLDI wrote: >> How fortunate you are David!I have in the family, 2 Macs and an iPod Touch, >> and sometimes I receive from Virgin, >> an email on all 3 Macs, sometimes, on 2 and sometimes only 1 - or none. >> When are Virgin going to finish their 'improvements"? >> >> Ken Arnoldi >> >> >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 15 11:24:40 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:24:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Mac OSX 10.7 Message-ID: <51B5E382-730B-4EC1-93A4-3B45DF550749@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. Well, Snow Leopard is with us and as usual Apple are keeping things under wraps, but it is time to think about the next release, 10.7? What will it bring? Which machines will be cut out this time? What will it's cat name be if any? There isn't any information on the net about it. Windows 8 info has been around for a long time, even though Windows 7 isn't released yet. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From michelehurst at mac.com Thu Oct 15 12:24:24 2009 From: michelehurst at mac.com (Michele Hurst) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:24:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow leopard for sale Message-ID: Hi thanks Simon of course I suppose 5 years which is how long I have had my power book is not bad for a computer! Anyway I have an unused copy for sale if anyone wants it. Otherwise will put on eBay . Have also got ilfe and iWork 09. Best wishes Michele Sent from Michele's iPhone From kevin at sanderling.co.uk Thu Oct 15 13:34:10 2009 From: kevin at sanderling.co.uk (Kevin Allenby) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:34:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Various problems on my Mac Mini Message-ID: <9c83344f0910150534g5e4ee5a9k38d620cbe485bc80@mail.gmail.com> Hi folks - wondered if anyone can shed light on any of these issues - which all seemed to start at the same time! Machine is a Mac Mini about 8 months old (running Leopard). 1 - one of my key programs, Dreamweaver CS4 (a genuine version I should add!) - when opening program, it appears to open normally, but then just closes after about 5 seconds. 2 - copy/paste using cmd C/cmd V doesn't work (always did before) 3 - I can no longer see other machines/external hard drive - they still show in the 'shared' section but say connection failed. I am sucessfully connecting to the internet through the ethernet/router (which should also let me see the other machines) I'm not aware that I've changed anything but who knows! Any thoughts appreciated (I'd normally call in Ken Hamer, but he's away) Thanks Kevin From hidunc at ntlworld.com Thu Oct 15 15:42:53 2009 From: hidunc at ntlworld.com (J L Duncan Bradford) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:42:53 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Virgin Message-ID: <9A984352-99C7-4936-9380-BC818EDDE3E5@ntlworld.com> No, nothing to do with naked women, but... Oddly, apart from it's usual message that it's offline, and demanding a password which I've never set up and which it eventually forgets about anyway, Mail seems to be getting on with Virgin better than ever at the mo. My problem is getting access to my webspace. Virgin's prerecorded message tells me that they are investigating a fault in the NR3 postcode area. Do people in NR1 - NR99 and beyond get their own version of the message? Is there a way of getting rid of the 'going offline until you supply a non-existent password then forgetting all about it for a day or week' behaviour of Mail? And why is it sometimes for one account only - or the other account - or both? Tried most things such as reinstalling from the workplace copy [which works fine, as did mine until about a year ago] so assume it is something Virginal. Really glad I don't get multiple copies though, although they are sometimes a few hours out in reverse order. Just got one timed 10.49 this morning, though I've had 2 from him this aft, on same computer! Aah! Is it something to do with mimicking Royal Mail's backlog... Duncan From dvg at f2s.com Thu Oct 15 18:19:17 2009 From: dvg at f2s.com (David Gregory) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:19:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] NMUG Digest, Vol 69, Issue 32 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <14915886-B623-4A17-97E3-F06B4174E2F7@f2s.com> > > > --------------------------- > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:32:58 +0100 > From: Richard Nevill > Subject: Re: [NMUG] colour coded cables > To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Message-ID: <128428E8-ADA9-41F5-B262-778DB72650B6 at mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > On 13 Oct 2009, at 19:57, dvg at f2s.com wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> I have started to install a Maplin ADSL/phone surface Box (A94CQ) >> but on opening >> the present box find the cables are coloured Black, White, Green and >> Orange - >> not the usual colour coding. Black and Green aren't used. >> >> Can anyone suggest how the colours should be connencted between >> points 2 through >> to 5 in the Maplin adaptor? >> >> David Gregory > > > This site seems to tell all: > > http://www.telephonesuk.co.uk/wiring_info.htm > > > Richard Nevill > ricnev at mac.com > > > > > Richard Thanks for this; all done and dusted Problems sorted and a nice 20% increase in speed. David Gregory dvg at f2s.com From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Thu Oct 15 18:19:33 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:19:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Virgin In-Reply-To: <9A984352-99C7-4936-9380-BC818EDDE3E5@ntlworld.com> References: <9A984352-99C7-4936-9380-BC818EDDE3E5@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Hi, just tried my freespace with Virgin (ntlworld.com) and all seems fine, I'm in NR1. I don't seem to have any spam problems either, I have been wondering if it is working to well and I'm loosing mail should check it out really. Kerin On 15 Oct 2009, at 15:42, J L Duncan Bradford wrote: > No, nothing to do with naked women, but... > Oddly, apart from it's usual message that it's offline, and demanding > a password which I've never set up and which it eventually forgets > about anyway, Mail seems to be getting on with Virgin better than > ever at the mo. > My problem is getting access to my webspace. Virgin's prerecorded > message tells me that they are investigating a fault in the NR3 > postcode area. Do people in NR1 - NR99 and beyond get their own > version of the message? > Is there a way of getting rid of the 'going offline until you supply > a non-existent password then forgetting all about it for a day or > week' behaviour of Mail? And why is it sometimes for one account only > - or the other account - or both? Tried most things such as > reinstalling from the workplace copy [which works fine, as did mine > until about a year ago] so assume it is something Virginal. Really > glad I don't get multiple copies though, although they are sometimes > a few hours out in reverse order. Just got one timed 10.49 this > morning, though I've had 2 from him this aft, on same computer! > Aah! Is it something to do with mimicking Royal Mail's backlog... > Duncan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 15 20:31:21 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:31:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhone On Watchdog Message-ID: Hi. Just watched BBC Watchdog and it gave a slamming report of iPhone users and the so called 'coma' mode. It appears as if your phone is on, but it doesn't accept incoming calls or texts. Apple released an update last week - 3.1.2 - but this hasn't resolved it for everyone. Not a good picture for Apple. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Thu Oct 15 20:41:50 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:41:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhone On Watchdog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: But reading between the lines it seems to effect 3g phones with the update? but do the 3gs phones have the same problem. Kerin On 15 Oct 2009, at 20:31, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > Just watched BBC Watchdog and it gave a slamming report of iPhone > users and the so called 'coma' mode. > > It appears as if your phone is on, but it doesn't accept incoming > calls or texts. Apple released an update last week - 3.1.2 - but this > hasn't resolved it for everyone. > > Not a good picture for Apple. > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 15 20:49:35 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:49:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] iPhone On Watchdog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Kerin They didn't mention specific models, although one of the guys on there said he had had his iPhone for about six months. Mobile phone experts (not sure what one of those is) says it could be down to having too many apps on the machine. Apple countered this by saying it can't be that as the iPhone doesn't really multi task so only one app runs at a time. Whatever the problem Apple need to sort it quickly. Bad news travels fast - especially when the details are sketchy. All people will see is 'iPhones don't work'. Simon On 15 Oct 2009, at 20:41, Kerin Westgate wrote: > But reading between the lines it seems to effect 3g phones with the > update? but do the 3gs phones have the same problem. > Kerin > > > On 15 Oct 2009, at 20:31, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Just watched BBC Watchdog and it gave a slamming report of iPhone >> users and the so called 'coma' mode. >> >> It appears as if your phone is on, but it doesn't accept incoming >> calls or texts. Apple released an update last week - 3.1.2 - but this >> hasn't resolved it for everyone. >> >> Not a good picture for Apple. >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From Tgoldensection at aol.com Fri Oct 16 10:02:19 2009 From: Tgoldensection at aol.com (Tgoldensection at aol.com) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:02:19 EDT Subject: [NMUG] Converting Quark files to Indesign? Message-ID: I have a 180 odd page catalogue currently in quark7 that, if possible (without too much hassle), I'd like to convert to Indesign. Anyone got any tips/experience of such a task? From kevin at sanderling.co.uk Fri Oct 16 10:22:30 2009 From: kevin at sanderling.co.uk (Kevin Allenby) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:22:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] (Even) more probs! Message-ID: <9c83344f0910160222h1a799b28vf0f023b7b3f0f7b3@mail.gmail.com> To add to my previous list of woes, now realise I cannot drag and drop either - eg between Finder windows so cannot move files about - also cannot move icons on the desktop - oh dear! Kevin From ricnev at mac.com Fri Oct 16 10:51:48 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:51:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Various problems on my Mac Mini In-Reply-To: <9c83344f0910150534g5e4ee5a9k38d620cbe485bc80@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c83344f0910150534g5e4ee5a9k38d620cbe485bc80@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I am not expert enough to be able to recommend a solution to Kevin's problem, although I would personally try to repair disk permissions as a first shot. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452?viewlocale=en_US Does the panel think there is any value in running Repair Permissions in these circumstances? Also see: http://www.macworld.com/article/52220/2006/08/repairpermissions.html On 15 Oct 2009, at 13:34, Kevin Allenby wrote: > Hi folks - wondered if anyone can shed light on any of these issues > - which > all seemed to start at the same time! > Machine is a Mac Mini about 8 months old (running Leopard). > > 1 - one of my key programs, Dreamweaver CS4 (a genuine version I > should > add!) - when opening program, it appears to open normally, but then > just > closes after about 5 seconds. > > 2 - copy/paste using cmd C/cmd V doesn't work (always did before) > > 3 - I can no longer see other machines/external hard drive - they > still show > in the 'shared' section but say connection failed. I am sucessfully > connecting to the internet through the ethernet/router (which should > also > let me see the other machines) > > I'm not aware that I've changed anything but who knows! > > Any thoughts appreciated (I'd normally call in Ken Hamer, but he's > away) > Also, on the 16th. October, Kevin wrote: > To add to my previous list of woes, now realise I cannot drag and drop > either - eg between Finder windows so cannot move files about - also > cannot > move icons on the desktop - oh dear! Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From phil.charnley at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 16 20:10:20 2009 From: phil.charnley at ntlworld.com (Phil Charnley) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:10:20 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Gifs Message-ID: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> A little thing, but I can't work it out (and I've googled it and searched the forums). I have a small animated gif file (35 frames) sent to me from a dark side machine. I'd like to incorporate it in a Mail signature, but how? Phil From paul at durrant.co.uk Fri Oct 16 20:20:10 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:20:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Gifs In-Reply-To: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> References: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <04E3E21A-05A3-47CB-84DB-7E01D1B4CF16@durrant.co.uk> Drag & Drop onto the signature window in preferences should do it. regards, Paul On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Phil Charnley wrote: > A little thing, but I can't work it out (and I've googled it and > searched the forums). > > I have a small animated gif file (35 frames) sent to me from a dark > side machine. I'd like to incorporate it in a Mail signature, but how? From penguinsplj at me.com Fri Oct 16 21:15:49 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:15:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] The Apple Store is down, new Macs on the way? Message-ID: Not in the market at the moment but always interested. Paul C From penguinsplj at me.com Fri Oct 16 22:05:46 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:05:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] The Apple Store is down, new Macs on the way? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <720A573C-1C29-4927-B776-03AE94C5AE62@me.com> On Oct 16, 2009, at 21:15, Paul Chapman wrote: > Not in the market at the moment but always interested. Back up again with updates and the new iPods available. No new Macs. Paul C From phil.charnley at ntlworld.com Fri Oct 16 22:41:24 2009 From: phil.charnley at ntlworld.com (Phil Charnley) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:41:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Gifs In-Reply-To: <04E3E21A-05A3-47CB-84DB-7E01D1B4CF16@durrant.co.uk> References: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> <04E3E21A-05A3-47CB-84DB-7E01D1B4CF16@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <332CBF0F-F060-418B-B0A7-0A05FB06918D@ntlworld.com> Nope, can't get that to work, Paul. Have tried every flavour of drag & drop, cut, copy & paste into the signature window that I can think of but it does no more than copy a single image/frame. I can copy the frames in one at a time but all I get is a series of frames in the finished e mail The gif doesn't work in Mail at all, even on the email I received from the dark side. I can only open it in Safari, though oddly it works fine on the iPhone. Its a trivial issue, but annoying. I've even tried downloading a new gif and copying into the signature window to no avail Phil On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > Drag & Drop onto the signature window in preferences should do it. > > regards, > > Paul > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Phil Charnley wrote: > >> A little thing, but I can't work it out (and I've googled it and >> searched the forums). >> >> I have a small animated gif file (35 frames) sent to me from a dark >> side machine. I'd like to incorporate it in a Mail signature, but >> how? > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Fri Oct 16 23:03:48 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:03:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Gifs In-Reply-To: <332CBF0F-F060-418B-B0A7-0A05FB06918D@ntlworld.com> References: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> <04E3E21A-05A3-47CB-84DB-7E01D1B4CF16@durrant.co.uk> <332CBF0F-F060-418B-B0A7-0A05FB06918D@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Ah - so the problem is the animated gif, not pictures in the signature. Sorry. Hmm.... OK, having checked with an animated GIF, I can tell you that dragging and dropping into the signature /does/ work. It's just that Apple Mail won't animate the GIF. If you send yourself a test message using the signature with the animated gif, the gif will just display with the first cell of the animation. But right click on it and select "Open With/Safari" and you'll see the gif play. So it's just possible that recipients who aren't using Apple Mail might see the animation, depending on whether their mail client plays embedded animated gifs. regards, Paul On 16 Oct 2009, at 22:41, Phil Charnley wrote: > Nope, can't get that to work, Paul. > Have tried every flavour of drag & drop, cut, copy & paste into the > signature window that I can think of but it does no more than copy a > single image/frame. > I can copy the frames in one at a time but all I get is a series of > frames in the finished e mail > The gif doesn't work in Mail at all, even on the email I received from > the dark side. > I can only open it in Safari, though oddly it works fine on the > iPhone. > Its a trivial issue, but annoying. > I've even tried downloading a new gif and copying into the signature > window to no avail > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> Drag & Drop onto the signature window in preferences should do it. >> >> >> On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Phil Charnley wrote: >> >>> A little thing, but I can't work it out (and I've googled it and >>> searched the forums). >>> >>> I have a small animated gif file (35 frames) sent to me from a dark >>> side machine. I'd like to incorporate it in a Mail signature, but >>> how? From jeremyknight at mac.com Sat Oct 17 09:32:26 2009 From: jeremyknight at mac.com (jeremy knight) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:32:26 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -please In-Reply-To: References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> Morning All, My wife has started an OU course in German. She would like the answers to two questions please. 1. How does she get a german keyboard with the accents? 2. She has to submit spoken text. with something called eliminator live. For a mac they specifically recommend not using the built in Microphone, or the mini jack, But using a USB connection..Do the members have any recommendations please? jeremy From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sat Oct 17 09:53:02 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:53:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -please In-Reply-To: <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> Message-ID: Hi, Open 'System Preferences' then click on 'Language & Text', select the 'Input Sources' tab, scroll down and tick the box for German. Now go to 'System Preferences' and 'Keyboard', place a tick in the box next to 'Show Keyboard... in menu bar'. Now you have a little flag in your menu bar (top right), click on the flag and select 'German', then click on the flag and select 'Show Keyboard Viewer'. Ta da, a German keyboard with the accents. Steve. On 17 Oct 2009, at 09:32, jeremy knight wrote: > 1. How does she get a german keyboard with the accents? From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 10:13:15 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:13:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -please In-Reply-To: <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> Message-ID: If she wants a physical keyboard, just order from Apple, there are two wired versions, and one bluetooth version: http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MB110D/A?fnode=MTY1NDA1Mg&mco=MTE0MDIzOTU http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MB869D/A?fnode=MTY1NDA1Mg&mco=MTE0NDAwMzI http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MB167D/A?fnode=MTY1NDA1Mg&mco=MTE0Mzk1MDQ If she wants to learn to touch-type on a German keyboard, switch the the German layout using Steve's instructions. But if she just needs to type German text, the accents are all already available on the keyboard. ? - type alt-s umlaut, e.g. ? - type alt-u and then the character circumflex, e.g. ? - type alt-i and then the character acute, e.g. ? - type alt-e and then the character grave, e.g. ? - type alt-` and then the character For the microphone, I'd suggest the Griffin iMic http://www.dolphinmusic.co.uk/product/9326-griffin-imic-2-usb-audio-interface.html You /can/ record through the 3.5mm input, but you need a microphone that outputs a line-level signal - i.e. a built-in pre-amp. (Or a separate pre-amp, of course.) If you have one handy, that's fine, but otherwise the iMic is likely to be a lot cheaper. regards, Paul On 17 Oct 2009, at 09:32, jeremy knight wrote: > 1. How does she get a german keyboard with the accents? > 2. She has to submit spoken text. with something called eliminator > live. > For a mac they specifically recommend not using the built in > Microphone, or the mini jack, > But using a USB connection..Do the members have any recommendations > please? From rrandlesome at mac.com Sat Oct 17 10:12:49 2009 From: rrandlesome at mac.com (Richard Randlesome) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:12:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -please In-Reply-To: <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> Message-ID: <68D9E054-850A-437C-AA78-1DB08420E0D9@mac.com> Jeremy 2. Try a Griffin iMic, these plug in to a usb port you then plug a mic into the iMic. I use mine to plug a guitar into garageband works well. Hope this helps. Regards Richard E-mail: rrandlesome at mac.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/rrandlesome On 17 Oct 2009, at 09:32, jeremy knight wrote: > > Morning All, > My wife has started an OU course in German. > She would like the answers to two questions please. > 1. How does she get a german keyboard with the accents? > 2. She has to submit spoken text. with something called eliminator > live. > For a mac they specifically recommend not using the built in > Microphone, or the mini jack, > But using a USB connection..Do the members have any recommendations > please? > jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From djpbet at polbet.co.uk Sat Oct 17 11:08:05 2009 From: djpbet at polbet.co.uk (Betty Pooley) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:08:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new member Message-ID: Good morning New to the Mac family, I am having downloading my itunes library from windows to the mac. In desperation I have decided to get an external hard drive. I know I must have one with (firewire?) Can you suggest the best for my needs? I will keep it specifically for itunes and photos. Many thanks Betty Pooley From jeremyknight at mac.com Sat Oct 17 12:04:36 2009 From: jeremyknight at mac.com (jeremy knight) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:04:36 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -One more please In-Reply-To: <68D9E054-850A-437C-AA78-1DB08420E0D9@mac.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> <68D9E054-850A-437C-AA78-1DB08420E0D9@mac.com> Message-ID: <24344D6F-1609-49EC-B981-093CA021D35A@mac.com> Thank you everyone for your excellent answers. One more question apparently My wife will be doing real time talking. What headset would members recommend please? good cheaper is preferred to good expensive! jeremy From phil.charnley at ntlworld.com Sat Oct 17 12:32:05 2009 From: phil.charnley at ntlworld.com (Phil Charnley) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:32:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Gifs In-Reply-To: References: <31E82F3C-1C70-432B-83B5-1A1FB9E9280A@ntlworld.com> <04E3E21A-05A3-47CB-84DB-7E01D1B4CF16@durrant.co.uk> <332CBF0F-F060-418B-B0A7-0A05FB06918D@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Thanks Paul. That's about how far I'd got, but it's good to have it confirmed. Phil On 16 Oct 2009, at 23:03:48, Paul Durrant wrote: > Ah - so the problem is the animated gif, not pictures in the > signature. Sorry. Hmm.... > > > OK, having checked with an animated GIF, I can tell you that dragging > and dropping into the signature /does/ work. It's just that Apple Mail > won't animate the GIF. If you send yourself a test message using the > signature with the animated gif, the gif will just display with the > first cell of the animation. But right click on it and select "Open > With/Safari" and you'll see the gif play. > > So it's just possible that recipients who aren't using Apple Mail > might see the animation, depending on whether their mail client plays > embedded animated gifs. > > regards, > > Paul > > > > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 22:41, Phil Charnley wrote: > >> Nope, can't get that to work, Paul. >> Have tried every flavour of drag & drop, cut, copy & paste into the >> signature window that I can think of but it does no more than copy a >> single image/frame. >> I can copy the frames in one at a time but all I get is a series of >> frames in the finished e mail >> The gif doesn't work in Mail at all, even on the email I received >> from >> the dark side. >> I can only open it in Safari, though oddly it works fine on the >> iPhone. >> Its a trivial issue, but annoying. >> I've even tried downloading a new gif and copying into the signature >> window to no avail >> >> On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:20, Paul Durrant wrote: >> >>> Drag & Drop onto the signature window in preferences should do it. >>> >>> >>> On 16 Oct 2009, at 20:10, Phil Charnley wrote: >>> >>>> A little thing, but I can't work it out (and I've googled it and >>>> searched the forums). >>>> >>>> I have a small animated gif file (35 frames) sent to me from a dark >>>> side machine. I'd like to incorporate it in a Mail signature, but >>>> how? > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ricnev at mac.com Sat Oct 17 12:35:04 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:35:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] help with german -One more please In-Reply-To: <24344D6F-1609-49EC-B981-093CA021D35A@mac.com> References: <41895C6B-2D02-4A84-9486-20D2CB236BE3@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AD59A20.2060805@tomkershaw.com> <857C6E5A-8BBB-4162-AFC6-F2DB3DE8975E@mac.com> <68D9E054-850A-437C-AA78-1DB08420E0D9@mac.com> <24344D6F-1609-49EC-B981-093CA021D35A@mac.com> Message-ID: Ahh... this is now a whole new ballpark! This new factor now allows me to recommend a very good overall solution , and that is to use the excellent Logitech Clearchat PC Wireless headset. http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/webcam_communications/internet_headsets_phones/devices/4226&cl=gb,en This headset is very comfortable to use and being wireless it means that one can wander around whist dictating. Not the cheapest headset out there, but you now don't need the Griffin iMike. If you shop around you should get it for around 60 pounds or so. It is important to be prepared to pay for comfort with things like this. especially when trying to educate yourself. On 17 Oct 2009, at 12:04, jeremy knight wrote: > Thank you everyone for your excellent answers. > One more question apparently My wife will be doing real time talking. > What headset would members recommend please? > good cheaper is preferred to good expensive! > jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From yahooist at anyisle.com Sat Oct 17 12:51:31 2009 From: yahooist at anyisle.com (Neil S.) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:51:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new member In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <604DBA4E-553C-47D7-AF3E-9E2EF60D0EEA@anyisle.com> Hi Betty, Welcome. I recently upgraded to Leopard and wanted to take advantage of Time Machine. I bought a "Seagate 1TB FreeAgent Mac 7200RPM USB/FW800 3.5" SILVER" from Dabs (Quicklinx : 57QFWS) and it is terrific. It is Firewire and USB and I have three partitions on it. 1. Purely an duplicate OS X in case the disk in my iMac fails and I need to boot the thing. 2. A Time Machine partition 3. Currently unused, but for further storage in future. It also looks great, it is quiet and has power saving linked to that of the Mac. Regards... Neil On 17 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Betty Pooley wrote: > Good morning > > New to the Mac family, I am having downloading my itunes library > from windows to the mac. > In desperation I have decided to get an external hard drive. I know > I must have one with (firewire?) Can you suggest the best for my > needs? I will keep it specifically for itunes and photos. > > Many thanks > > Betty Pooley -- Neil Stevens Sent from my ? iMac G5 From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 13:02:11 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:02:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new member In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0016C5CC-13BB-44E9-8619-EC04FEEBD4FE@durrant.co.uk> If your iTunes Library isn't too big, doing a backup to DVD-R on your windows machine and then a restore from the DVD-Rs to the Mac should work very well. If you have a /big/ iTunes library, this seems a good guide to doing it via external hard disk: http://lifehacker.com/software/itunes/geek-to-live--how-to-move-an-itunes-library-from-a-pc-to-mac-and-back-242468.php regards, Paul On 17 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Betty Pooley wrote: > New to the Mac family, I am having downloading my itunes library > from windows to the mac. > In desperation I have decided to get an external hard drive. I know > I must have one with (firewire?) Can you suggest the best for my > needs? I will keep it specifically for itunes and photos. From djpbet at polbet.co.uk Sat Oct 17 13:42:47 2009 From: djpbet at polbet.co.uk (Betty Pooley) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:42:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] new member In-Reply-To: <0016C5CC-13BB-44E9-8619-EC04FEEBD4FE@durrant.co.uk> References: <0016C5CC-13BB-44E9-8619-EC04FEEBD4FE@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: This is brilliant Paul..Thanks so much. This I will do. Betty ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Durrant" To: "Norwich Mac User Group list" Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [NMUG] new member > If your iTunes Library isn't too big, doing a backup to DVD-R on your > windows machine and then a restore from the DVD-Rs to the Mac should > work very well. > > If you have a /big/ iTunes library, this seems a good guide to doing > it via external hard disk: > > http://lifehacker.com/software/itunes/geek-to-live--how-to-move-an-itunes-library-from-a-pc-to-mac-and-back-242468.php > > regards, > > Paul > > On 17 Oct 2009, at 11:08, Betty Pooley wrote: >> New to the Mac family, I am having downloading my itunes library >> from windows to the mac. >> In desperation I have decided to get an external hard drive. I know >> I must have one with (firewire?) Can you suggest the best for my >> needs? I will keep it specifically for itunes and photos. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 14:45:29 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:45:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] mail tests - help wanted Message-ID: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> I'd me most grateful if someone could send test emails to the following addresses: paul at durrantpublishing.co.uk editor at durrantpublishing.co.uk editor at durrantpublishing.com Thanks! Paul From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 17 14:50:19 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:50:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] mail tests - help wanted In-Reply-To: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> References: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Paul Done. Simon On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Paul Durrant wrote: > I'd me most grateful if someone could send test emails to the > following addresses: > > paul at durrantpublishing.co.uk > editor at durrantpublishing.co.uk > editor at durrantpublishing.com > > Thanks! > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 14:56:15 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:56:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] mail tests - help wanted In-Reply-To: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> References: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <87B61197-8544-49CD-8657-CC3E772E592D@durrant.co.uk> Thanks to Richard, Rob and Simon for such a swift response. It looks like the email redirection of those addresses is working fine. No more test messages required! On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Paul Durrant wrote: > I'd me most grateful if someone could send test emails to the > following addresses: > > paul at durrantpublishing.co.uk > editor at durrantpublishing.co.uk > editor at durrantpublishing.com > From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 15:03:22 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:03:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] MobileMe, Websites and Paypal buttons Message-ID: <75C74635-2C2D-4C43-AF05-30C3AE0F83BD@durrant.co.uk> Has anyone on the list got any experience with setting up Paypal payments on a MobileMe web site? I'm looking into selling ebooks directly, and PayPal seems the way to go initially, but the documentation on how to set it up is complex. If anyone has done this already, I'd appreciate advice. regards, Paul From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 15:11:03 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:11:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] [OT] mail tests - help wanted In-Reply-To: <87B61197-8544-49CD-8657-CC3E772E592D@durrant.co.uk> References: <064D2FC5-948F-42DC-B71C-1C3651B8D616@durrant.co.uk> <87B61197-8544-49CD-8657-CC3E772E592D@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <5CD1F812-F1D5-45F6-89C0-3338E2F1ADE4@durrant.co.uk> And thanks also to Min and Kerin. Paul On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:56, Paul Durrant wrote: > Thanks to Richard, Rob and Simon for such a swift response. It looks > like the email redirection of those addresses is working fine. > > No more test messages required! > On 17 Oct 2009, at 14:45, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> I'd me most grateful if someone could send test emails to the >> following addresses: >> >> paul at durrantpublishing.co.uk >> editor at durrantpublishing.co.uk >> editor at durrantpublishing.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 15:12:02 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:12:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New list email address Message-ID: Some of you may have noticed that my last two messages to the list were sent to a new address: nmug at nmug.org.uk Yes, at long last I've tweaked the DNS records and the server, so that messages to the NMUG mailing list can be sent to an nmug.org.uk address. The old address will continue to work for the foreseeable future, but in case it ever happens that we need to switch the mailing list to a different server, it would be a good idea to start sending messages to the new address now. regards, Paul NMUG listmaster From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 17 16:10:16 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:10:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New list email address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: And thanks to Richard Nevill's sharp eyes, the footer to messages should now also have the correct address - and the Reply-To: header should be correct as well! regards, Paul On 17 Oct 2009, at 15:12, Paul Durrant wrote: > Some of you may have noticed that my last two messages to the list > were sent to a new address: > > nmug at nmug.org.uk > > Yes, at long last I've tweaked the DNS records and the server, so that > messages to the NMUG mailing list can be sent to an nmug.org.uk > address. > > The old address will continue to work for the foreseeable future, but > in case it ever happens that we need to switch the mailing list to a > different server, it would be a good idea to start sending messages to > the new address now. From turrethouse at talktalk.net Sat Oct 17 16:44:11 2009 From: turrethouse at talktalk.net (hugh morgan) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:44:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] address change Message-ID: duly noted! Hugh From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 18 10:53:09 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:53:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC Message-ID: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I just built my wife a good high spec PC out of parts I had given to me. After getting it up and running I sat and thought, this would never happen in the Mac world. It is a 2.66Ghz Pentium 4 with 1.25GB of RAM, 64MB graphics card, built in LAN, 4x USB 2.0 ports, 4x USB 1.1 ports, DVDRW and DVD-ROM drives and currently Windows XP Home installed. It is running on a 15" TFT monitor, which I also got for free. That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it makes it even more high spec. It still hasn't made me wanna switch, or build one for myself to replace my old G4 PowerBook even though it wipes the floor with it when doing anything processor intensive. A machine of that spec in the Mac world would cost about ?200. It just shows the price gap between Mac and Windows is still there. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From munkt0n at gmail.com Sun Oct 18 11:42:07 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:42:07 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: it's all about the build quality, sure you can knock up a really powerful PC for next to nothing but it'll sound like a hovercraft and probably rattle like a tin shed in a hurricane. On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > I just built my wife a good high spec PC out of parts I had given to > me. After getting it up and running I sat and thought, this would > never happen in the Mac world. > > It is a 2.66Ghz Pentium 4 with 1.25GB of RAM, 64MB graphics card, > built in LAN, 4x USB 2.0 ports, 4x USB 1.1 ports, DVDRW and DVD-ROM > drives and currently Windows XP Home installed. It is running on a 15" > TFT monitor, which I also got for free. > > That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it makes > it even more high spec. > > It still hasn't made me wanna switch, or build one for myself to > replace my old G4 PowerBook even though it wipes the floor with it > when doing anything processor intensive. > > A machine of that spec in the Mac world would cost about ?200. It just > shows the price gap between Mac and Windows is still there. > > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 18 12:09:17 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:09:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Scott It is as quiet as a mouse. It has two massive cooling fans, but you don't hear them. It is virtually silent. I don't build rubbish. I hate it when you start up a computer PC or Mac and it sound you are on a runway. Simon On 18 Oct 2009, at 11:42, Scott Matthews wrote: > it's all about the build quality, sure you can knock up a really > powerful PC for next to nothing but it'll sound like a hovercraft and > probably rattle like a tin shed in a hurricane. > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Simon Royal > wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I just built my wife a good high spec PC out of parts I had given to >> me. After getting it up and running I sat and thought, this would >> never happen in the Mac world. >> >> It is a 2.66Ghz Pentium 4 with 1.25GB of RAM, 64MB graphics card, >> built in LAN, 4x USB 2.0 ports, 4x USB 1.1 ports, DVDRW and DVD-ROM >> drives and currently Windows XP Home installed. It is running on a >> 15" >> TFT monitor, which I also got for free. >> >> That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it makes >> it even more high spec. >> >> It still hasn't made me wanna switch, or build one for myself to >> replace my old G4 PowerBook even though it wipes the floor with it >> when doing anything processor intensive. >> >> A machine of that spec in the Mac world would cost about ?200. It >> just >> shows the price gap between Mac and Windows is still there. >> >> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :wq > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 18 12:19:27 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:19:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <344FCEE5-240D-4A61-89D5-32828C0B02D4@gmail.com> Nothing is free, when it becomes virus infested it will eat your soul and make you wish you spent ?200 on a Mac :p Steve. On 18 Oct 2009, at 10:53, Simon Royal wrote: > That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it makes > it even more high spec. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 18 12:32:04 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:32:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: <344FCEE5-240D-4A61-89D5-32828C0B02D4@gmail.com> References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> <344FCEE5-240D-4A61-89D5-32828C0B02D4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <37FBB0AA-4B5A-4A3A-8EC1-F1B5E5A94EBE@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve I love Macs, but it does make me laugh when Mac fans pull the virus card out to slap Windows users with. I've had Windows machines on and off for about 17 years, everything from Windows 3.11 up to Windows 7 RC and in that time only had about 3 viruses, one of which was fatal. Good virus protection - which you can get for free like AVG and common sense prevents viruses. My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. I've just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum has Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took down both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection installed but he never bothered to update it. OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set up correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry about it either. And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision time. A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I would take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages fine and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it handles just as well as a high powered machine. Simon On 18 Oct 2009, at 12:19, Steve Batch wrote: > Nothing is free, when it becomes virus infested it will eat your soul > and make you wish you spent ?200 on a Mac > > :p > > Steve. > > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 10:53, Simon Royal wrote: > >> That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it makes >> it even more high spec. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 18 12:51:10 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:51:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: <37FBB0AA-4B5A-4A3A-8EC1-F1B5E5A94EBE@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> <344FCEE5-240D-4A61-89D5-32828C0B02D4@gmail.com> <37FBB0AA-4B5A-4A3A-8EC1-F1B5E5A94EBE@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: Simon, I was kidding with the virus comment, I know you are more than capable of taking precautions. However, you are probably going to get taken off Steve Jobs' Christmas card list though. Steve. On 18 Oct 2009, at 12:32, Simon Royal wrote: > Steve > > I love Macs, but it does make me laugh when Mac fans pull the virus > card out to slap Windows users with. > > I've had Windows machines on and off for about 17 years, everything > from Windows 3.11 up to Windows 7 RC and in that time only had about 3 > viruses, one of which was fatal. Good virus protection - which you can > get for free like AVG and common sense prevents viruses. > > My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. I've > just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum has > Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two > Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took down > both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection > installed but he never bothered to update it. > > OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set up > correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry > about it either. > > And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision time. > A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I would > take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages fine > and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it > handles just as well as a high powered machine. > > Simon > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 12:19, Steve Batch wrote: > >> Nothing is free, when it becomes virus infested it will eat your soul >> and make you wish you spent ?200 on a Mac >> >> :p >> >> Steve. >> >> >> On 18 Oct 2009, at 10:53, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> That is a pretty decent spec machine. And to pay nothing for it >>> makes >>> it even more high spec. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 18 13:19:19 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:19:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Free High Spec PC In-Reply-To: References: <92F6F5A3-15F8-4C83-9072-2C5769806070@simonroyal.co.uk> <344FCEE5-240D-4A61-89D5-32828C0B02D4@gmail.com> <37FBB0AA-4B5A-4A3A-8EC1-F1B5E5A94EBE@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <11A6994B-89BB-4DE2-AAA3-C673A1BF5359@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve Oh no. Really? I have just thrown all of the Windows machines out of... well... the window and watched as they smashed on the floor below. Now I am going off up stairs for some 'Mac time'. :) Simon PS. Steve J, I hope you are reading this. On 18 Oct 2009, at 12:51, Steve Batch wrote: > However, you are probably going to get taken off Steve Jobs' Christmas > card list though. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Sun Oct 18 17:02:22 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:02:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Numbers Message-ID: Any ideas how I can generate some numbers? Explanation - I have to allocate a series of numbers to place next to products that we will shortly be selling as downloads on our website and I have to have a part number for each sale. Pain in the b.. to do it manually ? anyone have a solution to this? Kelvin http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Sun Oct 18 18:29:32 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:29:32 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <90306705-C948-450E-96E1-77AD863FFB85@durrant.co.uk> Don't forget to add a checksum digit to the part numbers when you do generate them. You don't want people ordering the wrong thing through a typo, and a checsum digit catches most typos in part numbers. As for generating them - I would have thought it should be possible to generate a list with a spreadsheet. regards, Paul On 18 Oct 2009, at 17:02, Kelvin Youngs wrote: > Any ideas how I can generate some numbers? > > Explanation - I have to allocate a series of numbers to place next to > products that we will shortly be selling as downloads on our website > and I have to have a part number for each sale. > Pain in the b.. to do it manually ? anyone have a solution to this? From sc at davidviner.com Sun Oct 18 18:45:59 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:45:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ADB5457.80603@davidviner.com> Kelvin Another solution is if your web site can run PHP or (ugh) ASP. If it can then it's very easy to generate a sequential set of numbers via a loop - it is also quite easy to do a checksum of the generated number and add that as a final digit. If your site runs PHP then I could knock up a quick skeleton of some code that could do what you want. How many products have you got? David Kelvin Youngs wrote: > Any ideas how I can generate some numbers? > > Explanation - I have to allocate a series of numbers to place next to > products that we will shortly be selling as downloads on our website > and I have to have a part number for each sale. > Pain in the b.. to do it manually ? anyone have a solution to this? > > Kelvin > > http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Sun Oct 18 18:51:27 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:51:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Numbers In-Reply-To: <4ADB5457.80603@davidviner.com> References: <4ADB5457.80603@davidviner.com> Message-ID: <7BECA8C2-757E-4EA3-9EA6-F4B389CCA8C0@mac.com> Well, we dont have many as yet (about 30) but really need to add about 20 numbers at least for each one. All I wanted to be able to do is to generate a series of numbers starting with something like 642001 and then obtain a list as that starting point. Then simply copy and paste them into the box provided by the ecommerce site I am using. (Cartloom) By the way David, very nice web designs you do. Kelvin On 18 Oct 2009, at 18:45, David Viner wrote: > Kelvin > > Another solution is if your web site can run PHP or (ugh) ASP. If it > can > then it's very easy to generate a sequential set of numbers via a > loop - > it is also quite easy to do a checksum of the generated number and add > that as a final digit. > > If your site runs PHP then I could knock up a quick skeleton of some > code that could do what you want. How many products have you got? > > David From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 18 19:56:58 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:56:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Numbers In-Reply-To: <7BECA8C2-757E-4EA3-9EA6-F4B389CCA8C0@mac.com> References: <4ADB5457.80603@davidviner.com> <7BECA8C2-757E-4EA3-9EA6-F4B389CCA8C0@mac.com> Message-ID: <5513DCE7-44EC-4C07-A076-D6443DAF24E0@gmail.com> 642001 642002 642003 642004 642005 642006 642007 642008 642009 642010 642011 642012 642013 642014 642015 642016 642017 642018 642019 642020 642021 642022 642023 642024 642025 642026 642027 642028 642029 642030 ? On 18 Oct 2009, at 18:51, Kelvin Youngs wrote: > Well, we dont have many as yet (about 30) but really need to add about > 20 numbers at least for each one. > All I wanted to be able to do is to generate a series of numbers > starting with something like 642001 and then obtain a list as that > starting point. Then simply copy and paste them into the box provided > by the ecommerce site I am using. (Cartloom) > > By the way David, very nice web designs you do. > Kelvin > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 18:45, David Viner wrote: > >> Kelvin >> >> Another solution is if your web site can run PHP or (ugh) ASP. If it >> can >> then it's very easy to generate a sequential set of numbers via a >> loop - >> it is also quite easy to do a checksum of the generated number and >> add >> that as a final digit. >> >> If your site runs PHP then I could knock up a quick skeleton of some >> code that could do what you want. How many products have you got? >> >> David > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Sun Oct 18 20:24:06 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:24:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 18 Oct 2009, at 19:57, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. I've > just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum has > Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two > Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took down > both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection > installed but he never bothered to update it. > > OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set up > correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry > about it either. > > And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision time. > A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I would > take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages fine > and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it > handles just as well as a high powered machine. > > Simon I don't know what planet you live on but I don't recognize it. I left a PC unprotected and connected to the Internet for 12 hours. In that time I accumulated over 10,000 files. This is what happens when you run Windows on an unprotected machine. I run several Macs, none of them protected, and have done so for 20 years. I can't remember when something unwanted got downloaded. The fact is that when you protect a Windows machine with expensive software, your troubles are only beginning. Windows machine users are plagued by annoying messages on a continuous basis about something that might damage their contents. Pop ups, annoying bleeps, warnings.. it's never ending. Might I suggest this is not the forum for proselytising Windows. This is a Mac forum. There are plenty of other places you can voice ill- founded opinions on the benefits of Windows machines. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 18 20:57:27 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:57:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> Stefan I am not proselytising Windows and I am fully aware of this being a Mac group. You seem to be preaching to the converted, and the heavily converted at that. I cannot stand Windows, but credit where credit is due. I am not an Apple fanboy who loves everything Apple do for no good reason. I love Apple, Mac and Mac OS because it is so good. A Windows machine without any protection is a dangerous world. I know leaving a machine unprotected can very quickly infected. My point was, that with some carefully chosen and most of the time free software you can protect Windows. Not against everything. I am not saying it is impenetrable after all, I think it was you who also said the biggest threat to a computer is the user. Good protection software and common sense protects Windows. Yes Windows is awash with pop ups and yellow blobs galore. Most of the time this is Windows itself and not the software you install. Nevertheless, this is incredibly annoying. I don't feel my opinions are ill-founded. I don't feel your damning comments were warranted. I have used just about every version of Windows for over 17 years and countless number of machines. I am a Mac fan. In the last 8 years I have owned over 20 Macs and used every version of Mac OS and Mac OSX from System 6 upwards. Mac OSX is a marvel and a joy to use. If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the processing power. I love my PowerBook. I love it more than this high powered Windows machine. Why? Because it is a Mac running OSX. Not everyone on this group is a devout Mac user. Not everyone is in the position to be in a Mac only household or work place. Simon On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:24, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 19:57, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > >> My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. >> I've >> just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum has >> Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two >> Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took >> down >> both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection >> installed but he never bothered to update it. >> >> OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set up >> correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry >> about it either. >> >> And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision >> time. >> A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I would >> take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages >> fine >> and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it >> handles just as well as a high powered machine. >> >> Simon > > > I don't know what planet you live on but I don't recognize it. > > I left a PC unprotected and connected to the Internet for 12 hours. In > that time I accumulated over 10,000 files. This is what happens when > you run Windows on an unprotected machine. I run several Macs, none of > them protected, and have done so for 20 years. I can't remember when > something unwanted got downloaded. > > The fact is that when you protect a Windows machine with expensive > software, your troubles are only beginning. Windows machine users are > plagued by annoying messages on a continuous basis about something > that might damage their contents. Pop ups, annoying bleeps, warnings.. > it's never ending. > > Might I suggest this is not the forum for proselytising Windows. This > is a Mac forum. There are plenty of other places you can voice ill- > founded opinions on the benefits of Windows machines. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Sun Oct 18 22:33:08 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:33:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <0E95909F-D5B3-4732-9707-B159F614F5F8@zen.co.uk> I had the deep joy of playing with a Vista based laptop today. Loading the Zoo Tycoon Game and two expansion packs (one of which would not load as the CD was a bit dodgy) Despite the games coming via Microsoft's Games Division, UAC insisted on popping up but didn't even request a password..... Just clicked "I trust this....." Mmmmm It was most unintuitive and difficult to use. Nuff said. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk The other Steve J! On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: > Stefan > > I am not proselytising Windows and I am fully aware of this being a > Mac group. You seem to be preaching to the converted, and the heavily > converted at that. > > I cannot stand Windows, but credit where credit is due. I am not an > Apple fanboy who loves everything Apple do for no good reason. I love > Apple, Mac and Mac OS because it is so good. > > A Windows machine without any protection is a dangerous world. I know > leaving a machine unprotected can very quickly infected. My point was, > that with some carefully chosen and most of the time free software you > can protect Windows. Not against everything. I am not saying it is > impenetrable after all, I think it was you who also said the biggest > threat to a computer is the user. Good protection software and common > sense protects Windows. > > Yes Windows is awash with pop ups and yellow blobs galore. Most of the > time this is Windows itself and not the software you install. > Nevertheless, this is incredibly annoying. > > I don't feel my opinions are ill-founded. I don't feel your damning > comments were warranted. I have used just about every version of > Windows for over 17 years and countless number of machines. I am a Mac > fan. In the last 8 years I have owned over 20 Macs and used every > version of Mac OS and Mac OSX from System 6 upwards. Mac OSX is a > marvel and a joy to use. > > If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either > way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the > processing power. I love my PowerBook. I love it more than this high > powered Windows machine. Why? Because it is a Mac running OSX. > > Not everyone on this group is a devout Mac user. Not everyone is in > the position to be in a Mac only household or work place. > > Simon > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:24, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > >> >> On 18 Oct 2009, at 19:57, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: >> >>> My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. >>> I've >>> just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum >>> has >>> Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two >>> Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took >>> down >>> both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection >>> installed but he never bothered to update it. >>> >>> OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set >>> up >>> correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry >>> about it either. >>> >>> And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision >>> time. >>> A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I >>> would >>> take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages >>> fine >>> and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it >>> handles just as well as a high powered machine. >>> >>> Simon >> >> >> I don't know what planet you live on but I don't recognize it. >> >> I left a PC unprotected and connected to the Internet for 12 hours. >> In >> that time I accumulated over 10,000 files. This is what happens when >> you run Windows on an unprotected machine. I run several Macs, none >> of >> them protected, and have done so for 20 years. I can't remember when >> something unwanted got downloaded. >> >> The fact is that when you protect a Windows machine with expensive >> software, your troubles are only beginning. Windows machine users are >> plagued by annoying messages on a continuous basis about something >> that might damage their contents. Pop ups, annoying bleeps, >> warnings.. >> it's never ending. >> >> Might I suggest this is not the forum for proselytising Windows. This >> is a Mac forum. There are plenty of other places you can voice ill- >> founded opinions on the benefits of Windows machines. >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 02:55:20 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:55:20 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <0E95909F-D5B3-4732-9707-B159F614F5F8@zen.co.uk> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> <0E95909F-D5B3-4732-9707-B159F614F5F8@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <60C8A384-1EA9-4E85-B85B-BDB52F66A236@gmail.com> The Zoo Tycoon series is available for Mac (if you can find somewhere that sells it, I ended up downloading it, not because I am an evil pirate but just because I could not find the game at retail), I played the old 2D game waaaaay to much. Steve. On 18 Oct 2009, at 22:33, Steven Jefferson wrote: > It was most unintuitive and difficult to use. Nuff said. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 03:09:34 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:09:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <15B46B23-1FE9-45F4-9D7D-18CDBE0C0F76@gmail.com> Aah, the Megahertz Myth, Just because your G4 is 867MHz/1GHz and the P4 is 2.66GHz does not mean it's a third of the processing power http://pulsar.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/graphics/movies/mhz_myth_320f.mov Your G4 is probably equally matched to the P4 given that the 2.66GHz did not have hyperthreadding. Obviously there are other factors such as the hard drive that impact performance, I think the G4 laptops came with 3200rpm drives where as your PC desktop is probably using a 7200rpm drive. Steve. On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: > If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either > way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the > processing power. From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Mon Oct 19 08:17:28 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:17:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <60C8A384-1EA9-4E85-B85B-BDB52F66A236@gmail.com> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> <0E95909F-D5B3-4732-9707-B159F614F5F8@zen.co.uk> <60C8A384-1EA9-4E85-B85B-BDB52F66A236@gmail.com> Message-ID: <11035FB0-4429-42FF-8210-55017B1C98D4@zen.co.uk> This was Vista, not the game, though installation was convuluted, as it was even dumping stuff in the registry. Seems odd. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 19 Oct 2009, at 02:55, Steve Batch wrote: > The Zoo Tycoon series is available for Mac (if you can find somewhere > that sells it, I ended up downloading it, not because I am an evil > pirate but just because I could not find the game at retail), I played > the old 2D game waaaaay to much. > > Steve. > > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 22:33, Steven Jefferson wrote: > >> It was most unintuitive and difficult to use. Nuff said. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 19 08:44:09 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:44:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <15B46B23-1FE9-45F4-9D7D-18CDBE0C0F76@gmail.com> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> <15B46B23-1FE9-45F4-9D7D-18CDBE0C0F76@gmail.com> Message-ID: Steve I was going by processor figure rather than actual performance. My G4 867Mhz outpaces my wifes Sempron running at 1.8Ghz. I am aware Macs and PCs are not equally matched in the Ghz/Mhz scale. Like you say though, there are other factors. G4: 133Mhz system bus. P4: 533Mhz system bus. G4: 64KB L1, 256KB L2, 1MB L3 cache. P4: 512KB L2 G4: 1GB PC133 RAM P4: 1.25GB DDR RAM G4: 5400RPM 80GB Hard Drive. P4: 5400RPM 40GB Hard Drive. This P4 processor does have HyperThreading. Simon On 19 Oct 2009, at 03:09, Steve Batch wrote: > > Aah, the Megahertz Myth, Just because your G4 is 867MHz/1GHz and the > P4 is 2.66GHz does not mean it's a third of the processing power > > http://pulsar.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/graphics/movies/mhz_myth_320f.mov > > Your G4 is probably equally matched to the P4 given that the 2.66GHz > did not have hyperthreadding. > > Obviously there are other factors such as the hard drive that impact > performance, I think the G4 laptops came with 3200rpm drives where as > your PC desktop is probably using a 7200rpm drive. > > Steve. > > > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: > >> If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either >> way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the >> processing power. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Mon Oct 19 09:12:08 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:12:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <3239694F-D202-477C-8BF5-F60E7B5EB203@virgin.net> Free anti virus software is not the answer for the poor PC user. On the news this morning millions of PC users have unloaded what they thought was anti virus software. It was the opposite. I am always astonished at the vulnerability of some people. They seem to think If it's in print it must be true. Nathan On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: > Stefan > > I am not proselytising Windows and I am fully aware of this being a > Mac group. You seem to be preaching to the converted, and the heavily > converted at that. > > I cannot stand Windows, but credit where credit is due. I am not an > Apple fanboy who loves everything Apple do for no good reason. I love > Apple, Mac and Mac OS because it is so good. > > A Windows machine without any protection is a dangerous world. I know > leaving a machine unprotected can very quickly infected. My point was, > that with some carefully chosen and most of the time free software you > can protect Windows. Not against everything. I am not saying it is > impenetrable after all, I think it was you who also said the biggest > threat to a computer is the user. Good protection software and common > sense protects Windows. > > Yes Windows is awash with pop ups and yellow blobs galore. Most of the > time this is Windows itself and not the software you install. > Nevertheless, this is incredibly annoying. > > I don't feel my opinions are ill-founded. I don't feel your damning > comments were warranted. I have used just about every version of > Windows for over 17 years and countless number of machines. I am a Mac > fan. In the last 8 years I have owned over 20 Macs and used every > version of Mac OS and Mac OSX from System 6 upwards. Mac OSX is a > marvel and a joy to use. > > If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either > way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the > processing power. I love my PowerBook. I love it more than this high > powered Windows machine. Why? Because it is a Mac running OSX. > > Not everyone on this group is a devout Mac user. Not everyone is in > the position to be in a Mac only household or work place. > > Simon > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:24, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > >> >> On 18 Oct 2009, at 19:57, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: >> >>> My wife has a Windows machine, my two sons have Windows machines. >>> I've >>> just built this new one. I have had no problems with them. My mum >>> has >>> Windows machines and she has never had a virus. My best mate has two >>> Windows machines and he recently got some nasty viruses that took >>> down >>> both his machines. Why? Well, he might have had virus protection >>> installed but he never bothered to update it. >>> >>> OK, so you don't have to worry about it on a Mac, but if it is set >>> up >>> correctly on a Windows machine, then you don't really need to worry >>> about it either. >>> >>> And for the record, I won't be using the new PC anyway. Decision >>> time. >>> A 2.66Ghz P4 Windows machine vs an 867Mhz G4 Mac. No contest. I >>> would >>> take the Mac everytime. My PowerBook might be old, but it manages >>> fine >>> and for day-to-day work, web browsing, emailing, writing etc... it >>> handles just as well as a high powered machine. >>> >>> Simon >> >> >> I don't know what planet you live on but I don't recognize it. >> >> I left a PC unprotected and connected to the Internet for 12 hours. >> In >> that time I accumulated over 10,000 files. This is what happens when >> you run Windows on an unprotected machine. I run several Macs, none >> of >> them protected, and have done so for 20 years. I can't remember when >> something unwanted got downloaded. >> >> The fact is that when you protect a Windows machine with expensive >> software, your troubles are only beginning. Windows machine users are >> plagued by annoying messages on a continuous basis about something >> that might damage their contents. Pop ups, annoying bleeps, >> warnings.. >> it's never ending. >> >> Might I suggest this is not the forum for proselytising Windows. This >> is a Mac forum. There are plenty of other places you can voice ill- >> founded opinions on the benefits of Windows machines. >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 19 09:17:33 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:17:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Windows? Virus free? You must be joking. In-Reply-To: <3239694F-D202-477C-8BF5-F60E7B5EB203@virgin.net> References: <937E69D6-7571-4AE4-AD45-73DE19FD073B@simonroyal.co.uk> <3239694F-D202-477C-8BF5-F60E7B5EB203@virgin.net> Message-ID: I think we've now thoroughly covered the subject. No more on Windows and viruses for a while please. Paul NMUG Listmaster From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 10:44:24 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:44:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Megahertz and the suchlike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0ED142DD-89F5-4C6D-AFC9-44F6349A3732@gmail.com> On 19 Oct 2009, at 09:12, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: >> If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either >> way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the >> processing power. > > Aah, the Megahertz Myth, Just because your G4 is 867MHz/1GHz and the > P4 is 2.66GHz does not mean it's a third of the processing power > > http://pulsar.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/graphics/movies/mhz_myth_320f.mov > > Your G4 is probably equally matched to the P4 given that the 2.66GHz > did not have hyperthreadding. > > Obviously there are other factors such as the hard drive that impact > performance, I think the G4 laptops came with 3200rpm drives where as > your PC desktop is probably using a 7200rpm drive. > > Steve. > > > > On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: Exactly right Steve. Ill-founded and misleading claims from folks who claim a level of knowledge that turns out to be superficial (at best) must expect the claims to be called for what they are. Maybe I'm alone in this, but it's my opinion that I for one am not interested in reading about Windows in this forum unless it bears on the Mac (use of Parallels or VM Fusion for example). There are thousands of forums devoted to Windows and anyone unfortunate enough to use Windows has more than enough to choose from. From brian at clearlight.uk.net Mon Oct 19 10:53:58 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:53:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Nothing to do with Windows In-Reply-To: <3239694F-D202-477C-8BF5-F60E7B5EB203@virgin.net> Message-ID: Such gullibility is the inevitable consequence of 'educating' people into expecting to be herded without having any actual understanding or responsibility. All the wolf has to do is masquerade the guidance - and either offer something the sheep want to be true - or a protection against something they fear to be true. But without understanding, many simply want a system of delivery that doesn't require 'learning processes' - and then fear indiscriminately such that ordinary trust based functionality is blocked or reduced. all the best Brian Nathan Crosby said recently: > I am always astonished at the vulnerability of some people. > They seem to think If it's in print it must be true. From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 19 11:47:35 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:47:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Megahertz and the suchlike In-Reply-To: <0ED142DD-89F5-4C6D-AFC9-44F6349A3732@gmail.com> References: <0ED142DD-89F5-4C6D-AFC9-44F6349A3732@gmail.com> Message-ID: <10A2A9E9-342F-4589-97C9-216C0DA7E56E@simonroyal.co.uk> Stefan I find that offensive. I have been a member of this group for quite a while and my level of knowledge has been evident. I am not superficial. My claims are not misleading, just drawn from my own experiences of over 17 years of computing. I must point out I did not start off a Mac fan, it wasn't until the turn of the century I switched to Macs. Prior to that I built and used Windows machines right from Windows 3.11. Maybe I do not word things correctly, 'processing power' should have read 'clock speed'. No matter what the differences in PC and Macs are, there is going to be a significant difference between 2.66Ghz and 867Mhz. There is no way a sub-1Ghz machine can outrun a machine 6 years older with more RAM and 4 times the bus speed. My original post was not praising Windows. It was merely pointing out that to get such a high spec machine for free in the Windows world is fairly easy, but in the Mac world you are still looking at a considerable amount of money. I wasn't praising Windows. I will agree with you that this isn't the place for discussing Windows unless it is related to a Mac in some way. I am a happy switcher. I have Windows machines in my house, which I have to maintain, but I do not like them and couldn't use them all day. A few hours after using them and it frustrates the hell out of me. Simon On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:44, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 09:12, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > > >>> If I was a Windows fan, sitting on the fence or not bothered either >>> way then I wouldn't choose a machine that was a third of the >>> processing power. >> > >> Aah, the Megahertz Myth, Just because your G4 is 867MHz/1GHz and the >> P4 is 2.66GHz does not mean it's a third of the processing power >> >> http://pulsar.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/graphics/movies/mhz_myth_320f.mov >> >> Your G4 is probably equally matched to the P4 given that the 2.66GHz >> did not have hyperthreadding. >> >> Obviously there are other factors such as the hard drive that impact >> performance, I think the G4 laptops came with 3200rpm drives where as >> your PC desktop is probably using a 7200rpm drive. >> >> Steve. >> >> >> >> On 18 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Simon Royal wrote: > > > Exactly right Steve. Ill-founded and misleading claims from folks who > claim a level of knowledge that turns out to be superficial (at best) > must expect the claims to be called for what they are. > > Maybe I'm alone in this, but it's my opinion that I for one am not > interested in reading about Windows in this forum unless it bears on > the Mac (use of Parallels or VM Fusion for example). There are > thousands of forums devoted to Windows and anyone unfortunate enough > to use Windows has more than enough to choose from. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 13:27:54 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:27:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Megahertz and the suchlike In-Reply-To: <0ED142DD-89F5-4C6D-AFC9-44F6349A3732@gmail.com> References: <0ED142DD-89F5-4C6D-AFC9-44F6349A3732@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4F72806F-EB6D-42E4-BB73-15450641B05C@gmail.com> Stefan, It would seem that some of my claims were ill founded (hard drive speed of the G4 and Hyper-threading on the P4) and Simon called me up on those that thats great I encourage people to challenge me when I'm wrong it's my way of learning. I never claim a level of knowledge beyond "some experience but trying to learn". Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:44, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > Exactly right Steve. Ill-founded and misleading claims from folks who > claim a level of knowledge that turns out to be superficial (at best) > must expect the claims to be called for what they are. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 13:32:05 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:32:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Nothing to do with Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7252DDD3-43EC-49CF-BCEA-5E0AECDFA59D@gmail.com> Unfortunately, that's how some people view us Mac users. Not true of course. Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:53, Brian Steere wrote: > Such gullibility is the inevitable consequence of 'educating' people > into > expecting to be herded without having any actual understanding or > responsibility. > > All the wolf has to do is masquerade the guidance - and either offer > something the sheep want to be true - or a protection against > something they > fear to be true. > > But without understanding, many simply want a system of delivery that > doesn't require 'learning processes' - and then fear > indiscriminately such > that ordinary trust based functionality is blocked or reduced. From alan at asw6000.plus.com Mon Oct 19 13:33:01 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:33:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files Message-ID: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these videos. I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 13:41:12 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:41:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files In-Reply-To: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> References: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: While flip4mac is usually the answer for playing .WMV I too have had trouble with it since the change to SL, so I now use VLC player for my .WMV files and have removed flip4mac. Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:33, Alan Williams wrote: > Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these videos. > I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 13:49:35 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:49:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare Message-ID: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> I am quite new to Mac and one of the reasons for switching was because I wanted to learn more about Unix, I used Linux for about a year but to be honest while I 'got by' I never fully understood what was going on. I am planning to read: Unix for Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Visual QuickPro Guide) and then maybe: Mac OS X For Unix Geeks Does anyone have better book suggestions or website resources to get me started? Thanks, Steve. From allanmacam at me.com Mon Oct 19 14:30:22 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:30:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files In-Reply-To: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> References: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: TRy installing the free Perian. http://perian.org/ Allan Johns On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:33, Alan Williams wrote: > Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these videos. > I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. > > > > Alan Williams > alan at asw6000.plus.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 14:55:30 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:55:30 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files In-Reply-To: References: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <9135B033-3636-478E-A697-7A6581D1221B@gmail.com> Allan, Perian does not handle .WMV, it's great for many types of codecs but not that puppy. From the website: Perian enables QuickTime application support for additional media: File formats: AVI, DIVX, FLV, MKV, GVI, VP6, and VFW Video types: MS-MPEG4 v1 & v2, DivX, 3ivx, H.264, Sorenson H.263, FLV/ Sorenson Spark, FSV1, VP6, H263i, VP3, HuffYUV, FFVHuff, MPEG1 & MPEG2 Video, Fraps, Snow, NuppelVideo, Techsmith Screen Capture, DosBox Capture Audio types: Windows Media Audio v1 & v2, Flash ADPCM, Xiph Vorbis (in Matroska), and MPEG Layer I & II Audio, True Audio, DTS Coherent Acoustics, Nellymoser ASAO AVI support for: AAC, AC3 Audio, H.264, MPEG4, and VBR MP3 Subtitle support for SSA/ASS and SRT Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 14:30, Allan wrote: > TRy installing the free Perian. > > http://perian.org/ > > > Allan Johns > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:33, Alan Williams wrote: > >> Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these >> videos. >> I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. >> >> >> >> Alan Williams >> alan at asw6000.plus.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Mon Oct 19 15:13:38 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:13:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files In-Reply-To: References: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <2977138B-F459-4820-AE88-7A56C783F162@asw6000.plus.com> Downloaded that thanks but still no joy Alan On 19 Oct 2009, at 14:30, Allan wrote: > TRy installing the free Perian. > > http://perian.org/ > > > Allan Johns > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:33, Alan Williams wrote: > >> Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these >> videos. >> I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. >> >> >> >> Alan Williams >> alan at asw6000.plus.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From ricnev at mac.com Mon Oct 19 15:46:42 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:46:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] wmv files In-Reply-To: <2977138B-F459-4820-AE88-7A56C783F162@asw6000.plus.com> References: <0E16CF3E-F648-4E74-9C25-CCA27A928520@asw6000.plus.com> <2977138B-F459-4820-AE88-7A56C783F162@asw6000.plus.com> Message-ID: <04A8B38D-1E88-43E9-8E67-FB0380E585D3@mac.com> I'd try Steve's suggestion of VideoLan Player if I wanted to play WMVs. VideoLan really is a very useful tool to have in your toolbox. I would remind everyone that uses VideoLan that its continual development and usefulness depends on us all supporting it, either by donations or in some other way. The VideoLan website explains what you can do to help. Richard. On 19 Oct 2009, at 15:13, Alan Williams wrote: > Downloaded that thanks but still no joy > > Alan > On 19 Oct 2009, at 14:30, Allan wrote: > >> TRy installing the free Perian. >> >> http://perian.org/ >> >> >> Allan Johns >> >> On 19 Oct 2009, at 13:33, Alan Williams wrote: >> >>> Since upgrading to Snow Leopard I dont seem able to open these >>> videos. >>> I've upgraded flip4mac . Any ideas please. >>> >>> >>> >>> Alan Williams >>> alan at asw6000.plus.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > Alan Williams > alan at asw6000.plus.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 19 18:37:02 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:37:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P4 vs G4 Message-ID: Hi. Further to my emails earlier - and my rant at Stefan - I have gone off and googled my query. I already knew that Macs and PCs cannot be compared simply down to clock speed due to the differences in the PowerPC and Intel architecture, but I didn't realise it was so wide. I have read countless comparisons, benchmarks and head-to-heads and the results were very surprising. A G4 867Mhz (which is what I have - although the article was referring to a PowerMac not a PowerBook) has the same performance as a 1.5Ghz Pentium 4. A G4 1Ghz has the same performance as a 1.8Ghz Pentium 4. Generally speaking in terms of video and music encoding the above is true. Graphics tests such as image processing in Photoshop and the G4 creeps ahead. Going up the scale, technically speaking a G4 1.7Ghz should compare roughly to a 2.6Ghz Pentium 4. When you introduce HyperThreading with a compatible OS and software then the gap widens and you get more of the performance gap you would expect. Introduce the G5 chip with it's massive 2Ghz processors and the P4 falls short again. My head has been swimming in Mhz, Ghz, pipelining, cache and all sorts this afternoon. What an interesting subject processors are. Of course, processors are not the only factor in determining overall system speed. You have system bus, amount of ram, ram speed, drive speed and graphics cards. Although generally speaking a faster/newer machine will score higher on all of these points anyway. So while I owe Stefan a small apology for not having an indepth knowledge of processor architectures, my original theory still stands. A P4 2.66Ghz with HyperThreading will trounce a G4 867Mhz. The faster processor combined with the better/newer hardware and technology in the P4 machine should double the performance of the G4. One thing has come out of this, is that a G4 867Mhz is not as slow as it sounds. A 1.5Ghz P4 is still a fairly respectable sounding spec in the Windows world. Now that Apple has moved to Intel and both Mac and Windows share a similar architecture the gap should be closer. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Mon Oct 19 22:45:19 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:45:19 -0400 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare In-Reply-To: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> References: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> Steve, Of all the many UNIX and UNIX-like "distributions", I would have thought that Mac OS X is about the worst one to use for learning UNIX because of the lengths Apple have gone to in hiding the operating system from the user. This gives the reliability and security advantages of UNIX and a very pretty, well-documented GUI but probably not the best UNIX environment to study due to highly proprietary configuration structures. The trouble with UNIX is that all versions are different from each other. There are many fundamental differences so you might want to define what you want to learn about before choosing a distribution. Ken Steve Batch wrote: > I am quite new to Mac and one of the reasons for switching was because > I wanted to learn more about Unix, I used Linux for about a year but > to be honest while I 'got by' I never fully understood what was going > on. I am planning to read: > > Unix for Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger (Visual QuickPro Guide) > > and then maybe: > > Mac OS X For Unix Geeks > > Does anyone have better book suggestions or website resources to get > me started? > > Thanks, > Steve. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Mon Oct 19 23:59:28 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:59:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Playing wmv in QT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 19 Oct 2009, at 22:45, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > Subject: Re: [NMUG] wmv files > To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > While flip4mac is usually the answer for playing .WMV I too have had > trouble with it since the change to SL, so I now use VLC player > for my .WMV files and have removed flip4mac. > > Steve. I am playing .wmv files just fine in QT 10.5 (build 51) flip4MacWMV 2.2.0.49 There's a setting in the flip4Mac system pref that allows you to tell the software to play the wmv file in QT player and not the standalone player they provide. I've got that set to play in QT What is the file header info in a wmv file you can't play in QT? There's anolther reason to keep flip4Mac installed.. the latest version decodes Microsoft's latest and greatest format Silverlight.. which I would happily ignore except the Ryanair site requires it and you can't beat 5p flights to Palma From brian at clearlight.uk.net Tue Oct 20 00:05:32 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:05:32 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Nothing to do with Windows In-Reply-To: <7252DDD3-43EC-49CF-BCEA-5E0AECDFA59D@gmail.com> Message-ID: I felt it was indiscriminately true of many - but not as a put down. Only insecure folk need to find fault with their fellows. There is a tendency to treat consumers as dumb - and perhaps there is a lot of evidence for this. But it then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. I wasn't suggesting everyone needs to understand the deep picture - but to have an overview of basic relationships involved in principle. I neednt ramble on - but I suppose these psychological emotional aspects are a significant factor in the shaping of the systems that are then shaping us. I only put this particular subject header because ... pssst ... I posted it after Paul D said to close the transparently paned offtopic subject (7 letters starting with invisible force - and almost ending in debt). But in the spirit of the thing I didn't feel I was gnawing on the same old bone. all the best Brian Steve Batch said recently: > Unfortunately, that's how some people view us Mac users. > > Not true of course. > > Steve. > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 10:53, Brian Steere wrote: > >> Such gullibility is the inevitable consequence of 'educating' people >> into >> expecting to be herded without having any actual understanding or >> responsibility. >> >> All the wolf has to do is masquerade the guidance - and either offer >> something the sheep want to be true - or a protection against >> something they >> fear to be true. >> >> But without understanding, many simply want a system of delivery that >> doesn't require 'learning processes' - and then fear >> indiscriminately such >> that ordinary trust based functionality is blocked or reduced. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan at asw6000.plus.com Tue Oct 20 08:24:15 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:24:15 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Playing wmv in QT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > > Thanks Steve videolan worked perfectly Alan > >> Subject: Re: [NMUG] wmv files >> To: Norwich Mac User Group list >> Message-ID: >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes >> >> >> While flip4mac is usually the answer for playing .WMV I too have had >> trouble with it since the change to SL, so I now use VLC player >> for my .WMV files and have removed flip4mac. >> >> Steve. > > Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 09:54:38 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:54:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! Message-ID: The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow regards, Paul From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Tue Oct 20 11:59:35 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:59:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Analysing WMV files Message-ID: The tool I use to look at header info on problematic video files is called Videospec. A very neat utility that uses one of the Mac's semi-secret weapons - AppleScript to do its work. From karl.hortt at btinternet.com Tue Oct 20 13:19:10 2009 From: karl.hortt at btinternet.com (Karl hortt) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:19:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] memory sticks Message-ID: Hi All, My wife is running a training course next week for about 25 trainees last year, we produced a training booklet that had about 50 pages in it I am thinking about putting all this information on to a memory stick and give one to each of the trainees where is the best place to buy about 25 small memory sticks ? can I make one master and clone them using carbon copy ? regards Karl From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 13:49:06 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:49:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] memory sticks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <366D40C2-C3F9-42D8-81F8-EBF08614FE7F@durrant.co.uk> http://www.bigpockets.co.uk/product.php?product=BELKIN012 was the best price I could find. I don't know how they are on delivery though. regards, Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:19, Karl hortt wrote: > > Hi All, > > My wife is running a training course next week for about 25 trainees > > last year, we produced a training booklet that had about 50 pages in > it > > I am thinking about putting all this information on to a memory stick > and > > give one to each of the trainees > > where is the best place to buy about 25 small memory sticks ? > > can I make one master and clone them using carbon copy ? > > regards > > Karl > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From kevin at sanderling.co.uk Tue Oct 20 14:04:37 2009 From: kevin at sanderling.co.uk (Kevin Allenby) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:04:37 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Various problems on my Mac Mini In-Reply-To: References: <9c83344f0910150534g5e4ee5a9k38d620cbe485bc80@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <9c83344f0910200604w4f021ef5tf1a91853cb6d4e10@mail.gmail.com> Richard Many thanks for you suggestion. Problems now solved! Ken Hamer of this group has talked me through the permission repairs in Terminal (something I would have had no clue how to do) - which was mentioned in the macworld article you linked to - and it has solved all the problems in one go. Now I have no excuse to not get on with work....... Cheers Kevin 2009/10/16 Richard Nevill > I am not expert enough to be able to recommend a solution to Kevin's > problem, although I would personally try to repair disk permissions as > a first shot. > > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452?viewlocale=en_US > > Does the panel think there is any value in running Repair Permissions > in these circumstances? > > Also see: > > http://www.macworld.com/article/52220/2006/08/repairpermissions.html > > > On 15 Oct 2009, at 13:34, Kevin Allenby wrote: > > > Hi folks - wondered if anyone can shed light on any of these issues > > - which > > all seemed to start at the same time! > > Machine is a Mac Mini about 8 months old (running Leopard). > > > > 1 - one of my key programs, Dreamweaver CS4 (a genuine version I > > should > > add!) - when opening program, it appears to open normally, but then > > just > > closes after about 5 seconds. > > > > 2 - copy/paste using cmd C/cmd V doesn't work (always did before) > > > > 3 - I can no longer see other machines/external hard drive - they > > still show > > in the 'shared' section but say connection failed. I am sucessfully > > connecting to the internet through the ethernet/router (which should > > also > > let me see the other machines) > > > > I'm not aware that I've changed anything but who knows! > > > > Any thoughts appreciated (I'd normally call in Ken Hamer, but he's > > away) > > > > Also, on the 16th. October, Kevin wrote: > > > To add to my previous list of woes, now realise I cannot drag and drop > > either - eg between Finder windows so cannot move files about - also > > cannot > > move icons on the desktop - oh dear! > > Richard Nevill > ricnev at mac.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 20 14:53:27 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:53:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple Store Down! Message-ID: <78BA4251-0605-43DC-9A78-789279F176C2@mac.com> Get ready Guys!! Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 14:54:33 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:54:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The Apple Store is down.... On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:54, Paul Durrant wrote: > The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated > products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. > > We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! > > http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 20 14:56:41 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:56:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> How sad is that - two of us monitoring during the same minute! On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:54, Paul Durrant wrote: > The Apple Store is down.... > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:54, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated >> products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. >> >> We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! >> >> http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 20 14:57:14 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:57:14 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] memory sticks In-Reply-To: <366D40C2-C3F9-42D8-81F8-EBF08614FE7F@durrant.co.uk> References: <366D40C2-C3F9-42D8-81F8-EBF08614FE7F@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <81830C10-582E-4594-ABB6-DF46568CA762@simonroyal.co.uk> Paul Great find, so I thought anyway. ?4 delivery on an 80p item. Simon On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:49, Paul Durrant wrote: > http://www.bigpockets.co.uk/product.php?product=BELKIN012 > > was the best price I could find. I don't know how they are on delivery > though. > > regards, > > Paul > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:19, Karl hortt wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> My wife is running a training course next week for about 25 trainees >> >> last year, we produced a training booklet that had about 50 pages in >> it >> >> I am thinking about putting all this information on to a memory stick >> and >> >> give one to each of the trainees >> >> where is the best place to buy about 25 small memory sticks ? >> >> can I make one master and clone them using carbon copy ? >> >> regards >> >> Karl >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 14:57:35 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:57:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Apple Store Down! In-Reply-To: <78BA4251-0605-43DC-9A78-789279F176C2@mac.com> References: <78BA4251-0605-43DC-9A78-789279F176C2@mac.com> Message-ID: Beat me to the news by a minute! I wonder how long they'll take to come back up? On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:53, Richard Nevill wrote: > Get ready Guys!! From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 20 15:08:43 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:08:43 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Various problems on my Mac Mini In-Reply-To: <9c83344f0910200604w4f021ef5tf1a91853cb6d4e10@mail.gmail.com> References: <9c83344f0910150534g5e4ee5a9k38d620cbe485bc80@mail.gmail.com> <9c83344f0910200604w4f021ef5tf1a91853cb6d4e10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4ADDC46B.2080307@stackyard.org> Just as a bit of information for everybody in case the same thing happens to anybody else, Kevin's many and varied troubles were caused by the still-unexplained disappearance of the symbolic link in the root directory which points to /private/tmp. /tmp is pretty important in all things UNIXy and lots of things use it. They all look for /tmp rather than /private/tmp which was still there. Why the symlink disappeared - who knows? One would need root privileges to delete it. Kevin Allenby wrote: > Richard > > Many thanks for you suggestion. Problems now solved! Ken Hamer of this group > has talked me through the permission repairs in Terminal (something I would > have had no clue how to do) - which was mentioned in the macworld article > you linked to - and it has solved all the problems in one go. > > Now I have no excuse to not get on with work....... > > Cheers > Kevin > > > > 2009/10/16 Richard Nevill > > >> I am not expert enough to be able to recommend a solution to Kevin's >> problem, although I would personally try to repair disk permissions as >> a first shot. >> >> http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452?viewlocale=en_US >> >> Does the panel think there is any value in running Repair Permissions >> in these circumstances? >> >> Also see: >> >> http://www.macworld.com/article/52220/2006/08/repairpermissions.html >> >> >> On 15 Oct 2009, at 13:34, Kevin Allenby wrote: >> >> >>> Hi folks - wondered if anyone can shed light on any of these issues >>> - which >>> all seemed to start at the same time! >>> Machine is a Mac Mini about 8 months old (running Leopard). >>> >>> 1 - one of my key programs, Dreamweaver CS4 (a genuine version I >>> should >>> add!) - when opening program, it appears to open normally, but then >>> just >>> closes after about 5 seconds. >>> >>> 2 - copy/paste using cmd C/cmd V doesn't work (always did before) >>> >>> 3 - I can no longer see other machines/external hard drive - they >>> still show >>> in the 'shared' section but say connection failed. I am sucessfully >>> connecting to the internet through the ethernet/router (which should >>> also >>> let me see the other machines) >>> >>> I'm not aware that I've changed anything but who knows! >>> >>> Any thoughts appreciated (I'd normally call in Ken Hamer, but he's >>> away) >>> >>> >> Also, on the 16th. October, Kevin wrote: >> >> >>> To add to my previous list of woes, now realise I cannot drag and drop >>> either - eg between Finder windows so cannot move files about - also >>> cannot >>> move icons on the desktop - oh dear! >>> >> Richard Nevill >> ricnev at mac.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at durrant.co.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 15:08:53 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:08:53 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] memory sticks In-Reply-To: <81830C10-582E-4594-ABB6-DF46568CA762@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <366D40C2-C3F9-42D8-81F8-EBF08614FE7F@durrant.co.uk> <81830C10-582E-4594-ABB6-DF46568CA762@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <34DC6CAD-4F69-42C8-9755-69804BC35893@durrant.co.uk> But not so bad if you're buying 25 of them, as presumably that's ?4 per consignment, not ?4 per item. Not that I've checked... Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:57, Simon Royal wrote: > Great find, so I thought anyway. > > ?4 delivery on an 80p item. > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:49, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> http://www.bigpockets.co.uk/product.php?product=BELKIN012 >> >> was the best price I could find. I don't know how they are on >> delivery >> though. >> >> On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:19, Karl hortt wrote: >>> >>> My wife is running a training course next week for about 25 trainees >>> >>> last year, we produced a training booklet that had about 50 pages in >>> it >>> >>> I am thinking about putting all this information on to a memory >>> stick >>> and >>> >>> give one to each of the trainees >>> >>> where is the best place to buy about 25 small memory sticks ? >>> >>> can I make one master and clone them using carbon copy ? From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 15:16:47 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:16:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> Message-ID: <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> Well, I just checked having lunch (yes, late lunch) - and there it wasn't. Oh - and this is a fun site: http://isapplestoredown.com/ regards, Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:56, Richard Nevill wrote: > How sad is that - two of us monitoring during the same minute! > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 14:54, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> The Apple Store is down.... >> >> On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:54, Paul Durrant wrote: >> >>> The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated >>> products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. >>> >>> We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! >>> >>> http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 20 15:26:02 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:26:02 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> I'm using the pingdom Apple Store status widget; lets you know if Apple Store site is up or down: http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/03/19/apple-store-status-widget-for-mac-os-x/ On 20 Oct 2009, at 15:16, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > Oh - and this is a fun site: > > http://isapplestoredown.com/ > > Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 17:20:36 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:20:36 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> Message-ID: <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> The Apple Store isn't back up yet, but BusinessWeek have jumped the gun, and if they've broken an embargo time are going to be in Apple's Bad Books. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_announces.html The MacBook has a new polycarbonate shell, that's more like the unibody aluminium, and a built-in 7 hour battery, a LED backlight, 2.26GHz, 250GB and still the same price (in US$, anyway!) No more 20" and 24" iMac. The smaller iMac is now 21.5", and the bigger is 27", both with LED backlights. The new iMac design has a much smaller 'chin' under the display. The 21.5" has 3.06 and 3.33GHz chips, optional high end graphics, up to 16GB RAM and up to 2TB (Yes, 2,000GB) storage. Te 21.5" is available now. (Or at least, when the store comes back up.) The 27" is mouch more high end. The upper end of the range includes a QUAD CORE processor, but won't be with us until November. Both iMacs will have an SD Card slot. There's a new mouse - the mechanical scroll ball is replaced with a more tackpad like surface, so scrolling is by two fingered gestures. Mac Mini has got revamped - 2.26GHz and 2.53GHz. Also - Mac Mini Server! $999 and includes Mac OS X Server. No optical drive, but up to 1TB internal hard disk. It looks like a great line up. Paul From band1 at mac.com Tue Oct 20 17:36:36 2009 From: band1 at mac.com (David King) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:36:36 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> The store is back up David On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > The Apple Store isn't back up yet, but BusinessWeek have jumped the > gun, and if they've broken an embargo time are going to be in Apple's > Bad Books. > > http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_announces.html > > The MacBook has a new polycarbonate shell, that's more like the > unibody aluminium, and a built-in 7 hour battery, a LED backlight, > 2.26GHz, 250GB and still the same price (in US$, anyway!) > > No more 20" and 24" iMac. The smaller iMac is now 21.5", and the > bigger is 27", both with LED backlights. > > The new iMac design has a much smaller 'chin' under the display. > > The 21.5" has 3.06 and 3.33GHz chips, optional high end graphics, up > to 16GB RAM and up to 2TB (Yes, 2,000GB) storage. Te 21.5" is > available now. (Or at least, when the store comes back up.) > > The 27" is mouch more high end. The upper end of the range includes a > QUAD CORE processor, but won't be with us until November. > > Both iMacs will have an SD Card slot. > > There's a new mouse - the mechanical scroll ball is replaced with a > more tackpad like surface, so scrolling is by two fingered gestures. > > Mac Mini has got revamped - 2.26GHz and 2.53GHz. > > Also - Mac Mini Server! $999 and includes Mac OS X Server. No optical > drive, but up to 1TB internal hard disk. > > > > It looks like a great line up. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 17:40:28 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:40:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <5A23B9DA-4AB8-4FEE-ACA8-AD45341ACFC7@durrant.co.uk> BusinessWeek didn't jump the gun - the store is just slow coming back. Full details are on the UK web site (except pricing). http://www.apple.com/uk/macbook/ http://www.apple.com/uk/imac/ http://www.apple.com/uk/macmini/ http://www.apple.com/uk/macmini/ regards, Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > The Apple Store isn't back up yet, but BusinessWeek have jumped the > gun, and if they've broken an embargo time are going to be in Apple's > Bad Books. > > http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_announces.html > > The MacBook has a new polycarbonate shell, that's more like the > unibody aluminium, and a built-in 7 hour battery, a LED backlight, > 2.26GHz, 250GB and still the same price (in US$, anyway!) > > No more 20" and 24" iMac. The smaller iMac is now 21.5", and the > bigger is 27", both with LED backlights. > > The new iMac design has a much smaller 'chin' under the display. > > The 21.5" has 3.06 and 3.33GHz chips, optional high end graphics, up > to 16GB RAM and up to 2TB (Yes, 2,000GB) storage. Te 21.5" is > available now. (Or at least, when the store comes back up.) > > The 27" is mouch more high end. The upper end of the range includes a > QUAD CORE processor, but won't be with us until November. > > Both iMacs will have an SD Card slot. > > There's a new mouse - the mechanical scroll ball is replaced with a > more tackpad like surface, so scrolling is by two fingered gestures. > > Mac Mini has got revamped - 2.26GHz and 2.53GHz. > > Also - Mac Mini Server! $999 and includes Mac OS X Server. No optical > drive, but up to 1TB internal hard disk. > > > > It looks like a great line up. > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From macman at f2s.com Tue Oct 20 17:44:38 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:44:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: From Apple Hot News RSS ...... 1. Apple today updated its popular MacBook with a new, durable polycarbonate unibody design featuring a brilliant LED-backlit display, a glass Multi-Touch trackpad and Apple?s innovative built-in battery for up to seven hours of battery life. Inheriting technology and design features from the MacBook Pro line, the new MacBook is an ideal consumer notebook for students and new Mac users, and is available for $999. 2. Today Apple introduced the new wireless Magic Mouse, the first mouse to use Apple?s revolutionary Multi-Touch technology. Pioneered on iPhone, iPod touch and Mac notebook trackpads, Multi-Touch allows customers to navigate using intuitive finger gestures. Instead of mechanical buttons, scroll wheels or scroll balls, the entire top of the Magic Mouse is a seamless Multi-Touch surface. Magic Mouse comes standard with the new iMac and will be available as a Mac accessory at just $69. 3. Apple today unveiled an all new iMac line featuring brilliant LED- backlit 21.5 and 27-inch widescreen displays in a new edge-to-edge glass design and seamless all aluminum enclosure. The new iMac line, starting at $1,199, is the fastest ever with Intel Core 2 Duo processors starting at 3.06 GHz, and Core i5 and i7 quad-core processors for up to twice the performance. Every new iMac ships with a wireless keyboard and the all new wireless Magic Mouse, the world?s first mouse with Multi-Touch technology. Robbie On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:54, Paul Durrant wrote: The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow regards, Paul _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From band1 at mac.com Tue Oct 20 17:46:14 2009 From: band1 at mac.com (David King) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:46:14 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <5A23B9DA-4AB8-4FEE-ACA8-AD45341ACFC7@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <5A23B9DA-4AB8-4FEE-ACA8-AD45341ACFC7@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <3031908F-931F-4014-9466-AE4A5D67EBEF@mac.com> The pricing is there. Mac mini has a boost but same price. David On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:40, Paul Durrant wrote: > BusinessWeek didn't jump the gun - the store is just slow coming back. > > Full details are on the UK web site (except pricing). > > http://www.apple.com/uk/macbook/ > http://www.apple.com/uk/imac/ > http://www.apple.com/uk/macmini/ > http://www.apple.com/uk/macmini/ > > regards, > > Paul > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> The Apple Store isn't back up yet, but BusinessWeek have jumped the >> gun, and if they've broken an embargo time are going to be in Apple's >> Bad Books. >> >> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_announces.html >> >> The MacBook has a new polycarbonate shell, that's more like the >> unibody aluminium, and a built-in 7 hour battery, a LED backlight, >> 2.26GHz, 250GB and still the same price (in US$, anyway!) >> >> No more 20" and 24" iMac. The smaller iMac is now 21.5", and the >> bigger is 27", both with LED backlights. >> >> The new iMac design has a much smaller 'chin' under the display. >> >> The 21.5" has 3.06 and 3.33GHz chips, optional high end graphics, up >> to 16GB RAM and up to 2TB (Yes, 2,000GB) storage. Te 21.5" is >> available now. (Or at least, when the store comes back up.) >> >> The 27" is mouch more high end. The upper end of the range includes a >> QUAD CORE processor, but won't be with us until November. >> >> Both iMacs will have an SD Card slot. >> >> There's a new mouse - the mechanical scroll ball is replaced with a >> more tackpad like surface, so scrolling is by two fingered gestures. >> >> Mac Mini has got revamped - 2.26GHz and 2.53GHz. >> >> Also - Mac Mini Server! $999 and includes Mac OS X Server. No optical >> drive, but up to 1TB internal hard disk. >> >> >> >> It looks like a great line up. >> >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Tue Oct 20 17:48:19 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:48:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1C648084-84B4-446F-ABB5-3F2B5240E99D@zen.co.uk> So, thats out of the way. When are we going to get updates to Aperture, Final Cut Express using 64 bit goodness......? Any ideas? Also, does anyone know of a rental shop that will rent out digital projectors. I'm doing a presentation for someone at the end of November and don't want to buy one. Must be Mac DVI capable or at least fit an adapter. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:44, Robbie Murray wrote: > From Apple Hot News RSS ...... > > 1. Apple today updated its popular MacBook with a new, durable > polycarbonate unibody design featuring a brilliant LED-backlit > display, a glass Multi-Touch trackpad and Apple?s innovative built-in > battery for up to seven hours of battery life. Inheriting technology > and design features from the MacBook Pro line, the new MacBook is an > ideal consumer notebook for students and new Mac users, and is > available for $999. > > 2. Today Apple introduced the new wireless Magic Mouse, the first > mouse to use Apple?s revolutionary Multi-Touch technology. Pioneered > on iPhone, iPod touch and Mac notebook trackpads, Multi-Touch allows > customers to navigate using intuitive finger gestures. Instead of > mechanical buttons, scroll wheels or scroll balls, the entire top of > the Magic Mouse is a seamless Multi-Touch surface. Magic Mouse comes > standard with the new iMac and will be available as a Mac accessory at > just $69. > > 3. Apple today unveiled an all new iMac line featuring brilliant LED- > backlit 21.5 and 27-inch widescreen displays in a new edge-to-edge > glass design and seamless all aluminum enclosure. The new iMac line, > starting at $1,199, is the fastest ever with Intel Core 2 Duo > processors starting at 3.06 GHz, and Core i5 and i7 quad-core > processors for up to twice the performance. Every new iMac ships with > a wireless keyboard and the all new wireless Magic Mouse, the world?s > first mouse with Multi-Touch technology. > > > > > Robbie > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:54, Paul Durrant wrote: > > The current rumour is that Apple will announce lots of updated > products later today - MacBook, iMac, Mac Mini, Mouse. > > We'll find out in a few hours if it's true! > > http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/10/19/tomorrow > > regards, > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ian at igdesign.co.uk Tue Oct 20 18:39:18 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:39:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] "Inside Macintosh" vols 1-5 from 1987 Message-ID: Dear All, I have volumes I to V of Inside Macintosh, going free to a good home. Well, any home really. This is the original technical manual for the Mac operating system in the days of OS6 and 7, and a lot of it stayed relevant up to OS9, although there were many more volumes by then. Vols I-IV are from 1987; Vol V is 1988. They're in "used" condition, though not actually falling apart. If anyone is interested, I might be able to get them to Norwich sometime soon (I live in Felixstowe). Otherwise they're for the bin. Regards, Ian From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 19:22:46 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:22:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> Message-ID: <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> So it is. MacBook - now up to ?799 from ?749. Not a good move. :-( And they've dropped firewire on the MacBook - a very bad move. It looks rather poor value compared to the 13" MacBook Pro, just ?100 more, and with Firewire 800 and an SD card slot. (In the US, the difference is $200) The iMacs look wonderful, as do the Mac Minis and Mac Mini Server. regards, Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:36, David King wrote: > The store is back up > > David > > > On 20 Oct 2009, at 17:20, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> The Apple Store isn't back up yet, but BusinessWeek have jumped the >> gun, and if they've broken an embargo time are going to be in Apple's >> Bad Books. >> >> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_announces.html >> >> The MacBook has a new polycarbonate shell, that's more like the >> unibody aluminium, and a built-in 7 hour battery, a LED backlight, >> 2.26GHz, 250GB and still the same price (in US$, anyway!) >> >> No more 20" and 24" iMac. The smaller iMac is now 21.5", and the >> bigger is 27", both with LED backlights. >> >> The new iMac design has a much smaller 'chin' under the display. >> >> The 21.5" has 3.06 and 3.33GHz chips, optional high end graphics, up >> to 16GB RAM and up to 2TB (Yes, 2,000GB) storage. Te 21.5" is >> available now. (Or at least, when the store comes back up.) >> >> The 27" is mouch more high end. The upper end of the range includes a >> QUAD CORE processor, but won't be with us until November. >> >> Both iMacs will have an SD Card slot. >> >> There's a new mouse - the mechanical scroll ball is replaced with a >> more tackpad like surface, so scrolling is by two fingered gestures. >> >> Mac Mini has got revamped - 2.26GHz and 2.53GHz. >> >> Also - Mac Mini Server! $999 and includes Mac OS X Server. No optical >> drive, but up to 1TB internal hard disk. >> >> >> >> It looks like a great line up. >> >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 20 19:36:17 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:36:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <01BED516-CF4E-45F3-91FB-6B76F89961ED@mac.com> On 20 Oct 2009, at 19:22, Paul Durrant wrote: > The iMacs look wonderful That Jony (sic) Ives has been at it again, I see. I think the marketing video for the new iMacs is pretty polished in itself, and it's great to see our English designer centre stage. Of course I want one, but I can only justify it if I can get one of my older machines to crack up. A few months of flat-out AVCHD video editing should do it, I reckon. Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 20 19:46:51 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:46:51 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Look for updates TODAY! In-Reply-To: <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <0DB19A26-375A-4930-A623-0D6F955FEF8A@mac.com> On 20 Oct 2009, at 19:22, Paul Durrant wrote: > The iMacs look wonderful And just check out that Magic mouse - possibly the most innovative and important engineering/design feature of today's launches. Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From helendawson41 at yahoo.com Tue Oct 20 20:22:11 2009 From: helendawson41 at yahoo.com (Helen Dawson) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [NMUG] Help! - Printer recognition Message-ID: <402917.14501.qm@web112015.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Hi all. I have an Apple imac OSX10.5.7 It won't recognise my laser printer Panasonic KX-P6300, although it seems to recognise a significant number of other Panasonic models. I know the printer is ten years old, but it hasn't had much use and it was still functioning perfectly with the old pc. I'm reluctant to consign it to the re-cycle bin and buy a newer model if there is a way that I can use it with the new Apple. Is anyone able to help, please? Helen From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Tue Oct 20 20:55:03 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:55:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help! - Printer recognition In-Reply-To: <402917.14501.qm@web112015.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <402917.14501.qm@web112015.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <483D4564-B1E3-46A2-91EC-BD2922C105D0@zen.co.uk> Could Try the Gutenprint Drivers.... They cover off a lot, track down at Version tracker Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 20 Oct 2009, at 20:22, Helen Dawson wrote: > Hi all. > > I have an Apple imac OSX10.5.7 > > It won't recognise my laser printer Panasonic KX-P6300, although it > seems to recognise a significant number of other Panasonic models. > > I know the printer is ten years old, but it hasn't had much use and > it was still functioning perfectly with the old pc. I'm reluctant > to consign it to the re-cycle bin and buy a newer model if there is > a way that I can use it with the new Apple. > > Is anyone able to help, please? > > Helen > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 21:56:09 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:56:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: I've been having a look through the updates. Here's my summary and comments. MacBook ======= A nice design, but spoiled by lack of Firewire. I'd recommend anyone wanting a 13" portable Mac to spend the extra ?100 and get the 13" MacBook Pro. iMac ==== iMac 21.5" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (21.5", 1920x1080 pixels), faster processor, more memory, bigger hard drive, Sd card slot, SAME price as before, ?949. (?1:$1.45) iMac 21.5" High: Not as good value as the low end model IMO. An Extra 500GB storage and a better graphics card doesn't seem a lot for the extra ?250. But if you'll be doing intensive graphics or 3D gaming it might be worth it. iMac 27" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (27", 2560x1440 pixels), faster processor, same memory, but 16GB maximum, bigger hard drive, Better Graphics card, SD card slot, LOWER price than before, ?1349. (?1:$1.45) iMac 27" High: Wow. As above, but QUAD core processor and better graphics. And ?200 cheaper than the previous high-end iMac, at 'just' ?1599. (?1:$1.44) And the 27" iMacs can display video from an external source - i.e. you can use them as a big 27" monitor for, say, a BlueRay player. Amazing value, seeing as the 30" monitor (2560x1600) costs ?1173 on its own! All iMacs now come with new Magic Mouse and Bluetooth keyboard as standard. Mac mini ======== Same prices as before, but faster with more memory and bigger hard disks. A ho-hum speed bump. EXCEPT - the Mac mini now has BOTH a Mini DisplayPort AND a Mini DVI port, and it can use both at once, support TWO monitors! But the BIGGER Mac mini news is the Mac mini Server. ?799 gets you the Mac mini server. A new machine in a Mac mini case - but with no optical drive. This makes room to have dual 500GB internal hard drives - giving mirroring in-the-box. And that ?799 INCLUDES the ?399 unlimited Snow Leopard Server software. This is an amazing little server machine. Stunning value. Magic Mouse =========== Intriguing new bluetooth mouse. Looks good. ?55. Remote Control ============== At last, a new remote control that matches the Aluminium styling of new Macs. ?15. regards, Paul From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 20 22:01:47 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:01:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Help! - Printer recognition In-Reply-To: <402917.14501.qm@web112015.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <402917.14501.qm@web112015.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <66E1063C-1C75-4824-8C56-704F3D2BBE3C@durrant.co.uk> I think that printer is a GDI printer - it relies on the Graphics System Software in Windows to work, and won't work with anything other than Windows. Gutenprint says it supports the KX-P6150 and the KX-P6500, but doesn't mention your KX-P6300. It's still worth trying, but I don't expect it to work. You can download from http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimp-print/files/ you want the gutenprint-5.2.4.dmg download. regards, Paul On 20 Oct 2009, at 20:22, Helen Dawson wrote: > I have an Apple imac OSX10.5.7 > > It won't recognise my laser printer Panasonic KX-P6300, although it > seems to recognise a significant number of other Panasonic models. > > I know the printer is ten years old, but it hasn't had much use and > it was still functioning perfectly with the old pc. I'm reluctant > to consign it to the re-cycle bin and buy a newer model if there is > a way that I can use it with the new Apple. > > Is anyone able to help, please? From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Tue Oct 20 22:03:14 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:03:14 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <301BBF0B-5BDD-43B2-86EB-F9AB215CC597@zen.co.uk> Pretty good summary. Were it not that I upgraded earlier this year the high end Macs would be very tempting against the base Mac Pro I bought (2.26 Octocore). One thing I have found is that all 8 cores do occasionally get an outing but so far the most processor intensive its got is 50% and briefly at that. However, what will GCD and OpenCL open up on updated software like Aperture and Final Cut? It will be interesting to see the benchmarks when they are done. I will however, be getting a magic mouse. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 20 Oct 2009, at 21:56, Paul Durrant wrote: > I've been having a look through the updates. Here's my summary and > comments. > > MacBook > ======= > A nice design, but spoiled by lack of Firewire. I'd recommend anyone > wanting a 13" portable Mac to spend the extra ?100 and get the 13" > MacBook Pro. > > > iMac > ==== > iMac 21.5" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (21.5", 1920x1080 > pixels), faster processor, more memory, bigger hard drive, Sd card > slot, SAME price as before, ?949. (?1:$1.45) > > iMac 21.5" High: Not as good value as the low end model IMO. An Extra > 500GB storage and a better graphics card doesn't seem a lot for the > extra ?250. But if you'll be doing intensive graphics or 3D gaming it > might be worth it. > > iMac 27" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (27", 2560x1440 > pixels), faster processor, same memory, but 16GB maximum, bigger hard > drive, Better Graphics card, SD card slot, LOWER price than before, > ?1349. (?1:$1.45) > > iMac 27" High: Wow. As above, but QUAD core processor and better > graphics. And ?200 cheaper than the previous high-end iMac, at 'just' > ?1599. (?1:$1.44) > > And the 27" iMacs can display video from an external source - i.e. you > can use them as a big 27" monitor for, say, a BlueRay player. Amazing > value, seeing as the 30" monitor (2560x1600) costs ?1173 on its own! > > All iMacs now come with new Magic Mouse and Bluetooth keyboard as > standard. > > Mac mini > ======== > Same prices as before, but faster with more memory and bigger hard > disks. A ho-hum speed bump. EXCEPT - the Mac mini now has BOTH a Mini > DisplayPort AND a Mini DVI port, and it can use both at once, support > TWO monitors! > > But the BIGGER Mac mini news is the Mac mini Server. ?799 gets you the > Mac mini server. A new machine in a Mac mini case - but with no > optical drive. This makes room to have dual 500GB internal hard drives > - giving mirroring in-the-box. And that ?799 INCLUDES the ?399 > unlimited Snow Leopard Server software. This is an amazing little > server machine. Stunning value. > > Magic Mouse > =========== > Intriguing new bluetooth mouse. Looks good. ?55. > > Remote Control > ============== > At last, a new remote control that matches the Aluminium styling of > new Macs. ?15. > > regards, > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Tue Oct 20 22:05:39 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:05:39 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: <301BBF0B-5BDD-43B2-86EB-F9AB215CC597@zen.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <301BBF0B-5BDD-43B2-86EB-F9AB215CC597@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <33C1B767-92C7-428D-B20F-FA2D059BB2A9@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> On 20 Oct 2009, at 22:03, Steven Jefferson wrote: > I will however, be getting a magic mouse. Me too. I don't really have any need to upgrade at the moment but the mouse looks interesting enough to give a try. Hopefully will be able to try one out in the Apple store beforehand. -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 10:04:10 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:04:10 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop Message-ID: I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the next image it changes itself to 8! Regards Martin Martin Fry www.martinfryphotography.com From stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk Wed Oct 21 12:53:07 2009 From: stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk (Stair) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:53:07 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching Message-ID: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Hi all, I tried to attach an email using Yahoo mail in Firefox on my MacBook today and the document (as were several others) was greyed out so I couldn't click on it. Firefox also crashed. Anyone know what is wrong? Stair From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 21 13:50:50 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:50:50 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> Did you actually intend to attach one email message inside another email? If so, I don't know how Yahoo will react to this without first saving the email as text and then attaching it. I don't use BT/Yahoo so don't know. The better option is to forward the email you intended to attach rather than actually trying to attach it. Or were you attaching a document? What was the size of the thing you were trying to attach? And at what point did Firefox crash? Ken Stair wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to attach an email using Yahoo mail in Firefox on my MacBook today and the document (as were several others) was greyed out so I couldn't click on it. > > Firefox also crashed. > > Anyone know what is wrong? > > Stair > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 21 15:13:03 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:13:03 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> Martin, Assuming you're shooting in RAW, why not simply convert down to jpeg at the end point? I don't really see any advantages working in jpeg format, although there are many disadvantages. Tom Martin Fry wrote: > I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. > > Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images > as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; > 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? > > I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the next > image it changes itself to 8! > > Regards > > Martin > > Martin Fry > www.martinfryphotography.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From david.tillyer at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 16:04:14 2009 From: david.tillyer at googlemail.com (David Tillyer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:04:14 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant Message-ID: Hi Guys & Gals, I've been very happy with my 24" iMac up until yesterday when Apple launched the 27" Quad Core version which will suit my needs perfectly. Suffice to say I am scheming up ways to get the money together. I will want to migrate my stuff from the Old iMac on to the new one but I only want certain apps transferred. Can I be selective on what goes across or is 'all or nothing'? Cheers, Dave -- :: :: :: :: http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 21 16:07:22 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:07:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ADF23AA.1080908@tomkershaw.com> What about waiting for the Mac Pro machines to be updated, you then have more choice over upgrades, monitor selection etc? I suppose it's a question of more expense now for a longer lasting system or deciding to upgrade to a new machine every couple of years. Tom David Tillyer wrote: > Hi Guys & Gals, > I've been very happy with my 24" iMac up until yesterday when Apple launched > the 27" Quad Core version which will suit my needs perfectly. Suffice to say > I am scheming up ways to get the money together. I will want to migrate my > stuff from the Old iMac on to the new one but I only want certain > apps transferred. Can I be selective on what goes across or is 'all or > nothing'? > > Cheers, > > Dave > > From david.tillyer at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 16:20:48 2009 From: david.tillyer at googlemail.com (David Tillyer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:20:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: <4ADF23AA.1080908@tomkershaw.com> References: <4ADF23AA.1080908@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: Hi Tom, The Pro's are over-kill for me and the 27" LED Screen and ability to play xbox or playstation through it as just a monitor is great. I also like the all-in-one form factor and the ?1600 price point is about all I could afford. D 2009/10/21 Tom Kershaw > What about waiting for the Mac Pro machines to be updated, you then have > more choice over upgrades, monitor selection etc? I suppose it's a > question of more expense now for a longer lasting system or deciding to > upgrade to a new machine every couple of years. > > Tom > > David Tillyer wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :: :: :: :: http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 16:27:44 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:27:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <66B60E5A-0712-4DD3-A259-4E95688C889B@durrant.co.uk> Migration Assistant allows you to choose categories to be transferred, but not to pick and choose within the categories. So you could choose not to transfer Applications, but you can't choose to transfer just some Applications. And yes, the qyad-core 27" iMac looks like a fantastic machine. Mind you - the Mac mini is looking pretty good these days too, with dual monitor support. Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:04, David Tillyer wrote: > Hi Guys & Gals, > I've been very happy with my 24" iMac up until yesterday when Apple > launched > the 27" Quad Core version which will suit my needs perfectly. > Suffice to say > I am scheming up ways to get the money together. I will want to > migrate my > stuff from the Old iMac on to the new one but I only want certain > apps transferred. Can I be selective on what goes across or is 'all or > nothing'? > From david.tillyer at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 16:33:22 2009 From: david.tillyer at googlemail.com (David Tillyer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:33:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: <66B60E5A-0712-4DD3-A259-4E95688C889B@durrant.co.uk> References: <66B60E5A-0712-4DD3-A259-4E95688C889B@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Thanks Paul, I would want to only transfer applications although I worry that I only have the old iLife and the new machine would have the new one. I assume its smart enough not to replace new with old? The Mini is a good prospect, especially after the recent updates but this may replace my Plasma as my main media screen so the 27" size is crucial and the 24" Cinema is not big enough. D 2009/10/21 Paul Durrant > Migration Assistant allows you to choose categories to be transferred, > but not to pick and choose within the categories. So you could choose > not to transfer Applications, but you can't choose to transfer just > some Applications. > > And yes, the qyad-core 27" iMac looks like a fantastic machine. > Mind you - the Mac mini is looking pretty good these days too, with > dual monitor support. > > Paul > > On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:04, David Tillyer wrote: > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :: :: :: :: http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 16:37:08 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:37:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: References: <66B60E5A-0712-4DD3-A259-4E95688C889B@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <178609E6-A879-4743-A7E6-E873B42CF398@durrant.co.uk> Yes, if you transfer the applications, it's smart enough not to delete newer versions. Looking at the price of the 27" iMac compared to the 30" monitor, it's surprisingly good value. Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:33, David Tillyer wrote: > Thanks Paul, > I would want to only transfer applications although I worry that I > only have > the old iLife and the new machine would have the new one. I assume > its smart > enough not to replace new with old? > > The Mini is a good prospect, especially after the recent updates but > this > may replace my Plasma as my main media screen so the 27" size is > crucial and > the 24" Cinema is not big enough. > > D > > 2009/10/21 Paul Durrant > >> Migration Assistant allows you to choose categories to be >> transferred, >> but not to pick and choose within the categories. So you could choose >> not to transfer Applications, but you can't choose to transfer just >> some Applications. >> >> And yes, the qyad-core 27" iMac looks like a fantastic machine. >> Mind you - the Mac mini is looking pretty good these days too, with >> dual monitor support. >> >> Paul >> >> On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:04, David Tillyer wrote: >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > > > -- > :: :: :: :: > > http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 16:41:29 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:41:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> References: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: <5446E436-5687-4942-B5A4-0DA6506D1A94@virgin.net> Tom I really wish you could answer a straight question without trying to tell professionals how to do their jobs. There is no advantage in working in Jpeg at all, but to have the images printed at any professional labs & upload them via FTP, they have to be jpegs! Also shooting 1000 kids images in raw format using a studio light setup on site when everything (lighting) is controlled would use a massive amount of storage space & time to convert. I very seldom need to adjust my images using raw as I take the time to check & recheck as I shoot. But I do normally and always have shot stock in raw format. Now, as to my original question: >> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images >> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? Martin > Martin, > > Assuming you're shooting in RAW, why not simply convert down to jpeg > at > the end point? I don't really see any advantages working in jpeg > format, > although there are many disadvantages. > > Tom > > Martin Fry wrote: >> I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. >> >> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images >> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >> >> I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the next >> image it changes itself to 8! >> >> Regards >> >> Martin >> >> Martin Fry >> www.martinfryphotography.com >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Martin Fry www.martinfryphotography.com From david.tillyer at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 16:54:31 2009 From: david.tillyer at googlemail.com (David Tillyer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:54:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Migration Assitant In-Reply-To: <178609E6-A879-4743-A7E6-E873B42CF398@durrant.co.uk> References: <66B60E5A-0712-4DD3-A259-4E95688C889B@durrant.co.uk> <178609E6-A879-4743-A7E6-E873B42CF398@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Thanks again Paul, Great, that's perfect. I didn't bother using the assistant last time as I wanted to be selective on I moved. Yes, the 27" is great value in comparison to the 30" and I could always add a PRO later and use the iMac as a monitor. Dave 2009/10/21 Paul Durrant > Yes, if you transfer the applications, it's smart enough not to delete > newer versions. > > Looking at the price of the 27" iMac compared to the 30" monitor, it's > surprisingly good value. > > Paul > > On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:33, David Tillyer wrote: > > > >> > >> Paul > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :: :: :: :: http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer From david.tillyer at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 17:00:08 2009 From: david.tillyer at googlemail.com (David Tillyer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:00:08 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: <5446E436-5687-4942-B5A4-0DA6506D1A94@virgin.net> References: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> <5446E436-5687-4942-B5A4-0DA6506D1A94@virgin.net> Message-ID: Martin, I agree with you, a question asked should deserve a decent answer or no response at all. As for your issue, I cannot see why it would do that. Mine tends to give the last used qulaity setting or the setting for the file if it has already been through PS (if that makes sense?). Do you have lightroom? Its great for batch sizing. But if you are working on an image by image basis then I do not know what to suggest as it should not do what it appears to be doing! Dave 2009/10/21 Martin Fry > > Tom > > I really wish you could answer a straight question without trying to > tell professionals how to do their jobs. > > There is no advantage in working in Jpeg at all, but to have the > images printed at any professional labs & upload them via FTP, they > have to be jpegs! > > Also shooting 1000 kids images in raw format using a studio light > setup on site when everything (lighting) is controlled would use a > massive amount of storage space & time to convert. > > I very seldom need to adjust my images using raw as I take the time to > check & recheck as I shoot. But I do normally and always have shot > stock in raw format. > > Now, as to my original question: > > >> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images > >> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; > >> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? > > > > Martin > > > > > Martin, > > > > Assuming you're shooting in RAW, why not simply convert down to jpeg > > at > > the end point? I don't really see any advantages working in jpeg > > format, > > although there are many disadvantages. > > > > Tom > > > > Martin Fry wrote: > >> I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. > >> > >> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images > >> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; > >> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? > >> > >> I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the next > >> image it changes itself to 8! > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> Martin Fry > >> www.martinfryphotography.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > >> Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > Martin Fry > www.martinfryphotography.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :: :: :: :: http://www.twitter.com/davetillyer From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 21 17:07:28 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:07:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> Message-ID: I've just finished a remote session with Stair. The main problem was that he was attempting to attach an Apple Pages document to a Yahoo Mail email. Yahoo Mail seems to be restricted in terms of the filetypes it can handle. Exporting the Pages document as a .doc file and attaching that to an email did the trick. Richard. On 21 Oct 2009, at 13:50, Ken Hamer wrote: > Did you actually intend to attach one email message inside another > email? If so, I don't know how Yahoo will react to this without first > saving the email as text and then attaching it. I don't use BT/ > Yahoo so > don't know. The better option is to forward the email you intended to > attach rather than actually trying to attach it. > > Or were you attaching a document? > > What was the size of the thing you were trying to attach? > > And at what point did Firefox crash? > > Ken > > Stair wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I tried to attach an email using Yahoo mail in Firefox on my >> MacBook today and the document (as were several others) was greyed >> out so I couldn't click on it. >> >> Firefox also crashed. >> >> Anyone know what is wrong? >> >> Stair >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 17:07:51 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:07:51 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: References: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> <5446E436-5687-4942-B5A4-0DA6506D1A94@virgin.net> Message-ID: Thanks David I use Bridge with P/shop, It does Ok for my needs. Also my Canon Raw software if & when needed. As you say, in P/shop the last setting used is normal, this just decides to change the setting after a few pictures...Weird! Martin Martin Fry www.martinfryphotography.com > Martin, > I agree with you, a question asked should deserve a decent answer or > no > response at all. > > As for your issue, I cannot see why it would do that. Mine tends to > give the > last used qulaity setting or the setting for the file if it has > already been > through PS (if that makes sense?). > > Do you have lightroom? Its great for batch sizing. But if you are > working on > an image by image basis then I do not know what to suggest as it > should not > do what it appears to be doing! > > Dave > > 2009/10/21 Martin Fry > >> >> Tom >> >> I really wish you could answer a straight question without trying to >> tell professionals how to do their jobs. >> >> There is no advantage in working in Jpeg at all, but to have the >> images printed at any professional labs & upload them via FTP, they >> have to be jpegs! >> >> Also shooting 1000 kids images in raw format using a studio light >> setup on site when everything (lighting) is controlled would use a >> massive amount of storage space & time to convert. >> >> I very seldom need to adjust my images using raw as I take the time >> to >> check & recheck as I shoot. But I do normally and always have shot >> stock in raw format. >> >> Now, as to my original question: >> >>>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the >>>> images >>>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >> >> >>> Martin, >>> >>> Assuming you're shooting in RAW, why not simply convert down to jpeg >>> at >>> the end point? I don't really see any advantages working in jpeg >>> format, >>> although there are many disadvantages. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> Martin Fry wrote: >>>> I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. >>>> >>>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the >>>> images >>>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >>>> >>>> I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the >>>> next >>>> image it changes itself to 8! From munkt0n at gmail.com Wed Oct 21 17:27:24 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:24 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: exciting stuff, but I don't think the following is new > the Mac mini now has BOTH a Mini DisplayPort AND a Mini DVI port, and it can use both at once, support TWO monitors! The Mac mini I bought about 4 months ago had both those ports On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Paul Durrant wrote: > I've been having a look through the updates. Here's my summary and > comments. > > MacBook > ======= > A nice design, but spoiled by lack of Firewire. I'd recommend anyone > wanting a 13" portable Mac to spend the extra ?100 and get the 13" > MacBook Pro. > > > iMac > ==== > iMac 21.5" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (21.5", 1920x1080 > pixels), faster processor, more memory, bigger hard drive, Sd card > slot, SAME price as before, ?949. (?1:$1.45) > > iMac 21.5" High: Not as good value as the low end model IMO. An Extra > 500GB storage and a better graphics card doesn't seem a lot for the > extra ?250. But if you'll be doing intensive graphics or 3D gaming it > might be worth it. > > iMac 27" Low: What's not to like? Bigger display (27", 2560x1440 > pixels), faster processor, same memory, but 16GB maximum, bigger hard > drive, Better Graphics card, SD card slot, LOWER price than before, > ?1349. (?1:$1.45) > > iMac 27" High: Wow. As above, but QUAD core processor and better > graphics. And ?200 cheaper than the previous high-end iMac, at 'just' > ?1599. (?1:$1.44) > > And the 27" iMacs can display video from an external source - i.e. you > can use them as a big 27" monitor for, say, a BlueRay player. Amazing > value, seeing as the 30" monitor (2560x1600) costs ?1173 on its own! > > All iMacs now come with new Magic Mouse and Bluetooth keyboard as > standard. > > Mac mini > ======== > Same prices as before, but faster with more memory and bigger hard > disks. A ho-hum speed bump. EXCEPT - the Mac mini now has BOTH a Mini > DisplayPort AND a Mini DVI port, and it can use both at once, support > TWO monitors! > > But the BIGGER Mac mini news is the Mac mini Server. ?799 gets you the > Mac mini server. A new machine in a Mac mini case - but with no > optical drive. This makes room to have dual 500GB internal hard drives > - giving mirroring in-the-box. And that ?799 INCLUDES the ?399 > unlimited Snow Leopard Server software. This is an amazing little > server machine. Stunning value. > > Magic Mouse > =========== > Intriguing new bluetooth mouse. Looks good. ?55. > > Remote Control > ============== > At last, a new remote control that matches the Aluminium styling of > new Macs. ?15. > > regards, > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 21 17:27:13 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> Just expanding on this slightly - the intended recipient in this case probably couldn't have handles a Pages file anyway. If Stair wanted to send a Pages document to someone who had had Pages at their end, he could have compressed the Pages file before sending. Yahoo seems to accept zip files (sometimes after baulking about sending them a couple of times first - over enthusiastic ant-virus software, probably Norton, I suspect!). Richard. On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:07, Richard Nevill wrote: > I've just finished a remote session with Stair. > > The main problem was that he was attempting to attach an Apple Pages > document to a Yahoo Mail email. > Yahoo Mail seems to be restricted in terms of the filetypes it can > handle. > > Exporting the Pages document as a .doc file and attaching that to an > email did the trick. > > Richard. > > Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 21 17:34:44 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:34:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> Message-ID: <2F5CD05D-869E-4F62-B8A8-3E61DABD2445@mac.com> On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:27, Richard Nevill wrote: > couldn't have handles a Pages file anyway. Handles? Simples! > over enthusiastic ant-virus Is there a jab available on the NHS for this yet? I must pop my keyboard through the washing machine tomorrow - anyone know which programme to use? Richard. From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 17:34:54 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:34:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <650B8DC3-BE4E-4F04-960C-21F9F02F8521@durrant.co.uk> You're right - the two video ports got added to the previous Mac mini update. No wonder there wasn't much mention of it this time around. Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:27, Scott Matthews wrote: > exciting stuff, but I don't think the following is new > >> the Mac mini now has BOTH a Mini DisplayPort AND a Mini DVI port, >> and it can use both at once, support TWO monitors! > > The Mac mini I bought about 4 months ago had both those ports From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 17:36:41 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:36:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> Message-ID: Unless the document needs editing at the other end, I'd always suggest sending a PDF. regards, Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:07, Richard Nevill wrote: > I've just finished a remote session with Stair. > > The main problem was that he was attempting to attach an Apple Pages > document to a Yahoo Mail email. > Yahoo Mail seems to be restricted in terms of the filetypes it can > handle. > > Exporting the Pages document as a .doc file and attaching that to an > email did the trick. From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 21 17:55:42 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:55:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: References: <4ADF16EF.9090703@tomkershaw.com> <5446E436-5687-4942-B5A4-0DA6506D1A94@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4ADF3D0E.8030503@tomkershaw.com> I don't think any offense should be taken Martin, it wasn't clear at what point jpegs came into the discussion. I thought you were re-editing jpegs. Tom Martin Fry wrote: > Thanks David > > I use Bridge with P/shop, It does Ok for my needs. Also my Canon Raw > software if & when needed. > > As you say, in P/shop the last setting used is normal, this just > decides to change the setting after a few pictures...Weird! > > Martin > > Martin Fry > www.martinfryphotography.com > > > > > > > >> Martin, >> > > >> I agree with you, a question asked should deserve a decent answer or >> no >> response at all. >> >> As for your issue, I cannot see why it would do that. Mine tends to >> give the >> last used qulaity setting or the setting for the file if it has >> already been >> through PS (if that makes sense?). >> >> Do you have lightroom? Its great for batch sizing. But if you are >> working on >> an image by image basis then I do not know what to suggest as it >> should not >> do what it appears to be doing! >> >> Dave >> >> 2009/10/21 Martin Fry >> >> >>> Tom >>> >>> I really wish you could answer a straight question without trying to >>> tell professionals how to do their jobs. >>> >>> There is no advantage in working in Jpeg at all, but to have the >>> images printed at any professional labs & upload them via FTP, they >>> have to be jpegs! >>> >>> Also shooting 1000 kids images in raw format using a studio light >>> setup on site when everything (lighting) is controlled would use a >>> massive amount of storage space & time to convert. >>> >>> I very seldom need to adjust my images using raw as I take the time >>> to >>> check & recheck as I shoot. But I do normally and always have shot >>> stock in raw format. >>> >>> Now, as to my original question: >>> >>> >>>>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the >>>>> images >>>>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>>>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >>>>> >>> >>>> Martin, >>>> >>>> Assuming you're shooting in RAW, why not simply convert down to jpeg >>>> at >>>> the end point? I don't really see any advantages working in jpeg >>>> format, >>>> although there are many disadvantages. >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> Martin Fry wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am editing 700 images from a dance school shoot. >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the >>>>> images >>>>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>>>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >>>>> >>>>> I do perhaps, 12 images at quality 10 and when I go to save the >>>>> next >>>>> image it changes itself to 8! >>>>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From macman at f2s.com Wed Oct 21 17:56:59 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: <2F5CD05D-869E-4F62-B8A8-3E61DABD2445@mac.com> References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> <628C2520-B714-4864-8E00-06D99BE108E0@mac.com> <2F5CD05D-869E-4F62-B8A8-3E61DABD2445@mac.com> Message-ID: <61CB2C19-C807-44FD-9874-6596579556E9@f2s.com> Not sure about the washing machine, but I've successfully restored 5 x Mac keyboards back to life in the dishwasher ..... Robbie On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:34, Richard Nevill wrote: On 21 Oct 2009, at 17:27, Richard Nevill wrote: > couldn't have handles a Pages file anyway. Handles? Simples! > over enthusiastic ant-virus Is there a jab available on the NHS for this yet? I must pop my keyboard through the washing machine tomorrow - anyone know which programme to use? Richard. _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 18:05:35 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:05:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Remote support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Subject: Re: [NMUG] Email attaching > > > I've just finished a remote session with Stair. That's interesting.. what did you do to connect and conduct the support? I've never found a reliable and consistent way of doing this: sometimes the iChat solution works, another time it runs out of bandwidth. From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 21 18:16:44 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:16:44 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Remote support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <18B6EA9B-6DC4-4335-92B9-C7033748BD52@mac.com> On 21 Oct 2009, at 18:05, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > > >> Subject: Re: [NMUG] Email attaching >> >> >> I've just finished a remote session with Stair. > > > That's interesting.. what did you do to connect and conduct the > support? I've never found a reliable and consistent way of doing this: > sometimes the iChat solution works, another time it runs out of > bandwidth. > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug LogMeIn Free: https://secure.logmein.com/US/products/free/ I've been using it every now and then for a couple of years to support about 20 F&F. It was a bit flakey on Macs at first, but recent updates have made it quite useable. I am on BT's rural package :-( so if it works for me it should be fine for anyone with a more typical UK average broadband speed: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2008/feb/20/averageukbroadbandspeedis Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From djr.massy at ntlworld.com Wed Oct 21 18:17:38 2009 From: djr.massy at ntlworld.com (DJR Massy) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:17:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> Hi Martin, I don't know the answer to the question either, but a way round might be to use an "Action". I would think that would be more consistent. The "Action" could be started at the "Save As. . ." stage. I've just tried this out and it is consistent over 3 images. And of course using an "Action" saves time. I hope this suggestion is useful. Jim. ============================================== On 21 Oct 2009, at 16:54, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > Now, as to my original question: > >>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the images >>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? > > > > Martin From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 18:45:40 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:45:40 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P/Shop In-Reply-To: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> References: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> Hi Jim Good point! I had already made actions to lighten the shadows & to saturate & Sharpen the images, and as all the images were going into the same folder!!! Too late now as I have finished them all & they are with the printers now. Regards Martin Martin Fry www.martinfryphotography.com > Hi Martin, > > I don't know the answer to the question either, but a way round might > be to use an "Action". I would think that would be more consistent. > The "Action" could be started at the "Save As. . ." stage. I've just > tried this out and it is consistent over 3 images. And of course > using an "Action" saves time. > > I hope this suggestion is useful. > > > >> Now, as to my original question: >> >>>> Has anyone any ideas as to why, in Photoshop, when saving the >>>> images >>>> as jpegs the 'Save As' box keeps changing the quality number ie; >>>> 8,10,12 etc all on it's own? >> From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 18:56:19 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:56:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Backup to tape In-Reply-To: <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> References: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> Message-ID: <33D1AEEF-952A-4FAB-8412-AA39BE5E1FB6@durrant.co.uk> Hi finally got around to swapping out my ancient 400MHz B&W G3 (upgraded to G4) for a much more more recent Quicksilver G4 867MHz model (?65). I'm backing up the network to a couple of SDLT tape drives over gigabit ethernet using Retrospect. I was getting just 50MB/min with the old setup. 500MB/min with the new one! Yes, ten times faster. I wish I'd swapped it out a bit sooner! Paul From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 21 19:15:16 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:15:16 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Backup to tape In-Reply-To: <33D1AEEF-952A-4FAB-8412-AA39BE5E1FB6@durrant.co.uk> References: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> <33D1AEEF-952A-4FAB-8412-AA39BE5E1FB6@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <4ADF4FB4.1040007@tomkershaw.com> Paul, Are you running your Mac OS X server installation on this G4 machine or is it simply used for tape backup? Tom Paul Durrant wrote: > Hi finally got around to swapping out my ancient 400MHz B&W G3 > (upgraded to G4) for a much more more recent Quicksilver G4 867MHz > model (?65). > > I'm backing up the network to a couple of SDLT tape drives over > gigabit ethernet using Retrospect. I was getting just 50MB/min with > the old setup. 500MB/min with the new one! Yes, ten times faster. > > I wish I'd swapped it out a bit sooner! > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 19:31:22 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:31:22 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Backup to tape In-Reply-To: <4ADF4FB4.1040007@tomkershaw.com> References: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> <33D1AEEF-952A-4FAB-8412-AA39BE5E1FB6@durrant.co.uk> <4ADF4FB4.1040007@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: It's just for tape backup. The old one was running Tiger, I upgraded to Leopard with the new machine. The main difference in speed is caused by the Mac being able to keep up with the speed of the tape drive - so it writes and reads (verifying) almost continuously. The old Mac couldn't quite supply the data fast enough, so the tape drive had to stop, back up, and find the place again a lot of times during a backup. So the machine's not ten times as fast. But the combination is. I had been considering moving to using cheap hard disks for archive instead of tape. But tape is still a little bit cheaper. Although it's getting very close! A 110GB tape costs me less than ?15. A 160GB hard drive is still around ?30. It may be that in another year I'll be better off buying a hard disk per month for archival purposes, rather than a tape. In which case, I'll swap that PCI SCSI card for an eSATA card and use some minimal hot-swap enclosure. regards, Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 19:15, Tom Kershaw wrote: > Paul, > > Are you running your Mac OS X server installation on this G4 machine > or > is it simply used for tape backup? > > Tom > > Paul Durrant wrote: >> Hi finally got around to swapping out my ancient 400MHz B&W G3 >> (upgraded to G4) for a much more more recent Quicksilver G4 867MHz >> model (?65). >> >> I'm backing up the network to a couple of SDLT tape drives over >> gigabit ethernet using Retrospect. I was getting just 50MB/min with >> the old setup. 500MB/min with the new one! Yes, ten times faster. >> >> I wish I'd swapped it out a bit sooner! >> >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 21 19:50:11 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:50:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Email attaching In-Reply-To: References: <174281.16361.qm@web26108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4ADF03AA.9090507@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <4ADF57E3.8050307@stackyard.org> Interesting. Some might argue that it's none of Yahoo's G.D. Business what 3-letter extension a file has, but there you go. I wonder if it actually looks to see if the file is what it says it is or if you can rename a file with the wrong 3LE to get it passed. Ridiculous either way. Richard Nevill wrote: > I've just finished a remote session with Stair. > > The main problem was that he was attempting to attach an Apple Pages > document to a Yahoo Mail email. > Yahoo Mail seems to be restricted in terms of the filetypes it can > handle. > > Exporting the Pages document as a .doc file and attaching that to an > email did the trick. > > Richard. > > > On 21 Oct 2009, at 13:50, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Did you actually intend to attach one email message inside another >> email? If so, I don't know how Yahoo will react to this without first >> saving the email as text and then attaching it. I don't use BT/ >> Yahoo so >> don't know. The better option is to forward the email you intended to >> attach rather than actually trying to attach it. >> >> Or were you attaching a document? >> >> What was the size of the thing you were trying to attach? >> >> And at what point did Firefox crash? >> >> Ken >> >> Stair wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I tried to attach an email using Yahoo mail in Firefox on my >>> MacBook today and the document (as were several others) was greyed >>> out so I couldn't click on it. >>> >>> Firefox also crashed. >>> >>> Anyone know what is wrong? >>> >>> Stair >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > Richard Nevill > ricnev at mac.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From steve.forst at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 19:54:21 2009 From: steve.forst at virgin.net (Steve Forster) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:54:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Keyboard In-Reply-To: <61CB2C19-C807-44FD-9874-6596579556E9@f2s.com> Message-ID: I?d forgotten about this. I?ve got 2 (white) Apple keyboards that the space bar has failed on (one a while back, the other yesterday). Got to be worth a try before buying a new one. Do you put soap etc in? I don?t have a home dishwasher but have access to an ?industrial? one in a catering kitchen, is this likely to be worth trying? Is there any particular programme to use? Which way up should it go? Any tips in drying the k/b out after? Sorry if these seem stupid questions. -- Steve Forster From: Robbie Murray Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:59 +0100 To: Norwich Mac User Group list Subject: Re: [NMUG] Email attaching Not sure about the washing machine, but I've successfully restored 5 x Mac keyboards back to life in the dishwasher ..... Robbie From stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk Wed Oct 21 19:54:45 2009 From: stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk (Stair) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:54:45 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [NMUG] Email attachment and remote Message-ID: <390768.6604.qm@web26101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Thanks to Richard for his help this afternoon...and thanks to Ken for the prompt questions. This support is great, especially when one is not just fairly new to Macs but rusty with IT in general. Stair From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Wed Oct 21 20:11:49 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:11:49 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] LogMeIn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7B99D933-B0B1-4574-8982-3EF8453F5810@gmail.com> >>> >>> I've just finished a remote session with Stair. >> >> >> That's interesting.. what did you do to connect and conduct the >> support? I've never found a reliable and consistent way of doing >> this: >> sometimes the iChat solution works, another time it runs out of >> bandwidth. > > LogMeIn Free: > > https://secure.logmein.com/US/products/free/ That'\s encouraging. Thanks for the inof. I used that to connect to my Mac farm in Naarwich from the USA and found I couldn't get a trouble free connection every time but if I persisted then I could get a long enough connection to do what had to be done. I am off again in a week's time and with your experience in mind I will give it another go. Latency obviously increases with distance and with the poor bandwidth one gets in the UK and indeed in lots of the USA this increases the chance of the sender overlapping identical commands because he isn't sure if the first one got through since he is still waiting for a response.. the consequence often being a crash... not too bad if it's local but a disaster if its the remote router or Mac that gets confused. This is one facility I'd really like Apple to tackle because when they do, they will do it right. That's not to say LogMeIn isn't well done, but I do think remote control ought to be part of OSX From sc at davidviner.com Wed Oct 21 20:15:17 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:15:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4ADF5DC5.5080801@davidviner.com> Steve You don't say exactly how the space bar has failed. Larger keys (space bar, return, backspace, shift etc) tend to have a thin, bent metal bar that slots into a couple of guides. The metal bar can often fall out of the guides or the lubrication that is used may have dried out making the key hard to press. If the bar falls out then the key will usually rock from side to side instead of only going up and down properly. If these are the older style white keyboards with proper keys (and not the "modern" Sinclair Spectrum style) then I've certainly had one of those completely apart and refurbished (all working nicely now). All keyboards will contain electronics so DON'T put them in water under any circumstances!! No really, I mean it! You can sometimes get away with it but I wouldn't risk it, ever. Any water left inside can cause shorts, problems and possibly blown chips. The best way is to completely dismantle the keyboard (the keys will usually pop off with a little force), manually clean off any dust or anything else nasty from the electronic or contact parts, then wash all the non-electronic parts in warm soapy water followed by a rinse in clean warm water. Many times the reason for failure is the contact has got dirty or the little rubbery "spring" has failed. In the keyboard I took to pieces these springs were all separate which means you can swap them around so that a little used one can be put under the space bar - getting all the little springs back in is fun ;-) Hope that helps (but if you bust 'em, don't blame me!) David Steve Forster wrote: > I?d forgotten about this. I?ve got 2 (white) Apple keyboards that the space > bar has failed on (one a while back, the other yesterday). > > Got to be worth a try before buying a new one. Do you put soap etc in? I > don?t have a home dishwasher but have access to an ?industrial? one in a > catering kitchen, is this likely to be worth trying? Is there any particular > programme to use? Which way up should it go? Any tips in drying the k/b out > after? Sorry if these seem stupid questions. > From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 21 20:36:47 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:36:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Backup to tape In-Reply-To: References: <1F47C7D4-3F88-41CB-892A-E005C4BFF04B@ntlworld.com> <4192FB88-F7FA-4053-AEF7-EE5B45F2203F@virgin.net> <33D1AEEF-952A-4FAB-8412-AA39BE5E1FB6@durrant.co.uk> <4ADF4FB4.1040007@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: Having check my logs, I see I was exaggerating slightly. The old backu speeds were actually 100-150MB/min. It's still a three to five times speed increase. I've also had a quick look at disk prices. Hmm.... you can get 250GB SATA desktop drives for ?30 now. That's certainly enough for a whole month's archiving. I shall have to investigate SATA cards and quick- change enclosures. Paul From steve.forst at virgin.net Wed Oct 21 21:37:38 2009 From: steve.forst at virgin.net (Steve Forster) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:37:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Keyboard In-Reply-To: <4ADF5DC5.5080801@davidviner.com> Message-ID: Thanks David They are older style rather than ?Spectrum? style (I still have a Spectrum ? but not a mono tape deck to load it with!) In fiddling just now I?ve clumsily managed to break the plastic clips on the key that the metal bar fits fits onto on yesterdays failure (spilt cup of tea, milk but thankfully no sugar) but have replaced it with the key from the older keyboard (beer spill a year or so back, big clean left everything except the space bar working but occasional erratic behaviour with random keys). I?ve had all the keys off and cleaned under them and everything works except space bar and up direction key (of the four direction keys that sit between letter keys and numeric keys). Not sure I?m brave enough or have time for a complete strip down. I also tried a gentle prod with a thin bit of plastic in the ?hole? beneath the space bar but that gives no result either. I do understand your reluctance re water ? my initial thoughts but it does seem to work for many people. I had already thought I?d try it with an old machine that isn?t crucial after a good long period of drying with keys off. A bit of web research shows quite a few mentions of the dishwasher method ? interestingly mostly from Mac users with Apple keyboards. Anyway if I do try washing I?ll let you know the result. Thanks again, Steve From: David Viner Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:15:17 +0100 To: Norwich Mac User Group list Subject: Re: [NMUG] Keyboard Steve You don't say exactly how the space bar has failed. Larger keys (space bar, return, backspace, shift etc) tend to have a thin, bent metal bar that slots into a couple of guides. The metal bar can often fall out of the guides or the lubrication that is used may have dried out making the key hard to press. If the bar falls out then the key will usually rock from side to side instead of only going up and down properly. If these are the older style white keyboards with proper keys (and not the "modern" Sinclair Spectrum style) then I've certainly had one of those completely apart and refurbished (all working nicely now). All keyboards will contain electronics so DON'T put them in water under any circumstances!! No really, I mean it! You can sometimes get away with it but I wouldn't risk it, ever. Any water left inside can cause shorts, problems and possibly blown chips. The best way is to completely dismantle the keyboard (the keys will usually pop off with a little force), manually clean off any dust or anything else nasty from the electronic or contact parts, then wash all the non-electronic parts in warm soapy water followed by a rinse in clean warm water. Many times the reason for failure is the contact has got dirty or the little rubbery "spring" has failed. In the keyboard I took to pieces these springs were all separate which means you can swap them around so that a little used one can be put under the space bar - getting all the little springs back in is fun ;-) Hope that helps (but if you bust 'em, don't blame me!) David Steve Forster wrote: > I?d forgotten about this. I?ve got 2 (white) Apple keyboards that the space > bar has failed on (one a while back, the other yesterday). > > Got to be worth a try before buying a new one. Do you put soap etc in? I > don?t have a home dishwasher but have access to an ?industrial? one in a > catering kitchen, is this likely to be worth trying? Is there any particular > programme to use? Which way up should it go? Any tips in drying the k/b out > after? Sorry if these seem stupid questions. > _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ian at igdesign.co.uk Wed Oct 21 22:45:41 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:45:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] "Inside Macintosh" vols 1-5 from 1987 Message-ID: <1C224872-7FB2-4864-AC71-4C6BC36A675E@igdesign.co.uk> Dear All, I have volumes I to V of Inside Macintosh, going free to a good home. Well, any home really. This is the original technical manual for the Mac operating system in the days of OS6 and 7, and a lot of it stayed relevant through OS9, although there were many more volumes by then. They're of historical interest only now, I guess. Vols I-IV are from 1987; Vol V is 1988. They're in "used" condition, though not actually falling apart. If anyone is interested, I might be able to get them to Norwich sometime soon (I live in Felixstowe). Otherwise they're for the bin. Regards, Ian From ricnev at mac.com Wed Oct 21 23:59:12 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:59:12 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] LogMeIn In-Reply-To: <7B99D933-B0B1-4574-8982-3EF8453F5810@gmail.com> References: <7B99D933-B0B1-4574-8982-3EF8453F5810@gmail.com> Message-ID: <647B81E6-AB08-4C97-9854-1DC6D8874C13@mac.com> On 21 Oct 2009, at 20:11, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > Latency obviously increases with > distance Err... not with my visualisation of the www it doesn't. Perhaps my presumption of random paths, repeaters and nodes is wrong? Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 06:57:55 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:57:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare In-Reply-To: <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> References: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> Message-ID: Hi Ken thanks for your input, sorry for the slow reply, I've been working a lot of hours lately. Let me try to explain how I came to the obscure choice of Darwin: I want to use the Unix commands to complement and enhance my Mac experience so rather than just learning about standard functionality that is present on most Unix I actually want to learn about the additional Apple commands. (I know these are useless outside of OS X, but that's ok). I want to feel in control of my OS and understand for myself what is happening for example when file permissions go screwy or an application behaves peculiarly without having to resort to third party application downloads that perform the task for me, when I know that I could simply carry out the task myself if I had a better understanding of the commands. I don't have a desire at the moment to configure a server but in the future that will most likely come up. I hear what you are saying about OS X not being the best place to start, I am now thinking that because I have forgotten pretty much all I learnt about Unix/Linux I should probably start from scratch and get up to speed with a basic Linux distribution and then move on to OS X once I have a better grasp. A friends once said that the best way to learn Linux is to complete a 'Linux from scratch' system he swore by it saying he learnt so much from this approach. Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 22:45, Ken Hamer wrote: > Of all the many UNIX and UNIX-like "distributions", I would have > thought > that Mac OS X is about the worst one to use for learning UNIX > because of > the lengths Apple have gone to in hiding the operating system from the > user. This gives the reliability and security advantages of UNIX > and a > very pretty, well-documented GUI but probably not the best UNIX > environment to study due to highly proprietary configuration > structures. > > The trouble with UNIX is that all versions are different from each > other. There are many fundamental differences so you might want to > define what you want to learn about before choosing a distribution. From allanmacam at me.com Thu Oct 22 07:12:25 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:12:25 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Lightroom 3 Message-ID: <0DA5EC46-046B-4848-9F10-201726A0D6A8@me.com> Adobe have just announced a public beta of Lightroom 3. Exciting and very impressive set of new features. http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom3/ Julieanne Kos does a walkthrough of some of the new features at: http://thurly.net//6th AJ From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Thu Oct 22 07:35:19 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:35:19 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare In-Reply-To: References: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> Message-ID: Have you thought about Clix? From rixstep Unix commands in a basic Mac GUI Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 22 Oct 2009, at 06:57, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi Ken thanks for your input, sorry for the slow reply, I've been > working a lot of hours lately. > > Let me try to explain how I came to the obscure choice of Darwin: > > I want to use the Unix commands to complement and enhance my Mac > experience so rather than just learning about standard functionality > that is present on most Unix I actually want to learn about the > additional Apple commands. (I know these are useless outside of OS X, > but that's ok). > > I want to feel in control of my OS and understand for myself what is > happening for example when file permissions go screwy or an > application behaves peculiarly without having to resort to third party > application downloads that perform the task for me, when I know that I > could simply carry out the task myself if I had a better understanding > of the commands. > > I don't have a desire at the moment to configure a server but in the > future that will most likely come up. > > I hear what you are saying about OS X not being the best place to > start, I am now thinking that because I have forgotten pretty much all > I learnt about Unix/Linux I should probably start from scratch and get > up to speed with a basic Linux distribution and then move on to OS X > once I have a better grasp. > > A friends once said that the best way to learn Linux is to complete a > 'Linux from scratch' system he > swore by it saying he learnt so much from this approach. > > Steve. > > > On 19 Oct 2009, at 22:45, Ken Hamer wrote: > >> Of all the many UNIX and UNIX-like "distributions", I would have >> thought >> that Mac OS X is about the worst one to use for learning UNIX >> because of >> the lengths Apple have gone to in hiding the operating system from >> the >> user. This gives the reliability and security advantages of UNIX >> and a >> very pretty, well-documented GUI but probably not the best UNIX >> environment to study due to highly proprietary configuration >> structures. >> >> The trouble with UNIX is that all versions are different from each >> other. There are many fundamental differences so you might want to >> define what you want to learn about before choosing a distribution. > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 07:38:00 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:38:00 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] P4 vs G4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Simon, While I agree that it's interesting remember that there will be people who do not share our enthusiasm and will be reading this and thinking "just because I drive a car doesn't mean I want to know how it works". That's fine but if you do have an interest in micro processors and their history I encourage you to watch a BBC documentary (available on iPlayer) called "Podfather" This is slightly apple related as it's said that Steve Jobs gained inspiration from the Podfather (Robert Noyce) for his business, style and innovation. I think it's great that Intel upped their game and improved the design of their CPUs after the P4 to the point where Apple deemed them worthy for inclusion in their desktops and notebooks but the processor war is not quite over yet as Apple refuse to adopt Intel's ATOM line claiming they are too power hungry for their intended purpose in netbooks/sub notebooks/tablets instead Apple is woking on it's own chip design that will go head-to-head with the Intel ATOM. Steve. On 19 Oct 2009, at 18:37, Simon Royal wrote: > My head has been swimming in Mhz, Ghz, pipelining, cache and all sorts > this afternoon. What an interesting subject processors are. > > Now that Apple has moved to Intel and both Mac and Windows share a > similar architecture the gap should be closer. From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Thu Oct 22 07:38:48 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:38:48 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Lightroom 3 In-Reply-To: <0DA5EC46-046B-4848-9F10-201726A0D6A8@me.com> References: <0DA5EC46-046B-4848-9F10-201726A0D6A8@me.com> Message-ID: <188D7522-BA20-4C0E-AF51-21C7E669A3FB@zen.co.uk> So when will Apple announce Aperture 3? 64 bit as I believe LR is already? I've played with LR lately. However, even with my Mac Pro its not as smooth as Aperture (or as easy to use) Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 22 Oct 2009, at 07:12, Allan wrote: > > Adobe have just announced a public beta of Lightroom 3. Exciting and > very impressive set of new features. > > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom3/ > > Julieanne Kos does a walkthrough of some of the new features at: > > http://thurly.net//6th > > AJ > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 08:13:47 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:13:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare In-Reply-To: References: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <92177D50-8495-4115-B324-7D02BB700137@gmail.com> Thanks, that looks ideal. Steve. On 22 Oct 2009, at 07:35, Steven Jefferson wrote: > Have you thought about Clix? > > From rixstep From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 22 08:47:36 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:47:36 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] LogMeIn In-Reply-To: <647B81E6-AB08-4C97-9854-1DC6D8874C13@mac.com> References: <7B99D933-B0B1-4574-8982-3EF8453F5810@gmail.com> <647B81E6-AB08-4C97-9854-1DC6D8874C13@mac.com> Message-ID: Latency does usually increase with distance, both because of an increase in the number of routers the packets are passing through, and also with speed of light issues. But only when we're talking about distances of several thousand miles (e.g. across the atlantic). Within the UK it won't make a lot of difference where you are. Take a look at the Network Utility (in the Utilities folder). Try a traceroute to various web addresses. You'll see a big jump in latency as you cross the atlantic. e.g. try a traceroute to www.durrant.co.uk - that's a server at Demon Internet in London. For me (as my ISP is Demon Internet) latency is only about 22ms on average. But a traceroute to www.wikipedia.org shows an average latency of 130ms. that's because the Wikipedia server appears to be in Florida. About 70ms of the extra time is the hop across the atlantic. Most of the other 40ms is because of some weird routing in the states through Washington and Atlanta. Paul On 21 Oct 2009, at 23:59, Richard Nevill wrote: > > On 21 Oct 2009, at 20:11, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > >> Latency obviously increases with >> distance > > > > Err... not with my visualisation of the www it doesn't. > > Perhaps my presumption of random paths, repeaters and nodes is wrong? From jill at 2js.org Thu Oct 22 08:59:33 2009 From: jill at 2js.org (Jill Searle) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:59:33 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Ext HD's Message-ID: Advice please. I am just setting up a new machine & to back up I have 2 Ext HD's - USB 2 & Firewire 800 - both with enough space for either Time Machine or SuperDuper. Which combination should I use for best advantage ? Jill From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 22 09:08:18 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:08:18 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Ext HD's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6BB5EE92-BA4B-4477-9E91-B7CE7398F67F@durrant.co.uk> Hi Jill, Use Firewire 800 for the hard disk connection rather than USB - it's a lot faster. If both your external drives are Firewire 800 then you can "daisy-chain" them - one cable from Mac to first drive, another cable from first drive to second drive. Time Machine is excellent for continuous backup and short-term archive. You should definitely have one disk as a Time Machine backup of your internal hard disk. What Time Machine doesn't do is provide you an instant way to continue working if your main disk or machine dies. Time Machine disks aren't bootable - you have to restore from the Time Machine volume to a new drive. SuperDuper, on the other hand, does produce bootable disks. You can boot off the SuperDuper drive and carry on (from the state of your last backup) as normal. So, a SuperDuper backup is good if you can't afford a few hours downtime. If you're in that situation, a backup Mac is also a good idea. For most users, Time Machine is all they need as backup. But ideally you should also do some archiving - copying important data (e.g. photos, music, documents) to DVD-R and storing the DVD-Rs away from the machine, and if possible off-site. Time Machine /isn't/ an archival system. Some people treat it that way, but if the Time Machine disk dies, your archive is gone. Archiving regularly to DVD-R will give you redundant copies of your most important data in multiple locations. regards, Paul On 22 Oct 2009, at 08:59, Jill Searle wrote: > Advice please. I am just setting up a new machine & to back up I have > 2 Ext HD's - USB 2 & Firewire 800 - both with enough space for either > Time Machine or SuperDuper. Which combination should I use for best > advantage ? > Jill > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 10:45:04 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:45:04 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Play WMV in QT Message-ID: <18361D03-61AD-4FB4-918C-61F86D4A2588@gmail.com> An earlier posting referenced difficulty playing WMV files in QuickTime and proposed VLC as the solution. At the time I said I was playing WMV files just fine in my OSX10.6.1/ QT 10.0 (51) set-up I have now found the same problem with a file. Opening the problem file throws an error that this file cannot be opened. Analysis of the header shows this: *** General Parameters *** - Name: goldfish.wmv - Container: ASF (Active Streaming Format) - Creation Date: 2009-10-22 10:06:21 - Size: 2.2 MiB - Duration: 0:00:42 - Bitrate: 455 Kbps - Encoding Library: Undefined - Encoding Application: Undefined *** Video Track Parameters *** - Format: DivX ;-) (MS MPEG-4 v3) - Size: 1.43 MiB (66%) - FourCC: MP43 - Track number(s): 1 - Bitrate: Max.: Undefined Average: 300 Kbps Min.: Undefined - Frame rate (fps): Max.: Undefined Average: 24.000 Min.: Undefined - Bitrate mode: Undefined - Encoding profile: Undefined - Resolution: 24 bits - Width (Pixel number): 320 - Height (Pixel number): 240 - Pixel Aspect Ratio: Undefined - Display aspect ratio: 4:3 - Chroma subsampling format: YUV420p - TV standard: Undefined - Interlacing: Undefined - Encoding library: Undefined - Additional Parameters: Bits/(Pixel*Frame) ratio: 0.163 *** Audio Track(s) Parameters *** - Format: Mpeg-1 layer 3 (mp3) Analysis of a WMV that plays fine shows this: *** General Parameters *** - Name: 20692-poolchick.wmv - Container: ASF (Active Streaming Format) - Creation Date: 2008-12-15 23:33:07 - Size: 659.1 KiB - Duration: 0:00:15 - Bitrate: 447 Kbps - Encoding Library: Undefined - Encoding Application: Undefined *** Video Track Parameters *** - Format: Windows Media Video 9 - Size: 382 KiB (58%) - FourCC: WMV3 - Track number(s): 2 - Bitrate: Max.: Undefined Average: 242 Kbps Min.: Undefined - Frame rate (fps): Max.: Undefined Average: 25.000 Min.: Undefined - Bitrate mode: Variable - Encoding profile: MP at ML - Resolution: 24 bits - Width (Pixel number): 640 - Height (Pixel number): 480 - Pixel Aspect Ratio: Undefined - Display aspect ratio: 4:3 - Chroma subsampling format: YUV420p - TV standard: Undefined - Interlacing: Progressive - Encoding library: Undefined - Additional Parameters: Bits/(Pixel*Frame) ratio: 0.031 *** Audio Track(s) Parameters *** - Format: Windows Media Audio Std v.2 - DivX audio v2 The major difference seems to be in the format. The one that doesn't play is DiVX, the other is WMV9. I reinstalled DiVX for QT and thought this had solved it because the file started to open into the familiar QT window but stopped with an OSS error which I failed to note before hitting the retry,. (something like -10009). On retry I just got the file was not recognized error. Anybody got more information and experience than I to help with this? Thanks From alan at asw6000.plus.com Thu Oct 22 12:02:42 2009 From: alan at asw6000.plus.com (Alan Williams) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:02:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Play WMV in QT In-Reply-To: <18361D03-61AD-4FB4-918C-61F86D4A2588@gmail.com> References: <18361D03-61AD-4FB4-918C-61F86D4A2588@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9B952082-7CF2-455E-B90E-00C51A26AA53@asw6000.plus.com> Stefan No idea what any of this means but VLC worked fine for me !!!!! regards Alan On 22 Oct 2009, at 10:45, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > An earlier posting referenced difficulty playing WMV files in > QuickTime and proposed VLC as the solution. > > At the time I said I was playing WMV files just fine in my OSX10.6.1/ > QT 10.0 (51) set-up > > I have now found the same problem with a file. Opening the problem > file throws an error that this file cannot be opened. Analysis of the > header shows this: > > *** General Parameters *** > - Name: goldfish.wmv > - Container: ASF (Active Streaming Format) > - Creation Date: 2009-10-22 10:06:21 > - Size: 2.2 MiB > - Duration: 0:00:42 > - Bitrate: 455 Kbps > - Encoding Library: Undefined > - Encoding Application: Undefined > > *** Video Track Parameters *** > - Format: DivX ;-) (MS MPEG-4 v3) > - Size: 1.43 MiB (66%) > - FourCC: MP43 > - Track number(s): 1 > - Bitrate: Max.: Undefined > Average: 300 Kbps > Min.: Undefined > - Frame rate (fps): Max.: Undefined > Average: 24.000 > Min.: Undefined > - Bitrate mode: Undefined > - Encoding profile: Undefined > - Resolution: 24 bits > - Width (Pixel number): 320 > - Height (Pixel number): 240 > - Pixel Aspect Ratio: Undefined > - Display aspect ratio: 4:3 > - Chroma subsampling format: YUV420p > - TV standard: Undefined > - Interlacing: Undefined > - Encoding library: Undefined > - Additional Parameters: Bits/(Pixel*Frame) ratio: 0.163 > > *** Audio Track(s) Parameters *** > - Format: Mpeg-1 layer 3 (mp3) > > Analysis of a WMV that plays fine shows this: > > *** General Parameters *** > - Name: 20692-poolchick.wmv > - Container: ASF (Active Streaming Format) > - Creation Date: 2008-12-15 23:33:07 > - Size: 659.1 KiB > - Duration: 0:00:15 > - Bitrate: 447 Kbps > - Encoding Library: Undefined > - Encoding Application: Undefined > > *** Video Track Parameters *** > - Format: Windows Media Video 9 > - Size: 382 KiB (58%) > - FourCC: WMV3 > - Track number(s): 2 > - Bitrate: Max.: Undefined > Average: 242 Kbps > Min.: Undefined > - Frame rate (fps): Max.: Undefined > Average: 25.000 > Min.: Undefined > - Bitrate mode: Variable > - Encoding profile: MP at ML > - Resolution: 24 bits > - Width (Pixel number): 640 > - Height (Pixel number): 480 > - Pixel Aspect Ratio: Undefined > - Display aspect ratio: 4:3 > - Chroma subsampling format: YUV420p > - TV standard: Undefined > - Interlacing: Progressive > - Encoding library: Undefined > - Additional Parameters: Bits/(Pixel*Frame) ratio: 0.031 > > *** Audio Track(s) Parameters *** > - Format: Windows Media Audio Std v.2 - DivX audio v2 > > The major difference seems to be in the format. The one that doesn't > play is DiVX, the other is WMV9. I reinstalled DiVX for QT and thought > this had solved it because the file started to open into the familiar > QT window but stopped with an OSS error which I failed to note before > hitting the retry,. (something like -10009). On retry I just got the > file was not recognized error. > > Anybody got more information and experience than I to help with this? > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Alan Williams alan at asw6000.plus.com From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 14:42:01 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:42:01 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Play WMV in QT (addendum) Message-ID: With reference to my earlier posting on this problem, I should have said the problem file plays OK in VLC, so there does not appear to be a problem with the file itself being corrupted From paul.stern at me.com Thu Oct 22 15:44:37 2009 From: paul.stern at me.com (Paul Stern) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:44:37 +0200 Subject: [NMUG] LogMeIn Message-ID: <93540BCB-A6AD-4CE6-A91C-C84C8BD0614D@me.com> Just joined the group so I hope I am not repeating anything already said, if so, sorry! I have been using LogMeIn for a few years, both on PC's and Windows. Its use has mainly been to support family and friends. I work at sea and have accessed LogMeIn with little trouble. Remote Control can be slow due to the graphics and the resolution needs playing with. Its so far the best product I have found. Should you need any help, feel free to drop me a line. Regards, Paul From jill at 2js.org Thu Oct 22 18:03:05 2009 From: jill at 2js.org (Jill Searle) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:03:05 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Ext HD's Message-ID: <5B77E705-CD93-4056-ADA0-59994C5772C1@2js.org> Thanks Paul for the quick reply I will start the process. Jill From jwebber19 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 18:09:21 2009 From: jwebber19 at googlemail.com (james webber) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:09:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! Message-ID: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email list as im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! Many, many thanks James Webber From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Thu Oct 22 18:13:00 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:13:00 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:09, james webber wrote: > Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email > list as > im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! That is the nature of a mailing list - it often takes the form of a . As for unsubscribing, each email that you get has a link that you can follow which will enable you to unsubscribe yourself. -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From robharrington at mac.com Thu Oct 22 19:56:54 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:56:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> Message-ID: I note that James Webber first mentioned this on the 3rd of August! Rob Harrington > On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:09, james webber wrote: > >> Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email >> list as >> im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! > > That is the nature of a mailing list - it often takes the form of a . > > As for unsubscribing, each email that you get has a link that you can > follow which will enable you to unsubscribe yourself. > > -- > David Reynolds > david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From penguinsplj at me.com Thu Oct 22 20:11:23 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:11:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> Message-ID: <7819D784-F3AE-4CB6-B206-BC196FB9ED8F@me.com> On Oct 22, 2009, at 19:56, ROB HARRINGTON wrote: > I note that James Webber first mentioned this on the 3rd of August! Wrong! He first mentioned it 14th May and then again on the 3rd of August. Paul D told him what to do in May, Scott and Paul D gave advice again in August and so far David has given the advice and I expect the next message just after Christmas. Paul C From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 22 20:24:54 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:24:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: <7819D784-F3AE-4CB6-B206-BC196FB9ED8F@me.com> References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> <7819D784-F3AE-4CB6-B206-BC196FB9ED8F@me.com> Message-ID: <7080ABB8-E5E2-4E09-8115-689E6DCFF7A5@durrant.co.uk> Well, I switched him to digest mode meantime, and offered to manually remove him from the list if that doesn't suit. I hadn't thought to look back for past requests! Paul On 22 Oct 2009, at 20:11, Paul Chapman wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2009, at 19:56, ROB HARRINGTON wrote: > >> I note that James Webber first mentioned this on the 3rd of August! > > Wrong! He first mentioned it 14th May and then again on the 3rd of > August. > > Paul D told him what to do in May, Scott and Paul D gave advice again > in August and so far David has given the advice and I expect the next > message just after Christmas. From sc at davidviner.com Thu Oct 22 20:33:23 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:33:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: <7819D784-F3AE-4CB6-B206-BC196FB9ED8F@me.com> References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> <0401E931-DB1E-4C8A-AC79-6192477E8B68@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> <7819D784-F3AE-4CB6-B206-BC196FB9ED8F@me.com> Message-ID: <4AE0B383.3020106@davidviner.com> > Wrong! He first mentioned it 14th May and then again on the 3rd of > August. > > Paul D told him what to do in May, Scott and Paul D gave advice again > in August and so far David has given the advice and I expect the next > message just after Christmas. > Is anyone taking bets on the exact date? David From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Thu Oct 22 20:58:27 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:58:27 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Darwinian nightmare In-Reply-To: References: <67FA4EA1-C0CF-4A1A-BE8B-EC0C73A31A76@gmail.com> <4ADCDDEF.2080800@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <4AE0B963.6050602@stackyard.org> Steve, Well, it depends on what you ultimately want to achieve. There's nothing wrong with learning UNIX by using a Mac as long as you have an ultimate use for the Mac's abilities. The mistake would be to choose the Mac platform with the sole aim of learning UNIX. "Learning UNIX" is a bit of a vague ambition anyway due to the vast variation between the many versions of both the UNIX and UNIX-like OSs (Linux and OS X are UNIX-like, not UNIX). There are, of course, similarities but you might want to consider what your ultimate goal is first before choosing which version to learn. The Mac platform provides many advantages, not least of which is the limitless help available from the esteemed members of this mailing list. If you can make use of a Mac (and who can't?), then there's no reason not to learn the OS X version of UNIX as you experience the enjoyment of using a Mac. Your point about wanting to be in control is valid and true for all OSs including Windows. It's always nice to know what is actually happening. Regarding the configuration of a server, it is simpler than you think. As soon as you share a printer or a folder, you have configured a server whether you like it or not. One critical issue is the hardware. Many UNIX and UNIX-like OSs are multi-platform. OS X is proprietary and only runs on Apple hardware unless you start getting very technical (His Steveness frowns upon people who do this and doth smite companies which lend assistance to such evildoers). Of course, the advantage of Apple hardware is that it can run Mac OS X AND Linux AND Windows which a normal X86 box will not - easily. So choose what you want to end up with. Then choose your platform. Ken Steve Batch wrote: > Hi Ken thanks for your input, sorry for the slow reply, I've been > working a lot of hours lately. > > Let me try to explain how I came to the obscure choice of Darwin: > > I want to use the Unix commands to complement and enhance my Mac > experience so rather than just learning about standard functionality > that is present on most Unix I actually want to learn about the > additional Apple commands. (I know these are useless outside of OS X, > but that's ok). > > I want to feel in control of my OS and understand for myself what is > happening for example when file permissions go screwy or an > application behaves peculiarly without having to resort to third party > application downloads that perform the task for me, when I know that I > could simply carry out the task myself if I had a better understanding > of the commands. > > I don't have a desire at the moment to configure a server but in the > future that will most likely come up. > > I hear what you are saying about OS X not being the best place to > start, I am now thinking that because I have forgotten pretty much all > I learnt about Unix/Linux I should probably start from scratch and get > up to speed with a basic Linux distribution and then move on to OS X > once I have a better grasp. > > A friends once said that the best way to learn Linux is to complete a > 'Linux from scratch' system he > swore by it saying he learnt so much from this approach. > > Steve. > > From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Thu Oct 22 21:48:38 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:48:38 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Latencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > >> >> On 21 Oct 2009, at 20:11, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: >> >>> Latency obviously increases with >>> distance >> >> >> >> Err... not with my visualisation of the www it doesn't. >> >> Perhaps my presumption of random paths, repeaters and nodes is wrong? A moment's reflection will surely reveal that latency always increases with distance. Obviously with a direct connection A to B, the longer the distance, the greater the latency. Speed of light. Now imagine an alternative path is provided: A to C to B.. well now we have to have a device at A to choose which path... this will take time = latency, some packets will go via C, some will still go direct, so now we need a mechanism to stitch the packets together correctly at B. More processing = more latency. As the number of intermediate nodes increases so does the opportunity for an error, which means retries = more latency. Since the internet is non deterministic and there is (currently) no mechanism to make it not so, it's very likely that as nodes increase, latency will follow and upward spiral since there will be more route options at every bifurcation point. I did some work with the advanced music group at Stanford a few years ago where we had musicians at Stanford, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Cleveland and the Juilliard School in New York all playing together over the Internet. What we found was that even 500 miles was long enough for enough latency to come into play to make its effect noticeable to professional musicians, who apparently can hear within a gnat's crotchet (to quote the late, much lamented Humphrey Lyttleton). Interestingly, Stanford repeated the experiment using high speed Internet2 and latency fell rather dramatically. Speed of light can't be overcome of course, but Internet2 experience bears out Paul's point about routers and switches contributing to huge latencies since they were much smaller in number in the Internet2 experiment. From ricnev at mac.com Fri Oct 23 14:25:47 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:25:47 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hello all. Quiet here today. Just wondered if everyone has perhaps over-reacted to this! I quite like getting lots of emails about something I'm interested in, as long as they are constructive and/or educational. I also like helping people, and if people feel inhibited from asking questions, I'll miss the warm glow of spreading misinformation ;-) If traffic is bothering anyone, there are lots of ways to filter messages so you don't get swamped with everything. I tend to scan message Subject lines, and delete anything I'm not interested in immediately. If my conscience ever pricks me into thinking I should have followed up on something I've deleted, there's always the trash bin and/or the NMUG list archives. Richard. On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:09, james webber wrote: > Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email > list as > im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! > Many, many thanks > > James Webber > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From sc at davidviner.com Fri Oct 23 14:39:34 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:39:34 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] New Mac advert In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4AE1B216.7010003@davidviner.com> LOL http://movies.apple.com/media/us/mac/getamac/2009/apple-mvp-broken_promises-us-20091022_480x272.mov From batchsteve at googlemail.com Fri Oct 23 14:40:37 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:40:37 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I'll admit that the message did make me stop to think that perhaps I should be messaging individuals directly more instead of posting everything to the group but I suppose I was hoping that I would get other people's opinions on something even if it was not directly aimed at them. Steve. On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:25, Richard Nevill wrote: > I quite like getting lots of emails about something I'm interested in, > as long as they are constructive and/or educational. > > > > On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:09, james webber wrote: > >> Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email >> list as >> im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! From macman at f2s.com Fri Oct 23 14:50:46 2009 From: macman at f2s.com (Robbie Murray) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:50:46 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Some months ago we went through a period of auto-replying to the original poster rather than to the group. If my memory serves me right, it was in an attempt to make the digest smaller, but I for one missed the responses, and was often left wondering if a satisfactory outcome to a problem had been achieved. I often see queries posted which may today be irrelevant to me, but I take heed of the solutions for the day when I may just encounter the same problem! Robbie On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:40, Steve Batch wrote: I'll admit that the message did make me stop to think that perhaps I should be messaging individuals directly more instead of posting everything to the group but I suppose I was hoping that I would get other people's opinions on something even if it was not directly aimed at them. Steve. On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:25, Richard Nevill wrote: > I quite like getting lots of emails about something I'm interested in, > as long as they are constructive and/or educational. > > > > On 22 Oct 2009, at 18:09, james webber wrote: > >> Hello!, just wondered if you be so kind and remove me from the email >> list as >> im getting what seems like all the traffic between everyone! _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From bazyoungs at mac.com Fri Oct 23 14:58:28 2009 From: bazyoungs at mac.com (Barry Youngs) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:58:28 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hear Hear! My sentiments exactly. Baz On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:50, Robbie Murray wrote: > > I often see queries posted which may today be irrelevant to me, but I > take heed of the solutions for the day when I may just encounter the > same problem! > I went to a bookstore and asked the sales woman,?Where?s the self-help section?? She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose. From robharrington at mac.com Fri Oct 23 18:26:13 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:26:13 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! In-Reply-To: References: <4b639c160910221009g5b7f8221ne365d77c049ec8cf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <271EC5E1-10EA-4D16-93C8-DDE2C1A46EC0@mac.com> We had quite a correspondence about auto-replying to the original poster, and how much can be learned from following a line of enquiry without taking part.It is not difficult to assign folders to filter the mass of e-mails. Please long may it continue this way. Rob Harrington On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:50, Robbie Murray wrote: > Some months ago we went through a period of auto-replying to the > original poster rather than to the group. If my memory serves me > right, it was in an attempt to make the digest smaller, but I for one > missed the responses, and was often left wondering if a satisfactory > outcome to a problem had been achieved. > > I often see queries posted which may today be irrelevant to me, but I > take heed of the solutions for the day when I may just encounter the > same problem! > > Robbie > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 24 09:09:31 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:09:31 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] too many emails! Message-ID: Hi. I for one like how it works at present and hated the 'reply to original sender' method we tried a few months ago. Like Rob said, you couldnt follow a thread through as half of it was missing. Mailing groups create a lot of mail just by there nature. I subscribe to many lists and my inbox gets full. But I sift through reading most messages and replies. You can always set up folders and filter them. Or you can pick up the digest instead of individual emails. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) - original message - Subject: Re: [NMUG] too many emails! From: ROB HARRINGTON Date: 23/10/2009 17:28 We had quite a correspondence about auto-replying to the original poster, and how much can be learned from following a line of enquiry without taking part.It is not difficult to assign folders to filter the mass of e-mails. Please long may it continue this way. Rob Harrington On 23 Oct 2009, at 14:50, Robbie Murray wrote: > Some months ago we went through a period of auto-replying to the > original poster rather than to the group. If my memory serves me > right, it was in an attempt to make the digest smaller, but I for one > missed the responses, and was often left wondering if a satisfactory > outcome to a problem had been achieved. > > I often see queries posted which may today be irrelevant to me, but I > take heed of the solutions for the day when I may just encounter the > same problem! > > Robbie > _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 24 10:58:42 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:58:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spotlight, Time Machine and Memory Message-ID: I thought it worth-while recounting some troubleshooting I just did. I found that my machine was being unreasonably slow when I had lots of open applications. Now, if you have lots of applications open, it's possible to use more memory than your machine actually has installed. In this case, some of the data used by applications in the background is written out to disk. When you bring these applications to the foreground to use them, it takes a few seconds for this data to be read back in (and other data to be written to disk). When data has to be written out to disk this is a "Page out", and Activity Monitor will show (in the System Memory tab) the number of Page outs since the system was last started. If you have adequate memory for your use of the machine, the Page outs will typically be zero, or perhaps a few tens of megabytes. Mine was showing gigabytes by pageouts. But I have 4GB installed, and I shouldn't have been seeing any. So I sorted the process list by RSIZE - the amount of physical memory the process was using. A process called mds was using over 700MB of memory! mds is part of Spotlight. After much searching of the internet, and tests of my machine, I found that mds normally used 50MB or less of memory. But on my machine, the first time that Time Machine ran after a restart, the memory used by mds went up to over 700MB and didn't come back down. More searching found a solution (although not an explanation). I had already excluded my Time Machine volume from Spotlight. But it seems the problem was being triggered by the partial index already created on my Time Machine disk. The solution suggested was to delete this index and let spotlight rebuild a minimal one. Using the terminal, I deleted the entire .Spotlight-V100 folder from my Time Machine drive. Spotlight quickly rebuilt a minimal folder, and now my mds no longer takes up 700MB, even when Time Machine runs. I hope this is of some interest - I don't think this is a common problem though. If anyone would like more details, I'd be happy to go into the commands needed. regards, Paul From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Sat Oct 24 11:13:54 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:13:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard Message-ID: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> Am I right in surmising that in order to carry out a S/N re-install it would be necessary to start with your Leopard disc then wade through all the updates-then re-install your S/N disc? 'Cos that seems a lot of tedium Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From allanmacam at me.com Sat Oct 24 11:17:42 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:17:42 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> References: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0914E284-8B4A-49E1-8268-3128CA949977@me.com> If you have S/L running already, just pop in the installer disc, click Utilitilies and the machine will boot from the disc. You can than do a clean install. AJ On 24 Oct 2009, at 11:13, Richard Stewart wrote: > Am I right in surmising that in order to carry out a S/N re-install it > would be necessary to start with your Leopard disc then wade through > all the updates-then re-install your S/N disc? 'Cos that seems a lot > of tedium > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From munkt0n at gmail.com Sat Oct 24 11:20:00 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:20:00 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Spotlight, Time Machine and Memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: thanks for the description of 'page outs' I've been meaning to look that up for a while. I've also just realised why firefox is acting sluggish - it's taking up over 1GB On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Paul Durrant wrote: > I thought it worth-while recounting some troubleshooting I just did. > > I found that my machine was being unreasonably slow when I had lots of > open applications. > > Now, if you have lots of applications open, it's possible to use more > memory than your machine actually has installed. In this case, some of > the data used by applications in the background is written out to > disk. When you bring these applications to the foreground to use them, > it takes a few seconds for this data to be read back in (and other > data to be written to disk). > > When data has to be written out to disk this is a "Page out", and > Activity Monitor will show (in the System Memory tab) the number of > Page outs since the system was last started. > > If you have adequate memory for your use of the machine, the Page outs > will typically be zero, or perhaps a few tens of megabytes. > > Mine was showing gigabytes by pageouts. But I have 4GB installed, and > I shouldn't have been seeing any. So I sorted the process list by > RSIZE - the amount of physical memory the process was using. > > A process called mds was using over 700MB of memory! > > mds is part of Spotlight. After much searching of the internet, and > tests of my machine, I found that mds normally used 50MB or less of > memory. But on my machine, the first time that Time Machine ran after > a restart, the memory used by mds went up to over 700MB and didn't > come back down. > > More searching found a solution (although not an explanation). I had > already excluded my Time Machine volume from Spotlight. But it seems > the problem was being triggered by the partial index already created > on my Time Machine disk. The solution suggested was to delete this > index and let spotlight rebuild a minimal one. > > Using the terminal, ?I deleted the entire .Spotlight-V100 folder from > my Time Machine drive. Spotlight quickly rebuilt a minimal folder, and > now my mds no longer takes up 700MB, even when Time Machine runs. > > I hope this is of some interest - I don't think this is a common > problem though. If anyone would like more details, I'd be happy to go > into the commands needed. > > regards, > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > -- :wq From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Sat Oct 24 11:31:09 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:31:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: <0914E284-8B4A-49E1-8268-3128CA949977@me.com> References: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> <0914E284-8B4A-49E1-8268-3128CA949977@me.com> Message-ID: <5A563D72-6B8E-4DC6-8EB6-27BD33F566CB@gmail.com> Thanks Allan, I'm not sure you quite grasp what I'm getting at. As far as I can determine, S/N is an upgrade and as such needs Leopard already installed in order to function properly, it's not a standalone system, at least, I now realise, not on my upgrade disc which was the low cost item available to those of us who purchased a Mac recently. On 24 Oct 2009, at 11:17, Allan wrote: clean install. Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From allanmacam at me.com Sat Oct 24 11:37:29 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:37:29 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: <5A563D72-6B8E-4DC6-8EB6-27BD33F566CB@gmail.com> References: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> <0914E284-8B4A-49E1-8268-3128CA949977@me.com> <5A563D72-6B8E-4DC6-8EB6-27BD33F566CB@gmail.com> Message-ID: You have the same disc I have and `I've installed a number of Clean Installs on all our machines here. Even if the base machine is running 10.5, you can still clean install by going through the Utilities folder on the upgrade disc. On 24 Oct 2009, at 11:31, Richard Stewart wrote: > Thanks Allan, I'm not sure you quite grasp what I'm getting at. As far > as I can determine, S/N is an upgrade and as such needs Leopard > already installed in order to function properly, it's not a standalone > system, at least, I now realise, not on my upgrade disc which was the > low cost item available to those of us who purchased a Mac recently. > On 24 Oct 2009, at 11:17, Allan wrote: > > clean install. > > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Sat Oct 24 11:40:54 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:40:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: References: <6AF72614-C4EA-41F6-A4BB-E52F3828F55D@gmail.com> <0914E284-8B4A-49E1-8268-3128CA949977@me.com> <5A563D72-6B8E-4DC6-8EB6-27BD33F566CB@gmail.com> Message-ID: <883A6C2B-7421-45EE-9CBB-7A83CE5E1720@gmail.com> Thanks for that Allan, I'll reinstall with confidence as it becomes necessary On 24 Oct 2009, at 11:37, Allan wrote: clean install by going through the Utilities Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From alanbarber at mac.com Sat Oct 24 14:30:06 2009 From: alanbarber at mac.com (Alan Barber) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:30:06 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] chat rooms Message-ID: Friends in spain were using a chat room which was recently updated. They can no longer get into the chat room. Does anyone think there could be additional software needed. Using a pc works fine its just a mac that causes problems Regards Alan From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 24 15:35:55 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:35:55 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] chat rooms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6089EDE2-082C-42B2-8288-AE21ADD20B67@durrant.co.uk> The could try with Firefox. If that doesn't work, they could try with Firefox and set the "User Agent" (in preferences I think) to be Microsoft Explorer. Paul On 24 Oct 2009, at 14:30, Alan Barber wrote: > Friends in spain were using a chat room which was recently updated. > They can no longer get into the chat room. > Does anyone think there could be additional software needed. > Using a pc works fine its just a mac that causes problems From hidunc at ntlworld.com Sat Oct 24 17:47:17 2009 From: hidunc at ntlworld.com (J L Duncan Bradford) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:47:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted Message-ID: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> Having written several articles and technical help documents about old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient place where I can direct people to in order to read and download anything I put up there. There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut above what I need, or can really afford. Any simple guidance, folks? Duncan From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sat Oct 24 18:36:59 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:36:59 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted Message-ID: Hi Firstly, I love Reliant cars and would love to be one of your first visitors. Secondly, I use Madasafish who over Just Mail for only ?2 a month with a free domain and 100mb web space. It is nothing fancy and they do not offer support for php, but my site is hosted with them so you can see the sort of site you can create. My blog is also hosted there but managed by blogger. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) - original message - Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted From: J L Duncan Bradford Date: 24/10/2009 16:47 Having written several articles and technical help documents about old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient place where I can direct people to in order to read and download anything I put up there. There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut above what I need, or can really afford. Any simple guidance, folks? Duncan _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From david.maskell at ntlworld.com Sat Oct 24 19:02:54 2009 From: david.maskell at ntlworld.com (David Maskell) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:02:54 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Archive and Install Question Message-ID: <7C81F7D9-060C-440D-AF8F-717DB8C18A02@ntlworld.com> Hi, I Have a G5 Imac 17" Isight. I remember it used to be lightning quick with tiger, but with leopard it's just a little slower than I like.. When I installed Leopard i didn't want to lose any data, so i just chose the upgrade option. Now I am thinking of doing an Archive and Install... how would this work? When I bought the Imac 2nd hand it had word/cs3 on it... but not the install discs If I archived and installed will I be able to get these back from the archived folder? Would this essentially be a new install, with a folder with the old system on which I can drag and drop programs etc? If this is the case it seems a good way to go? David From sc at davidviner.com Sat Oct 24 19:49:58 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:49:58 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> Duncan One thing to check is whether or not any "build-it-yourself" type of sites you are considering require the use of ASP or PHP. Whilst at least one of these will usually come as standard with paid-for hosting, many of the freebie ones that come with ISP accounts won't. I know that the Virgin Media space is like that and Simon can probably confirm whether or not the Madasafish one is the same. If you decide that you do need more than the freebie webspace then there are a hell of a lot of web hosting companies out there and, as you rightly surmise, a lot of them are too good to be true and some are downright dire. From experience I can tell you to avoid (at all costs): * Positive Internet - their slogan is "We're Good" - I would beg to differ.... they are incompetent (though not as bad as the 3 listed below) and have no telephone support (only sales lines). * FastHosts - they are cheap but their support is appalling, trained monkeys would give better technical support than the brain-dead drones they employ! * Streamline - no telephone support, and they use FastHost for their infrastructure. Technical support is worse than FastHosts - and in one experience of mine, totally insulting (the one client I had using them has now moved to PlugSocket - see below) * 1&1 - this is actually the same company as FastHosts (although both brands still exist). They used to be separate companies but merged (I think 1&1 took FastHosts over when the guy that started FastHosts sold up) several years ago when FastHosts used to be a reasonable hosting company. (you can probably see a pattern emerging there!!!) Many of the extremely cheap/free hosting companies may also look tempting, I've tried a couple but in general I've found that they put so many sites onto a single server that they all run slowly. Other things to avoid are any company with no telephone support and those that will switch off your web site if you go over your monthly bandwidth. A good number of the web sites I've built over the past few years are hosted by PlugSocket (www.plugsocket.com) and I've used them for my own site since 2002. They do regular backups 4 times a day (though I've never had a site that they host go down) and they allow you to get at several of the site configuration files yourself. The speed at which the sites run is quite acceptable. Whenever I've had technical problems they've always been fixed within 30 minutes. They do have telephone support though I've only needed to use it once - the other times I've used email (they have a support form on their web site in case the customer's problem is that their email has stopped working). They are not quite in the same league as some of the well-respected big timers such as Rackspace (who are good but are bloody expensive!) and I wouldn't host a high volume (bandwidth or disk capacity) site with them. However, they do have a good ?25/year hosting package will would probably suit you fine (I've got around 15 clients using it for things such as small business and schools). Domain names cost extra - currently ?4.49/year for .co.uk or ?9.99 for .com - you can certainly find cheaper prices around than that but I find it convenient to use the same company for domain names and hosting (which avoids the hassle of transferring or forwarding the domain once purchased). PlugSocket have an online domain name checker so you can check which domains are available. I did have some hosting with Heart Internet for a while (www.heartinternet.co.uk) - they seemed ok and, although I didn't make much use of their technical support, it seemed competent when I did. The only reason I moved my single host from them was that I upgraded my PlugSocket account from the ?25 starter to a Multi-5 account and moved the Heart hosting over onto PlugSocket for the sheer convenience of having everything in the same place. I know you're not the first to ask these questions - I remember I and others answering a similar query a few months ago. Simon, maybe the NMUG site should have a new page which contains a list of hosting companies that NMUG members recommend (and a list of those to be avoided). Hope that helps! David J L Duncan Bradford wrote: > Having written several articles and technical help documents about > old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on > a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played > with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around > the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I > have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain > name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't > mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a > site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient > place where I can direct people to in order to read and download > anything I put up there. > There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ > am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just > confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. > The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an > excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut > above what I need, or can really afford. > Any simple guidance, folks? > Duncan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From brian at clearlight.uk.net Sat Oct 24 20:39:21 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:39:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: There are two Freewayers who also offer hosting: http://www.have-host.com http://www.ineedwebhosting.com J L Duncan Bradford said recently: > Having written several articles and technical help documents about > old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on > a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played > with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around > the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I > have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain > name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't > mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a > site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient > place where I can direct people to in order to read and download > anything I put up there. > There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ > am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just > confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. > The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an > excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut > above what I need, or can really afford. > Any simple guidance, folks? > Duncan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From brian at clearlight.uk.net Sat Oct 24 20:55:23 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 20:55:23 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Sorry I sent that too soon by mistake http://www.ineedwebhosting.co.uk/ not com. I have used these two for clients. I myself use http://www.clook.info But I have a feeling their doors are shut at present to new clients while changes are being instigated. You can use any of the domain providers just to buy the domain and then point the nameservers to whatever the hosting company (you decide to choose). This is very simply done. Generally I feel for the way that a company sets out their stall. Funnily a lot of folk actually want to respond to things that I would run a mile from. Not unlike Windows! I personally hate companies that try and coerce sales. all the best Brian Brian Steere said recently: > There are two Freewayers who also offer hosting: > http://www.have-host.com > http://www.ineedwebhosting.com > > > > J L Duncan Bradford said recently: > >> Having written several articles and technical help documents about >> old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on >> a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played >> with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around >> the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I >> have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain >> name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't >> mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a >> site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient >> place where I can direct people to in order to read and download >> anything I put up there. >> There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ >> am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just >> confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. >> The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an >> excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut >> above what I need, or can really afford. >> Any simple guidance, folks? >> Duncan >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From penguinsplj at me.com Sat Oct 24 21:49:21 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:49:21 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] October meeting Message-ID: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> The next meeting will be on the 28th October 2009 that being the fourth Wednesday of the month. It will be held at The Quebec in a separate room from the bar and will be from 7.30. Quebec 93-97 Quebec Road Norwich NR1 4HY Here is a link to a map. Don't forget to wear your new Chapelfield Apple Store t-shirts. Paul C From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 24 21:53:41 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:53:41 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> Message-ID: <65B9FA1C-1C30-4EE0-AC79-577047E7D1AD@durrant.co.uk> An excellent idea - at least the positive recommendations bit. Personal opinions on the list are fine, but I'd be unhappy about NMUG officially saying the members should avoid certain hosting companies. regards, Paul On 24 Oct 2009, at 19:49, David Viner wrote: > I know you're not the first to ask these questions - I remember I and > others answering a similar query a few months ago. Simon, maybe the > NMUG > site should have a new page which contains a list of hosting companies > that NMUG members recommend (and a list of those to be avoided). From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 24 21:57:09 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:57:09 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] October meeting In-Reply-To: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> References: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> Message-ID: <42800EDC-F4C8-462E-A15A-1AF89C7B24A0@durrant.co.uk> I'll be bringing along three ebook readers and a PDA: a Sony PRS-505, a Bookeen Cybook Gen 3, an Amazon Kindle (International) and a Sony Cli? SJ20. They all work pretty well with my Mac, which is my excuse for bringing them. Paul On 24 Oct 2009, at 21:49, Paul Chapman wrote: > The next meeting will be on the 28th October 2009 that being the > fourth Wednesday of the month. It will be held at The Quebec in a > separate room from the bar and will be from 7.30. From kelvinyoungs at mac.com Sun Oct 25 01:43:32 2009 From: kelvinyoungs at mac.com (Kelvin Youngs) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:43:32 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <65B9FA1C-1C30-4EE0-AC79-577047E7D1AD@durrant.co.uk> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> <65B9FA1C-1C30-4EE0-AC79-577047E7D1AD@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: These are the business: http://www.littleoak.net and Rapid weaver are the Mac people: http://www.realmacsoftware.com/rapidweaver Kelvin http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com From minkennison at mac.com Sun Oct 25 06:10:11 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:10:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] October meeting In-Reply-To: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> References: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> Message-ID: Hi Paul Apologies for non attendance. It's a little bit too far to come this month - I'm in Malta! Min On 24 Oct 2009, at 22:4924 Oct 2009, Paul Chapman wrote: > The next meeting will be on the 28th October 2009 that being the > fourth Wednesday of the month. It will be held at The Quebec in a > separate room from the bar and will be from 7.30. > > Quebec > 93-97 Quebec Road > Norwich > NR1 4HY > > Here is a link to a map. > > > > Don't forget to wear your new Chapelfield Apple Store t-shirts. > > Paul C > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From minkennison at mac.com Sun Oct 25 06:10:11 2009 From: minkennison at mac.com (Min Kennison) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:10:11 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] October meeting In-Reply-To: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> References: <0A133AFD-2538-4292-840C-12611FD0D148@me.com> Message-ID: Hi Paul Apologies for non attendance. It's a little bit too far to come this month - I'm in Malta! Min On 24 Oct 2009, at 22:4924 Oct 2009, Paul Chapman wrote: > The next meeting will be on the 28th October 2009 that being the > fourth Wednesday of the month. It will be held at The Quebec in a > separate room from the bar and will be from 7.30. > > Quebec > 93-97 Quebec Road > Norwich > NR1 4HY > > Here is a link to a map. > > > > Don't forget to wear your new Chapelfield Apple Store t-shirts. > > Paul C > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From sc at davidviner.com Sun Oct 25 10:17:02 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:17:02 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> <65B9FA1C-1C30-4EE0-AC79-577047E7D1AD@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AE4259E.4060302@davidviner.com> > These are the business: http://www.littleoak.net > They may be good but a lot of their web site is almost unreadable with them using white text on a pale green background - what were they thinking?! From sc at davidviner.com Sun Oct 25 10:39:08 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:39:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <4AE4259E.4060302@davidviner.com> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> <4AE34C56.3000503@davidviner.com> <65B9FA1C-1C30-4EE0-AC79-577047E7D1AD@durrant.co.uk> <4AE4259E.4060302@davidviner.com> Message-ID: <4AE42ACC.8050703@davidviner.com> >> These are the business: http://www.littleoak.net >> >> > > They may be good but a lot of their web site is almost unreadable with > them using white text on a pale green background - what were they thinking?! > Ok, they are good - I told them about how unreadable their site was and they almost immediately replied: / David, you are perfectly right, thanks for pointing that out. The lack of a right contrast was due to the update we are making to the site for the season promotion that will start tomorrow. During the year, when with a "normal" graphic, the text has a right contrast to keep readability to all visitors. I fixed that, I hope you like it. Please, don't hesitate to contact us if you should find any other bug. Your feedback is very appreciated. / That is a great response! They've really gone up in my estimation. Kelvin, thanks for bringing htem to our attention. David From jill at 2js.org Sun Oct 25 10:41:55 2009 From: jill at 2js.org (Jill Searle) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:41:55 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] matching resolutions Message-ID: Yet more advice please I enjoyed using a Dell 1907FP Monitor ( Matte screen because of window reflection & height adjustable) both with my macbook & imac, but it does not really work so well with my new macbook pro. Trying to match up the two resolutions it seems that I can either use a stretched resolution or have a space either side on the macbook! I would like to find a replacement with at least a 1920x1200 to do the same job without spending a fortune, is that possible? Am I missing something? what is your advice? Jill From paul at durrant.co.uk Sun Oct 25 11:04:12 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:04:12 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] matching resolutions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Are you using the monitor to mirror the Mac Book pro's display? Why not use it as a second monitor - then your can set it to its native resolution. But if you want a new monitor, this 24" model seems pretty good at ?190.37 including the VAT: http://www.dabs.com/products/lg-electronics-24--widescreen-w2452tx-5ms-dvi-lcd-tft-5JJF.html regards Paul On 25 Oct 2009, at 10:41, Jill Searle wrote: > Yet more advice please > I enjoyed using a Dell 1907FP Monitor ( Matte screen because of > window reflection & height adjustable) both with my macbook & imac, > but it does not really work so well with my new macbook pro. Trying to > match up the two resolutions it seems that I can either use a > stretched resolution or have a space either side on the macbook! > I would like to find a replacement with at least a 1920x1200 to do > the same job without spending a fortune, is that possible? Am I > missing something? what is your advice? From batchsteve at googlemail.com Sun Oct 25 12:05:09 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:05:09 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] matching resolutions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6628D8FF-EC34-4D2A-B155-A72840B03B45@gmail.com> Hi, I was going to suggest running the external display with black bars at the top and bottom but the DELL monitor can only support up to 1280x1024 (1280x800 widescreen) which does not meet your requirements so I guess the answer is to buy a new display. Paul's suggestion seems to be about the best option in this price range, however, it's a glossy screen, finding a monitor with a matte screen is going to be difficult and cost you more. Steve. On 25 Oct 2009, at 10:41, Jill Searle wrote: > Yet more advice please > I enjoyed using a Dell 1907FP Monitor ( Matte screen because of > window reflection & height adjustable) both with my macbook & imac, > but it does not really work so well with my new macbook pro. Trying to > match up the two resolutions it seems that I can either use a > stretched resolution or have a space either side on the macbook! > I would like to find a replacement with at least a 1920x1200 to do > the same job without spending a fortune, is that possible? Am I > missing something? what is your advice? > Jill From jill at 2js.org Sun Oct 25 12:15:44 2009 From: jill at 2js.org (Jill Searle) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:15:44 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] matching resolutions Message-ID: Thanks Paul the LG looks good. I use the monitor to extend my workspace not to mirror it. The max res for my monitor is 1280x1024 & I think it is a 16:10 size, so where it was perfectly matched with the imac, text always seem to look different on each screen Jill From ed at mendelsohn.me.uk Sun Oct 25 12:29:51 2009 From: ed at mendelsohn.me.uk (Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:29:51 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac Message-ID: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> Hi, Can anyone help me? A friend of mine is considering switching from a PC to an iMac. Before doing so he is checking various things - one of them is the possibility of typing Hebrew on the Mac. He can do this with ease on his PC using Word. I told him I would check this out on our Mac - which now has Snow Leopard but I am not sure if I downloaded all the languages. I had a go this morning, but did not find it easy (using Word). Is there a way of doing this and what do I have to do in order to be able to demonstrate this to him using our Mac? Regards Phyll From paul at durrant.co.uk Sun Oct 25 12:42:38 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:42:38 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] matching resolutions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <17F74C95-7DB2-4392-8F57-8744D08FDEFE@durrant.co.uk> 1280x1024 is 5:4, not 16:10. The difference in text size is down to the different pixel sizes. Recent MacBook Pro 15" are 1440x900 and 15.4" diagonal, which works out at 110 ppi. For things to look the same size on your external screen, you'll need a monitor with a similar resolution, The LG I mentioned is 24" diagonal and 1920x1200, which works out at just over 94ppi, so things will look bigger on it than on the MacBook Pro monitor. The closest I could find in current monitors is a 1920x1080 monitor at 21.5" diagonal. It's around 102ppi. regards, Paul On 25 Oct 2009, at 12:15, Jill Searle wrote: > Thanks Paul the LG looks good. I use the monitor to extend my > workspace not to mirror it. The max res for my monitor is 1280x1024 & > I think it is a 16:10 size, so where it was perfectly matched with > the imac, text always seem to look different on each screen From david at vanedwards.co.uk Sun Oct 25 13:19:28 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:19:28 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> Message-ID: We think under system preferences the tab Language and Texts raises a dialogue box which doesn't show Hebrew but then you can add other languages and, among the various arabic scripts is what appears to my untrained eye to be Hebrew. Fairly near the bottom of a long scrolling list. I've recently been trying to identify a Hebrew text in a painting so it's in my mind! Best wishes, David >Hi, > >Can anyone help me? > >A friend of mine is considering switching from a PC to an iMac. >Before doing so he is checking various things - one of them is the >possibility of typing Hebrew on the Mac. He can do this with ease on >his PC using Word. > >I told him I would check this out on our Mac - which now has Snow >Leopard but I am not sure if I downloaded all the languages. I had a >go this morning, but did not find it easy (using Word). Is there a >way of doing this and what do I have to do in order to be able to >demonstrate this to him using our Mac? > >Regards > >Phyll >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From penguinsplj at me.com Sun Oct 25 13:21:46 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:21:46 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> Message-ID: <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> On Oct 25, 2009, at 12:29, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: > I told him I would check this out on our Mac - which now has Snow > Leopard but I am not sure if I downloaded all the languages. I had a > go this morning, but did not find it easy (using Word). Is there a > way of doing this and what do I have to do in order to be able to > demonstrate this to him using our Mac? I'm running 10.5.8 and experimented to see if it was in International and it is. To help go here which explains things: http://www.dougshivers.com/mikhtav/osx.html Paul C From ed at mendelsohn.me.uk Sun Oct 25 14:08:26 2009 From: ed at mendelsohn.me.uk (Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:08:26 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> Message-ID: <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> Thank you Paul and David. That website was good , but I have been unable to link this to Microsoft Office. I have emailed the link from the website and await Doug Shivers reply. I will keep you informed. Phyll On 25 Oct 2009, at 13:21, Paul Chapman wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2009, at 12:29, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: > >> I told him I would check this out on our Mac - which now has Snow >> Leopard but I am not sure if I downloaded all the languages. I had a >> go this morning, but did not find it easy (using Word). Is there a >> way of doing this and what do I have to do in order to be able to >> demonstrate this to him using our Mac? > > I'm running 10.5.8 and experimented to see if it was in International > and it is. To help go here which explains things: > > http://www.dougshivers.com/mikhtav/osx.html > > Paul C > From ed at mendelsohn.me.uk Sun Oct 25 15:08:33 2009 From: ed at mendelsohn.me.uk (Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:08:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> Message-ID: <2AB29D04-69D4-447D-8E87-84D89652780D@mendelsohn.me.uk> I have just picked up the following from Doug Shivers - a quick respone. Never used Open Office, but will try and download it. Not sure if this will turn my friend off converting from a PC to a Mac! regards Phyll Microsoft has never supported Hebrew on the Mac (they want people to use Windows). However, there are several good alternatives. Most people that use Hebrew a lot prefer Mellel, which costs $49 (or $35 for the educational version). NeoOffice and Open Office are good free alternatives. They have a suite of applications that work just like Microsoft Office. Hebrew is easy to enter and you can save it as word document that people with PCs can open with no problem.Microsoft has never supported Hebrew on the Mac (they want people to use Windows). However, there are several good alternatives. Most people that use Hebrew a lot prefer Mellel, which costs $49 (or $35 for the educational version). NeoOffice and Open Office are good free alternatives. They have a suite of applications that work just like Microsoft Office. Hebrew is easy to enter and you can save it as word document that people with PCs can open with no problem. On 25 Oct 2009, at 14:08, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: > Thank you Paul and David. > > That website was good , but I have been unable to link this to > Microsoft Office. I have emailed the link from the website and await > Doug Shivers reply. I will keep you informed. > > Phyll > > On 25 Oct 2009, at 13:21, Paul Chapman wrote: > From mercer at gotadsl.co.uk Sun Oct 25 15:18:25 2009 From: mercer at gotadsl.co.uk (Valerie Mercer) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:18:25 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <2AB29D04-69D4-447D-8E87-84D89652780D@mendelsohn.me.uk> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> <2AB29D04-69D4-447D-8E87-84D89652780D@mendelsohn.me.uk> Message-ID: <6D0410B5-2822-419F-A5CC-A17B15D1DF26@gotadsl.co.uk> I just selected Hebrew from the international menu, opened a blank word document, typed away and was rewarded with a whole lot of characters I couldn't read - so I assume it works. Valerie On 25 Oct 2009, at 15:08, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: I have just picked up the following from Doug Shivers - a quick respone. Never used Open Office, but will try and download it. Not sure if this will turn my friend off converting from a PC to a Mac! regards Phyll Microsoft has never supported Hebrew on the Mac (they want people to use Windows). However, there are several good alternatives. Most people that use Hebrew a lot prefer Mellel, which costs $49 (or $35 for the educational version). NeoOffice and Open Office are good free alternatives. They have a suite of applications that work just like Microsoft Office. Hebrew is easy to enter and you can save it as word document that people with PCs can open with no problem.Microsoft has never supported Hebrew on the Mac (they want people to use Windows). However, there are several good alternatives. Most people that use Hebrew a lot prefer Mellel, which costs $49 (or $35 for the educational version). NeoOffice and Open Office are good free alternatives. They have a suite of applications that work just like Microsoft Office. Hebrew is easy to enter and you can save it as word document that people with PCs can open with no problem. On 25 Oct 2009, at 14:08, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: > Thank you Paul and David. > > That website was good , but I have been unable to link this to > Microsoft Office. I have emailed the link from the website and await > Doug Shivers reply. I will keep you informed. > > Phyll > > On 25 Oct 2009, at 13:21, Paul Chapman wrote: > _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ed at mendelsohn.me.uk Sun Oct 25 16:22:33 2009 From: ed at mendelsohn.me.uk (Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:22:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: <6D0410B5-2822-419F-A5CC-A17B15D1DF26@gotadsl.co.uk> References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> <2AB29D04-69D4-447D-8E87-84D89652780D@mendelsohn.me.uk> <6D0410B5-2822-419F-A5CC-A17B15D1DF26@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: Thank you Valerie - i have just managed it!! I now have to work out how to type from right to left as in hebrew! I remember seeing this somewhere but can't remember where. Phyll On 25 Oct 2009, at 15:18, Valerie Mercer wrote: > I just selected Hebrew from the international menu, opened a blank > word document, typed away and was rewarded with a whole lot of > characters I couldn't read - so I assume it works. > > Valerie > From mercer at gotadsl.co.uk Sun Oct 25 17:27:08 2009 From: mercer at gotadsl.co.uk (Valerie Mercer) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:27:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: References: <903AE2E7-D7F2-453B-BE7B-FD1BF950A2F5@mendelsohn.me.uk> <64C11BD5-19EA-4CF9-A007-D0E7115F1EFA@me.com> <52E175E6-964E-406C-BD0C-D8FF624BA36F@mendelsohn.me.uk> <2AB29D04-69D4-447D-8E87-84D89652780D@mendelsohn.me.uk> <6D0410B5-2822-419F-A5CC-A17B15D1DF26@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: <72995A88-74A3-4BA2-AB28-37FD49BFC84B@gotadsl.co.uk> It seemed to do it automatically. V On 25 Oct 2009, at 16:22, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: Thank you Valerie - i have just managed it!! I now have to work out how to type from right to left as in hebrew! I remember seeing this somewhere but can't remember where. Phyll On 25 Oct 2009, at 15:18, Valerie Mercer wrote: > I just selected Hebrew from the international menu, opened a blank > word document, typed away and was rewarded with a whole lot of > characters I couldn't read - so I assume it works. > > Valerie > _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Sun Oct 25 17:53:49 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:53:49 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 25 Oct 2009, at 17:27, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > Subject: Re: [NMUG] Hebrew on a Mac > > I just selected Hebrew from the international menu, opened a blank > word document, typed away and was rewarded with a whole lot of > characters I couldn't read - so I assume it works. The Mac is the pre-eminent platform for fonts from everywhere and has always paid great attention to this issue. As a matter of fact, and a source of great pride to those from Naarwich, the font king at Apple is none other than my friend Peter Lofting, who is indeed a Naaarwich lad. He and I go to Burning Man in the Nevada desert where I last saw him bo*&ock naked on a penny farthing borrowed from a Cupertino bike shop and carried to the desert strapped to the top of Peter's 1961 Mini, crying "I am not a number. I am a free man!" A true eccentric character indeed in the finest traditions of the English. From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Sun Oct 25 18:24:44 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:24:44 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <5259D357-8FDE-4DA0-B242-EE0E331CBEFA@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Had a bad experience with Streamline.net They tempt you in with three 'free' months then slap you with the highest tarrif the minute this expires with no warning expires. But it was "in the small print" they said. So not even with the proverbial 40 foot bargepole. Ruth On 24 Oct 2009, at 17:47, J L Duncan Bradford wrote: > Having written several articles and technical help documents about > old Reliant cars over the years I'm thinking about putting them up on > a website which I can control, add to etc. as necessary. I've played > with Freeway Pro a bit & think I can just about get my head around > the building & publishing of a site. As a complete beginner though I > have no idea of what to do next. I guess I need to obtain a domain > name and find a basic reasonably priced [or free?] host. I wouldn't > mind adverts or whatever, to keep the cost down as this wouldn't be a > site to reflect the public face of my business, just a convenient > place where I can direct people to in order to read and download > anything I put up there. > There are loads of things I guess I don't know/haven't thought about/ > am unaware of needing etc. but searching the internet has just > confused me, and lots of 'offers' are obviously too good to be true. > The alternative is to pay good money to someone like Netcom who do an > excellent job for the Company I work for, but are probably a cut > above what I need, or can really afford. > Any simple guidance, folks? > Duncan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > Ruth Murray ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com Ruth Murray Graphic Design and Illustration 01603 632334 Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sun Oct 25 19:00:57 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:00:57 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] iBook going spare Message-ID: <4AE4A069.6000409@stackyard.org> Dear All, Does anyone want a 12" white G3 iBook? It has Tiger installed but needs updates. It had a new hard disk installed a few years ago as the original one failed due to excessive heat (Apple designers seem convinced that electronics needs lots of heat to work properly). Details are: Machine Name: iBook Machine Model: PowerBook4,1 CPU Type: PowerPC 750 (33.11) Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 600 MHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB Memory: 384 MB Bus Speed: 100 MHz Boot ROM Version: 4.2.7f1 Serial Number: UV2046BCMDW Sales Order Number: M8599B/C It has an Airport adapter and a Fujitsu 60GB hard disk. The DVD-ROM drive is slightly eccentric in that sometimes it falls open by itself and also sometimes refuses to open when asked. The battery is past its best but can hold a charge for a while. The power adapter works. There are the disks that came with it including 10.1 and an upgrade to 10.2. There is no Tiger disk. It's free to anyone who is either nearby (NR9 4RD) or can come and get it. Ken From penguinsplj at me.com Sun Oct 25 19:23:58 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:23:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Interesting!! Message-ID: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> I saw Ken's offer of an old iBook and wondered where he was so opened Google Earth to put in his post code. Whereas normally all the information and boxes are to the left of the main window this time they were to the right and much of the writing was in Hebrew! Teach me to tinker around with my settings to help others. The Union Flag was still showing on the top menu bar but I had altered the order in International>Language section of preferences and that change takes effect when you open a new application. Good job I did open GE as the next time I restarted the finder it would have been in Hebrew as well. Paul C From david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk Sun Oct 25 20:28:55 2009 From: david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk (David Reynolds) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:28:55 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] webhosting advice wanted In-Reply-To: <5259D357-8FDE-4DA0-B242-EE0E331CBEFA@ruthmurray.f2s.com> References: <4784968B-D3AB-42C6-B205-4825B4761CC4@ntlworld.com> <5259D357-8FDE-4DA0-B242-EE0E331CBEFA@ruthmurray.f2s.com> Message-ID: <715D155C-FF7C-4141-90B7-6EFB15A7217C@reynoldsfamily.org.uk> On 25 Oct 2009, at 18:24, Ruth Murray wrote: > Had a bad experience with Streamline.net > > They tempt you in with three 'free' months then slap you with the > highest tarrif the minute this expires with no warning expires. > > But it was "in the small print" they said. > > So not even with the proverbial 40 foot bargepole. I can recommend http://www.webfaction.com/ although I should mention that I work for them. However, I am also a very happy customer. -- David Reynolds david at reynoldsfamily.org.uk From yahooist at anyisle.com Sun Oct 25 21:51:39 2009 From: yahooist at anyisle.com (Neil S.) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:51:39 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Leopard v Snow Leopard Message-ID: Hi Guys, Please excuse me if this has been discussed previously. To those that have gone from Leopard to Snow Leopard, have you seen a difference in tangible performance? Just wondered.... Regards.... Neil -- Neil Stevens Sent from my ? iMac G5 From yahooist at anyisle.com Sun Oct 25 22:14:02 2009 From: yahooist at anyisle.com (Neil S.) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:14:02 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] iMac 27" Message-ID: <4B96C81C-3562-40F9-9E64-0122B89FE016@anyisle.com> Hi, Of late, I have enticed two good friends away from the dark side to soon-to-be on Macs. In doing so, it's got me looking at the current hardware line up and last week a new iMac 27" system was released. It looks fantastic. My 20" iMac G5, now on Leopard utilising Time Machine, is a lovely beast although it does seem to struggle sometimes especially with BBC iPlayer, but it never fails. I email, I browse, I edit photos, I use iTunes, and I Office (is that a verb). Nothing really heavy. I went into the Apple shop today - because now we can - and I played with the new iMac and the new Apple mouse. It's incredible. We have two long haired black cats and they keep nobbling my mighty mices but this new thing is awesome (I advise, this word is not used lightly by me). Best yet, it's included in the sale of a new iMac. Are there any other takers to the 27" iMac. Regards... Neil -- Neil Stevens Sent from my ? iMac G5 From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Sun Oct 25 22:33:46 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:33:46 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] iBook going spare Message-ID: Ken I still love G3 machines and have been looking for an OS9 machine for a while. Might even run Ubuntu on it. If you still have it I would love it. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) - original message - Subject: [NMUG] iBook going spare From: Ken Hamer Date: 25/10/2009 19:01 Dear All, Does anyone want a 12" white G3 iBook? It has Tiger installed but needs updates. It had a new hard disk installed a few years ago as the original one failed due to excessive heat (Apple designers seem convinced that electronics needs lots of heat to work properly). Details are: Machine Name: iBook Machine Model: PowerBook4,1 CPU Type: PowerPC 750 (33.11) Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 600 MHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB Memory: 384 MB Bus Speed: 100 MHz Boot ROM Version: 4.2.7f1 Serial Number: UV2046BCMDW Sales Order Number: M8599B/C It has an Airport adapter and a Fujitsu 60GB hard disk. The DVD-ROM drive is slightly eccentric in that sometimes it falls open by itself and also sometimes refuses to open when asked. The battery is past its best but can hold a charge for a while. The power adapter works. There are the disks that came with it including 10.1 and an upgrade to 10.2. There is no Tiger disk. It's free to anyone who is either nearby (NR9 4RD) or can come and get it. Ken _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mercer at gotadsl.co.uk Sun Oct 25 23:11:31 2009 From: mercer at gotadsl.co.uk (Valerie Mercer) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:11:31 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Interesting!! In-Reply-To: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> Message-ID: <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> Thank you for the warning! Valerie On 25 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Paul Chapman wrote: I saw Ken's offer of an old iBook and wondered where he was so opened Google Earth to put in his post code. Whereas normally all the information and boxes are to the left of the main window this time they were to the right and much of the writing was in Hebrew! Teach me to tinker around with my settings to help others. The Union Flag was still showing on the top menu bar but I had altered the order in International>Language section of preferences and that change takes effect when you open a new application. Good job I did open GE as the next time I restarted the finder it would have been in Hebrew as well. Paul C _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 26 08:08:37 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:08:37 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Leopard v Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <74DFD909-9B54-488E-AF01-29D03DA137E9@gmail.com> Hi, I haven't bothered running any specific tests to see if things are running faster but I've noticed a couple of things since installing SL I'm running SL on a MacBook Pro, 2GB RAM. It does seem to do more without needing to hit the hard drive as much, for example when using finder to browse folders in Leopard if the folder contained a lot of images or video it would take a good few seconds to retrieve all the file info and icons/thumbnails and the hard disk would be churning like mad trying to access all the data while in SL this has been improved and browsing directories is instant and with little hard drive access. Another similar example is coverflow in iTunes on Leopard going in to coverflow usually takes a good few seconds to load all the cover art of music and as you scroll through the library it continues to churn the hard drive and access more cover art, in SL this is also instant. Another thing I noticed is that while running Leopard I often got close to using the whole 2GB of ram and was on the verge of upgrading to 4GB but since the upgrade I've found that am not using as much RAM and so have put off buying a RAM upgrade until I actually need it. Steve. On 25 Oct 2009, at 21:51, Neil S. wrote: > To those that have gone from Leopard to Snow Leopard, have you seen a > difference in tangible performance? From ed at mendelsohn.me.uk Mon Oct 26 08:51:55 2009 From: ed at mendelsohn.me.uk (Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:51:55 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Interesting!! In-Reply-To: <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: <0B54D3E2-5665-46B6-B63B-B90D9E1B9850@mendelsohn.me.uk> I'm sorry for causing a problem Paul. I will check my settings now. Phyll On 25 Oct 2009, at 23:11, Valerie Mercer wrote: > Thank you for the warning! > > Valerie > On 25 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Paul Chapman wrote: > > I saw Ken's offer of an old iBook and wondered where he was so opened > Google Earth to put in his post code. Whereas normally all the > information and boxes are to the left of the main window this time > they were to the right and much of the writing was in Hebrew! Teach me > to tinker around with my settings to help others. The Union Flag was > still showing on the top menu bar but I had altered the order in > International>Language section of preferences and that change takes > effect when you open a new application. Good job I did open GE as the > next time I restarted the finder it would have been in Hebrew as well. > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From fowler.j at mac.com Mon Oct 26 09:06:53 2009 From: fowler.j at mac.com (Jonathan Fowler) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:06:53 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi all As we know apple have once again raised the bar with their new iMac range, which look amazing! However, on the back of that, I have been left with stock of the previous range. This has lead to some awesome clearance pricing, if anyone is interested. 20" iMac ?949 - now ?799 24" iMac ?1199 - now ?1049 24" iMac ?1499 - now ?1199 24" iMac ?1799 - now ?1299 If anybody is interested, or would like more detailed specifications please don't hesitate to call me. Jon Fowler Apple Solutions Consultant 07894949043 Fowler.j at euro.apple.com Sent from my iPhone On 25 Oct 2009, at 23:11, Valerie Mercer wrote: > Thank you for the warning! > > Valerie > On 25 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Paul Chapman wrote: > > I saw Ken's offer of an old iBook and wondered where he was so opened > Google Earth to put in his post code. Whereas normally all the > information and boxes are to the left of the main window this time > they were to the right and much of the writing was in Hebrew! Teach me > to tinker around with my settings to help others. The Union Flag was > still showing on the top menu bar but I had altered the order in > International>Language section of preferences and that change takes > effect when you open a new application. Good job I did open GE as the > next time I restarted the finder it would have been in Hebrew as well. > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From allanmacam at me.com Mon Oct 26 09:12:37 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:12:37 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> Hi Jon, Could you send me more details/specs on these two machine? I know somebody in the market for a new Mac. > 24" iMac ?1499 - now ?1199 > 24" iMac ?1799 - now ?1299 Thanks. Allan Johns. On 26 Oct 2009, at 09:06, Jonathan Fowler wrote: > Hi all > > As we know apple have once again raised the bar with their new iMac > range, which look amazing! > > However, on the back of that, I have been left with stock of the > previous range. This has lead to some awesome clearance pricing, if > anyone is interested. > > 20" iMac ?949 - now ?799 > 24" iMac ?1199 - now ?1049 > 24" iMac ?1499 - now ?1199 > 24" iMac ?1799 - now ?1299 > > If anybody is interested, or would like more detailed specifications > please don't hesitate to call me. > > Jon Fowler > Apple Solutions Consultant > 07894949043 > Fowler.j at euro.apple.com > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 25 Oct 2009, at 23:11, Valerie Mercer wrote: > >> Thank you for the warning! >> >> Valerie >> On 25 Oct 2009, at 19:23, Paul Chapman wrote: >> >> I saw Ken's offer of an old iBook and wondered where he was so opened >> Google Earth to put in his post code. Whereas normally all the >> information and boxes are to the left of the main window this time >> they were to the right and much of the writing was in Hebrew! Teach >> me >> to tinker around with my settings to help others. The Union Flag was >> still showing on the top menu bar but I had altered the order in >> International>Language section of preferences and that change takes >> effect when you open a new application. Good job I did open GE as the >> next time I restarted the finder it would have been in Hebrew as >> well. >> >> Paul C >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 26 09:45:40 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:45:40 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> Message-ID: Old ?1499 model: 2.93GHz, 4GB memory, 640GB hard drive, NVIDIA GeForce 120/256MB. Old ?1799 model: 3.06GHz, 4GB memory, 1TB hard drive, NVIDIA GeForce 130/512MB Both with usual port - Firewire 800, USB 2.0, mini DisplayPort, audio in, audio out Maximum RAM 8GB, not the 16GB with the new models. Sorry Jon, but unless they particularly want the 24" display, I think the new upper end 21.5" model is better at ?1199, and the new low end 27" model, at just ?50 more, is better than the ?1299 one. The new iMac models are really very much cheaper than the old ones at the high end. But the 20" and low end 24" discounted models Jon's offering look interesting for those on a tight budget. regards, Paul On 26 Oct 2009, at 09:12, Allan wrote: > Could you send me more details/specs on these two machine? I know > somebody in the market for a new Mac. > >> 24" iMac ?1499 - now ?1199 >> 24" iMac ?1799 - now ?1299 > From penguinsplj at me.com Mon Oct 26 10:39:09 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:39:09 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Interesting!! In-Reply-To: <0B54D3E2-5665-46B6-B63B-B90D9E1B9850@mendelsohn.me.uk> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <0B54D3E2-5665-46B6-B63B-B90D9E1B9850@mendelsohn.me.uk> Message-ID: <19EE0F8D-4DE6-429B-957C-B90ACF03F9F8@me.com> On Oct 26, 2009, at 08:51, Ed & Phyll Mendelsohn wrote: > I'm sorry for causing a problem Paul. I will check my settings now. No problems, it was quite funny really. Paul C From ian at igdesign.co.uk Mon Oct 26 10:53:16 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:53:16 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email Message-ID: <1F647F5D-CF02-4EAE-BFC3-85B95A98F57F@igdesign.co.uk> Dear All, One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. As it happens, I'm expect a delivery which might well come by DHL. But checking on the DHL web site turned up a warning (posted on 20 September). In case anyone hasn't seen this already - beware! Regards, Ian From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 26 11:09:24 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:09:24 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email Message-ID: Hi. A similar fake message was going around for FedEx a few weeks ago. Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) - original message - Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email From: Ian Garrett Date: 26/10/2009 10:53 Dear All, One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. As it happens, I'm expect a delivery which might well come by DHL. But checking on the DHL web site turned up a warning (posted on 20 September). In case anyone hasn't seen this already - beware! Regards, Ian _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From sc at davidviner.com Mon Oct 26 11:25:52 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:25:52 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> Message-ID: <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> > Sorry Jon, but unless they particularly want the 24" display, I think > the new upper end 21.5" model is better at ?1199, and the new low end > 27" model, at just ?50 more, is better than the ?1299 one. > > The new iMac models are really very much cheaper than the old ones at > the high end. > > But the 20" and low end 24" discounted models Jon's offering look > interesting for those on a tight budget. > My old G4 Macs are both getting long in the tooth (450MHz tower + 800MHz eMac) so I've been thinking it was about time to get an Intel Mac of some sort and have been watching out for the recons at the applet store. I was initially tempted by Jon's 20" (oo-err, that doesn't sound right!) but what you get for an extra ?150 for the newer version seems more than worth it. If the old 20" was more like ?650 I'd jump at it! David From fowler.j at mac.com Mon Oct 26 11:38:03 2009 From: fowler.j at mac.com (Jonathan Fowler) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:38:03 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> Message-ID: I do have stock of the new models too! Jon Sent from my iPhone On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:25, David Viner wrote: > >> Sorry Jon, but unless they particularly want the 24" display, I think >> the new upper end 21.5" model is better at ?1199, and the new low >> end >> 27" model, at just ?50 more, is better than the ?1299 one. >> >> The new iMac models are really very much cheaper than the old ones at >> the high end. >> >> But the 20" and low end 24" discounted models Jon's offering look >> interesting for those on a tight budget. >> > > My old G4 Macs are both getting long in the tooth (450MHz tower + > 800MHz > eMac) so I've been thinking it was about time to get an Intel Mac of > some sort and have been watching out for the recons at the applet > store. > I was initially tempted by Jon's 20" (oo-err, that doesn't sound > right!) > but what you get for an extra ?150 for the newer version seems more > than > worth it. If the old 20" was more like ?650 I'd jump at it! > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 26 11:46:41 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:46:41 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> Message-ID: This is how Apple now tempt you into spending more than you intended... lots of models in a rational range, each one just a little more then the cheaper one, but worth the difference... :-) Paul On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:25, David Viner wrote: > but what you get for an extra ?150 for the newer version seems more > than > worth it. From sc at davidviner.com Mon Oct 26 11:49:33 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:49:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Clearance iMac In-Reply-To: References: <089EE6BE-ECD4-4F40-A942-0C1A127EF0F4@me.com> <21EE58CE-ADB4-4441-ADE7-40D1DEF3A317@gotadsl.co.uk> <2028310E-B2DE-4681-803E-34628B34ED50@me.com> <4AE58740.4080409@davidviner.com> Message-ID: <4AE58CCD.5060401@davidviner.com> Yes, I know - and then their online configuration thingy makes you spend even more! The bastards!!! Paul Durrant wrote: > This is how Apple now tempt you into spending more than you > intended... lots of models in a rational range, each one just a little > more then the cheaper one, but worth the difference... > > :-) > > Paul > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:25, David Viner wrote: > >> but what you get for an extra ?150 for the newer version seems more >> than >> worth it. >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From steve.forst at virgin.net Mon Oct 26 10:53:17 2009 From: steve.forst at virgin.net (Steve Forster) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:53:17 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email In-Reply-To: <1F647F5D-CF02-4EAE-BFC3-85B95A98F57F@igdesign.co.uk> Message-ID: I had one of these a couple of months back. As I use DHL to send things it got as close as anything ever has to making me believe it was genuine until I noticed that it was sent to one of my addresses that DHL could not know. S From: Ian Garrett Reply-To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:53:16 +0000 To: Norwich Mac User Group list Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email Dear All, One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. As it happens, I'm expect a delivery which might well come by DHL. But checking on the DHL web site turned up a warning (posted on 20 September). In case anyone hasn't seen this already - beware! Regards, Ian _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com Mon Oct 26 12:33:07 2009 From: stefanyoungs1945 at googlemail.com (Stefan Pietrzak Youngs) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:33:07 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:53, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email > From: Ian Garrett > Date: 26/10/2009 10:53 > > Dear All, > > One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open > a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a > package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that > purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. This trick would catch the unwary, but a moment's thought would remind you .exe is a PROGRAM Why would someone send you a label as a program?? Caveat!! This trick would be just as easy on a Mac, in one way easier. For most us, I wager, do not invoke the Finder preference to append a suffix to every file, thus applications just appear as their name without the .app suffix. For us therefore we would not even get the warning .exe provides and it's probably therefore more likely one would just click the attachment without thinking. And since most of don't run anti-virus software routinely, we would probably not catch the installation of a keystroke recorder and a phone-home routine (Little Snitch would catch that however) and before you knew where you were, all your money would be in Leningrad via Costa Rica. Or have I missed something? From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 26 13:03:05 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:03:05 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> Message-ID: <63C73C0C-A73C-4272-90FA-633047AD6D63@gmail.com> Hi, OS X (10.5 & later) will quarantine executables and scripts downloaded (regardless of the file extension) and prompt you to confirm before running them. More info: Steve. On 26 Oct 2009, at 12:33, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > This trick would be just as easy on a Mac, in one way easier. For most > us, I wager, do not invoke the Finder preference to append a suffix to > every file, thus applications just appear as their name without > the .app suffix. For us therefore we would not even get the > warning .exe provides and it's probably therefore more likely one > would just click the attachment without thinking. And since most of > don't run anti-virus software routinely, we would probably not catch > the installation of a keystroke recorder and a phone-home routine > (Little Snitch would catch that however) and before you knew where you > were, all your money would be in Leningrad via Costa Rica. > > Or have I missed something? From ian at igdesign.co.uk Mon Oct 26 13:05:08 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:05:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> Message-ID: Yes, I was suspicious when I saw that the label was executable! I get a warning message every time I try to launch an app downloaded from the net. Does anyone know if it's possible to turn this off for trusted apps, like AppKiDo which I use quite a bit? Ah, just got Steve Batch's email. Thanks Steve, the link you sent may answer my question. Regards, Ian On 26 Oct , at Mon 26 Oct 2009, 12:33:07, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:53, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > >> Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email >> From: Ian Garrett >> Date: 26/10/2009 10:53 >> >> Dear All, >> >> One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open >> a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a >> package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that >> purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. > > > This trick would catch the unwary, but a moment's thought would remind > you .exe is a PROGRAM > > Why would someone send you a label as a program?? Caveat!! > > This trick would be just as easy on a Mac, in one way easier. For most > us, I wager, do not invoke the Finder preference to append a suffix to > every file, thus applications just appear as their name without > the .app suffix. For us therefore we would not even get the > warning .exe provides and it's probably therefore more likely one > would just click the attachment without thinking. And since most of > don't run anti-virus software routinely, we would probably not catch > the installation of a keystroke recorder and a phone-home routine > (Little Snitch would catch that however) and before you knew where you > were, all your money would be in Leningrad via Costa Rica. > > Or have I missed something? > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From kj.westgate at ntlworld.com Mon Oct 26 13:07:00 2009 From: kj.westgate at ntlworld.com (Kerin Westgate) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:07:00 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> Message-ID: <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> Have i missed something, but is .exe a windows program? so how easy would that be to install on a Mac without you knowing. (New to Mac's) On 26 Oct 2009, at 12:33, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:53, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: > >> Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email >> From: Ian Garrett >> Date: 26/10/2009 10:53 >> >> Dear All, >> >> One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to open >> a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a >> package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that >> purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. > > > This trick would catch the unwary, but a moment's thought would remind > you .exe is a PROGRAM > > Why would someone send you a label as a program?? Caveat!! > > This trick would be just as easy on a Mac, in one way easier. For most > us, I wager, do not invoke the Finder preference to append a suffix to > every file, thus applications just appear as their name without > the .app suffix. For us therefore we would not even get the > warning .exe provides and it's probably therefore more likely one > would just click the attachment without thinking. And since most of > don't run anti-virus software routinely, we would probably not catch > the installation of a keystroke recorder and a phone-home routine > (Little Snitch would catch that however) and before you knew where you > were, all your money would be in Leningrad via Costa Rica. > > Or have I missed something? > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 26 13:11:43 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:11:43 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Ian, You can disable the warning message but I don't recommend it. Here's how: Steve. On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:05, Ian Garrett wrote: > I get a warning message every time I try to launch an app downloaded > from the net. Does anyone know if it's possible to turn this off for > trusted apps, like AppKiDo which I use quite a bit? From ian at igdesign.co.uk Mon Oct 26 13:23:24 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:23:24 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> Message-ID: <311BEAE0-620D-442D-80D4-651C1CD3195B@igdesign.co.uk> Thanks Steve. That looks like something I can cope with. If I put a trusted app in a separate folder in my Applications folder and attach the script to the folder, I assume other downloaded apps will still be quarantined. Regards, Ian On 26 Oct , at Mon 26 Oct 2009, 01:11:43, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi Ian, > > You can disable the warning message but I don't recommend it. > > Here's how: > > > Steve. > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:05, Ian Garrett wrote: > >> I get a warning message every time I try to launch an app downloaded >> from the net. Does anyone know if it's possible to turn this off for >> trusted apps, like AppKiDo which I use quite a bit? > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Mon Oct 26 13:26:13 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:26:13 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <3EB24228-EBF4-46E1-9FA0-5FF1540E99FF@gmail.com> Hi Kerin, If you have Parallels desktop for Mac you could in theory accidentally open a malicious windows executable from Finder and it would infect the Parallels desktop but this is isolated from your actual Mac OS and applications so no harm can be done to your Mac. Steve. On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:07, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Have i missed something, but is .exe a windows program? so how easy > would that be to install on a Mac without you knowing. > (New to Mac's) From ian at igdesign.co.uk Mon Oct 26 13:29:09 2009 From: ian at igdesign.co.uk (Ian Garrett) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:29:09 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: Not easy. You'd need to run Parallels or similar, transfer the .exe file to the Windows file system, and run it from there. Or you'd have to be receiving emails in Windows. And you'd have to believe that the .exe file really was something you needed to open. On 26 Oct , at Mon 26 Oct 2009, 01:07:00, Kerin Westgate wrote: > Have i missed something, but is .exe a windows program? so how easy > would that be to install on a Mac without you knowing. > (New to Mac's) > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 12:33, Stefan Pietrzak Youngs wrote: > >> >> On 26 Oct 2009, at 11:53, nmug-request at nmug.org.uk wrote: >> >>> Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email >>> From: Ian Garrett >>> Date: 26/10/2009 10:53 >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> One advantage of using a Mac is that it requires extra effort to >>> open >>> a .exe file! I've just had an email claiming to be from DHL about a >>> package they wanted to deliver etc etc, with a .zip attachment that >>> purported to be a label and which expanded to an .exe file. >> >> >> This trick would catch the unwary, but a moment's thought would >> remind >> you .exe is a PROGRAM >> >> Why would someone send you a label as a program?? Caveat!! >> >> This trick would be just as easy on a Mac, in one way easier. For >> most >> us, I wager, do not invoke the Finder preference to append a suffix >> to >> every file, thus applications just appear as their name without >> the .app suffix. For us therefore we would not even get the >> warning .exe provides and it's probably therefore more likely one >> would just click the attachment without thinking. And since most of >> don't run anti-virus software routinely, we would probably not catch >> the installation of a keystroke recorder and a phone-home routine >> (Little Snitch would catch that however) and before you knew where >> you >> were, all your money would be in Leningrad via Costa Rica. >> >> Or have I missed something? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Mon Oct 26 14:09:37 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:09:37 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use Message-ID: Being a former publisher and designer I know the importance of good images. Clients dont always supply good images or ones suitable for print. Photo libraries are expensive and free ones are usually rubbish or not for commercial use any way. I was wondering the legality of using or offering your own images. I know there are a number of photographers in the group. Where do you stand when it comes to images you take yourself. I have just been to Cheshire and the Peak District over the weekend and the views are marvellous. I snapped away frantically on a reasonably high specced camera. I was going to offer these and other photos I have taken for people to use freely with only a mention back to myself. However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or land and wondered where the law stood on this. Am I opening myself up for a lot of grief? Is it a good idea? Simon --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) From paul at durrant.co.uk Mon Oct 26 14:59:48 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:59:48 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <855B0996-B381-4F38-9422-BD646BCDD524@durrant.co.uk> Copyright in a photograph generally belongs to the photographer. If you took a photo of copyright material (e.g. a recent sculpture), you'd still have copyright in the photo, but the sculptor would also have some copyright interest in it. If your subjects are landscapes, I don't think there's any possible problem. You should investigate the Creative Common licences. It sounds like you want the Creative Commons Attribution license. (Anyone can do anything with the photos, provided they mention you as the originator of the photos.) http://creativecommons.org/ regards, Paul On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > Being a former publisher and designer I know the importance of good > images. Clients dont always supply good images or ones suitable for > print. > > Photo libraries are expensive and free ones are usually rubbish or > not for commercial use any way. > > I was wondering the legality of using or offering your own images. I > know there are a number of photographers in the group. > > Where do you stand when it comes to images you take yourself. I have > just been to Cheshire and the Peak District over the weekend and the > views are marvellous. I snapped away frantically on a reasonably > high specced camera. > > I was going to offer these and other photos I have taken for people > to use freely with only a mention back to myself. > > However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or > land and wondered where the law stood on this. > > Am I opening myself up for a lot of grief? Is it a good idea? From rob at atvetsystems.com Mon Oct 26 15:57:57 2009 From: rob at atvetsystems.com (Robert Tillyard) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:57:57 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5E9EAEBD-6AAC-4183-8358-9AD03F04C09C@atvetsystems.com> Hello, Simon, I put a lot of my images on Flickr and have had a magazine and a few web-sites ask if they can use the images. There is a clause in the copyright act the says if you photograph copyrighted material it's classed as "incidental inclusion" and doesn't prevent you from photographing something unless the photograph is a clear attempt at duplication. I think there is an exception that prevents you from photographing bank notes up close. I'll look at my copy of the copyright act when I get home and see if I can find the relevant chapters. Sometimes the owner of a building can stop you from photographing a building if you have to stand on their property yo do it. Have a Google for UK photographers rights. there is a PDF from them that defines all of this. Regards, Rob. On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > Being a former publisher and designer I know the importance of good > images. Clients dont always supply good images or ones suitable for > print. > > Photo libraries are expensive and free ones are usually rubbish or > not for commercial use any way. > > I was wondering the legality of using or offering your own images. I > know there are a number of photographers in the group. > > Where do you stand when it comes to images you take yourself. I have > just been to Cheshire and the Peak District over the weekend and the > views are marvellous. I snapped away frantically on a reasonably > high specced camera. > > I was going to offer these and other photos I have taken for people > to use freely with only a mention back to myself. > > However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or > land and wondered where the law stood on this. > > Am I opening myself up for a lot of grief? Is it a good idea? > > Simon > > --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) From rob at atvetsystems.com Mon Oct 26 16:19:58 2009 From: rob at atvetsystems.com (Robert Tillyard) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:19:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Simon, See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_3 This is what I've had up my sleeve incase anyone evert tried to say I couldn't photograph something (I hear it happens in Docklands, Birmingham Bullring and bits of London quite a lot). But not being a lawyer I don't know how far this will get you... YMMV... 1998 Copyright act Chapter 3 section 31: 31 Incidental inclusion of copyright material (1) Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion in an artistic work, sound recording, film, broadcast or cable programme. (2) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of copies, or the playing, showing, broadcasting or inclusion in a cable programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of subsection (1), not an infringement of the copyright. (3) A musical work, words spoken or sung with music, or so much of a sound recording, broadcast or cable programme as includes a musical work or such words, shall not be regarded as incidentally included in another work if it is deliberately included. Regards, Rob. On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > ... > However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or > land and wondered where the law stood on this. ... From rob at atvetsystems.com Mon Oct 26 16:19:58 2009 From: rob at atvetsystems.com (Robert Tillyard) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:19:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Simon, See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_3 This is what I've had up my sleeve incase anyone evert tried to say I couldn't photograph something (I hear it happens in Docklands, Birmingham Bullring and bits of London quite a lot). But not being a lawyer I don't know how far this will get you... YMMV... 1998 Copyright act Chapter 3 section 31: 31 Incidental inclusion of copyright material (1) Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion in an artistic work, sound recording, film, broadcast or cable programme. (2) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of copies, or the playing, showing, broadcasting or inclusion in a cable programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of subsection (1), not an infringement of the copyright. (3) A musical work, words spoken or sung with music, or so much of a sound recording, broadcast or cable programme as includes a musical work or such words, shall not be regarded as incidentally included in another work if it is deliberately included. Regards, Rob. On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > ... > However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or > land and wondered where the law stood on this. ... From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Mon Oct 26 17:59:07 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:59:07 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Leopard v Snow Leopard In-Reply-To: <74DFD909-9B54-488E-AF01-29D03DA137E9@gmail.com> References: <74DFD909-9B54-488E-AF01-29D03DA137E9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <44DE833F-C10C-49DE-9CC1-918E4C490844@zen.co.uk> Early 2008 MBP & 2009 Mac Pro - seems to need less power so battery lasts longer. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 26 Oct 2009, at 08:08, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > I haven't bothered running any specific tests to see if things are > running faster but I've noticed a couple of things since installing SL > > I'm running SL on a MacBook Pro, 2GB RAM. > > It does seem to do more without needing to hit the hard drive as much, > for example when using finder to browse folders in Leopard if the > folder contained a lot of images or video it would take a good few > seconds to retrieve all the file info and icons/thumbnails and the > hard disk would be churning like mad trying to access all the data > while in SL this has been improved and browsing directories is instant > and with little hard drive access. Another similar example is > coverflow in iTunes on Leopard going in to coverflow usually takes a > good few seconds to load all the cover art of music and as you scroll > through the library it continues to churn the hard drive and access > more cover art, in SL this is also instant. > > Another thing I noticed is that while running Leopard I often got > close to using the whole 2GB of ram and was on the verge of upgrading > to 4GB but since the upgrade I've found that am not using as much RAM > and so have put off buying a RAM upgrade until I actually need it. > > Steve. > > > On 25 Oct 2009, at 21:51, Neil S. wrote: > >> To those that have gone from Leopard to Snow Leopard, have you >> seen a >> difference in tangible performance? > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Mon Oct 26 18:11:03 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:11:03 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1EAAC13B-BCB4-4D28-BF35-7336CE2013F9@zen.co.uk> I'd go along with whats been said so far. The only place I can think of where I know restrictions apply is Durdle Door in Dorset and I think the main reason there is that to take a decent photo you have to stand on the owner's land for which a charge applies IIRC and commercial use is a not permitted on the ticket. Having said that some airshows such as the big one at Fairford make it a condition precedent average punters can't use their images for personal profit but those who have snapped accidents seem to have been able to so. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 26 Oct 2009, at 16:19, Robert Tillyard wrote: > Hello, Simon, > > See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_3 > > This is what I've had up my sleeve incase anyone evert tried to say I > couldn't photograph something (I hear it happens in Docklands, > Birmingham Bullring and bits of London quite a lot). But not being a > lawyer I don't know how far this will get you... YMMV... > > 1998 Copyright act Chapter 3 section 31: > > 31 Incidental inclusion of copyright material > > (1) Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion > in an artistic work, sound recording, film, broadcast or cable > programme. > > (2) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of > copies, or the playing, showing, broadcasting or inclusion in a cable > programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of > subsection (1), not an infringement of the copyright. > > (3) A musical work, words spoken or sung with music, or so much of a > sound recording, broadcast or cable programme as includes a musical > work or such words, shall not be regarded as incidentally included in > another work if it is deliberately included. > > > Regards, Rob. > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > >> ... >> However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or >> land and wondered where the law stood on this. > ... > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Mon Oct 26 18:14:13 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:14:13 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Digital Projector Appeal Message-ID: <5A7753D9-4C13-45EF-90DA-C7C4ACA49942@zen.co.uk> I'm doing a presentation for a friend on 20th November and need to use a digital projector on the night. Does: 1. Anyone have one I could borrow 2. Anyone know where I can rent one? Please PM off list if you can help. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk From Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net Mon Oct 26 19:09:13 2009 From: Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net (Jeremy Webb) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:09:13 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Simon You're not a professional photographer so although you still retain copyright, you have a multitude of ways to offer them to people without having to earn dosh from them, which also takes the pressure off a bit :-) I'd put them up on Flickr with a Creative Commons licence as Paul suggested. You needn't worry about having photographed other peoples property, provided it doesn't blatantly compromise their security or privacy and could be claimed as doing so in a UK court. A bit off-topic but... Many individuals can and do try to prevent you taking pictures which just happen to feature their property but this is mostly of the "get orf moi laaand" variety and is just trying it on (unless you' re blatantly trespassing). Some photographers have come up against problems with landscape images taken on National Trust land which used to operate some quite incredible practices and try to demand the rights to images already taken. This led to some very interesting squabbles between visual artists and land agencies over who owns the "rights" to represent the clouds passing over the land I kid you not. Recently, the Met Police have been accused of abusing anti-terrorist legislation in order to prevent photographers from taking photographs perfectly innocently in central London and this has been highlighted and publicised in recent British Journal of Photography campaigns which have tried to clarify the law, bring the parties together and prevent these "misunderstandings" happening elsewhere. I've been escorted from the perimeter fences of all sorts of places but the scariest encounter I ever had was with a real old boy Norfolk farmer, who turned up on his ancient push bike, and simply stared at me, saying nothing but chewing a twig and looking hard. Boy did I move :-D Jeremy Webb Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > Being a former publisher and designer I know the importance of good > images. Clients dont always supply good images or ones suitable for > print. > > Photo libraries are expensive and free ones are usually rubbish or > not for commercial use any way. > > I was wondering the legality of using or offering your own images. > I know there are a number of photographers in the group. > > Where do you stand when it comes to images you take yourself. I > have just been to Cheshire and the Peak District over the weekend > and the views are marvellous. I snapped away frantically on a > reasonably high specced camera. > > I was going to offer these and other photos I have taken for people > to use freely with only a mention back to myself. > > However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or > land and wondered where the law stood on this. > > Am I opening myself up for a lot of grief? Is it a good idea? > > Simon > > --- visit http://www.simonroyal.co.uk (sent using Nokia E65) > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From martinfry.photo at virgin.net Mon Oct 26 21:31:10 2009 From: martinfry.photo at virgin.net (Martin Fry) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:31:10 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > > Hi Simon I've come in a bit late to this question Under the 1998 copyright act, The copyright of any photograph taken belongs to the photographer for 75 years after his/her death. I believe that the is no longer a law against 'trespassing' on any normal land, and the only thing you can get 'done for' is criminal damage. Very hard to prove that the grass you have walked on is damaged beyond repair. The police may try to stop you in cities, by airports etc. on terrorist grounds and its dodgy to disagree with a 6 foot copper or security man, so walk away and use a longer lens! Photographing property sometimes requires a property release, as shooting people for publication need a model release, but if the subject is small within a picture (ie, a cottage as a small part of a landscape image) nobody can come after you) unless you show it/them in a bad way ie; putting a red light over the door or making fun of somebody without their permission. Unlike the paparazzi. If I want to take a picture, I will. If I am charged entry into a place then I feel I have paid for the right to shoot what I want ( Within reason) As a professional I have work to do! Common Sense rules. OK! PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning out consistently good images. When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) Regards Martin Martin Fry www.martinfryphotography.com > > You're not a professional photographer so although you still retain > copyright, you have a multitude of ways to offer them to people > without having to earn dosh from them, which also takes the pressure > off a bit :-) > > I'd put them up on Flickr with a Creative Commons licence as Paul > suggested. You needn't worry about having photographed other peoples > property, provided it doesn't blatantly compromise their security or > privacy and could be claimed as doing so in a UK court. > > A bit off-topic but... > > Many individuals can and do try to prevent you taking pictures which > just happen to feature their property but this is mostly of the "get > orf moi laaand" variety and is just trying it on (unless you' re > blatantly trespassing). Some photographers have come up against > problems with landscape images taken on National Trust land which > used to operate some quite incredible practices and try to demand the > rights to images already taken. This led to some very interesting > squabbles between visual artists and land agencies over who owns the > "rights" to represent the clouds passing over the land I kid you not. > Recently, the Met Police have been accused of abusing anti-terrorist > legislation in order to prevent photographers from taking photographs > perfectly innocently in central London and this has been highlighted > and publicised in recent British Journal of Photography campaigns > which have tried to clarify the law, bring the parties together and > prevent these "misunderstandings" happening elsewhere. > > I've been escorted from the perimeter fences of all sorts of places > but the scariest encounter I ever had was with a real old boy Norfolk > farmer, who turned up on his ancient push bike, and simply stared at > me, saying nothing but chewing a twig and looking hard. Boy did I > move :-D > > Jeremy Webb > Jeremywebb.photo at virgin.net > > > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: > >> Being a former publisher and designer I know the importance of good >> images. Clients dont always supply good images or ones suitable for >> print. >> >> Photo libraries are expensive and free ones are usually rubbish or >> not for commercial use any way. >> >> I was wondering the legality of using or offering your own images. >> I know there are a number of photographers in the group. >> >> Where do you stand when it comes to images you take yourself. I >> have just been to Cheshire and the Peak District over the weekend >> and the views are marvellous. I snapped away frantically on a >> reasonably high specced camera. >> >> I was going to offer these and other photos I have taken for people >> to use freely with only a mention back to myself. >> >> However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or >> land and wondered where the law stood on this. >> >> Am I opening myself up for a lot of grief? Is it a good idea? From brian at clearlight.uk.net Mon Oct 26 20:34:35 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:34:35 +0100 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <1EAAC13B-BCB4-4D28-BF35-7336CE2013F9@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: Having walked to Durdle Door from Osmington Mills and back one day and snapped innumerable perspectives of it and its surroundings landscape - I had no idea of any such restriction - not having entered by any ticket producing portal. So I guess that if I did includes any of these pics in any public work, then I could be met with some kind of desist order or indeed demand for payment? regards Brian Steven Jefferson said recently: > I'd go along with whats been said so far. The only place I can think > of where I know restrictions apply is Durdle Door in Dorset and I > think the main reason there is that to take a decent photo you have to > stand on the owner's land for which a charge applies IIRC and > commercial use is a not permitted on the ticket. > > Having said that some airshows such as the big one at Fairford make it > a condition precedent average punters can't use their images for > personal profit but those who have snapped accidents seem to have been > able to so. > > Steven Jefferson > steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk > > > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 16:19, Robert Tillyard wrote: > >> Hello, Simon, >> >> See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_3 >> >> This is what I've had up my sleeve incase anyone evert tried to say I >> couldn't photograph something (I hear it happens in Docklands, >> Birmingham Bullring and bits of London quite a lot). But not being a >> lawyer I don't know how far this will get you... YMMV... >> >> 1998 Copyright act Chapter 3 section 31: >> >> 31 Incidental inclusion of copyright material >> >> (1) Copyright in a work is not infringed by its incidental inclusion >> in an artistic work, sound recording, film, broadcast or cable >> programme. >> >> (2) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of >> copies, or the playing, showing, broadcasting or inclusion in a cable >> programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of >> subsection (1), not an infringement of the copyright. >> >> (3) A musical work, words spoken or sung with music, or so much of a >> sound recording, broadcast or cable programme as includes a musical >> work or such words, shall not be regarded as incidentally included in >> another work if it is deliberately included. >> >> >> Regards, Rob. >> >> On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:09, Simon Royal wrote: >> >>> ... >>> However some of the images taken are of other peoples property or >>> land and wondered where the law stood on this. >> ... >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From batchsteve at googlemail.com Tue Oct 27 08:08:33 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:08:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> Humphies! Tests have proven that the video-in capabilities are limited to DisplayPort only, so those hoping to connect a Blu-Ray player or games console may be out of luck. Steve. On 20 Oct 2009, at 21:56, Paul Durrant wrote: > And the 27" iMacs can display video from an external source - i.e. you > can use them as a big 27" monitor for, say, a BlueRay player. From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Tue Oct 27 08:40:30 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:40:30 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] loss of internet access Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910270140h1fe10283h266b8e1fd3d32333@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Looking for an off the wall intellect. I am running an iMac on OS 10.4.11 I have been using Onspeed for a number of years with few problems. However, I found that if Onspeed failed to open, I could not access the net. Usually, when I restarted Onspeed, everything returned to normal. A couple of days ago, Onspeed packed up, I cannot restart, and I have lost contact with the outside world. Currently, I am struggling with a windows lap top. borrowed from a generous neighbour. Although I have made frequent contacts with Onspeed, they do not seem to be able to grasp that I am Macless and that their helpful download programmes are coming in on a windows machine. I have recorded their latest effort, but my Mac "does not recognize" the cd. As far as I can establish, I have removed all traces of Onspeed and therefore shoul be able to contact the net au naturel, so to speak. I'm not sure that I have either the confidence or for that matter competence, to return to a virgin hard drive but, short of that, what on earth can I do? All suggestions of the non geek speak variety would be pathetically gratefully received and actioned. [As was said of Rupert, "I am a bear of limited intelligence"] With many thanks in advance, Sincerely, John M Campbell From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 27 08:54:25 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:25 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] loss of internet access In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910270140h1fe10283h266b8e1fd3d32333@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910270140h1fe10283h266b8e1fd3d32333@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AE6B541.8020909@stackyard.org> John, You don't mention what sort of internet connection you are using, e.g. dial-up or broadband, your provider or what sort of device you have which connects the iMac to the phone line. Can you give us more info? Onspeed is one of those things which sounded like a good idea for dial-up users and many use it successfully. However, I have seen terrible problems caused by it on PCs and certainly wouldn't recommend for broadband users. If you want to persist, there is nothing to prevent you from downloading the Mac version of the Onspeed executable to the PC and transferring it to the iMac using a memory stick or optical disk. Ken Campbell wrote: > Hi, > Looking for an off the wall intellect. > I am running an iMac on OS 10.4.11 > I have been using Onspeed for a number of years with few problems. > However, I found that if Onspeed failed to open, I could not access the net. > Usually, when I restarted Onspeed, everything returned to normal. > > A couple of days ago, Onspeed packed up, I cannot restart, and I have > lost contact with the outside world. Currently, I am struggling with a > windows lap top. borrowed from a generous neighbour. > Although I have made frequent contacts with Onspeed, they do not seem to > be able to grasp that I am Macless and that their helpful download > programmes are coming in on a windows machine. I have recorded their latest > effort, but my Mac "does not recognize" the cd. > As far as I can establish, I have removed all traces of Onspeed and > therefore shoul be able to contact the net au naturel, so to speak. > I'm not sure that I have either the confidence or for that matter > competence, to return to a virgin hard drive but, short of that, what on > earth can I do? > All suggestions of the non geek speak variety would be pathetically > gratefully received and actioned. [As was said of Rupert, "I am a bear of > limited intelligence"] > With many thanks in advance, > Sincerely, > John M Campbell > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 27 10:09:12 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:09:12 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] 27 inch iMac Video in - Was: Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 27 Oct 2009, at 08:08, Steve Batch wrote: > > Humphies! Tests have proven that the video-in capabilities are > limited to DisplayPort only, so those hoping to connect a Blu-Ray > player or games console may be out of luck. > > > > This is worrying. The potential lack of video in capability is a deal-breaker for me. My last large (well, 19"!) monitor died recently. It had been connected to my Mac Mini, which I was thinking of replacing with a nice new iMac. I was also hopeful to be able to view Blu-Ray movies on it, as well as connect various other computers and video devices, to make use of that huge high resolution screen. How can I best express my dismay to Apple? Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From paul at durrant.co.uk Tue Oct 27 11:32:20 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:32:20 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] 27 inch iMac Video in - Was: Summary of today's updates In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E6223BA-000B-46D9-88D5-E07BF535D8E6@durrant.co.uk> On 27 Oct 2009, at 10:09, Richard Nevill wrote: > On 27 Oct 2009, at 08:08, Steve Batch wrote: >> Humphies! Tests have proven that the video-in capabilities are >> limited to DisplayPort only, so those hoping to connect a Blu-Ray >> player or games console may be out of luck. >> >> > This is worrying. > > The potential lack of video in capability is a deal-breaker for me. My > last large (well, 19"!) monitor died recently. It had been connected > to my Mac Mini, which I was thinking of replacing with a nice new > iMac. I was also hopeful to be able to view Blu-Ray movies on it, as > well as connect various other computers and video devices, to make use > of that huge high resolution screen. > > How can I best express my dismay to Apple? email to sjobs at apple.com (no, seriously. They do get read. Some even get read (& replied to) by Steve. Of course, if your do get a reply, I'd suggest also buyign a lottery ticket - Lady Luck is obviously on your side.) I've heard reports that you can get adapter boxes from DVI/HDMI to DisplayPort. But they're not cheap. But what you /can/ do is buy TWO iMacs, and then have a wonderful dual- display setup. :-) Paul From sc at davidviner.com Tue Oct 27 13:44:48 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:44:48 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Virus Infostealer.Banker.C on fake DHL email; Mac too In-Reply-To: References: <03162886-E4F2-4118-A471-09D066690F05@gmail.com> <280739B0-2C73-4D4E-9578-0F1A8D08C164@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <4AE6F950.3090608@davidviner.com> Ooh, and it's now my turn to get one of these fake DHL emails! No, I wasn't feeling left out of the party - this is probably the 4th or 5th one I've seen in the past few weeks. Mind you, their spelling and cruddy use of English is a bit of a give away that it's not genuine! Here's what it says: /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hello! The courier company was not able to deliver your parcel by your address. Cause: Error in shipping address. You may pickup the parcel at our post office personaly! Please attention! The shipping label is attached to this e-mail. Print this label to get this package at our post office. Please do not reply to this e-mail, it is an unmonitored mailbox. Thank you, DHL Express Services. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /David From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 27 15:28:42 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:28:42 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] loss of internet access (Onspeed) In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910270140h1fe10283h266b8e1fd3d32333@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910270140h1fe10283h266b8e1fd3d32333@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AE711AA.6020406@stackyard.org> John, Apologies for not reading your email more carefully. Had I put my glasses on, I would have read the sentence in which you say that your Mac didn't recognize the CD (burned on the PC). There are many possibilities here - first make sure that you can read the CD in the PC, in other words, that it burned successfully. If still no joy try a memory stick to transfer the program. Interestingly, in the Onspeed help section visible to non-users, there are network settings given only for Mac OS X versions up to and including Panther (10.3). Is this significant? Is it actually supported for Tiger or have they just not updated their help section? There does not appear to be a way of downloading without buying so I won't be doing that. Anyway, Onspeed appears to need a proxy set in the network settings and that proxy would be the "localhost", i.e. your own machine - IP address 127.0.0.1 and port 5400. Properly running Onspeed software will answer requests at this address and on this port. In other words, whenever you try to view a web site, your Mac uses the Onspeed software as a sort of middle-man to access the network. If you are no longer running Onspeed or if it is broken in some way, any requests for web pages will go nowhere because the proxy (middle-man) isn't there to pass on requests. So the moral of the story is to check your network settings under System Preferences -> Network -> Advanced (button) -> Proxies (tab) -> Configure Proxies Manually (drop-down menu) and untick any proxies ticked under "Select a protocol to configure". If they are already unticked, then the solution is something else. Let us know what happens. Ken (wearing glasses) Campbell wrote: > Hi, > Looking for an off the wall intellect. > I am running an iMac on OS 10.4.11 > I have been using Onspeed for a number of years with few problems. > However, I found that if Onspeed failed to open, I could not access the net. > Usually, when I restarted Onspeed, everything returned to normal. > > A couple of days ago, Onspeed packed up, I cannot restart, and I have > lost contact with the outside world. Currently, I am struggling with a > windows lap top. borrowed from a generous neighbour. > Although I have made frequent contacts with Onspeed, they do not seem to > be able to grasp that I am Macless and that their helpful download > programmes are coming in on a windows machine. I have recorded their latest > effort, but my Mac "does not recognize" the cd. > As far as I can establish, I have removed all traces of Onspeed and > therefore shoul be able to contact the net au naturel, so to speak. > I'm not sure that I have either the confidence or for that matter > competence, to return to a virgin hard drive but, short of that, what on > earth can I do? > All suggestions of the non geek speak variety would be pathetically > gratefully received and actioned. [As was said of Rupert, "I am a bear of > limited intelligence"] > With many thanks in advance, > Sincerely, > John M Campbell > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 16:00:36 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:00:36 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking Message-ID: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. I am changing around the layout of my house and it might mean I can switch some of my machines from wireless to wired. Wireless is great when it works, but it is a pain when it doesn't and a lot of the time it doesn't work for any known reason. I have a BT HomeHub 2.0 which serves 7 devices. A PC tower running XP Home wirelessly. A PC tower running XP Pro wirelessly. A PC tower running XP Home wired. A PC laptop running XP Home wirelessly. A PC laptop running Vista wirelessly. A PowerBook running Leopard wirelessly. My Nokia running S60 wirelessly. The publishing company I worked for previously had a main server for it's PCs around the office, but only one connection for the editorial department which served a PC sitting in the corner for emails and internet. When I moved into the department I ran that connection into a wired switch when I then plugged all the Macs into (wired) and got them all online (albiet via figuring out the proxy settings). Previously they had all talked to each other via a very slow and old hub, but they were not connected to the outside world - nor the rest of the office. I was thinking of doing a similar thing at home. I was going to run a Wired Switch from the HomeHub. This would connect to the wired PC tower running XP Home, which would be in the same room as the HomeHub. Directly above the room with the HomeHub and Switch in is my two boys room which has two wireless PC towers running XP. I would then run two ethernet cables up through the floor into their room and connect their two machines wired instead of wireless. I would keep my PowerBook, Vista machine and Nokia running wirelessly. Would this work do you think? I am also looking at getting some older Macs (G3 and pre-G3 era) which is a pain to go wirelessly and most have ethernet built in. I know the HomeHub has ethernet ports on it, but only a few and I intend to start collecting a lot of older Macs again. Also the main problem I have is the two XP wireless towers are using USB wireless dongles which pick up the HomeHub wireless signal when they feel like it, which is very frustrating. I know there is nothing wrong with the HomeHub or the positioning of it as my PowerBook and wifes XP laptop can always get a signal throughout the house, so it is probably down to the rubbish USB dongles. A wired connection would take out the hassle of keeping these machines online. Can anyone see a problem with my proposed set up? Does anyone have any advice? Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Tue Oct 27 16:48:17 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:48:17 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Loss of internet access Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910270948n46d43bdfo5fb89a6d23843d7c@mail.gmail.com> Ken, Many thanks for your informative reply. I am using Plus Net broadband via Thompson Speed Touch ST 585 v6 wired, not wireless. The curious thing is that I have been using Onspeed successfully, first on Dial Up and then on broadband for about six years. Broadband comparatively recently, which, possibly coincidentally, is when the fun started. Thanks to a saintly neighbour, I have been interrogating Onspeed on a Windows lap top, on " live chat " for three days and it has become clear that their experts have been merely quoting from their printed material, rather than from experience with the product. I am deliriously happy to report that I am writing this on my own iMac, having rooted out every vestige of Onspeed from the machine. The trash basket was red hot! However, there still remains the mystery as to HOW a piece of installed software could appear to have hijacked the system. I wonder if it was accidental that the uninstaller wouldn't? Thanks again, John ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Campbell To: nmug at nmug.org.uk Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:40:30 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] loss of internet access Hi, Looking for an off the wall intellect. I am running an iMac on OS 10.4.11 I have been using Onspeed for a number of years with few problems. However, I found that if Onspeed failed to open, I could not access the net. Usually, when I restarted Onspeed, everything returned to normal. A couple of days ago, Onspeed packed up, I cannot restart, and I have lost contact with the outside world. Currently, I am struggling with a windows lap top. borrowed from a generous neighbour. Although I have made frequent contacts with Onspeed, they do not seem to be able to grasp that I am Macless and that their helpful download programmes are coming in on a windows machine. I have recorded their latest effort, but my Mac "does not recognize" the cd. As far as I can establish, I have removed all traces of Onspeed and therefore shoul be able to contact the net au naturel, so to speak. I'm not sure that I have either the confidence or for that matter competence, to return to a virgin hard drive but, short of that, what on earth can I do? All suggestions of the non geek speak variety would be pathetically gratefully received and actioned. [As was said of Rupert, "I am a bear of limited intelligence"] With many thanks in advance, Sincerely, John M Campbell ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ken Hamer To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [NMUG] loss of internet access John, You don't mention what sort of internet connection you are using, e.g. dial-up or broadband, your provider or what sort of device you have which connects the iMac to the phone line. Can you give us more info? Onspeed is one of those things which sounded like a good idea for dial-up users and many use it successfully. However, I have seen terrible problems caused by it on PCs and certainly wouldn't recommend for broadband users. If you want to persist, there is nothing to prevent you from downloading the Mac version of the Onspeed executable to the PC and transferring it to the iMac using a memory stick or optical disk. Ken From batchsteve at googlemail.com Tue Oct 27 16:48:18 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:48:18 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <1D54A67C-E1AC-461E-BE2E-F3D8118FA9A1@gmail.com> Hi, Without knowing what is causing the wireless connections to stop working it's hard to say if using cables will resolve the issues, but it can't hurt to trial it. My only suggestion would be to plan the network and keep it as simple as possible before you start drilling holes and running cables, for example, you should only need a single cable running up to the boy's room if you then have a hub in the room to split the connection between the two PCs. Steve. On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:00, Simon Royal wrote: > A wired connection would take out the hassle of keeping these machines > online. > > Can anyone see a problem with my proposed set up? Does anyone have any > advice? From sc at davidviner.com Tue Oct 27 16:50:33 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:50:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AE724D9.3010101@davidviner.com> Simon I also run a combined wired/wireless system. In my case it's from a VM (ex NTL) cable modem into a LinkSys Firewall/4-port Router - a couple of switches/hubs give me the extra connections needed and, from those, I've got the house cabled up with Cat-5e Ethernet. There's a NetGear wireless hub that gets switched on when I want to use the wireless netbook or laptop (usually from the conservatory or garden). The NetGear is locked down solidly with WPA2 so that only certain MAC network card addresses can get access. The network has a Linux file/web server which is also doing some DNS - all the PCs and Macs on the network include the Linux box as the initial DNS nameserver in order for me to test all the various test versions of web sites that live on the server. It all works fine apart from when the Windows PCs forget or screw up their DNS settings (which happens for absolutely no reason as far as I can see). So, in your case, I'd say go for it! David > Hi. > > I am changing around the layout of my house and it might mean I can > switch some of my machines from wireless to wired. Wireless is great > when it works, but it is a pain when it doesn't and a lot of the time > it doesn't work for any known reason. > > I have a BT HomeHub 2.0 which serves 7 devices. > > A PC tower running XP Home wirelessly. > A PC tower running XP Pro wirelessly. > A PC tower running XP Home wired. > A PC laptop running XP Home wirelessly. > A PC laptop running Vista wirelessly. > A PowerBook running Leopard wirelessly. > My Nokia running S60 wirelessly. > > The publishing company I worked for previously had a main server for > it's PCs around the office, but only one connection for the editorial > department which served a PC sitting in the corner for emails and > internet. When I moved into the department I ran that connection into > a wired switch when I then plugged all the Macs into (wired) and got > them all online (albiet via figuring out the proxy settings). > Previously they had all talked to each other via a very slow and old > hub, but they were not connected to the outside world - nor the rest > of the office. > > I was thinking of doing a similar thing at home. I was going to run a > Wired Switch from the HomeHub. This would connect to the wired PC > tower running XP Home, which would be in the same room as the HomeHub. > Directly above the room with the HomeHub and Switch in is my two boys > room which has two wireless PC towers running XP. I would then run two > ethernet cables up through the floor into their room and connect their > two machines wired instead of wireless. > > I would keep my PowerBook, Vista machine and Nokia running wirelessly. > Would this work do you think? I am also looking at getting some older > Macs (G3 and pre-G3 era) which is a pain to go wirelessly and most > have ethernet built in. > > I know the HomeHub has ethernet ports on it, but only a few and I > intend to start collecting a lot of older Macs again. Also the main > problem I have is the two XP wireless towers are using USB wireless > dongles which pick up the HomeHub wireless signal when they feel like > it, which is very frustrating. I know there is nothing wrong with the > HomeHub or the positioning of it as my PowerBook and wifes XP laptop > can always get a signal throughout the house, so it is probably down > to the rubbish USB dongles. > > A wired connection would take out the hassle of keeping these machines > online. > > Can anyone see a problem with my proposed set up? Does anyone have any > advice? > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From ricnev at mac.com Tue Oct 27 17:00:42 2009 From: ricnev at mac.com (Richard Nevill) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:00:42 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:00, Simon Royal wrote: > Wireless is great > when it works, but it is a pain when it doesn't and a lot of the time > it doesn't work for any known reason. > > I have a BT HomeHub 2.0 Hmm... I suspect it doesn't work a lot of the time for a lot of us given that hardware/firmware combination! Richard Nevill ricnev at mac.com From batchsteve at googlemail.com Tue Oct 27 17:07:31 2009 From: batchsteve at googlemail.com (Steve Batch) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:07:31 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <5FC651A3-2DB8-41AD-AF51-B821D9064078@gmail.com> Oh yeah, one other suggestion, if you are making the cables up yourself invest in a cable tester as a poorly constructed network cable can appear to be working but cause headaches later on. Steve. On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:00, Simon Royal wrote: > Does anyone have any > advice? From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 27 17:09:27 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:09:27 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AE72947.2050909@stackyard.org> Simon, Yes, good idea. I don't know why you're having such wireless troubles but going wired can take the hassle out of the situation. Ethernet is pretty flexible and you don't have to worry too much about the topology just as long as you don't do any weird loopbacks where something is plugged back into itself. Just be sure to use gigabit switches if at all possible so that those machines with fast adapters can speak to each other at a decent speed. Gigabit makes a BIG difference when you are trying to download a big file from one machine to another. Of course it has no relevance for internet access because that will be far slower than standard 100baseT Ethernet. The router should be fine acting as the DHCP server for everything, even over all the switches. You should also set up address reservation on the router so that everything gets the same IP address when it boots up. This minimizes hassles with folder/printer sharing between machines. You might also want to consider HomePlug devices which can be a bit pricey but very useful if you don't want to drill lots of holes and run cables. If you do decide to take this route, get decent ones as cheap ones have a habit of not working. My favourite manufacturer of HomePlug stuff is Devolo. Ken Simon Royal wrote: > Hi. > > I am changing around the layout of my house and it might mean I can > switch some of my machines from wireless to wired. Wireless is great > when it works, but it is a pain when it doesn't and a lot of the time > it doesn't work for any known reason. > > I have a BT HomeHub 2.0 which serves 7 devices. > > A PC tower running XP Home wirelessly. > A PC tower running XP Pro wirelessly. > A PC tower running XP Home wired. > A PC laptop running XP Home wirelessly. > A PC laptop running Vista wirelessly. > A PowerBook running Leopard wirelessly. > My Nokia running S60 wirelessly. > > The publishing company I worked for previously had a main server for > it's PCs around the office, but only one connection for the editorial > department which served a PC sitting in the corner for emails and > internet. When I moved into the department I ran that connection into > a wired switch when I then plugged all the Macs into (wired) and got > them all online (albiet via figuring out the proxy settings). > Previously they had all talked to each other via a very slow and old > hub, but they were not connected to the outside world - nor the rest > of the office. > > I was thinking of doing a similar thing at home. I was going to run a > Wired Switch from the HomeHub. This would connect to the wired PC > tower running XP Home, which would be in the same room as the HomeHub. > Directly above the room with the HomeHub and Switch in is my two boys > room which has two wireless PC towers running XP. I would then run two > ethernet cables up through the floor into their room and connect their > two machines wired instead of wireless. > > I would keep my PowerBook, Vista machine and Nokia running wirelessly. > Would this work do you think? I am also looking at getting some older > Macs (G3 and pre-G3 era) which is a pain to go wirelessly and most > have ethernet built in. > > I know the HomeHub has ethernet ports on it, but only a few and I > intend to start collecting a lot of older Macs again. Also the main > problem I have is the two XP wireless towers are using USB wireless > dongles which pick up the HomeHub wireless signal when they feel like > it, which is very frustrating. I know there is nothing wrong with the > HomeHub or the positioning of it as my PowerBook and wifes XP laptop > can always get a signal throughout the house, so it is probably down > to the rubbish USB dongles. > > A wired connection would take out the hassle of keeping these machines > online. > > Can anyone see a problem with my proposed set up? Does anyone have any > advice? > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 17:42:41 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:42:41 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <05BC782A-A6E6-4400-BA04-8B2EAB44F2DD@simonroyal.co.uk> Richard That is the hardware: BT HomeHub 2.0 The firmware is the latest: 4.7.5.1.83 Simon On 27 Oct 2009, at 17:00, Richard Nevill wrote: > Hmm... I suspect it doesn't work a lot of the time for a lot of us > given that hardware/firmware combination! Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 17:55:25 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:55:25 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <1D54A67C-E1AC-461E-BE2E-F3D8118FA9A1@gmail.com> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> <1D54A67C-E1AC-461E-BE2E-F3D8118FA9A1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5B9006BE-FBD6-4EAA-B961-05CBEC5E8D85@simonroyal.co.uk> Steve At present the is one machine in the room directly above the HomeHub and the other machine is in the room next to that. I am now moving the other machine into the same room as the first, which is directly above the HomeHub. Both machines are running XP (one Pro, one Home), both have USB dongles (one Asus, one Zydas). Both connect fine at times, other times they don't see any networks, other times they don't see my network. I know the signal is good in those rooms as I have tried with my PowerBook (which has a Buffalo/Airport Extreme card) and my wifes laptop also running XP (which has a Buffalo PCMCIA card) and both have strong signals with no drop outs or missing signals. Therefore I am assuming it is down to rubbishy USB dongles or poor drivers at least. I could buy some more, or some PCI cards to sort the problem. However, I have been wanting to expand the network possibilities to include more network ports for some future projects and I thought this would resolve both issues. Simon On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:48, Steve Batch wrote: > Hi, > Without knowing what is causing the wireless connections to stop > working it's hard to say if using cables will resolve the issues, but > it can't hurt to trial it. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 17:56:45 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:56:45 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: <4AE72947.2050909@stackyard.org> References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AE72947.2050909@stackyard.org> Message-ID: Ken I'm not a fan of the HomePlug system and there are already holes in the walls/flooring where TV cables go through, hence my thought of putting ethernet cables in. If I had to drill holes in the walls, I don't think my wife would appreciate that. Simon On 27 Oct 2009, at 17:09, Ken Hamer wrote: > You might also want to consider HomePlug devices which can be a bit > pricey but very useful if you don't want to drill lots of holes and > run > cables. If you do decide to take this route, get decent ones as cheap > ones have a habit of not working. My favourite manufacturer of > HomePlug > stuff is Devolo. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 27 19:38:26 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:38:26 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Wired Networking In-Reply-To: References: <38D104D8-DDE2-41D1-BDA3-0E4A5D527FB7@simonroyal.co.uk> <4AE72947.2050909@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <4AE74C32.4000107@stackyard.org> Yes, well, a length of CAT(x) is going to be a lot cheaper than a pair of good HomePlug devices anyway so if the holes are already there... Simon Royal wrote: > Ken > > I'm not a fan of the HomePlug system and there are already holes in > the walls/flooring where TV cables go through, hence my thought of > putting ethernet cables in. > > If I had to drill holes in the walls, I don't think my wife would > appreciate that. > > Simon > > On 27 Oct 2009, at 17:09, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> You might also want to consider HomePlug devices which can be a bit >> pricey but very useful if you don't want to drill lots of holes and >> run >> cables. If you do decide to take this route, get decent ones as cheap >> ones have a habit of not working. My favourite manufacturer of >> HomePlug >> stuff is Devolo. >> > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Tue Oct 27 20:14:28 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:14:28 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Loss of internet access In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910270948n46d43bdfo5fb89a6d23843d7c@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910270948n46d43bdfo5fb89a6d23843d7c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AE754A4.801@stackyard.org> There's no mystery - it's just the wonderful world of computer software. Uninstaller programs are notoriously bad, many hilariously so. The installation of Onspeed didn't actually hijack the system. It just failed to reset a small but fundamental setting which just happened to control whether your network access was enabled, so nothing important. I'm glad you're back on-line again. Ken Campbell wrote: > Ken, > Many thanks for your informative reply. > I am using Plus Net broadband via Thompson Speed Touch ST 585 v6 > wired, not wireless. > The curious thing is that I have been using Onspeed > successfully, first on Dial Up and then on broadband for about six > years. Broadband comparatively recently, which, possibly > coincidentally, is when the fun started. > Thanks to a saintly neighbour, I have been interrogating Onspeed > on a Windows lap top, on " live chat " for three days and it has > become clear that their experts have been merely quoting from their > printed material, rather than from experience with the product. > I am deliriously happy to report that I am writing this on my > own iMac, having rooted out every vestige of Onspeed from the > machine. The trash basket was red hot! > However, there still remains the mystery as to HOW a piece of > installed software could appear to have hijacked the system. I wonder > if it was accidental that the uninstaller wouldn't? > Thanks again, > John > > From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 21:16:25 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:16:25 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <855B0996-B381-4F38-9422-BD646BCDD524@durrant.co.uk> References: <855B0996-B381-4F38-9422-BD646BCDD524@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <255B11F0-B2A7-4180-B195-DCAFBA6261C6@simonroyal.co.uk> Paul Thank you. That was very informative and I think it is what I was looking for. Simon On 26 Oct 2009, at 14:59, Paul Durrant wrote: > ou should investigate the Creative Common licences. It sounds like > you want the Creative Commons Attribution license. (Anyone can do > anything with the photos, provided they mention you as the originator > of the photos.) > > http://creativecommons.org/ Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Tue Oct 27 21:22:23 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:22:23 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Martin I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to put professional photographers like yourself and others on the group out of business. My images could never compete with those that you produce. My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding publishers without losing all rights to those images. As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is looking at going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low cost or free. My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. Simon On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: > PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it > for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning out > consistently good images. > When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. > > ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Tue Oct 27 22:01:27 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:01:27 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> Simon, Trouble is the playing field for photographs is now soooooooo flat you are not only competing against the pros but anybody with a basic camera and lens, and most are so desperate to get their pictures published they will virtually give their work away, undermining those who have to earn a living with their camera. I'm not one of them as I help a not for profit organisation but the quality from most digital cameras, and the fact that the camera does virtually everything means that people don't have to learn their craft nowadays. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 27 Oct 2009, at 21:22, Simon Royal wrote: > Martin > > I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive > equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to put > professional photographers like yourself and others on the group out > of business. My images could never compete with those that you > produce. > > My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding > publishers without losing all rights to those images. > > As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is looking at > going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low cost > or free. > > My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. > > Simon > > On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: > >> PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it >> for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning out >> consistently good images. >> When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. >> >> ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 28 00:07:50 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:07:50 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> Technology doesn't negate ability. Otherwise, where do you draw the line, dry plate, sheet film, adoption of 35mm film for stills photography, 1909 or 2009? Tom Steven Jefferson wrote: > Simon, > > Trouble is the playing field for photographs is now soooooooo flat you > are not only competing against the pros but anybody with a basic > camera and lens, and most are so desperate to get their pictures > published they will virtually give their work away, undermining those > who have to earn a living with their camera. I'm not one of them as I > help a not for profit organisation but the quality from most digital > cameras, and the fact that the camera does virtually everything means > that people don't have to learn their craft nowadays. > > Steven Jefferson > steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk > > > > On 27 Oct 2009, at 21:22, Simon Royal wrote: > > >> Martin >> >> I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive >> equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to put >> professional photographers like yourself and others on the group out >> of business. My images could never compete with those that you >> produce. >> >> My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding >> publishers without losing all rights to those images. >> >> As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is looking at >> going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low cost >> or free. >> >> My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. >> >> Simon >> >> On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: >> >> >>> PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it >>> for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning out >>> consistently good images. >>> When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. >>> >>> ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) >>> >> Simon Royal >> --- >> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Wed Oct 28 11:16:21 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:16:21 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: No but you have to shine very brightly above the crowd of others jostling for attention. The bar to entry ie kit, understanding of the underlying technology etc, barely exists today. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 00:07, Tom Kershaw wrote: > Technology doesn't negate ability. Otherwise, where do you draw the > line, dry plate, sheet film, adoption of 35mm film for stills > photography, 1909 or 2009? > > Tom > > > Steven Jefferson wrote: >> Simon, >> >> Trouble is the playing field for photographs is now soooooooo flat >> you >> are not only competing against the pros but anybody with a basic >> camera and lens, and most are so desperate to get their pictures >> published they will virtually give their work away, undermining those >> who have to earn a living with their camera. I'm not one of them as I >> help a not for profit organisation but the quality from most digital >> cameras, and the fact that the camera does virtually everything means >> that people don't have to learn their craft nowadays. >> >> Steven Jefferson >> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >> >> >> >> On 27 Oct 2009, at 21:22, Simon Royal wrote: >> >> >>> Martin >>> >>> I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive >>> equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to put >>> professional photographers like yourself and others on the group out >>> of business. My images could never compete with those that you >>> produce. >>> >>> My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding >>> publishers without losing all rights to those images. >>> >>> As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is >>> looking at >>> going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low cost >>> or free. >>> >>> My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. >>> >>> Simon >>> >>> On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: >>> >>> >>>> PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it >>>> for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning >>>> out >>>> consistently good images. >>>> When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. >>>> >>>> ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) >>>> >>> Simon Royal >>> --- >>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From alan.barber3 at ntlworld.com Wed Oct 28 12:16:01 2009 From: alan.barber3 at ntlworld.com (Alan Barber) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:16:01 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] keyboard Message-ID: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> I have a keyboard with a dodgy space bar. will someone going to the meeting tonight have a look at for me please. Regards Alan From mercer at gotadsl.co.uk Wed Oct 28 12:38:02 2009 From: mercer at gotadsl.co.uk (Valerie Mercer) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:38:02 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Desktop Font Message-ID: <1256E34C-FAD8-470E-9105-F68265C99E41@gotadsl.co.uk> Is there a way to change the Desktop font? Valerie From sc at davidviner.com Wed Oct 28 13:26:35 2009 From: sc at davidviner.com (David Viner) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:26:35 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] keyboard In-Reply-To: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> References: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: <4AE8468B.7070202@davidviner.com> I intend coming along for my first ever meeting tonight so, yes, I could take a look for you. David Alan Barber wrote: > I have a keyboard with a dodgy space bar. > will someone going to the meeting tonight have a look at for me please. > > Regards > > Alan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From alanbarber at mac.com Wed Oct 28 13:40:06 2009 From: alanbarber at mac.com (Alan Barber) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:40:06 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] keyboard In-Reply-To: <4AE8468B.7070202@davidviner.com> References: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> <4AE8468B.7070202@davidviner.com> Message-ID: Thanks I will be there about 21.00 Regards Alan On 28 Oct 2009, at 13:26, David Viner wrote: > I intend coming along for my first ever meeting tonight so, yes, I > could > take a look for you. > > David > > > Alan Barber wrote: >> I have a keyboard with a dodgy space bar. >> will someone going to the meeting tonight have a look at for me >> please. >> >> Regards >> >> Alan >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Wed Oct 28 15:22:07 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:22:07 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Onspeed SNAFU Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910280822x2813096fnd860562aaeef4e2b@mail.gmail.com> Ken, Once again I'm indebted to you for getting me out of the fertilizer business, in which I was developing a virtual monopoly. Without a trace of geekery, forsooth. I shall be doing a few more routine ticking and/or unticking of boxes from now on. By the way, it wasn't Rupert, it was Paddington ............... but then you knew that! The very best to you. John ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ken Hamer To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:14:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [NMUG] Loss of internet access There's no mystery - it's just the wonderful world of computer software. Uninstaller programs are notoriously bad, many hilariously so. The installation of Onspeed didn't actually hijack the system. It just failed to reset a small but fundamental setting which just happened to control whether your network access was enabled, so nothing important. I'm glad you're back on-line again. Ken Campbell wrote: > Ken, > Many thanks for your informative reply. > I am using Plus Net broadband via Thompson Speed Touch ST 585 v6 > wired, not wireless. > The curious thing is that I have been using Onspeed > successfully, first on Dial Up and then on broadband for about six > years. Broadband comparatively recently, which, possibly > coincidentally, is when the fun started. > Thanks to a saintly neighbour, I have been interrogating Onspeed > on a Windows lap top, on " live chat " for three days and it has > become clear that their experts have been merely quoting from their > printed material, rather than from experience with the product. > I am deliriously happy to report that I am writing this on my > own iMac, having rooted out every vestige of Onspeed from the > machine. The trash basket was red hot! > However, there still remains the mystery as to HOW a piece of > installed software could appear to have hijacked the system. I wonder > if it was accidental that the uninstaller wouldn't? > Thanks again, > John > From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Wed Oct 28 15:37:47 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:37:47 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Onspeed SNAFU In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910280822x2813096fnd860562aaeef4e2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910280822x2813096fnd860562aaeef4e2b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AE8654B.90102@stackyard.org> It was a bit geeky but you're probably just more knowledgeable than you thought you were. Actually, I thought it was Pooh who was referred to as a bear of very little brain but I read it a long time ago now so I can't be sure. Ken Campbell wrote: > Ken, > Once again I'm indebted to you for getting me out of the fertilizer > business, in which I was developing a virtual monopoly. > Without a trace of geekery, forsooth. > I shall be doing a few more routine ticking and/or unticking of > boxes from now on. > By the way, it wasn't Rupert, it was Paddington ............... but > then you knew that! > The very best to you. > John > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ken Hamer > To: Norwich Mac User Group list > Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:14:28 +0000 > Subject: Re: [NMUG] Loss of internet access > There's no mystery - it's just the wonderful world of computer software. > Uninstaller programs are notoriously bad, many hilariously so. The > installation of Onspeed didn't actually hijack the system. It just failed > to reset a small but fundamental setting which just happened to control > whether your network access was enabled, so nothing important. > > I'm glad you're back on-line again. > > Ken > > Campbell wrote: > > >> Ken, >> Many thanks for your informative reply. >> I am using Plus Net broadband via Thompson Speed Touch ST 585 v6 >> wired, not wireless. >> The curious thing is that I have been using Onspeed >> successfully, first on Dial Up and then on broadband for about six >> years. Broadband comparatively recently, which, possibly >> coincidentally, is when the fun started. >> Thanks to a saintly neighbour, I have been interrogating Onspeed >> on a Windows lap top, on " live chat " for three days and it has >> become clear that their experts have been merely quoting from their >> printed material, rather than from experience with the product. >> I am deliriously happy to report that I am writing this on my >> own iMac, having rooted out every vestige of Onspeed from the >> machine. The trash basket was red hot! >> However, there still remains the mystery as to HOW a piece of >> installed software could appear to have hijacked the system. I wonder >> if it was accidental that the uninstaller wouldn't? >> Thanks again, >> John >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From penguinsplj at me.com Wed Oct 28 16:21:58 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:21:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] keyboard In-Reply-To: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> References: <848D684F-C247-46CF-B1DC-D5F04718F4CA@ntlworld.com> Message-ID: On Oct 28, 2009, at 12:16, Alan Barber wrote: > I have a keyboard with a dodgy space bar. > will someone going to the meeting tonight have a look at for me > please. My trusty hammer is in the bag ready to take. Paul C From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Wed Oct 28 17:09:50 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:09:50 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Desktop Font In-Reply-To: <1256E34C-FAD8-470E-9105-F68265C99E41@gotadsl.co.uk> References: <1256E34C-FAD8-470E-9105-F68265C99E41@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: I think Apple in its wisdom has fixed this so its permanent and can't be changed but I may be wring. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 12:38, Valerie Mercer wrote: > Is there a way to change the Desktop font? > > Valerie > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mercer at gotadsl.co.uk Wed Oct 28 17:25:46 2009 From: mercer at gotadsl.co.uk (Valerie Mercer) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:25:46 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Desktop Font In-Reply-To: References: <1256E34C-FAD8-470E-9105-F68265C99E41@gotadsl.co.uk> Message-ID: Thank you, Steven - that would explain why I've failed to find a way of doing it! V On 28 Oct 2009, at 17:09, Steven Jefferson wrote: I think Apple in its wisdom has fixed this so its permanent and can't be changed but I may be wring. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 12:38, Valerie Mercer wrote: > Is there a way to change the Desktop font? > > Valerie > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From tom at tomkershaw.com Wed Oct 28 20:57:14 2009 From: tom at tomkershaw.com (Tom Kershaw) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:57:14 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> The bar to entry does lower, but what happens when the camera automation fails? - I don't mean mechanical or electronics failure, but when the photographic problem or task requires something additional; i.e. human input into making technical as well as compositional decisions. Tom Steven Jefferson wrote: > No but you have to shine very brightly above the crowd of others > jostling for attention. > > The bar to entry ie kit, understanding of the underlying technology > etc, barely exists today. > > Steven Jefferson > steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk > > > > On 28 Oct 2009, at 00:07, Tom Kershaw wrote: > > >> Technology doesn't negate ability. Otherwise, where do you draw the >> line, dry plate, sheet film, adoption of 35mm film for stills >> photography, 1909 or 2009? >> >> Tom >> >> >> Steven Jefferson wrote: >> >>> Simon, >>> >>> Trouble is the playing field for photographs is now soooooooo flat >>> you >>> are not only competing against the pros but anybody with a basic >>> camera and lens, and most are so desperate to get their pictures >>> published they will virtually give their work away, undermining those >>> who have to earn a living with their camera. I'm not one of them as I >>> help a not for profit organisation but the quality from most digital >>> cameras, and the fact that the camera does virtually everything means >>> that people don't have to learn their craft nowadays. >>> >>> Steven Jefferson >>> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 Oct 2009, at 21:22, Simon Royal wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>>> I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive >>>> equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to put >>>> professional photographers like yourself and others on the group out >>>> of business. My images could never compete with those that you >>>> produce. >>>> >>>> My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding >>>> publishers without losing all rights to those images. >>>> >>>> As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is >>>> looking at >>>> going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low cost >>>> or free. >>>> >>>> My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. >>>> >>>> Simon >>>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they ruin it >>>>> for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning >>>>> out >>>>> consistently good images. >>>>> When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. >>>>> >>>>> ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Simon Royal >>>> --- >>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Wed Oct 28 21:14:31 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:14:31 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: Thats the only area left where people can rise above everything else. It's a terribly small area. Seen the wedding shots of the couple who successfully sued the photographer? IMHO they should have had all their money back plus more. There are people out there purporting to deliver what is clearly beyond their capability yet we all have to successfully filter them out. Sometimes we don't succeed. Either way its a real pain. Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 20:57, Tom Kershaw wrote: > The bar to entry does lower, but what happens when the camera > automation > fails? - I don't mean mechanical or electronics failure, but when the > photographic problem or task requires something additional; i.e. human > input into making technical as well as compositional decisions. > > Tom > > Steven Jefferson wrote: >> No but you have to shine very brightly above the crowd of others >> jostling for attention. >> >> The bar to entry ie kit, understanding of the underlying technology >> etc, barely exists today. >> >> Steven Jefferson >> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >> >> >> >> On 28 Oct 2009, at 00:07, Tom Kershaw wrote: >> >> >>> Technology doesn't negate ability. Otherwise, where do you draw the >>> line, dry plate, sheet film, adoption of 35mm film for stills >>> photography, 1909 or 2009? >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> Steven Jefferson wrote: >>> >>>> Simon, >>>> >>>> Trouble is the playing field for photographs is now soooooooo flat >>>> you >>>> are not only competing against the pros but anybody with a basic >>>> camera and lens, and most are so desperate to get their pictures >>>> published they will virtually give their work away, undermining >>>> those >>>> who have to earn a living with their camera. I'm not one of them >>>> as I >>>> help a not for profit organisation but the quality from most >>>> digital >>>> cameras, and the fact that the camera does virtually everything >>>> means >>>> that people don't have to learn their craft nowadays. >>>> >>>> Steven Jefferson >>>> steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27 Oct 2009, at 21:22, Simon Royal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> I am not a professional photographer and do not have expensive >>>>> equipment to capture picture perfect images. I am not trying to >>>>> put >>>>> professional photographers like yourself and others on the group >>>>> out >>>>> of business. My images could never compete with those that you >>>>> produce. >>>>> >>>>> My aim is to provide cost-free images to publishers or budding >>>>> publishers without losing all rights to those images. >>>>> >>>>> As a professional designer/publisher who now out of work is >>>>> looking at >>>>> going freelance, quality stock images are hard to find at a low >>>>> cost >>>>> or free. >>>>> >>>>> My theory is 'you get what you pay for'. >>>>> >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>>> On 26 Oct 2009, at 21:31, Martin Fry wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> PS: If everyone gives away images or sells them cheap they >>>>>> ruin it >>>>>> for the professionals who are expect to make a living by turning >>>>>> out >>>>>> consistently good images. >>>>>> When publisher buy cheap they expect to buy every image cheap. >>>>>> >>>>>> ( Bolshie old Git, I know!) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Simon Royal >>>>> --- >>>>> Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal >>>>> . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, >>>>> SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Wed Oct 28 21:25:46 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:25:46 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> Message-ID: <35A3BF94-8D3F-4C4A-AC5B-8216ADC859FB@simonroyal.co.uk> Steven I know this wasn't a slur on my original point (I hope it wasn't anyway). I don't claim to be a professional photographer. I would barely class myself as an amateur. I am a professional designer/publisher and recognise and appreciate good quality professional photos when I see them and also snaps on a mobile phone. I just want to offer high res, large photographs for free (with a Common Creatives agreement) to help those in my position and other designers and not take away money from those professional photographers who rely on people paying for photos as a living. Simon On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:14, Steven Jefferson wrote: > There are people out there purporting to deliver what is clearly > beyond their capability yet we all have to successfully filter them > out. Sometimes we don't succeed Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk Wed Oct 28 21:38:55 2009 From: steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk (Steven Jefferson) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:38:55 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <35A3BF94-8D3F-4C4A-AC5B-8216ADC859FB@simonroyal.co.uk> References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> <35A3BF94-8D3F-4C4A-AC5B-8216ADC859FB@simonroyal.co.uk> Message-ID: <72EE37ED-6CAC-4B92-98CD-F632CA8C0FFA@zen.co.uk> Gosh, no slur intended. I'm just commenting on a view I've held for a long time. I also see it from the point of view that some mediocre photographers can look good simply because they have access to quality kit. I have experience of someone in precisely that position who because of connections is trying to completely take over something on the grounds he is a "professional" photographer, despite not earning a living by directly taking photographs, nor being any better than any other photographers, mainly experienced amateurs, despite trying to pull the wool over some people's eyes. End of bitter warped and twisted rant! Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:25, Simon Royal wrote: > Steven > > I know this wasn't a slur on my original point (I hope it wasn't > anyway). > > I don't claim to be a professional photographer. I would barely class > myself as an amateur. > > I am a professional designer/publisher and recognise and appreciate > good quality professional photos when I see them and also snaps on a > mobile phone. > > I just want to offer high res, large photographs for free (with a > Common Creatives agreement) to help those in my position and other > designers and not take away money from those professional > photographers who rely on people paying for photos as a living. > > Simon > > On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:14, Steven Jefferson wrote: > >> There are people out there purporting to deliver what is clearly >> beyond their capability yet we all have to successfully filter them >> out. Sometimes we don't succeed > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From david at vanedwards.co.uk Wed Oct 28 22:50:54 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:50:54 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Optical Drive LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM In-Reply-To: <4E6223BA-000B-46D9-88D5-E07BF535D8E6@durrant.co.uk> References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> <4E6223BA-000B-46D9-88D5-E07BF535D8E6@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: Dear Paul, LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM You kindly looked up this recommended DVD drive for my G5 tower PPC but the Dabs website says that it needs Microsoft OS, is this true? Software / System Requirements OS Required Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional , Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition, Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, Microsoft Windows XP Professional, Microsoft Windows Vista System Requirements Details Pentium 4 - 1.4 GHz - RAM 512 MB At the moment I have a PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-107D which writesCDs and DVDs okay but sometimes cannot read them. Not always but several DVDs have not been recognised at all even though they work in Thea's iMac. Best wishes, David -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From paul at durrant.co.uk Wed Oct 28 22:56:34 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:56:34 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Optical Drive LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> <4E6223BA-000B-46D9-88D5-E07BF535D8E6@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: The Dabs website info is incomplete. It'll work fine. Checking reports at http://www.xlr8yourmac.com I think you'll need to remove the front bezel from the drive, but that's easy to do. regards, Paul On 28 Oct 2009, at 22:50, David Van Edwards wrote: > LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM > > You kindly looked up this recommended DVD drive for my G5 tower PPC > but the Dabs website says that it needs Microsoft OS, is this true? > > Software / System Requirements > OS Required > Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional , Microsoft Windows Millennium > Edition, Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, Microsoft Windows XP > Professional, Microsoft Windows Vista > System Requirements Details > Pentium 4 - 1.4 GHz - RAM 512 MB > > At the moment I have a PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-107D which writesCDs and > DVDs okay but sometimes cannot read them. Not always but several DVDs > have not been recognised at all even though they work in Thea's iMac. From david at vanedwards.co.uk Wed Oct 28 23:27:48 2009 From: david at vanedwards.co.uk (David Van Edwards) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:27:48 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Optical Drive LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM In-Reply-To: References: <52D36F28-C7F7-4D4B-88A8-FE7BB0F5B765@mac.com> <92434D5E-2D3B-4AF5-98B1-BF5678C3AC48@durrant.co.uk> <4365D487-FE7C-4254-8DF6-D6E0E8A7EB27@mac.com> <1216991A-0A59-4CE5-B164-FEF69290F43D@durrant.co.uk> <4307448A-7580-43D0-A25B-F0EC18CFA4EE@mac.com> <6D72E0CA-917C-43EE-9D1F-3E622AAF6293@durrant.co.uk> <85BDBE22-8F8C-4CCC-8CBE-41F13AD2CD74@gmail.com> <4E6223BA-000B-46D9-88D5-E07BF535D8E6@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: How very kind of you! Thanks! David >The Dabs website info is incomplete. It'll work fine. Checking reports >at http://www.xlr8yourmac.com I think you'll need to remove the front >bezel from the drive, but that's easy to do. > >regards, > >Paul > >On 28 Oct 2009, at 22:50, David Van Edwards wrote: >> LG Electronics 22x DVDRW Black OEM >> >> You kindly looked up this recommended DVD drive for my G5 tower PPC >> but the Dabs website says that it needs Microsoft OS, is this true? >> >> Software / System Requirements >> OS Required >> Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional , Microsoft Windows Millennium >> Edition, Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, Microsoft Windows XP >> Professional, Microsoft Windows Vista >> System Requirements Details >> Pentium 4 - 1.4 GHz - RAM 512 MB >> >> At the moment I have a PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-107D which writesCDs and >> DVDs okay but sometimes cannot read them. Not always but several DVDs >> have not been recognised at all even though they work in Thea's iMac. > >_______________________________________________ >Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug -- The Smokehouse, 6 Whitwell Road, Norwich, NR1 4HB England. Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk From stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk Wed Oct 28 23:57:00 2009 From: stairbooks at yahoo.co.uk (Stair) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use In-Reply-To: <72EE37ED-6CAC-4B92-98CD-F632CA8C0FFA@zen.co.uk> References: <889235E8-30C4-4081-A900-E240A52569B5@zen.co.uk> <4AE78B56.3090704@tomkershaw.com> <4AE8B02A.6080003@tomkershaw.com> <35A3BF94-8D3F-4C4A-AC5B-8216ADC859FB@simonroyal.co.uk> <72EE37ED-6CAC-4B92-98CD-F632CA8C0FFA@zen.co.uk> Message-ID: <29340.30620.qm@web26101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Anyone seen the film Heavens Above where Peter Sellers plays a vicar. A similar dilemma unfolds. All the best, Stair ________________________________ From: Steven Jefferson To: Norwich Mac User Group list Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2009 21:38:55 Subject: Re: [NMUG] Pictures For Commercial Use Gosh, no slur intended. I'm just commenting on a view I've held for a long time. I also see it from the point of view that some mediocre photographers can look good simply because they have access to quality kit. I have experience of someone in precisely that position who because of connections is trying to completely take over something on the grounds he is a "professional" photographer, despite not earning a living by directly taking photographs, nor being any better than any other photographers, mainly experienced amateurs, despite trying to pull the wool over some people's eyes. End of bitter warped and twisted rant! Steven Jefferson steve.jefferson at zen.co.uk On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:25, Simon Royal wrote: > Steven > > I know this wasn't a slur on my original point (I hope it wasn't > anyway). > > I don't claim to be a professional photographer. I would barely class > myself as an amateur. > > I am a professional designer/publisher and recognise and appreciate > good quality professional photos when I see them and also snaps on a > mobile phone. > > I just want to offer high res, large photographs for free (with a > Common Creatives agreement) to help those in my position and other > designers and not take away money from those professional > photographers who rely on people paying for photos as a living. > > Simon > > On 28 Oct 2009, at 21:14, Steven Jefferson wrote: > >> There are people out there purporting to deliver what is clearly >> beyond their capability yet we all have to successfully filter them >> out. Sometimes we don't succeed > > Simon Royal > --- > Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal > . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, > SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug _______________________________________________ Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Thu Oct 29 06:47:25 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:47:25 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> Hello Ken, {Again?} The blessed Onspeed finally reacted with something that looks as if it makes sense, four days after my world fell apart! There are two courses of action here. 1) Don't fix it if it ain't broke and 2} This programme might just clear out the final shreds of any maquis, lurking in the undergrowth. Which school do you belong to? At my age, I was taught to be cautious, and I tend towards school 1) I also have trouble with a bad back - it has a pronounced yellow streak running down it. Do you recommend taking a deep breath and plunging in the deep end, or cracking on as if personal genius alone had rectified the situation and modestly accepting the plaudits. Last time to bother you, I promise, although I have been known to lie a little!! John Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your email. To manually remove ONSPEED from an Apple computer: 1. Log in to the machine with an administrative account. 2. Open the Terminal application by launching ?Finder?, browsing to ?/Applications/Utilities? and launching ?Terminal.app?. 3. In the terminal type the command ?cd /Applications?, and then hit the key. 4. Type the command ?sudo rm -rf ONSPEED.app?, and then hit the key. 5. Reboot to clear the ONSPEED kernel module from memory. 6. (Optional) Client preferences are kept in com.slipstream.sp.client.plist files under /Library/Preferences and ~/Library/Preferences (where the tilde sign "~" indicates the home directory of the user). To remove these as well, issue the following commands: sudo rm -f /Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist sudo rm -f ~/Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist 7. (Optional) To also erase the local copy of the package receipt, from the shell go to /Library/Receipts, locate the directory matching the name assigned to the Accelerator at branding time (again, for example, "ABC Accelerator.pkg") and remove that as well with: sudo rm -rf "/Library/Receipts/ONSPEED.pkg" 8. Reboot the computer. ONSPEED is now removed. 9.Once you done Please download Onspeed from http://download.onspeed.com/bin/en_GB/client/setup.dmg.tar.gz yours, ONSPEED Customer Services - Show quoted text - Quick Reply From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 29 08:30:34 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:30:34 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <756235DB-9273-4278-B70F-B9D91684345C@durrant.co.uk> I'm not quite sure why OnSpeed are making you drop into the Teminal and issue commands that are potentially dangerous if you mis-type them. All of what they suggest can be done from the finder: On 29 Oct 2009, at 06:47, Campbell wrote: > 4. Type the command ?sudo rm -rf ONSPEED.app?, and then hit the > key. Delete the ONSPEED application from the Applications folder by dragging it to the trash. > 6. (Optional) Client preferences are kept in > com.slipstream.sp.client.plist files under /Library/Preferences and > ~/Library/Preferences (where the tilde sign "~" indicates the home > directory of the user). To remove these as well, issue the following > commands: > > sudo rm -f /Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist > sudo rm -f ~/Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist Go to the /Library/Preferences folder and delete the file com.slipstream.sp.client.plist Go to the Library/Preferences folder inside your home folder and delete the file com.slipstream.sp.client.plist > 7. (Optional) To also erase the local copy of the package receipt, > from the shell go to /Library/Receipts, locate the directory matching > the name assigned to the Accelerator at branding time (again, for > example, "ABC > Accelerator.pkg") and remove that as well with: > > sudo rm -rf "/Library/Receipts/ONSPEED.pkg" > Go to /Library/Receipts and delete the file ONSPEED.pkg Why is "sudo rm -rf " a very dangerous command? It says to delete the following folder, and all the files and folders inside it, and run as superuser, so you get no warnings about permissions. If you type the name of the folder you want to delete, all well and good. But suppose you accidentally slip a space into the path? Perhaps after the first /? If you did that, it would delete all the files on your disk, without any warnings at all. regards, Paul From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Thu Oct 29 08:51:04 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:51:04 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts In-Reply-To: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> References: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4AE95778.2050709@stackyard.org> John, You probably can't remember now what you deleted when you were deleting things to try to get rid of Onspeed. Was any of it what they have described? Also, I don't know if you are intending to reinstall Onspeed (I wouldn't but that's just an opinion). If the machine is working correctly, you shouldn't need to do anything further but there is nothing wrong with doing as Paul (rather than Onspeed) suggests as it will tidy up the system and remove unnecessary configuration files. As Paul says, Onspeed have instructed you to do things in a potentially dangerous way. When you start using the sudo command, bad things can happen and one mistyping can turn your system into a very stylish paperweight. Ken Campbell wrote: > Hello Ken, {Again?} > > The blessed Onspeed finally reacted with something that > looks as if it makes sense, four days after my world fell apart! > There are two courses of action here. 1) Don't fix it > if it ain't broke and 2} This programme might just clear out the > final shreds of any maquis, lurking in the undergrowth. > Which school do you belong to? > At my age, I was taught to be cautious, and I tend > towards school 1) I also have trouble with a bad back - it has a > pronounced yellow streak running down it. > Do you recommend taking a deep breath and plunging in > the deep end, or cracking on as if personal genius alone had rectified > the situation and modestly accepting the plaudits. > Last time to bother you, I promise, although I have > been known to lie a little!! > > John > > Dear Sir/Madam, > > > Thank you for your email. > > To manually remove ONSPEED from an Apple computer: > > 1. Log in to the machine with an administrative account. > > 2. Open the Terminal application by launching ?Finder?, browsing to > ?/Applications/Utilities? and launching ?Terminal.app?. > > 3. In the terminal type the command ?cd /Applications?, and then hit > the key. > > 4. Type the command ?sudo rm -rf ONSPEED.app?, and then hit the key. > > 5. Reboot to clear the ONSPEED kernel module from memory. > > 6. (Optional) Client preferences are kept in > com.slipstream.sp.client.plist files under /Library/Preferences and > ~/Library/Preferences (where the tilde sign "~" indicates the home > directory of the user). To remove these as well, issue the following > commands: > > sudo rm -f /Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist > sudo rm -f ~/Library/Preferences/com.slipstream.sp.client.plist > > 7. (Optional) To also erase the local copy of the package receipt, > from the shell go to /Library/Receipts, locate the directory matching > the name assigned to the Accelerator at branding time (again, for > example, "ABC > Accelerator.pkg") and remove that as well with: > > sudo rm -rf "/Library/Receipts/ONSPEED.pkg" > > 8. Reboot the computer. ONSPEED is now removed. > > 9.Once you done Please download Onspeed from > http://download.onspeed.com/bin/en_GB/client/setup.dmg.tar.gz > > > yours, > > ONSPEED Customer Services > - Show quoted text - > Quick Reply > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 29 08:59:48 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:59:48 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Backups... In-Reply-To: <4AE95778.2050709@stackyard.org> References: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> <4AE95778.2050709@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <6FCE94C4-E8B9-4E14-B8C6-9AEE64BFBD9F@durrant.co.uk> On 29 Oct 2009, at 08:51, Ken Hamer wrote: > When you start using the sudo command, bad things can > happen and one mistyping can turn your system into a very stylish > paperweight. ... until you reinstall the system software and restore your data from your backup. You do all have backups, don't you? You don't have a backup? None at all? If you're on Leopard, go and buy an external firewire hard disk TODAY, and start using it as a Time Machine drive. Ask if you need more advice. There is one sure and certain thing about any hard drive. It will break sometime. And then all the data on it will be lost*. Get the data backed up, at minimum to another local hard disk. This has been your irregular Public Data Safety Warning. regards, Paul *Well, it /might/ be possible to recover the data in certain circumstances. For a price ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand pounds. Get an external Time Machine hard drive now. It's a lot less stressful, and cheaper in the long run. From allanmacam at me.com Thu Oct 29 09:02:44 2009 From: allanmacam at me.com (Allan) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:02:44 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts In-Reply-To: <756235DB-9273-4278-B70F-B9D91684345C@durrant.co.uk> References: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> <756235DB-9273-4278-B70F-B9D91684345C@durrant.co.uk> Message-ID: <98662066-F03D-4C99-BB17-69E2BF31C8F5@me.com> I agree with Paul. Odd set of instructions to give to a consumer when, if thew files are visible, the Finder option works just as well. Just as point of interest though, instead of typing these esoteric looking commands, you could always copy paste them into a Terminal window - Making sure you don't copy only the command and nothing else. AJ On 29 Oct 2009, at 08:30, Paul Durrant wrote: > But suppose you accidentally slip a space into the path? Perhaps after > the first /? If you did that, it would delete all the files on your > disk, without any warnings at all. From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Thu Oct 29 09:15:31 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:15:31 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts In-Reply-To: <98662066-F03D-4C99-BB17-69E2BF31C8F5@me.com> References: <58ab5cce0910282347y6d66f406s50a2d3fcbe10fd14@mail.gmail.com> <756235DB-9273-4278-B70F-B9D91684345C@durrant.co.uk> <98662066-F03D-4C99-BB17-69E2BF31C8F5@me.com> Message-ID: <4AE95D33.20902@stackyard.org> Agreed but the sudo command for the deletion of these files shouldn't really be necessary unless said files have restricted permissions/ownership (it's possible). Allan wrote: > I agree with Paul. Odd set of instructions to give to a consumer when, > if thew files are visible, the Finder option works just as well. > > Just as point of interest though, instead of typing these esoteric > looking commands, you could always copy paste them into a Terminal > window - Making sure you don't copy only the command and nothing else. > > AJ > > > On 29 Oct 2009, at 08:30, Paul Durrant wrote: > > >> But suppose you accidentally slip a space into the path? Perhaps after >> the first /? If you did that, it would delete all the files on your >> disk, without any warnings at all. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 29 09:19:06 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:19:06 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] ebooks and Macs Message-ID: <753EFBCD-C2EA-401F-86E5-C353CF2EF3A5@durrant.co.uk> As promised, I brought along some ebook readers to show at the group meeting last night. The all connect up fine to Macs, connecting via the USB Mass Storage protocol (i.e. like memory sticks), for copying ebooks on to them. Although still in the "early adopter" phase (i.e. relatively high price, and with some limitations), if you like to read a lot, an ebook reader might suit you. Lots of information and discussion about ebooks and ebook readers can be found at the Mobileread forums http://www.mobileread.com/ and the associated wiki http://wiki.mobileread.com/ regards, Paul From 2003r2tech at googlemail.com Thu Oct 29 13:51:03 2009 From: 2003r2tech at googlemail.com (Simon Bainbridge) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:51:03 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Leopard disks Message-ID: <8BE7B840-975F-45DB-B1DE-F20718FFDF37@googlemail.com> For all the people who were after genuine OSX Leopard & OSX Tiger disks a great place to look is on Ebay. As people sell off their old disks after buying OSX Snow Leopard. Here is an example below - http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Apple-Genuine-Software-Mac-OS-X-Leopard-10-5-UK-Retail_W0QQitemZ290361877364QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Computing_Software_Software_SR?hash=item439aeaa374#ht_1127wt_1167 Cheers Simon Bainbridge From mail at simonroyal.co.uk Thu Oct 29 14:11:44 2009 From: mail at simonroyal.co.uk (Simon Royal) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:11:44 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Flickr & Creative Commons Message-ID: <5450D9C3-4CC1-42EC-9E0D-08EC0221F490@simonroyal.co.uk> Hi. After my recent dig into protecting your own photos online, Paul directed me to the Creative Commons. I tried setting up a photo gallery on PhotoBucket but could not find anywhere to include a license tag. If you are using Flickr it seems they have it already built in and you can choose directly within Flickr the type of license you require and set it to all your photos. Pretty good I thought. I know a number of you use Flickr. I have for a while, but I never found this function before. Simon Royal --- Site: http://www.simonroyal.co.uk. Twitter: http://twitter.com/SimonRoyal . Skype: Simon-Royal. (PowerBook G4 867Mhz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HD, SuperDrive, Mac OSX 10.5) From paul at durrant.co.uk Thu Oct 29 14:57:46 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:57:46 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Good homes needed for Macs Message-ID: Peter James has a couple of Macs that need new homes. He's part of the Recycle-PC project. The project provides computers to those without computers: > To apply for a computer you must be able to provide proof that you > are : > > Registered Disabled > > In receipt of an Old Age Pension > > In receipt of a benefit and unable financially to afford a computer. > > A charitable organisation or community based project. > > We will not consider people who already have a computer, we do not > supply upgrades. We do not supply second computers so as the kids > will leave yours alone. So - does anyone know of someone who meets the bill? If so, please contact Peter: Interjay2 at btinternet.com Thanks, Paul From penguinsplj at me.com Thu Oct 29 17:59:37 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:59:37 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions Message-ID: This is where I show my ignorance, networks and things are still a mystery to me although I seem to have got a few to work. My LinkSys wireless router seems to stop sending a signal out occasionally and the only way to get it back is to turn it off, wait about 5 minutes and then turn it back on again. Any sooner and it usually fails to start up with all the right lights. Also we have a few power cuts in the village and if the router goes off you have to physically push the button to start it up again whereas my iMac will automatically restart and get me back to where I was. I have an old Airport Extreme Base Station, one of the rounded bump things which came with a collection of equipment I bought a few years ago but what I didn't realise at the time was that this just allowed a wireless connection/network to be created and I still needed the internet connection part...is that what is called a router? What I was wondering is does the latest Airport Extreme Base Station, the square one, need a router attached (if that is the correct word) or is it built in? I looked at the Apple site but my ignorance of the terminology means I am still not sure. If it is all in the one box is there a good reason why I shouldn't get one other than it seems to be more expensive than other wireless routers? Does it do more than the other routers? After all that, what can I do with this old Base Station? Paul C From thegees at jennygee.f2s.com Thu Oct 29 18:18:08 2009 From: thegees at jennygee.f2s.com (Malcolm Gee) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:18:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5F56F379-0102-479E-B20D-6167CC0C54C5@jennygee.f2s.com> Hi Paul, You will need a separate router to access the internet via an Apple Airport Extreme Base station. However it has a built in USB port which can be configured to enable direct access to a hard drive or printer for any connected computers!!! Hope this helps. Regards, Malcolm. On 29 Oct 2009, at 17:59, Paul Chapman wrote: > This is where I show my ignorance, networks and things are still a > mystery to me although I seem to have got a few to work. My LinkSys > wireless router seems to stop sending a signal out occasionally and > the only way to get it back is to turn it off, wait about 5 minutes > and then turn it back on again. Any sooner and it usually fails to > start up with all the right lights. Also we have a few power cuts in > the village and if the router goes off you have to physically push the > button to start it up again whereas my iMac will automatically restart > and get me back to where I was. > > I have an old Airport Extreme Base Station, one of the rounded bump > things which came with a collection of equipment I bought a few years > ago but what I didn't realise at the time was that this just allowed a > wireless connection/network to be created and I still needed the > internet connection part...is that what is called a router? What I was > wondering is does the latest Airport Extreme Base Station, the square > one, need a router attached (if that is the correct word) or is it > built in? I looked at the Apple site but my ignorance of the > terminology means I am still not sure. If it is all in the one box is > there a good reason why I shouldn't get one other than it seems to be > more expensive than other wireless routers? Does it do more than the > other routers? > > After all that, what can I do with this old Base Station? > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > From brian at clearlight.uk.net Thu Oct 29 20:24:16 2009 From: brian at clearlight.uk.net (Brian Steere) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:24:16 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: <5F56F379-0102-479E-B20D-6167CC0C54C5@jennygee.f2s.com> Message-ID: I have one and its fine - but the printer utility is not available via Airport shared printing on Leopard. I have to replug Canon printer in directly to use utility. I don't know if that is generally true for wireless shared printing or just Apple's peculiarity. all the best Brian Malcolm Gee said recently: > Hi Paul, > > You will need a separate router to access the internet via an Apple > Airport Extreme Base station. However it has a built in USB port > which can be configured to enable direct access to a hard drive or > printer for any connected computers!!! > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > > Malcolm. > > > On 29 Oct 2009, at 17:59, Paul Chapman wrote: > >> This is where I show my ignorance, networks and things are still a >> mystery to me although I seem to have got a few to work. My LinkSys >> wireless router seems to stop sending a signal out occasionally and >> the only way to get it back is to turn it off, wait about 5 minutes >> and then turn it back on again. Any sooner and it usually fails to >> start up with all the right lights. Also we have a few power cuts in >> the village and if the router goes off you have to physically push the >> button to start it up again whereas my iMac will automatically restart >> and get me back to where I was. >> >> I have an old Airport Extreme Base Station, one of the rounded bump >> things which came with a collection of equipment I bought a few years >> ago but what I didn't realise at the time was that this just allowed a >> wireless connection/network to be created and I still needed the >> internet connection part...is that what is called a router? What I was >> wondering is does the latest Airport Extreme Base Station, the square >> one, need a router attached (if that is the correct word) or is it >> built in? I looked at the Apple site but my ignorance of the >> terminology means I am still not sure. If it is all in the one box is >> there a good reason why I shouldn't get one other than it seems to be >> more expensive than other wireless routers? Does it do more than the >> other routers? >> >> After all that, what can I do with this old Base Station? >> >> Paul C >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ >> listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Fri Oct 30 00:01:51 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:01:51 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4AEA2CEF.1010200@stackyard.org> Paul, Sorry for the slow, lengthy response to this. There are routers and routers. An ADSL router has an integrated ADSL modem which can talk to a piece of equipment at the telephone exchange over the telephone line to give you an internet connection. It then passes that internet connection around to any network devices on its local area network, either wired or wirelessly if it's a wireless router. A Broadband router, on the other hand, passes on an existing network connection from one local area network to another but doesn't have the internal modem. These are usually used with cable broadband connections where the cable company supplies a cable modem which is then plugged into the broadband router which hands around the cable-supplied internet connection. Airport Extreme Base Stations are, in effect broadband routers and have no ADSL modem so need an ADSL or cable modem. However, older ones did have a dial-up modem which could initiate a dial-up connection if the ADSL or cable modem supplying the internet connection failed. So it's probably best to put the Linksys in a skip. It sounds like it has had its day although you might want to first see if there is a firmware update available for it, but if the router used to work and is now flaky, the firmware is probably not the issue - it's just a broken router. The new Airport Extreme is also a broadband router and has no modem. Rather than get an Airport Extreme, you might find it cheaper to get a standard ADSL router - wireless if wireless is useful to you, although the Airport Extreme does give you the option of network printing which most ADSL routers do not. However, as Brian has pointed out, your mileage may vary on this option with some printers not being compatible. There are literally hundreds of ADSL routers available. I used to like Netgear but now I like Thompson instead. You could use the old Airport Extreme as a wireless extender or network print server but are you sure of it's reliability. What is it's provenance? If it's OK, you could just buy a cheap ADSL Ethernet modem to plug into it (a Thompson one costs about ?25). The strict definition of a router is a device which ROUTES network traffic between one network and another. Ken Paul Chapman wrote: > This is where I show my ignorance, networks and things are still a > mystery to me although I seem to have got a few to work. My LinkSys > wireless router seems to stop sending a signal out occasionally and > the only way to get it back is to turn it off, wait about 5 minutes > and then turn it back on again. Any sooner and it usually fails to > start up with all the right lights. Also we have a few power cuts in > the village and if the router goes off you have to physically push the > button to start it up again whereas my iMac will automatically restart > and get me back to where I was. > > I have an old Airport Extreme Base Station, one of the rounded bump > things which came with a collection of equipment I bought a few years > ago but what I didn't realise at the time was that this just allowed a > wireless connection/network to be created and I still needed the > internet connection part...is that what is called a router? What I was > wondering is does the latest Airport Extreme Base Station, the square > one, need a router attached (if that is the correct word) or is it > built in? I looked at the Apple site but my ignorance of the > terminology means I am still not sure. If it is all in the one box is > there a good reason why I shouldn't get one other than it seems to be > more expensive than other wireless routers? Does it do more than the > other routers? > > After all that, what can I do with this old Base Station? > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com Fri Oct 30 06:54:26 2009 From: cruachan.beatus at googlemail.com (Campbell) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:54:26 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Onspeed Debacle Message-ID: <58ab5cce0910292354s6ea7e306xd2a42724054a297b@mail.gmail.com> Hello again Ken, Plus Paul and Alan, in the guise of the United States Cavalry. I think that I have finally got the message. Onspeed has gone to the big trash basket in the sky. As you remarked, Ken, I must, during desperate periods of the four days, have actioned at least some of the potentially dangerous Onspeed suggestions. I should have kept written records, I suppose. Nonetheless, all's well that ends well, as Granny would have said. Mind you, she was prone to say also, that every cloud has a silver lining, but I'm still waiting its arrival. Many, MANY thanks to you three musketeers. Take bars to your MBE's John P.S. I have, since, also successfully completed the move from AOL to Plusnet. Maybe that's the Silver Lining ! From: Ken Hamer To: Norwich Mac User Group list Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:51:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [NMUG] ONSPEED Finally reacts John, You probably can't remember now what you deleted when you were deleting things to try to get rid of Onspeed. Was any of it what they have described? Also, I don't know if you are intending to reinstall Onspeed (I wouldn't but that's just an opinion). If the machine is working correctly, you shouldn't need to do anything further but there is nothing wrong with doing as Paul (rather than Onspeed) suggests as it will tidy up the system and remove unnecessary configuration files. As Paul says, Onspeed have instructed you to do things in a potentially dangerous way. When you start using the sudo command, bad things can happen and one mistyping can turn your system into a very stylish paperweight. Ken Campbell wrote: Hello Ken, {Again?} The blessed Onspeed finally reacted with something that looks as if it makes sense, four days after my world fell apart! There are two courses of action here. 1) Don't fix it if it ain't broke and 2} This programme might just clear out the final shreds of any maquis, lurking in the undergrowth. Which school do you belong to? At my age, I was taught to be cautious, and I tend towards school 1) I also have trouble with a bad back - it has a pronounced yellow streak running down it. Do you recommend taking a deep breath and plunging in the deep end, or cracking on as if personal genius alone had rectified the situation and modestly accepting the plaudits. Last time to bother you, I promise, although I have been known to lie a little!! John From nathan.crosby at virgin.net Fri Oct 30 08:36:22 2009 From: nathan.crosby at virgin.net (Nathan Crosby) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:36:22 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <19C31CBF-E30A-410A-A971-33542A6DFD38@virgin.net> Paul. I share your cloudiness where networks are concerned. I have the same Airport base station as you and a Netgear router (supplied free, as far as I can remember, by Virgin) It resets itself after power cuts without a problem. I have an elderly Epson printer plugged in to the base station. When I am working downstairs on my Macbook, I press the print button and I hear the printer merrily printing away upstairs. White man's magic! regards Nathan On 29 Oct 2009, at 17:59, Paul Chapman wrote: > > > After all that, what can I do with this old Base Station? > > Paul C > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Fri Oct 30 09:20:49 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:20:49 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Photo not appearing in order taken after rotating Message-ID: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> Hello, I raise this question at last Wednesday meeting, and I believe it's been asked before. When I download images from camera and view then in the basic Mac view - Preview, they appear in the order taken. I ensure before rotating that they appear in numerical order (and not date order as this changes after rotating). However, when I rotate the ones that should be 'portrait' they no longer appear in their correct order when played on my DVD player. Any suggestions, please? Ken Arnoldi From penguinsplj at me.com Fri Oct 30 09:32:20 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:32:20 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Photo not appearing in order taken after rotating In-Reply-To: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> References: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> Message-ID: <1B6634ED-8783-4FCE-8DCF-D0E1AEEFBFF2@me.com> On Oct 30, 2009, at 09:20, Ken Arnoldi wrote: > Any suggestions, please? What was the outcome when you tried what was suggested on Wednesday? Paul C From paul at durrant.co.uk Fri Oct 30 09:43:07 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:43:07 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Photo not appearing in order taken after rotating In-Reply-To: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> References: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> Message-ID: <26695CF5-1AF3-4765-89C6-871B97EC19CD@durrant.co.uk> Since it seems likely that it's actually your DVD player that's using the modification or creation dates to set the display order, I'd suggest working on changing the creation/modification dates back again. "A Better Finder Attributes" allows you to set the creation date to the date the picture was taken (as cameras store that in the JPEG file), and then set the modification date to the creation date. That should fix your problem. http://www.publicspace.net/ABetterFinderAttributes/ ?14.95 regards, Paul On 30 Oct 2009, at 09:20, Ken Arnoldi wrote: > Hello, > > I raise this question at last Wednesday meeting, and I believe it's > been asked before. > When I download images from camera and view then in the basic Mac view > - Preview, > they appear in the order taken. I ensure before rotating that they > appear in numerical > order (and not date order as this changes after rotating). However, > when I rotate the ones > that should be 'portrait' they no longer appear in their correct order > when played on my DVD player. > Any suggestions, please? > > Ken Arnoldi > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Fri Oct 30 09:44:15 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:44:15 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Photo not appearing in order taken after rotating In-Reply-To: <1B6634ED-8783-4FCE-8DCF-D0E1AEEFBFF2@me.com> References: <1B08282C-D85C-4318-AEC6-28DAF1315DD7@virgin.net> <1B6634ED-8783-4FCE-8DCF-D0E1AEEFBFF2@me.com> Message-ID: <8F6F2D20-50DC-42CD-AB56-2442003B7873@virgin.net> Thanks Paul. I made sure that they were displayed in 'P' order and not date order, as I think you suggested. I've now tried a clumsy way of changing the current date back to the shooting date, doing the rotation and changing back to the current date. Of course, at the moment the date on the rotated pics reads 'today"! But I will see what happens tomorrow. If date reads correctly I will make CD for DVD player. Ken On 30 Oct 2009, at 09:32, Paul Chapman wrote: > What was the outcome when you tried what was suggested on Wednesday? From penguinsplj at me.com Fri Oct 30 09:50:24 2009 From: penguinsplj at me.com (Paul Chapman) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:50:24 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: <4AEA2CEF.1010200@stackyard.org> References: <4AEA2CEF.1010200@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <58911B21-B026-4EF5-A041-E46F7C1BF1E9@me.com> On Oct 30, 2009, at 00:01, Ken Hamer wrote: > Sorry for the slow, lengthy response to this. Thank you for the full explanation, things are a little clearer now and hopefully the fast retreating brain cells might remember some of it. A while back people talked about firmware updates for their routers so I checked and there wasn't any for my particular model, it is as up to date as it could be although it is a few years old now. The printer thing isn't a problem, downstairs my iMac has a printer attached and upstairs my wife's iMac also has a printer. We can both print to either if we wish to and don't need another one that is remote from either computer. The old Airport Base Station is still boxed and untested, in fact the paperwork/manual/discs pack appears unopened still. maybe I will utilise it by getting that Thompson ADSL Ethernet modem (non wireless) you mentioned. Before I do a search, is there a place you recommend buying it? I find it surprising that Apple don't appear to sell something that will do the job, is there a reason why they don't have it in their Base Stations? Years ago they were happy to have dial up modems as standard in all their machines. thanks again, Paul C From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Fri Oct 30 12:50:28 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:50:28 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] AirPort Extreme Base Station questions In-Reply-To: <58911B21-B026-4EF5-A041-E46F7C1BF1E9@me.com> References: <4AEA2CEF.1010200@stackyard.org> <58911B21-B026-4EF5-A041-E46F7C1BF1E9@me.com> Message-ID: <4AEAE114.7040201@stackyard.org> Have a look at http://www.broadbandbuyer.co.uk/Shop/ShopDetail.asp?ProductID=2455 which is a simple single-port Ethernet modem which works fine. It has one Ethernet port which can plug into the Airport Extreme. I don't know how many Ethernet ports your particular Airport Extreme has but it's probably 2 so you will be left with one to use for the Mac. Is this enough for your setup? If not, you might want to get a router with more Ethernet ports. I don't know why Apple don't include an ADSL modem in the base stations but it's probably because the technology is slightly country-dependant, changeable and, in the States at least, a lot of people use television cable and not ADSL (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line). I recently had to deal with Verizon (the north-east American equivalent to BT) to get my parents an ADSL connection in their new home. Despite their hype and assurances, it was like I had asked them to provide an internet connection to the moon. Had I known of the difficulties, I would have gone with ComCast, their local cable company, and it (probably) would have been straightforward. Ken Paul Chapman wrote: > On Oct 30, 2009, at 00:01, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Sorry for the slow, lengthy response to this. >> > > Thank you for the full explanation, things are a little clearer now > and hopefully the fast retreating brain cells might remember some of it. > > A while back people talked about firmware updates for their routers so > I checked and there wasn't any for my particular model, it is as up to > date as it could be although it is a few years old now. > > The printer thing isn't a problem, downstairs my iMac has a printer > attached and upstairs my wife's iMac also has a printer. We can both > print to either if we wish to and don't need another one that is > remote from either computer. > > The old Airport Base Station is still boxed and untested, in fact the > paperwork/manual/discs pack appears unopened still. maybe I will > utilise it by getting that Thompson ADSL Ethernet modem (non wireless) > you mentioned. Before I do a search, is there a place you recommend > buying it? > > > I find it surprising that Apple don't appear to sell something that > will do the job, is there a reason why they don't have it in their > Base Stations? Years ago they were happy to have dial up modems as > standard in all their machines. > > thanks again, > > Paul C > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From julianbarry.webb at virgin.net Fri Oct 30 18:29:08 2009 From: julianbarry.webb at virgin.net (JULIAN WEBB) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:29:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch Message-ID: <659f0050910301129y223db906k659735463eadbe3@mail.gmail.com> Hi all My first posting, after a few years of admiration and enjoyment at the ways you NMUG experts manage to solve complicated problems. I'm hoping my problem is relatively simple! I'm sending this via Virgin webmail as my Mail app started crashing about 11pm last night, and cannot be coaxed into behaving itself. Simon (Royal, of course, who else?) helped me update my G3/350 MHz/320 MB SDRAM slot loader iMac in August, bringing it closer to its maximum performance level; it has worked well (within its limitations) on Virgin ADSL broadband, with very few small glitches along the way. Mail 1.3.11 has never given any serious trouble before; the first signs came when the Inbox window showed 'Connecting to server' (and the turning cog wheel in the Toolbar) but nothing else happened. After various attempts to connect, there was a freeze and I had to Force Quit Mail (and, later, Force Quit by Power Off); at some point I recall the arrival of 2 emails, the first of which I had already received and read some 4 hours previously. On opening it to check, I noticed various changes (eg to the font of the incoming message) in comparison with the previous version. Each attempt to launch Mail was now producing a brief appearance of the Inbox window (blank) followed by the dialog box helpfully explaining that Mail had 'quit unexpectedly' and inviting me to submit a Bug report to Apple. Shutting down the iMac for a few minutes, and overnight, has made no difference. I've looked today at various apple discussion threads relating to similar problems, without understanding much of the time. As I'm completely self-taught and definitely not tech-savvy, I would not be able to carry out most of the actions that were suggested anyway! It does look as though helpful information can be gleaned from the Mail Crash Report, which I located; here is the extract re my latest crash (not certain if I've copied quite enough - there's yards more if needed!): Date/Time: 2009-10-30 15:22:58 +0000 OS Version: 10.3.9 (Build 7W98) Report Version: 2 Command: Mail Path: /Applications/Mail.app/Contents/MacOS/Mail Version: 1.3.11 (622) PID: 520 Thread: 3 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Code[0]: 0x0000000a Code[1]: 0x001ff000 Thread 0: 0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x90007878 mach_msg_trap + 0x8 1 libSystem.B.dylib 0x900073f8 mach_msg + 0x38 2 com.apple.CoreFoundation 0x901c2258 __CFRunLoopRun + 0x350 3 com.apple.CoreFoundation 0x901c69e4 CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 0x148 4 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x92886e10 RunCurrentEventLoopInMode + 0xac 5 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x9288d53c ReceiveNextEventCommon + 0x17c 6 com.apple.HIToolbox 0x928af638 BlockUntilNextEventMatchingListInMode + 0x60 7 com.apple.AppKit 0x92e82248 _DPSNextEvent + 0x180 8 com.apple.AppKit 0x92e98cc8 -[NSApplication nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 0x74 9 com.apple.AppKit 0x92ead048 -[NSApplication run] + 0x21c 10 com.apple.AppKit 0x92f69764 NSApplicationMain + 0x1d0 11 com.apple.mail 0x0000ed3c 0x1000 + 0xdd3c 12 com.apple.mail 0x0003dc34 0x1000 + 0x3cc34 I spent some of yesterday afternoon on car insurance comparison sites; their quotes duly arrived in my Inbox. Otherwise my email activity has been as normal. I would be really grateful for any help in overcoming the problem, especially if any member felt they could drop round and do the necessary on my machine! (Tea, coffee, stronger drinks etc can be provided; I live in NR2, close to Newmarket Road in Norwich, tel 01603 259364.) All the best Julian From julianbarry.webb at virgin.net Fri Oct 30 22:20:27 2009 From: julianbarry.webb at virgin.net (Julian Webb) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:20:27 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch Message-ID: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> Hi again Apologies for hitting the panic button too early - my son suggested a Safe Boot might do some good, and hey presto! Mail is back. All seems to be OK, though I've no idea what upset it; my goodness it is so many streets ahead of Virgin web mail that it's almost out of sight! If anyone can advise how to avoid this crashing tendency, I would be most grateful. Julian From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sat Oct 31 01:16:41 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:16:41 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch In-Reply-To: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> References: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4AEB8FF9.9020902@stackyard.org> Hmmm. This looks like it could be lots of things - certainly people are reporting various diverse, unrelated fixes, or no fixes at all. When you say that mail is back, is this just in safe mode or is it OK when the machine boots normally? Some people are reporting RAM issues - was it the RAM that got increased in August? If so, where did the RAM come from? Some people report issues with fonts - it's interesting that the font changed on some email messages. Some people report issues with plugins - what happens if you type "ls -la ~/Library/Mail/Bundles" (without quotes)? Ken Julian Webb wrote: > Hi again > > Apologies for hitting the panic button too early - my son suggested a > Safe Boot might do some good, and hey presto! Mail is back. All seems > to be OK, though I've no idea what upset it; my goodness it is so many > streets ahead of Virgin web mail that it's almost out of sight! > > If anyone can advise how to avoid this crashing tendency, I would be > most grateful. > > Julian > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From robharrington at mac.com Sat Oct 31 09:29:35 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:29:35 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Is This A Problem? Message-ID: <5B015870-EA25-46F2-89C9-0A7FEE37AB14@mac.com> - In homage to the philosophy exam paper -' Is this a question? ' * my idisk. I put a file in my public folder without checking its size. It was slightly over my allocation. (At the same time I had to upgrade my allocation with isp - plusnet.) So my idisk was spending ages synchronising when the file was too large, and, after I removed the file and stopped the synchronising, the idisk now just keeps displaying that it is stopping. What is the correct way to deal with this? RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRob *- the clever dick , who allegedly got top marks, just wrote ' If it is, then this is the answer ' From munkt0n at gmail.com Sat Oct 31 10:21:33 2009 From: munkt0n at gmail.com (Scott Matthews) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:21:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] MacHeist is back Message-ID: MacHeist is back again, if you haven't played it, it's a series of puzzles that offer free Mac software when you solve them. I've just received a free copy of 'daisy disk' http://www.daisydiskapp.com/ see http://www.macheist.com for details -- :wq From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Sat Oct 31 11:06:21 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:06:21 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Floppy disk reader Message-ID: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> A friend has asked if I can come up with a device that she can plug into her iMac that will allow her to transfer the data stored on floppy disks. Can anyone help please? Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From rrandlesome at mac.com Sat Oct 31 11:14:58 2009 From: rrandlesome at mac.com (Richard Randlesome) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:14:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Floppy disk reader In-Reply-To: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> References: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> Message-ID: Iomega do a USB floppy drive for around ?30.00. http://go.iomega.com/en/products/removable-storage/floppy-drives/ Regards Richard On 31 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Richard Stewart wrote: > A friend has asked if I can come up with a device that she can plug > into her iMac that will allow her to transfer the data stored on > floppy disks. Can anyone help please? > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug From julianbarry.webb at virgin.net Sat Oct 31 11:32:33 2009 From: julianbarry.webb at virgin.net (Julian Webb) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:32:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch In-Reply-To: <4AEB8FF9.9020902@stackyard.org> References: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> <4AEB8FF9.9020902@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <2d9c1ed2f6c91554d1d907c40bc682b4@virgin.net> Hi Ken Sorry, I should have made it clear - Mail now launches and operates properly from a normal boot. No RAM was added in August, or since; I know more would be desirable but I'm seeing how the iMac goes without extra. Both before and since my updating I've noticed fonts in incoming emails are sometimes changed by the time I've stored and then reopened the messages; I've never been troubled by this, and thought it was probably caused by the originator using Simple Text (or its darkside equivalent). Only one message (the one that arrived twice) behaved in this way; previous messages from the same sender have usually done this too. No other font problems spotted by me. Re plugins: I used pluginchecker.com (on Simon's suggestion) after my update and again just now, and all plugins that should be there are ticked and working, as is the Java version (1.4.2). When I type in your line in the search box in the Macintosh HD search window nothing appears; naturally all sorts of exciting things turn up when I type it into Google..... I'm sorry I don't understand sufficiently - where did you intend me to type it? Julian On 31 Oct 2009, at 01:16, Ken Hamer wrote: > Hmmm. This looks like it could be lots of things - certainly people > are > reporting various diverse, unrelated fixes, or no fixes at all. When > you say that mail is back, is this just in safe mode or is it OK when > the machine boots normally? > > Some people are reporting RAM issues - was it the RAM that got > increased > in August? If so, where did the RAM come from? > > Some people report issues with fonts - it's interesting that the font > changed on some email messages. > > Some people report issues with plugins - what happens if you type "ls > -la ~/Library/Mail/Bundles" (without quotes)? > > Ken > > > Julian Webb wrote: >> Hi again >> >> Apologies for hitting the panic button too early - my son suggested a >> Safe Boot might do some good, and hey presto! Mail is back. All seems >> to be OK, though I've no idea what upset it; my goodness it is so many >> streets ahead of Virgin web mail that it's almost out of sight! >> >> If anyone can advise how to avoid this crashing tendency, I would be >> most grateful. >> >> Julian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug From ken.arnoldi at virgin.net Sat Oct 31 11:40:51 2009 From: ken.arnoldi at virgin.net (Ken Arnoldi) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:51 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Floppy disk reader In-Reply-To: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> References: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> Message-ID: USB floppy drives are still available and are reasonably priced and they usually work on a Mac without extra drivers. Ken Arnoldi On 31 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Richard Stewart wrote: > A friend has asked if I can come up with a device that she can plug > into her iMac that will allow her to transfer the data stored on > floppy disks. Can anyone help please? > Richard Stewart From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 31 11:58:04 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:58:04 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Floppy disk reader In-Reply-To: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> References: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> Message-ID: As others have said, there are USB floppy drives readily available. BUT. If these floppy disks are old Mac 400K or 800K disks, the USB floppy drives won't be able to read them. She'll need to find someone with an old Mac with a working floppy drive to read and transfer them. (I have an old Power Macintosh 7600 that should do the trick if necessary.) regards, Paul On 31 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Richard Stewart wrote: > A friend has asked if I can come up with a device that she can plug > into her iMac that will allow her to transfer the data stored on > floppy disks. Can anyone help please? From ken.hamer at stackyard.org Sat Oct 31 12:05:35 2009 From: ken.hamer at stackyard.org (Ken Hamer) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:05:35 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch In-Reply-To: <2d9c1ed2f6c91554d1d907c40bc682b4@virgin.net> References: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> <4AEB8FF9.9020902@stackyard.org> <2d9c1ed2f6c91554d1d907c40bc682b4@virgin.net> Message-ID: <4AEC280F.1010401@stackyard.org> Sorry, that's what I get for emailing too late at night. What I SHOULD have said was to type it within a terminal window. But if you're OK now, then never mind. Ken Julian Webb wrote: > Hi Ken > > Sorry, I should have made it clear - Mail now launches and operates > properly from a normal boot. > > No RAM was added in August, or since; I know more would be desirable > but I'm seeing how the iMac goes without extra. > > Both before and since my updating I've noticed fonts in incoming emails > are sometimes changed by the time I've stored and then reopened the > messages; I've never been troubled by this, and thought it was probably > caused by the originator using Simple Text (or its darkside > equivalent). Only one message (the one that arrived twice) behaved in > this way; previous messages from the same sender have usually done this > too. No other font problems spotted by me. > > Re plugins: I used pluginchecker.com (on Simon's suggestion) after my > update and again just now, and all plugins that should be there are > ticked and working, as is the Java version (1.4.2). When I type in your > line in the search box in the Macintosh HD search window nothing > appears; naturally all sorts of exciting things turn up when I type it > into Google..... I'm sorry I don't understand sufficiently - where did > you intend me to type it? > > Julian > > On 31 Oct 2009, at 01:16, Ken Hamer wrote: > > >> Hmmm. This looks like it could be lots of things - certainly people >> are >> reporting various diverse, unrelated fixes, or no fixes at all. When >> you say that mail is back, is this just in safe mode or is it OK when >> the machine boots normally? >> >> Some people are reporting RAM issues - was it the RAM that got >> increased >> in August? If so, where did the RAM come from? >> >> Some people report issues with fonts - it's interesting that the font >> changed on some email messages. >> >> Some people report issues with plugins - what happens if you type "ls >> -la ~/Library/Mail/Bundles" (without quotes)? >> >> Ken >> >> >> Julian Webb wrote: >> >>> Hi again >>> >>> Apologies for hitting the panic button too early - my son suggested a >>> Safe Boot might do some good, and hey presto! Mail is back. All seems >>> to be OK, though I've no idea what upset it; my goodness it is so many >>> streets ahead of Virgin web mail that it's almost out of sight! >>> >>> If anyone can advise how to avoid this crashing tendency, I would be >>> most grateful. >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: >>> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > > From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 31 12:12:48 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:12:48 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] MacHeist is back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8A5A635D-ACA5-459E-8F24-DC21A829AF67@durrant.co.uk> On 31 Oct 2009, at 10:21, Scott Matthews wrote: > MacHeist is back again, if you haven't played it, it's a series of > puzzles that offer free Mac software when you solve them. > > I've just received a free copy of 'daisy disk' http://www.daisydiskapp.com/ > > see http://www.macheist.com for details Thanks for that. For those horribly puzzled by the MacHeist web page, the answer is in the scrolling headline. If you want to solve it yourself, ignore the rest of this message. s p o i l e r s p a c e s p o i l e r s p a c e Enter coordinated 151.7,174.4 and hit the yellow button. Then click on the Tweet for a Treat button. Wait for the twitter window to fully open, then close it. The Tweet for a treat button should have changed to "Free DaisyDisk License". Click on that to go to the download page. Don't forget to make a copy of your licence code which will be shown on the download page. Oh - you will need to sign up for a MacHeist account (free). regards, Paul From rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com Sat Oct 31 12:20:04 2009 From: rchrdstwrt43 at googlemail.com (Richard Stewart) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:20:04 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Ref floppy reader Message-ID: Many thanks to all who responded to my query about floppy disk readers with special thanks to Paul for the extra info! Richard Stewart rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com From julianbarry.webb at virgin.net Sat Oct 31 12:22:33 2009 From: julianbarry.webb at virgin.net (Julian Webb) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:22:33 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Help! Mail 1.3.11 won't launch In-Reply-To: <4AEC280F.1010401@stackyard.org> References: <3300b0be0201f5d469200953477ba7d4@virgin.net> <4AEB8FF9.9020902@stackyard.org> <2d9c1ed2f6c91554d1d907c40bc682b4@virgin.net> <4AEC280F.1010401@stackyard.org> Message-ID: <24d7caf64fbf0d2505975e3774a566c8@virgin.net> Thanks Ken. When I saw the time you sent your first response I hoped your computer clock was still on BST.... Had a quick look at Terminal (including Terminal Help), took fright and will leave well alone! Happy Hallowe'en Julian On 31 Oct 2009, at 12:05, Ken Hamer wrote: > Sorry, that's what I get for emailing too late at night. What I SHOULD > have said was to type it within a terminal window. But if you're OK > now, then never mind. > > Ken > > Julian Webb wrote: >> Hi Ken >> >> Sorry, I should have made it clear - Mail now launches and operates >> properly from a normal boot. >> >> No RAM was added in August, or since; I know more would be desirable >> but I'm seeing how the iMac goes without extra. >> >> Both before and since my updating I've noticed fonts in incoming >> emails >> are sometimes changed by the time I've stored and then reopened the >> messages; I've never been troubled by this, and thought it was >> probably >> caused by the originator using Simple Text (or its darkside >> equivalent). Only one message (the one that arrived twice) behaved in >> this way; previous messages from the same sender have usually done >> this >> too. No other font problems spotted by me. >> >> Re plugins: I used pluginchecker.com (on Simon's suggestion) after my >> update and again just now, and all plugins that should be there are >> ticked and working, as is the Java version (1.4.2). When I type in >> your >> line in the search box in the Macintosh HD search window nothing >> appears; naturally all sorts of exciting things turn up when I type it >> into Google..... I'm sorry I don't understand sufficiently - where >> did >> you intend me to type it? >> >> Julian >> >> On 31 Oct 2009, at 01:16, Ken Hamer wrote: >> >> >>> Hmmm. This looks like it could be lots of things - certainly people >>> are >>> reporting various diverse, unrelated fixes, or no fixes at all. When >>> you say that mail is back, is this just in safe mode or is it OK when >>> the machine boots normally? >>> >>> Some people are reporting RAM issues - was it the RAM that got >>> increased >>> in August? If so, where did the RAM come from? >>> >>> Some people report issues with fonts - it's interesting that the font >>> changed on some email messages. >>> >>> Some people report issues with plugins - what happens if you type "ls >>> -la ~/Library/Mail/Bundles" (without quotes)? >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> >>> Julian Webb wrote: >>> >>>> Hi again >>>> >>>> Apologies for hitting the panic button too early - my son suggested >>>> a >>>> Safe Boot might do some good, and hey presto! Mail is back. All >>>> seems >>>> to be OK, though I've no idea what upset it; my goodness it is so >>>> many >>>> streets ahead of Virgin web mail that it's almost out of sight! >>>> >>>> If anyone can advise how to avoid this crashing tendency, I would be >>>> most grateful. >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>>> Manage your subscription at: >>>> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >>> Manage your subscription at: >>> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk >> Manage your subscription at: >> http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: > http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/nmug > From robharrington at mac.com Sat Oct 31 16:05:28 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:05:28 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Idisk Message-ID: Does anybody know anything about idisk? 1. My storage allocation is 10GB . The idisk window displays 40kb of info on the files, yet says only 8.87GB is available. 2. I put a 1.13GB Quicktime movie on my public folder and later removed it. I vastly exceeded my isp data allocation in doing so: does the removal of a file not just go into the great trash in the sky, but entail it being transmitted out of idisk? Rob Harrington From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 31 16:51:15 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:51:15 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Idisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'd suggest you double-check your usage. Perhaps you've forgotten something on there. Alternatively, perhaps you're not taking into account some storage allocated to your mobileme email account? On the removal, I haven't checked, but perhaps it put it in your local trash? regards, Paul On 31 Oct 2009, at 16:05, ROB HARRINGTON wrote: > Does anybody know anything about idisk? > > 1. My storage allocation is 10GB . The idisk window displays 40kb of > info on the files, yet says only 8.87GB is available. > 2. I put a 1.13GB Quicktime movie on my public folder and later > removed it. I vastly exceeded my isp data allocation in doing so: > does the removal of a file not just go into the great trash in the > sky, but entail it being transmitted out of idisk? > > Rob Harrington From robharrington at mac.com Sat Oct 31 17:16:00 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:16:00 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] idisk Message-ID: <640F845B-FC18-4CE5-8BFA-376FABEF67E4@mac.com> That's the odd part Paul, I have doulble checked my usage before calling for help- 40kb is all there is on there - some text., And I have checked my mobileme storage allocation : 20GB total,equally divided between the Mail and Idisk apps. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRob I'd suggest you double-check your usage. Perhaps you've forgotten something on there. Alternatively, perhaps you're not taking into account some storage allocated to your mobileme email account? On the removal, I haven't checked, but perhaps it put it in your local trash? From paul at durrant.co.uk Sat Oct 31 17:20:22 2009 From: paul at durrant.co.uk (Paul Durrant) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:20:22 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] idisk In-Reply-To: <640F845B-FC18-4CE5-8BFA-376FABEF67E4@mac.com> References: <640F845B-FC18-4CE5-8BFA-376FABEF67E4@mac.com> Message-ID: Hmm... have you tried emptying your trash? On 31 Oct 2009, at 17:16, ROB HARRINGTON wrote: > That's the odd part Paul, I have doulble checked my usage before > calling for help- 40kb is all there is on there - some text., > And I have checked my mobileme storage allocation : 20GB > total,equally divided between the Mail and Idisk apps. > > RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRob > > > I'd suggest you double-check your usage. Perhaps you've forgotten > something on there. > > Alternatively, perhaps you're not taking into account some storage > allocated to your mobileme email account? > > On the removal, I haven't checked, but perhaps it put it in your local > trash? From rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com Sat Oct 31 18:00:58 2009 From: rm at ruthmurray.f2s.com (Ruth Murray) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:00:58 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Floppy disk reader In-Reply-To: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> References: <9A2277D9-E8AE-4E00-824B-119AEF6E66A9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7F893EF9-1CA6-487E-9C34-5D214EDDFDED@ruthmurray.f2s.com> I am very happy to lend you mine for your purposes for a while, but I will need it back. I am in Norwich. Ruth On 31 Oct 2009, at 11:06, Richard Stewart wrote: > A friend has asked if I can come up with a device that she can plug > into her iMac that will allow her to transfer the data stored on > floppy disks. Can anyone help please? > Richard Stewart > rchrdstwrt43 at gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Send messages for NMUG list to: NMUG at nmug.org.uk > Manage your subscription at: http://server.durrant.co.uk/mailman/ > listinfo/nmug > Ruth Murray ruth at ruthmurray.f2s.com Ruth Murray Graphic Design and Illustration 01603 632334 Web portfolio at www.ruthmurray.net From robharrington at mac.com Sat Oct 31 18:50:36 2009 From: robharrington at mac.com (ROB HARRINGTON) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:50:36 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] idisk problem Message-ID: <2D4E810F-2488-4472-BFF4-90109173CCAB@mac.com> I have just this moment come off from two hours - yes two hours - with apple support on the problem of my idisk storage stating. I have idisk stating that I have 1.1GB being used when I have only 120kb stored. It seems I finally got the support guy to agree that there was a stuck reading. After all this time - I have been told to wait 24 hours and hope that it goes away. Doctors are like that. I have been told to come back and ' chat' if it is still there . RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRob From rob at atvetsystems.com Sat Oct 31 19:22:13 2009 From: rob at atvetsystems.com (Robert Tillyard) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:22:13 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] New Apple Reseller in Bury St Edmunds. Message-ID: <4C13CBCE-B235-4CCD-BA40-0188AC87195E@atvetsystems.com> A new Apple reseller opened in Bury St Edmunds today at the Arc shopping centre, they are www.stormfront.co.uk They have 10% of everything Apple this weekend (except iPhones). The shop looks very much like an Apple Store but without the big Apple Logo. Regards, Rob. From bazyoungs at mac.com Sat Oct 31 23:40:08 2009 From: bazyoungs at mac.com (Barry Youngs) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:40:08 +0000 Subject: [NMUG] Internet Speed Message-ID: Hi I think I may have a problem with my internet! Your current bandwidth reading is: 36.50kbps Wow I long for the speed of Dial Up! I think I may need to get in touch with BT Barry The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.